Obviously Bruno is having an impact that far exceeds what Martin Ødegaard is achieving in Arsenal. He's been PL player of the month more times in a year than any other player has ever managed in the same time period. He's probably going to win player of the year. He's the heart, spine and brains of this team, and I wouldn't trade him for anyone. In view of that, there's a question how you can argue that Ødegaard is a better footballer overall, just because you can name a number of areas where he's better. Not all areas of a player's game are equally important. And for an attacker, no area is more important than the ability to rack up goals and assists with the regularity Bruno is doing - to say nothing of the obvious and fundamental impact he has on how the team performs. With and without him, it's like two different teams. There's a difference between being a more well-rounded player and being a better player.
That being said, there's no need to go over-board in the responses. The points made about Ødegaards qualities, including relative to Brunos, seem more than reasonable to me, even if the conclusion isn't.