Martín Zubimendi | Having medical at Arsenal (51m fee) | Romano: here we go

Partey is their holding midfielder, Rice has been deployed as an 8 when everyone is fit.
Zubamendi doesn't look like a good partry replacement but I may be wrong. He looks pretty lightweight and was bullied at times vs us.
 
Would you prefer we just started signing players assuming we aren't in the Champions League next year?
They have said our budget is dependent on if we are in CL or not, so we just have to wait and see. We will know a week on Wednesday.
 
They do need to replace both Jorginho (who is gone) and Partey (who isn't a top player anymore) to be fair. But of course Isak should be the priority. I'd imagine that they have a centre forward sorted as well... if not for them ignoring that glaring issue for multiple transfer windows already.


Not quite. He wasn't against leaving but since it was the very end of the window and Arsenal had just signed Merino, another key midfielder from Sociedad, he didn't want to leave his team with, basically, a gaping hole in their midfield.
Yeah, I think Gyokeres is probably high on their list as I see Isak as unsellable (i.e. north of 100m+ to even get Newcastle to the table). Gotcha both on the Merino bit - I've actually forgotten about him leaving for Arsenal as well. Probably more so because they've used him as a CF as much as they have a midfielder :lol:

Will be interesting to see how/where Havertz is used if they do sign a starting CF. Expensive for a squad option.

Think most will have more of a “his loss” attitude towards him just like with Caicedo and Lavia now. Missed out on a PL title for a midtable La Liga finish which he already had quite a few of.

Seems likely that Sociedad convinced him last season that they couldn’t lose both him and Merino in the same season but that he would be allowed to leave this time around. We already have Gravenberch at the moment and while we do need reinforcements in central midfield, it’s more about cover there and not immediate first XI impact like striker, left wing, and fullback positions currently are. I’ll be more than happy if this €60m saved goes towards a top tier striker.
When I say Pool fans, you don't count Robin- you and your rational and reasonable thoughts! :drool:

But on a serious note, agreed. Unless you entertained selling one of your midfielders, I don't see that an urgent need for you as its a lot of money for someone in a position you have a preferred/starting 3.

When are you and the missus coming back down to CT? Need to play some more footy together before my knees/achilles end me permanently!
 
Would see this more as their Jorginho replacement who gives them a flexible and more balanced midfield that is capable of rotation and different approaches to problems. I don't necessarily believe they just throw away Partey now, as he can be used sparingly or even next to Zubimendi with Rice going forward a bit to be a CM loitering in AM positions.

Of course, you also have Zubimendi next to Rice, with Rice than expected to operate as an actual all-action #8 (no excuses).

All depends on how Zubimendi settles and how much he needs his hand held in the deeper central midfield, but if he is competent in that aspect, they finally get a proper ball progressor from deep midfield which means they can hit the wings swiftly and early within a touch or two, instead of having to take all those steps with ball carriage because of the inability to consistently hit targets 40+ metres away.

Not sure on Zubimendi, but the logic behind acquiring makes a lot of sense to me.
 
Zubimendi is around 35M level player. Not a bad player at all but imo there's nothing special in him. Can do a bit of everything but not elite in anything.
 
While I'm not particularly envious of them buying Zubimendi, I am envious that they are getting business done early.
Their season finished then moment they lost to PSG. Zubimemdi has a release clause, so they just need to negotiate the contract.

We still don't know whether we'll be in Europe next year or not. That's kind of important when negotiating contracts.
 
Their season finished then moment they lost to PSG. Zubimemdi has a release clause, so they just need to negotiate the contract.

We still don't know whether we'll be in Europe next year or not. That's kind of important when negotiating contracts.
Not particularly when we give all players an automatic 25% bump if we qualify for the champions league. I think it's madness, but it's what we've done for years
 
Not particularly when we give all players an automatic 25% bump if we qualify for the champions league. I think it's madness, but it's what we've done for years
How do you know they still want to do that? And you're just confirming what I said. If you're about to join the club, you want your contract to be worth as much as possible, not be contingent on UCL qualification, which we haven't exactly been great at these last few years.

