Ish
Lights on for Luke
If he would even begin to contemplate that then he might have to start questioning if he should regret the “Property of Marcus Rashford” tramp-stamp he tattooed on his lower back.

If he would even begin to contemplate that then he might have to start questioning if he should regret the “Property of Marcus Rashford” tramp-stamp he tattooed on his lower back.

The interview came out almost immediately after the Manchester derby, which we won, and for which he was dropped for. Amorim had been in the job about a month.
The first time there was a specfic mention of selling him specifically was the same week of the derby. Before that we'd had one or two "open to offers" briefs about everyone, which was basically INEOS trying to give the players a collective kick up the arse.
The comment about the goalkeeping coach came over a month after Rashford had been dropped for the derby, with him not having played since, and he'd be at Villa not long after because it was right at the end of January.
The most noteable thing about this is that Garnacho was also dropped for the derby, improved his performances in training, and immediately returned to the team. I don't recall nor can I find any mention of Rashford reacting and training well after being dropped. In fact, I can find Amorim's next interview where he specifically mentions Garnacho being a bit upset but training really well, but his comments about Rashford were asking him to perform at his highest level and saying he wishes he'd spoken to him instead of doing the interview.
The rumours about Garnacho and Mainoo potentially being sold appeared in January as part of the FFP/PSR challenges we were supposedly facing. They have no relevance to Rashford.
The selective memories and revisionism around his exit really is something.
TBF he missed like 1/3 of last season.
He played 25 games and scored 6 goals and 3 assists. Fair dues if you guys think that’s quality output.
Yeah it’s a farmers league and all that. We can’t really give players too much credit when they’re not scoring in the mighty Premier League!Played well tonight
His pace is hard to judge because the league is less intense
And because he strolled around for Utd a lot in last year without any intensity
Fingers crossed, we need him off the books.Another two assists for Rashford. Having a very productive season so far. Hope he keeps it up.
The league is easier than the PL , the team around him is better. I think even with less application he could make it in that team, if they buy him of course. Which currently appears dumb not to, but its Barca and their levers, so you never know.He's done this before. It's never been a question of if he's good enough (apart from for the weirdos on here who were still slating him when he was banging in 30 goals in one season). The question is what happens when his form drops off again and whether the attitude and work rate takes a nose dive with it, as it has done in the past
That is true.
Well, it was four assists.
And he played 1426 minutes. Or under 16 full games.
10 goals or assists in 16 games is like - pretty decent I’d say. If you look at the full season he registered around 27 full games with 20 goals contributions.
He had 20 GA last season for United and Villa combined, of which 10 were for United.The feck are you on about? How on earth did you just double his “goal contributions”?! (God I hate that phrase)
He’s finished at Utd and the only thing I can see now is Barca trying to wriggle out of the obligation price and try and drive it down - probably getting Rashford to insist on going etc.
However if his stats continue to be good then we just need to hold firm and try and sell elsewhere.
He is cooked at OT, will be interesting to see if he can keep it going at Barca after Xmas?
It's all about the wagesThe price is set at £25 million, which is a massive bargain if he keeps this form up.
If they piss about with the price, we'll just sell him for £40 million to someone else.
Yea it is. As I said earlier in the thread it’s pretty pointless arguing about his ability and performances. The club already took the decision to get his salary off the books asapIt's all about the wages
It's all about the wages
If he doesn't take a big paycut, the only possible buyer will be the SaudisHowever, if he keeps this up for the rest of the season, and if Barca decide to be silly about the price, I think we could get someone to bite at around £40 million without wages being too much of an issue.
If he doesn't take a big paycut, the only possible buyer will be the Saudis
I wonder if he will change his mind about that if he ends up scoring 25 and creating 15.I think he's open to some sort of paycut.
The wost outcome for us is him refusing anywhere but Barca and them just stringing us along with loans until his contract runs out in 2028.
This will happenI think he's open to some sort of paycut.
The wost outcome for us is him refusing anywhere but Barca and them just stringing us along with loans until his contract runs out in 2028.
