RedDevil@84
Full Member
Everyone knew this was coming. There were warnings that many from English media have been assigned the jobs to dig dirt on Rashford.
I second this. Rashford really has every right to sue them for being racist. They are clearly targeting him because of his skin colors. If it was Gerrard or Lampard doing this investment in their playing days, they'd be praised for being financially astute."Destroying the Daily Mail" is some hyperbole. I got excited thinking he was suing them into bankruptcy or something.
Even if it seems clear, good luck proving that in court. It'll be impossibleI second this. Rashford really has every right to sue them for being racist. They are clearly targeting him because of his skin colors. If it was Gerrard or Lampard doing this investment in their playing days, they'd be praised for being financially astute.
In this day and age, racism must not be tolerated. Too bad the Daily Mail lives in 18th century.
You need some sort of system where people have the opportunity to rent, for several reasons. Some people can't afford to buy, and some people simply prefer to rent (for several very good reasons). How that system should be designed, though, is a whole different matter and there are good reasons to be skeptical of allowing people to be large scale landlords.Yeah of course everyone wants to buy here, was talking more about Europe-wide.
I live in London so am well aware of the lack of affordability. Point is you still need private landlords, eg for students, people starting out their working lives etc...
Correct answer.Who cares?
I'm not giving them clicks to find out.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Its Owen, theres a street in Liverpool and he owns every house on that road.Was it Fowler or Owen that owe a street in England? Wiki Fowler said he has a property portfolio of 28m. So that was not a news, but someone spent 2m on 4 property is. Assuming Rashford is paid 180K/wk, after 45% tax still take home 5m. So it is normal to spend 2m on sport cars, but abnormal to invest them into property, particularly English property instead of Dubai (Beckham, Neville invested in Dubai?)
I would have guessed half a million in England will get you a middle class Demi-detach or 3-bed room apartment in London. Many people dream home, but nowhere near Luxury.
Working from Home for journalist is simply too boring.
John O'Shea own lots of property here in Waterford Ireland. He invested most of his money into property and it's now paying off.Was it Fowler or Owen that owe a street in England? Wiki Fowler said he has a property portfolio of 28m. So that was not a news, but someone spent 2m on 4 property is. Assuming Rashford is paid 180K/wk, after 45% tax still take home 5m. So it is normal to spend 2m on sport cars, but abnormal to invest them into property, particularly English property instead of Dubai (Beckham, Neville invested in Dubai?)
I would have guessed half a million in England will get you a middle class Demi-detach or 3-bed room apartment in London. Many people dream home, but nowhere near Luxury.
Working from Home for journalist is simply too boring.
When he bought them, wasn't that basically the whole of his family moved into that street or something.Its Owen, theres a street in Liverpool and he owns every house on that road.
Haven't they attacked Foden not too long ago?I second this. Rashford really has every right to sue them for being racist. They are clearly targeting him because of his skin colors. If it was Gerrard or Lampard doing this investment in their playing days, they'd be praised for being financially astute.
In this day and age, racism must not be tolerated. Too bad the Daily Mail lives in 18th century.
A fine point during a University Economics lecture. I agree.Only people with wealth can afford to invest in numerous properties, though. Rich people buying an excess of housing has contributed to the chronic shortage that is affecting scores of people all over the world. It is a really serious issue that is leaving lots of people homeless. Rashford is looking after his own like lots of other wealthy people but the consolidation of housing in the hands of a few has dire consequences for the majority.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
...and the more their circulation will grow.I'm happy they've run with that Rashford story. Keep doing it, Daily Fail. The more you do, the more obvious it will be that your a Little England rag made for Little Englanders.
Solicitors and lawyers are paid to prove or deny intent, that's their job.Even if it seems clear, good luck proving that in court. It'll be impossible
This is huge from Rushden, on TalkSport especially. Really glad people are fighting back against the media and calling them out.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
They're on their arse or they wouldn't run shit like this. It's desperate times by desperate people....and the more their circulation will grow.
They have the largest circulation and online hits of any UK newspapers by a considerable distance.They're on their arse or they wouldn't run shit like this. It's desperate times by desperate people.
yeah, they're the most read online newspaper in the worldThey have the largest circulation and online hits of any UK newspapers by a considerable distance.
Of course. When they report on a footballer, it starts with a pic of footballer's girlfriend in bikinis. It has to be the most "read" online stuffyeah, they're the most read online newspaper in the world
Obviously, they're opponents politically but good to see another publication call them out.
https://amp.theguardian.com/footbal...n-a-young-black-man?__twitter_impression=true
The subtext here – that a 23-year-old footballer should not habitually be capable of any of these traits – is familiar enough. And in a way, Rashford is the populist right’s worst nightmare: a young, black, working-class campaigner who bases his appeal not on culture war or tribal loyalty or fiery invective, but on unity, consensus, the common ground. He is a political campaigner who rejects party politics, rejects the idea that conflict and progress are the same thing, indeed refuses to acknowledge that there is anything remotely contentious or left-leaning about wanting hungry children fed. And – coincidence! – he gets things done.
Small wonder this country’s conservative establishment has come to see Rashford not as a fleeting irritation but as an existential threat: a man cheerfully exposing not just the worst privations of government austerity but our own snide and bickering political culture. Small wonder his personal finances and lifestyle choices are now considered fair game. If Rashford is allowed to succeed, who else might follow in his wake? Rashford did not choose this fight. But with unerring precision and a depressing alacrity, it has chosen him. Perhaps there’s something deeply depressing in the treatment of this decent and principled man by a section of the media that has always thrived on conflict, the vindictive urge to tear down, to expose, to disgrace. Rashford, you suspect, would see it as incontrovertible proof that he is winning.
That's a bit patheticTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date