Irwin99
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2018
- Messages
- 13,154
Well we do have about 5 other players for that one position now.He needs to be fecked off then

Well we do have about 5 other players for that one position now.He needs to be fecked off then
He keeps the club doctor and physio in a job.Mount clearly has something but if I was asked I couldn't give you a clear account of it. He was dreadful tonight.
250k a week.Now after we have abandoned Amorim's system we come back to the same issue we had with Mount under ten Hag. He doesn't really fit anywhere.
He's a tidy player, composed but not creative enough to play in Bruno's position, doesn't have the speed or trickery to play as a winger and surely can't play as a midfielder.
It wasn't as he was setting the world alight as a 10 under Amorim, but he'll be one of the biggest losers along with Lisandro from changing formation.
I doubt we can sell him at this point, must be on big wages, his status is on the floor and has became really injury prone. This is one of those cases that we'll have to keep him until his contract expires.
Yeah no club is going to be willing to pay even half of that for him. Only top 6 clubs can afford it and they wouldn't touch him with a stick, considering outside of the top 6 the best paid players earn around 100-120k I'd say we'd be lucky to get someone willing to cover about 30% of his wages.250k a week.
Back to normal Mount. Looks like the only role he’s any good at is what he had under Amorim and he’s nowhere near good enough to change a system for.
If he doesn’t show he has a role by the end of the season he should be sold. He’s been back to being a ghost in his last two games.
There's a lot of blood lust for himHe has a bad game while we are practically without a manager and everybody is jumping at him again. No matter what formation we are going to play we need more players with his attributes. Good movement, very good on the ball, an eye for a pass, keeping things quick and simple.
But he doesn’t do that stuff consistently. His performance at the weekend was a very typical performance for Mason in a match where we really needed him.He has a bad game while we are practically without a manager and everybody is jumping at him again. No matter what formation we are going to play we need more players with his attributes. Good movement, very good on the ball, an eye for a pass, keeping things quick and simple.
But he doesn’t do that stuff consistently. His performance at the weekend was a very typical performance for Mason in a match where we really needed him.
In twice the time on the pitch, he managed to touch the ball only 8 more times than the 18 year old who replaced him. 30 touches compared to Bruno’s over 100 (or 65 or so prorated). It’s simply not good enough. He has to find a way to get involved.
We need to do all we can go keep Bruno anyway as we're going to a 433/4231.I genuinely think we can’t let him and Bruno go so if he goes we would need to keep Bruno, Cunha doesn’t fill me with too much faith as the main 10, he’s too selfish!
However Mount needs to have a stellar end to this season to get one more year?
Mount to be fair had to spend half his game filling for the spaces that Dalot was leavingDoes anyone know what Mason Mount's job description actually is? Dalot and Cunha were terrible but at least they got involved and made runs. Mount has magically found this hole in the pitch that he stands in. 10 yards from the winger's position, 10 yards from #10, 10 yards from CM and 10 yards from the striker's... and nobody can see him there, so they don't pass to him.
He's basically a fkn skiver. Lacey came on and in 3 mins had contributed more than CL winning, Euros Final-playing Mount. It continually amazes me how little he offers as an attacking player.
Agreed we need to keep Bruno if we sell Mount, he’s still our best player by some distance.We need to do all we can go keep Bruno anyway as we're going to a 433/4231.
Mount isn't close to good enough to be a 10 in that. You need to get a ton of creativity behind him if you're actively throwing away that position from a creativity POV.
Mount is irrelevant to any squad planning. If we sell Bruno we need a new creative midfielder, even if Mount stays. Mount isn't good enough to be a starter.Agreed we need to keep Bruno if we sell Mount, he’s still our best player by some distance.
He has good qualities but he’s just so slow off the ball and somehow far slower on the ball. He needs time on the ball but this team doesn’t afford him that little extra to make something happen. He really should be shipped out in the summer to make room for others but the same could be said about majority of this squad.He's a bit of a nothing player. Just a lot of meh. One of our big problems with the squad really, too many players who are mediocre at everything. Zirkzee, Mount, Mainoo, Ugarte, Dalot...
Nah, you're looking at that the wrong way around. Dalot HAS to make such runs into the box from a way out because Mount doesn't do it. Just watch him playing up top next time out. He doesn't run in behind, and he rarely shows to make an easy 5-yard pass for whoever has the ball. He hides! He doesn't help out Dalot at all, nor the 10 or CBs or CMs. This is how he has become invisible and manages about 4 touches per half.Mount to be fair had to spend half his game filling for the spaces that Dalot was leaving
That would have required him to abandon the needed defensive cover for Dalot and we know the consequences of that happeningDon't really understand why he couldn't do what Lacey did.
Just keep the width, work a yard and put the ball in(we know he can cross a ball).
Simple football.
Especially with Dalot drifting inside so much.
100% Mount is irrelevant to Bruno's future and should not be a starter, let alone our number 7. He is a squad player like a Madueke/Trossard. Although they are probably more useful players, to be honest.Mount is irrelevant to any squad planning. If we sell Bruno we need a new creative midfielder, even if Mount stays. Mount isn't good enough to be a starter.
Or the weekly wage he's some how manager to con out of us. £250k p/w for next to no return in 3 years is impressive for even us.I think there might be a market for him if we were to sell. But clearly we would take a big loss on him.
I didn’t rate him as a transfer. But almost think we are better off keeping him, if he can keep reasonably fit. He does have some good qualities - but not relative to the price we paid.
I’m sorry but this is a really generous analysis of Mount, it basically says that if he’s set up in perfect conditions and someone does all his work for him in an attacking sense then he can be a useful option. Even if we were to set up like that, is Mount’s output really good enough?He's not a winger, and trying to play him as one was always going to result in the nothing performance we saw against Brighton, especially with such a disjointed press. He can work in that system by tucking in more centrally, if he's supported by a top fullback who can get up and down the pitch, and has the trickery of a winger, but Dalot is nowhere near that.
Mount's strongest attributes are off the ball, he's very intelligent in terms of positioning etc and leads the press really well, but that's no good if there isn't a coherent press to lead. Fletcher's rather old school approach doesn't suit him at all, hopefully Carrick can find a way to use him or he'll be a passenger until the end of the season.
I’m sorry but this is a really generous analysis of Mount, it basically says that if he’s set up in perfect conditions and someone does all his work for him in an attacking sense then he can be a useful option. Even if we were to set up like that, is Mount’s output really good enough?
I thought one of his main selling points was meant to be his versatility but it’s pointless if he needs such a particular set up.
I think his fitness record will discourage any potential suitors, with a better fitness record I reckon someone like Everton, West Ham or anyone of that ilk would be interested. The wages due to him will be a hindrance so the only way out is use him as cover until he wants out on his own.I think there might be a market for him if we were to sell. But clearly we would take a big loss on him.
I didn’t rate him as a transfer. But almost think we are better off keeping him, if he can keep reasonably fit. He does have some good qualities - but not relative to the price we paid.
I was very pissed off, they didnt show anything as to why or when it was offside? COuld have been a different story for media. We deserved to win much higher. And from "demolition" story it's just a decent 2:0 win.Anyone know why exactly his goal was chalked off?
So little discussion by sky for a goal that come season's end could decide the title race.