Besides, it's likely some of our targets change or become more attainable if we win the Europa.

It feels like you just want another reason to moan about the club.
 
They have said our budget is dependent on if we are in CL or not, so we just have to wait and see. We will know a week on Wednesday.

Makes sense, so it's a bit strange some are bemoaning the fact we haven't signed anyone when we don't know yet which market we will be even shopping in.
 
We don't give players a 25% bump. We give them a 25% reduction when we don't qualify for Champions League. Subtle difference.
Do we? I’m pretty sure that they count in as performance bonuses on top of the base salary. A lot of the contracts in our team were signed under the assumption that CL qualification is more or less guaranteed though, so the salaries were always reported with those bonuses included.
 
A lot of the contracts in our team were signed under the assumption that CL qualification is more or less guaranteed though, so the salaries were always reported with those bonuses included.
Yeah, this is how it seems to have been reported over the years. We tend to see the higher end of a player's wage as opposed to the basic. Perhaps what I should have said is that it is perceived as a 25% reduction, purely do to how our player's salaries are exaggerated in the first place.
 
50M for Zubimendi? That’s pure Euros tax.

Not saying the lad’s bad, but let's be real if Spain hadn’t won that tournament, no one will be coming close to that figure.

He’s tidy on the ball, reads the game well, but he's not a controlling midfielder. He's also lightweight, struggled against our midfield in the europa league.

We’ve seen this before, Euros/World Cup hype inflates value, and suddenly clubs are rushing to pay premium for players who look good in a well-oiled national system, without remembering that national football level is way below club football level.

Another example is Nicholas Williams, sure he's an exciting young player but 100M+ for him? No way just see his numbers in la liga. Nothing special.
 
50M for Zubimendi? That’s pure Euros tax.

Not saying the lad’s bad, but let's be real if Spain hadn’t won that tournament, no one will be coming close to that figure.

He’s tidy on the ball, reads the game well, but he's not a controlling midfielder. He's also lightweight, struggled against our midfield in the europa league.

We’ve seen this before, Euros/World Cup hype inflates value, and suddenly clubs are rushing to pay premium for players who look good in a well-oiled national system, without remembering that national football level is way below club football level.

Another example is Nicholas Williams, sure he's an exciting young player but 100M+ for him? No way just see his numbers in la liga. Nothing special.

We paid €50m for Ugarte. Look at the cost of CM's now, just look at the price for Rice, Caicedo, Enzo Fernandez, Tchouameni, Melo, Pjanic, Lavia, Mattheus Nunes, Tonali etc.

None of them are really any better than Zubimendi and some cost double the price and some 10m more than him. Its kind of the going rate.
 
People are not grasping that the release clause needs to be paid in FULL. There is no negotiation to increase the overall payment but be paid in installments.

They had the opportunity to do pay the release clause last year, alongside Liverpool. They just wasted a year for an older player with the same release clause.
 
Obviously we need to translate this into euros. Only fair.

60M is a huge amount for Arsenal to spend on the midfield. But they already have a decent team so they only need to add 1-2 each year to stay competitive for the 2nd place.
 
We paid €50m for Ugarte. Look at the cost of CM's now, just look at the price for Rice, Caicedo, Enzo Fernandez, Tchouameni, Melo, Pjanic, Lavia, Mattheus Nunes, Tonali etc.

None of them are really any better than Zubimendi and some cost double the price and some 10m more than him. Its kind of the going rate.
You may be right, players are worth a lot nowadays. I'd say Rice, Caicedo and Enzo are easily better players.

For reference PSG paid 40M for Vitinha and 60M for Neves. I'd say that's a way better deal considering the players level and age.
 
