I’d imagine it’s combined. But no doubt the headline would hope people think it’s £2m each.2m combined or 2m per house?
Who cares?2m combined or 2m per house?
I know programmers who have spent more money than that on houses. How does a paper think that would sound sensationalist at all?I’d imagine it’s combined. But no doubt the headline would hope people think it’s £2m each.
If it’s £2m each, they look like clowns for choosing that house as a picture.
fixed. Let's not sugarcoat this, it's blatant racism and these asshats have done it for years. Sterling has been bullied by them for what seems like an eternity, looks like Greenwood is their chosen one as his heir in that regard. I hope United protect those boys as well as possible.Seems more and media sources are trying to damage our black players.
This is why we can't have nice thingsIt's a fair article if hes renting them out at the going rate it's a bit thatcherite
This is exactly what this is. They've moved on from Sterling to Greenwood. Rashford, no doubt they're just chomping at the bit to attack him after his good work with the feed the children stuff.fixed. Let's not sugarcoat this, it's blatant racism and these asshats have done it for years. Sterling has been bullied by them for what seems like an eternity, looks like Greenwood is their chosen one as his heir in that regard. I hope United protect those boys as well as possible.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
How dare he. The bore.So - let's say he makes £150.000 a week after taxes - what they are actually saying is that Rashford has spent a little less than 4 months of his net wages to invest in property
He should burn in hell - imagine spending his wages on properties rather than women and booze
Bet they haven't looked to see which other footballers own property. This sounds like the Tories getting involved with The Mail as they have been made to look heartless and in the end foolish.they are really scraping the barrel if "Rashford buys some houses" is the best they can come up with
The only thing more sickening than that bollocks is the people agreeing with it on Twitter. That place is a cesspit.Odd for the daily Mail to attack a young entrepreneur and property owner. I wonder why ?
Odd for the daily Mail to attack a young entrepreneur and property owner. I wonder why ?
I can believe that as well.Bet they haven't looked to see which other footballers own property. This sounds like the Tories getting involved with The Mail as they have been made to look heartless and in the end foolish.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
They obviously don't watch Homes under the Hammer as quite a few on there are just people investing in property to supplement their pension pots which have been hit hard.The only thing more sickening than that bollocks is the people agreeing with it on Twitter. That place is a cesspit.
They really should, they’re fecking scum.they are really scraping the barrel if "Rashford buys some houses" is the best they can come up with
I love Beckham but it is so blatant what they are doing. Disgusting rag. Hope United ban them from OT.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
The people agreeing with him “getting shit and about time” are mostly poor and uneducated. They’ll probably never own a home themselves and will never agree with anything anyone does to help other people until someone starts putting money in their back pocket.They obviously don't watch Homes under the Hammer as quite a few on there are just people investing in property to supplement their pension pots which have been hit hard.
I didn't even bother reading them as is just dispiriting.Errgh, some of the replies to the tweet.
Deplorable. I can’t wait until the day social media becomes moderated and you can’t sign up unless your account is tied to your NS or equivalent.Errgh, some of the replies to the tweet.
Many of them are not poor or uneducated. They are just cnuts.The people agreeing with him “getting shit and about time” are mostly poor and uneducated. They’ll probably never own a home themselves and will never agree with anything anyone does to help other people until someone starts putting money in their back pocket.
I even saw someone say “I never got any help. I hope he breaks his legs and we have one less Marxist in the England team”. Yet if Rashford did share his wealth with that person wouldn’t it make them both Marxists? The irony.
That's the thing with right-wingers - they are happy with charity that papers over cracks but are highly averse to social change.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I get the point but Beckham is not the best example, he was heavily abused by the media too.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Would be interesting to know how many Tory MP's own property and are sh*t landlords.I get the point but Beckham is not the best example, he was heavily abused by the media too.