Jacko21
Full Member
I chose the term 'toe-to-toe' poorly, in my earlier comments I wasn't necessarily implying that you had to play like City to beat them, rather match them for desire.I’m loving this talk of teams giving up before facing city. When Pep was at Barça one of the most common criticisms was that the other La Liga sides respected them too much and any mid table PL team would give them a harder challenge.
The fact is that this brand of football tends to demotivate most teams. It’s not only just a matter of going toe to toe, because that will lead to a bigger thrashing most of the time (remember that 5-0 clásico). Unless you can clone Klopp or buy Messi, the fact is that beating a Pep side goes down to luck most of the time.
I honestly thought Premier League teams would pose a greater challenge. Although this season has been a particularly poor barometer given how many awful teams there are in this division at present. I suppose I, like others, estimated that the conditions of this league (some literal) - tight grounds, febrile atmospheres, general ugliness - would pose more of an obstacle to a traditional Pep team. And to an extent they did last season - though Pep's fiercest defendants would absolve him of all blame last year, given that 'he didn't have his players'. It's probably why Pep has been so bullish this season, because he loves nothing more than being vindicated.
That said, I maintain that many teams could and should have done more to try and destabilise Manchester City. It's one thing to fail, it's another, to fail without trying. And they will have to do that going forward, because the alternative is waiting for a drop-off from Pep and City, which isn't going to happen.