We paid €50m for Ugarte. Look at the cost of CM's now, just look at the price for Rice, Caicedo, Enzo Fernandez, Tchouameni, Melo, Pjanic, Lavia, Mattheus Nunes, Tonali etc.

None of them are really any better than Zubimendi and some cost double the price and some 10m more than him. Its kind of the going rate.

All of them are better. Most comfortably
 
An absolutely crazy signing from Arsenal if true. Have a look at his seasons stats

https://fbref.com/en/players/3ee0dd59/Martin-Zubimendi

Does that look like the kinda player who's gonna thrive in the premier league? 83% pass completion in La liga where almost none of the opposing teams play a high press against Sociedad, is awful. I feel like his reputation has come from him looking great as a sub on the euros final? I've watched la liga for years and seen at least a dozen or so Sociedad games against teams other than Real/Barca and he's a good player, but eating up a huge chunk of Arsenal budget seems pretty dumb. Barca, Atletico and Real havent even made an attempt to try and sign him, and given he clearly prefers to live in spain based on his rejection of liverpool, I feel like he was hoping one of those clubs would try and buy him but it hasn't materialized so hes decided to go to a place where the manager speaks his language.

You can quote me on this, This transfer will not work out. He is not suited to PL football at all.
 
So is he supposed to provide cover for Partey? Surely their best midfield trio would still be Rice-Partey-Ødegaard.
 
So where does Merino play then if they have just two spots for the players behind Odegaard?. In that sense alone they have wasted money here if reports of Party’s renewal are true, that’s 4 players for two positions, and you’d assume MLsS would be moving to midfield as well next season.
 
So where does Merino play then if they have just two spots for the players behind Odegaard?. In that sense alone they have wasted money here if reports of Party’s renewal are true, that’s 4 players for two positions, and you’d assume MLsS would be moving to midfield as well next season.
4 players for 2 spots is the bare minimum you want if you're trying to challenge in 2/3 competitions. Wether Partey stays or leave don't make much of a difference, he needs phasing out for many reasons.
MLS will still be at LB next year and will see plenty of minutes if Calafiori keeps getting injured every 2 months.
 
Patently obvious to everyone that arsenal need a elite striker. Don't really understand why you wouldnt put everything towards on of those elite strikers.

Buying in a area of the team you are already quite strong in, doesn't really make sense. But then again I'm not a arsenal fan so may have it wrong.
 
Rice, Caicedo and Enzo are not double the price better.

They all do a lot more than his sidewards passing. A lot more progressive passes and progressive carries in a stronger league, not to mention the assists and goals that Enzo and Rice have on top and the far more ball winning Caicedo does

Not to mention Casemiro and Fernandes played him off the park just a few months ago
 
An absolutely crazy signing from Arsenal if true. Have a look at his seasons stats

https://fbref.com/en/players/3ee0dd59/Martin-Zubimendi

Does that look like the kinda player who's gonna thrive in the premier league? 83% pass completion in La liga where almost none of the opposing teams play a high press against Sociedad, is awful. I feel like his reputation has come from him looking great as a sub on the euros final? I've watched la liga for years and seen at least a dozen or so Sociedad games against teams other than Real/Barca and he's a good player, but eating up a huge chunk of Arsenal budget seems pretty dumb. Barca, Atletico and Real havent even made an attempt to try and sign him, and given he clearly prefers to live in spain based on his rejection of liverpool, I feel like he was hoping one of those clubs would try and buy him but it hasn't materialized so hes decided to go to a place where the manager speaks his language.

You can quote me on this, This transfer will not work out. He is not suited to PL football at all.
This 1000%. If he never played in that final I doubt anyone would even have noticed who he is. They should be spending that money on a striker and feel like he's a complete waste of money/profile of what they need
 
This 1000%. If he never played in that final I doubt anyone would even have noticed who he is. They should be spending that money on a striker and feel like he's a complete waste of money/profile of what they need

I dont even think his final performance was that great. It was good, but nothing special.