Manchester United dropped 15 points against bottom 7 teams, more than any top 5 sides.

deafepl

New Member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
2,974
City has dropped 2 points against bottom 7 teams and surprisingly Chelsea has dropped fewer points against bottom 7 than Spurs, United and Liverpool despite Chelsea is 5th in the league position.

If United dropped the same amount of points as City against bottom 7 team, would be still behind City by 4 points and above Liverpool by 21 points gap. Also If United had the same amount of points as last season against the bottom 7 teams, would be still behind City by 9points.

However, United has dropped 16 points against a 7-13th team last season but only improved this season by dropping just 6 points meaning United have gained more 10 points from 7-13th this season with a game in hand than last season and also gained more 10 points but dropped more 9 points from 13-20th placed this season than last season, I think this is not really kind of improvement I would expect from United against bottom 7 teams.

Let's see how City progressed from last season, City has gained biggest difference points compared to last season than any team with a game in hand. City has dropped more 4 points against 7th-13th, 2 less than United with a game in hand against the 13th team but City has gained more 8 points from the 7-13th season, only dropped more 2 points from the bottom 7 team with a game in hand and gained 12 points from top 6 sides, which is their biggest difference point they have gained compared to last season. It's not about how the shit bottom team is compared to last season but top 6 sides allowed City to walk the league easily as they gifted City 12 points more than last season. If we didn't improve our difference point against bottom 7 teams next season compared to this season despite probably keeping the same amount of point we would gain next season against 1st to 13th compared to this season, we won't win the league. If we do improve, we would be in a good chance of winning the league next season but it'd be difficult and hopefully, City won't replicate next season.

United's biggest weakness is set species as they conceded nearly half of the goals coming from set pieces that easily resulted in a draw and loss - Newcastle, Stoke City, Burnley, Leicester City, West Brom so we dropped 11 points from that than any team but we need to improve this and prevent this from happening again next season otherwive we would need to outscore team first by at least 2 goals before we conceded a goal from set pieces to assure that we don't drop point from that. On other hands, our attacking display is so meh, so cold and hot, inconsistent. Looked worse against bottom seven placed.

That's why I don't have enough confidence that there would be literally improvement next season, there would be 50/50 we would get worse or going opposites in a different way like we gotten worse against 14th to 20th or gotten better against 7-13th and top 6 sides, we need to do both at same time, hopefully, better.


Hopefully, we can sort this out next season.
 
Last edited:

Glideman

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 14, 2014
Messages
406
Things can change in an instant, let’s see how our transfers go, we can’t predict the future... no one really knows if we will be better next season
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,221
Stats don't always tell the full picture but there's definitely games we should have won that we could have made the league more interesting.
 

Bocca9978

Full Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
2,111
This has been my problem with this season. Didn’t we lose to the bottom three sides?
Amazing for a team that sets up to defend!
 

2cents

Historiographer, and obtainer of rare antiquities
Scout
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
16,268
Reminiscent of Liverpool under Benitez.
 

AR87

Full Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
3,217
Location
believer that Sancho will turn it around
I think a DLP, a box-to-box all action type to compete with Herrera and 2 FBs would make a major difference. There may be some structural issues remaining under Mou but if we added those 4 pieces I'd feel strongly we'd finish right around or above 90 points.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,361
Location
Birmingham
The reasons for those stats are fairly simple, to be honest.
 

deafepl

New Member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
2,974
I think a DLP, a box-to-box all action type to compete with Herrera and 2 FBs would make a major difference. There may be some structural issues remaining under Mou but if we added those 4 pieces I'd feel strongly we'd finish right around or above 90 points.
It is okay to lose games or draw against bottom teams but drops 15 points is unacceptable.
 

AR87

Full Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
3,217
Location
believer that Sancho will turn it around
It is okay to lose games or draw against bottom teams but drops 15 points is unacceptable.
I agree and I think it's largely because we miss the pieces I outlined which I feel are of utmost importance generally, but especially in breaking down deep lying defensees. Our FBs are a major reason I think we've looked as vulnerable on the counter as we often have in these matches.
 

Canagel

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
13,888
Beating the smaller teams requires breaking down deep lying defences and organized teams which we don't seem to practice or be ready for. My problem isn't even the goals we've given away. Against Huddersfield for example we conceded two silly goals but there was still ample time to get ourselves back into it. We spent what 70 minutes messing around, looking like we had no clue how to score until we forced something near the end. I've always felt that the smaller teams have us under control and this is for me a big concern. Our record against the big teams this season is decent but I don't believe we'll replicate that next season so if we don't improve against these small teams we will be even further away from winning the PL. Personally I believe we are closer to falling out of top 4 than we are to winning the PL. Our challenge will be to stay in the top 4 next season which is very difficult to accept.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,361
Location
Birmingham
It is normal for a poor attacking team to struggle against deep defences.
The reasons we are such a poor attacking team has been discussed in other threads.
 

deafepl

New Member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
2,974
All those predictions assume we'll be as good as this season against the top 6 which is not a guarantee either
Over 4 season, I think United has gained 18/19 points each season from the top 6 with the exception of 2016-17. I agreed this is not guaranteed, but if we win a game away at top 6, this is big for us.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,113
United's biggest weakness is set species as they conceded nearly half of the goals coming from set pieces that easily resulted in a draw and loss - Newcastle, Stoke City, Burnley, Leicester City, West Brom so we dropped 11 points from that than any team but we need to improve this and prevent this from happening again next season otherwive we would need to outscore team first by at least 2 goals before we conceded a goal from set pieces to assure that we don't drop point from that. On other hands, our attacking display is so meh, so cold and hot, inconsistent. Looked worse against bottom seven placed.
Thats nuts when you look at the height of the current squad. This is the biggest United team i can remember.
 