The feck are you on about? How on earth did you just double his “goal contributions”?! (God I hate that phrase)
Fingers crossed, we need him off the books.
Yea it is. As I said earlier in the thread it’s pretty pointless arguing about his ability and performances. The club already took the decision to get his salary off the books asap
We're all aware how you feel.My definition of wanting him to do well clearly isn’t the same as yours, and that’s perfectly fine. Just don’t lump me into the group that’s desperate for him to succeed purely so we can tick the “off our books” box.
See, I actually want him to do well because he’s one of our own - an academy lad, a lifelong fan, and, whether anyone cares to admit it or not, someone who’s contributed massively to the club.
Fingers crossed he continues to do well when he is off the books.
We're all aware how you feel.
That is true.
Well, it was four assists.
And he played 1426 minutes. Or under 16 full games.
10 goals or assists in 16 games is like - pretty decent I’d say. If you look at the full season he registered around 27 full games with 20 goals contributions.
Goals against Southampton, Ipswich, and Everton (2) for us in the league, Brighton and City for Villa.
2 goals against Preston in the FA Cup and 2 against Barnsley in the EFL Cup.
That’s a grand total of 2 goals all season against top 10 sides.
Bearing in mind he doesn’t offer anything else to the team either - no tracking back, no hustle. You allow that when you have an elite attacker in your squad, it’s criminal when you’re producing nothing against quality sides. Chuck in plenty of dispossessions and a lazy attitude and yeah, enjoy Barcelona.
In the past year he's got goals/assists against Man City/Real Madrid/PSG/Newcastle/Chelsea.
Of last years top ten - he played for one of the teams - didn't play against Bournemouth at all and has scored/assisted against six of the other eight teams. Two of them multiple goals/assists.
So yeah, very odd subject to beat him with.
100%. As soon as Ineos appointed Amorim, it clearly came with a brief that they wanted rid of Antony, Rashford and Casemiro.
Casemiro wouldn’t leave and proved himself far too valuable though.
Sense is not for the sensitiveIt is very weird how some people try and disect how and where his goal contributions were accrued to diminish his quality. Really odd, and not something I’ve seen with any other players on the forum, lately.
He obviously needed a move and wasn’t putting in the effort at United. Since he’s left he’s looked a very good player, scoring and assisting regularly in the league and in Europe, and contributing against good sides. Seems to be rated by top managers like Emery, Flick, and Tuchel. Seems daft to try and downplay his ability when he’s clearly delivering on the big stage, and is rated highly by top level football operators. His attitude at United was poor, though.
The amount of unabashed pedantry on display on every page would make even Sheldon Cooper blushIt is very weird how some people try and disect how and where his goal contributions were accrued to diminish his quality. Really odd, and not something I’ve seen with any other players on the forum, lately.
He obviously needed a move and wasn’t putting in the effort at United. Since he’s left he’s looked a very good player, scoring and assisting regularly in the league and in Europe, and contributing against good sides. Seems to be rated by top managers like Emery, Flick, and Tuchel. Seems daft to try and downplay his ability when he’s clearly delivering on the big stage, and is rated highly by top level football operators. His attitude at United was poor, though.

It’s just odd. Why can’t we just say ‘he didn’t do well at United and didn’t apply himself well towards the end, but is clearly a good player that’s now performing well’?The amount of unabashed pedantry on display on every page would make even Sheldon Cooper blush![]()
The vast majority of United fans wanted rid of Antony and Rashford too. Along with Sancho, the absolute waste of space. So it’s not as though it was some sort of wild, unfair agenda from Ineos to get rid of grossly overpaid, perennially underperforming players. It made perfect sense at the time. It still makes sense now. Casemiro is next on the list to be replaced. We can’t keep paying the premium wages to players who don’t deserve that much money. And you can be damn sure not one of them will earn the same salary at any other club.
The league is indeed easier, and he has some excellent players around him, but I don't think the "less application" will fly with a coach like Felix, who is will known to be a hardcore and taskmaster, but I guess the "less application" might be the case at times since Barca tend to dominate games from beginning to end most of the time which means Rashford would not have to press and run that hard.The league is easier than the PL , the team around him is better. I think even with less application he could make it in that team, if they buy him of course. Which currently appears dumb not to, but its Barca and their levers, so you never know.