2cents

Historiographer, and obtainer of rare antiquities
Scout
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
16,268
Thats nuts when you look at the height of the current squad. This is the biggest United team i can remember.
Yeah. Two of our tall lads - Lukaku and Pogba - are actually liabilities at set pieces at times, while others like Matic and Bailly are quite useless in the air despite their physicality.
 

Water Melon

Guest
What is amazing is that only top 6 teams have positive GD in the league. Our's is 39, City's is 78.
 

Minimalist

New Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Messages
15,091
It is normal for a poor attacking team to struggle against deep defences.
The reasons we are such a poor attacking team has been discussed in other threads.
All there is to it really. We're not a very good side in the final third (no matter what players are put in there). It's impressive that we've finished 2nd in spite of this.
 

Minimalist

New Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Messages
15,091
Doesn't add up with the usually rigid defense though.
All teams concede goals, unless they're drilled by a madman like Simone. United either through their tactics or De Gea's heroics have a decent goals against total.
 

2cents

Historiographer, and obtainer of rare antiquities
Scout
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
16,268
In more ways than one IMO - average wide players, dull football, decent cup side, capable of game-raising, but always likely to drop points against the dross.
 

Bojan11

Full Member
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
33,113
Agreed about the set pieces bit.

In the last two seasons City have come to Old Trafford. They scored from one long ball. Then two set pieces this season where the giant David Silva scores past us. That’s appalling.

If City came to old Trafford and opened us up with free flowing football then you can accept that even though it is hard. But conceding from set pieces against them is ridiculous.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
52,995
Agreed about the set pieces bit.

In the last two seasons City have come to Old Trafford. They scored from one long ball. Then two set pieces this season where the giant David Silva scores past us. That’s appalling.

If City came to old Trafford and opened us up with free flowing football then you can accept that even though it is hard. But conceding from set pieces against them is ridiculous.
In fairness, that first half in the home game against us last year they absolutely played us off the park.

This year we played ok, and it was the set piece that did us in.
 

Stocar

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2011
Messages
699
Set pieces are usually about that extra sharpness that comes out of strength of will. Being good at set pieces, either offensive or defensive, is a testament to positive mentality of the team. That's why a team like Atletico is great at them, not because they are taller or stronger than anyone else.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,113
Yeah. Two of our tall lads - Lukaku and Pogba - are actually liabilities at set pieces at times, while others like Matic and Bailly are quite useless in the air despite their physicality.
Yeah must say i agree our centre backs in general are not great in the air with the exception of Smalling who is good for the most part. It makes you wonder why Mourinho leans towards players of taller stature who aren't great in the air.
 

Chairman Steve

Full Member
Joined
May 9, 2018
Messages
7,047
This fits well with Jose's style of play for the most part. He likes to absorb pressure and counter-attack. The smaller sides are happy to sit back, set out to play for a point, not go for it initially, frustrate us then feed off of small chances and lucky breaks especially when we've hypothetically made 3 attacking subs and sacrificed a midfield/defensive head(s) for it. We still lack 1-2 additional players who are able to open up a team like that and get that goal that will make them come out of their shell and play to Jose's counter-attack.

A skillful central midfielder who can put in a devastating through-ball could do that

A skilful full-back/winger who can deliver a pin-point perfect cross to someones head or foot into the box could too

A skilful full-back who can link up the play further up the field a la Evra also.

And lo and behold, these are the types of players that universally we want to sign this summer.
 
Last edited:

FootballHQ

Full Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
18,236
Supports
Aston Villa
Man. United failing to score in 7 or 8 away games interested me more.
 

Tony247

Full Member
Joined
May 2, 2018
Messages
9,486
This has been my problem with this season. Didn’t we lose to the bottom three sides?
Amazing for a team that sets up to defend!
Set up to defend but unable to effectively counter attack due to defenders who cannot play from the back. That brings wave after wave of attacks, making our attacking players put up defensive overtime who are prone to make mistakes on opponent's set pieces anyway.

We need a strong experienced CB to bring the stability at back and who can play from the back. Only Bailly can play like that and he desperately needs an experienced partner to form something to bloom into terry-carvalho, terry-ivanovic, vidic-ferdinand.

I strongly believe one real good CB will dramatically improve fortune of this team.
 

groovyalbert

it's a mute point
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
9,651
Location
London
Our players are complacent and we lack that player that can just flat out bully the smaller clubs to get us the wins.
I can't think of a single player from the other top clubs that does this, with the exception maybe of Kane. It definitely comes down to our style of play/mentality on these occasions.
 

izzydiggler

Full Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2006
Messages
3,099
There are some big flaws with our squad and it can be very dull but in terms of points, we've a) improved massively from last year and b) we would have been challenging for title in many other years with the same results. Man City are breaking records...we should obviously be ambitious enough to try and improve to challenge but I'm not too worked up over the statistic.

My point is that we've always lost/drawn games we should have won - almost unbelievably, the treble winning side drew 13 PL games that season. Yes, we can and should improve at creating chances and putting worse teams to the sword but it's a tough league where promoted teams are now amongst the richest in Europe...I'm not saying we shouldn't be winning these games but...
 

Bocca9978

Full Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
2,111
Beating the smaller teams requires breaking down deep lying defences and organized teams which we don't seem to practice or be ready for. My problem isn't even the goals we've given away. Against Huddersfield for example we conceded two silly goals but there was still ample time to get ourselves back into it. We spent what 70 minutes messing around, looking like we had no clue how to score until we forced something near the end. I've always felt that the smaller teams have us under control and this is for me a big concern. Our record against the big teams this season is decent but I don't believe we'll replicate that next season so if we don't improve against these small teams we will be even further away from winning the PL. Personally I believe we are closer to falling out of top 4 than we are to winning the PL. Our challenge will be to stay in the top 4 next season which is very difficult to accept.
Set up to defend but unable to effectively counter attack due to defenders who cannot play from the back. That brings wave after wave of attacks, making our attacking players put up defensive overtime who are prone to make mistakes on opponent's set pieces anyway.

We need a strong experienced CB to bring the stability at back and who can play from the back. Only Bailly can play like that and he desperately needs an experienced partner to form something to bloom into terry-carvalho, terry-ivanovic, vidic-ferdinand.

I strongly believe one real good CB will dramatically improve fortune of this team.
Completely agree. Would be good to see a Vidic type player come in to calm the back four down.
Big summer for Mourinho to prove he can get quality in.
 

Canagel

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
13,888
Completely agree. Would be good to see a Vidic type player come in to calm the back four down.
Big summer for Mourinho to prove he can get quality in.
What annoys me is that our default set up is to sit deep with men behind the ball, invite teams forward yet somehow DDG is still one of the busiest if not the busiest keeper in the PL. That doesn't sit right with me. We sacrifice attack to be solid defensively yet we are anything but solid defensively because DDG is being made to work more than he should. In short these defenders except for Bailly are not good enough both defensively and offensively. Defensively because of the reasons just mentioned. Offensively because they can't build from the back. A Serious lack of technical ability and spatial awareness in some of them especially Smalling and Jones. It's not difficult to open up your body and pass in between the lines but they can't even do that. To be honest I can't wait until Smalling, Jones and Rojo are all gone. And if Lindelof doesn't want to man up and be more braver than he can follow them as well. But I'll give him until next season because he only just arrived. Being solid in general is good but not good enough for Untied. We're not asking for Xavi and Iniesta levels of technical ability but we do need upgrades to speed up our laboured play and defenders who understand the concept of things you do to open space and other things you mustn't do because spaces close.
 
Last edited:

cyril C

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Messages
2,643
I agree and I think it's largely because we miss the pieces I outlined which I feel are of utmost importance generally, but especially in breaking down deep lying defensees. Our FBs are a major reason I think we've looked as vulnerable on the counter as we often have in these matches.
Putting aside the Lindelof mistakeS, Pogba had his hands on practically all of these. He likes to take on players on every opportunity, but when he failed, there is only 1 or 2 defenders behind him.
 

Tony247

Full Member
Joined
May 2, 2018
Messages
9,486
Smalling is average. Quite disappointed with Lindelof. The boy does not instill calm at the back. Each time the team attacks it is matic who covers the front of our box, literally stays close to the line whereas ideally he should be manning front half of our half. We invite teams so close to our box it demands back four to distribute balls cleverly to start any effective counter attack. Instead we see Pogba drop deep to retrieve the ball. He needs to be somewhere near the front half of our half to start any kind of effective counter attack. Same with Rashford. Matic is acting last line of defence shows his lack of confidence in CB. Everything is cascading effect of that.

First get an excellent pair as CB and free up Matic to intercept attack near the front half of our half. If they go pass Matic & Co. then CB should intercept and distribute the ball in midfield. This then will lead to counter attack which can reach to their box before they even recover to their position. You do this 5 times and then opponent will think twice before going all out attack on us.

Now, how to break them when they sit back is to get a proper no. 10 and a RW who can cross.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Sultan

Tony247

Full Member
Joined
May 2, 2018
Messages
9,486
In his chelsea days Matic in front of Cahill, Ivanovic, Azpi, Terry was different beast. At Man Utd he is almost a part of back 4 line, and like a magnet he pulls our attacking midfield with him towards our box.
 
Last edited: