A contender for our worst ever signing?
Off the top of my head Sanchez, Sancho and Zirkzee were even bigger blunders. Probably way more I've removed from my memory.
A contender for our worst ever signing?
Up there but it will hopefully forever be Sancho as No.1.A contender for our worst ever signing?
Zirkzee? You've definitely removed a lot from your memory.Off the top of my head Sanchez, Sancho and Zirkzee were even bigger blunders. Probably way more I've removed from my memory.
Zirkzee? You've definitely removed a lot from your memory.
Zirkzee has been diabolical in my view, can't think of many worse recent signings.
I dunno - Sanchez was dire but at least he scored a crucial an FA Cup semi final win for us - I can't remember one game when Mount made any difference, the few times he has been fit that is. Plus Sanchez was away on loan a year after joining us - Mount is still here three years later.Off the top of my head Sanchez, Sancho and Zirkzee were even bigger blunders. Probably way more I've removed from my memory.
I know Hojlund didnt make it but to regard him as one of our worst signings is extremely harsh. Particularly comparing him to Antony, Onana and Sancho. He still has a decent market value and is only 23 btw.Antony? Onana!!!? Hojlund?
He was cheap enough, on low enough wages and young enough that we'll be able to move him on after 2 seasons to a modest hit. Compare that Hojlund, Onana, Antony or Sancho, where we either massively overpaid or stuck them on a huge wage (or both) and thus had to risk a big financial loss for our troubles. That's just in the last few years.Zirkzee has been diabolical in my view, can't think of many worse recent signings.
I know Hojlund didnt make it but to regard him as one of our worst signings is extremely harsh. Particularly comparing him to Antony, Onana and Sancho. He still has a decent market value and is only 23 btw.
Remember all the Van Gaal signings? Schneiderlin, Depay, Rojo, Schweinsteiger, Di Maria, Falcao... These were seasoned players for the most parts. Then there was Alexis Sanchez, Van der beek, arguably Pogba, ... Its a long list and Hojlund is definitely not top ten on it in my books.
You’re absolutely right. But I didn’t consider those signings as recent. Still a fine collection of underachievers though.
Off the top of my head Sanchez, Sancho and Zirkzee were even bigger blunders. Probably way more I've removed from my memory.
Yeah, he is the worst in my view. Not the worst player but taking into account he was free at the end of the next season, plays a position where our captain is never injured, had significant injury red flags the season we signed him and got Chelsea out of a hole in respect of what to do with him/gave them funds to invest, it was an absolute shocker then and remains so now.A contender for our worst ever signing?
He's played less than a season's worth of minutes in 3 seasons now. That's like 2 full years where we paid his salary for absolutely zero benefit.
He's living a charmed life. There's no reason for him to leave when he still has 2 more years left on that contract. Best we can hope for is someone like Villa taking him on loan. They seem to love our castoffs.
Yep. You can count on one hand the number of "decent" games he's had. It's a waste of a squad spot if you ask me. Probably there to make up the English player quota. I don't see a good player there. He presses well. That's about it.In that seasons worth of football, about 2/3rds of it was playing himself back into match fitness, before promptly getting injured again.
It’s not really curious. Who would wan’t to buy him and pay him wages at this point? You can be spirting director of any club in the world - which director are you prepared to convince to pay a fee and salary for Mount today? You say it yourself. You wouldn’t, if you were at Leeds, Lyon or Lausanne, it wouldn’t make sense.This is my main problem with him though, he can play in a few positions but he can't play well in the majority of them. His inability to make an impact out wide means he's third choice in those positions behind Dorgu and Amad. He's at best second choice as an AM behind Bruno but he's never going to get meaningful minutes there even if he can stay fit for a prolonged period. With all that taken into account, even if he was on a reasonable salary, is there any purpose in keeping him around? I think we should really prioritise getting him out of the squad somehow this summer and it's concerning that there's no real speculation regarding this. Yeah we'd take a big hit but we did the same with Antony and Sancho I believe. It was said that INEOS will only give players 2 seasons to prove their value, it's been three years of failure for Mount but you hardly hear any talk about it from media and fans which is curious.
Some lovely skill to break their press towards the end there and set up a nice counter. Don't know his position moving forward because you can't be having a bloke on 250k a week riding the bench. Hopefully he can have a Shaw season and show us why he was bought.
Problem with seeing him as one of the three midfielders excluding Mainoo, is that he’s never reliably fit, which means we’re potentially risking playing with 3 senior midfielders for parts of next season. That’s too risky given the intensity of the season we’ll likely be having.Much better today next to Kobbie when he came on. The wages and his fitness are the obvious issue, but he won't leave realistically, so the question is what's the best way to make use of him. A bench CM is fine, we need a group of them anyway and it's unrealistic to buy 3 of them probably. Definitely need aggression and some physical strength from the 2 who come in though to make sure we're balanced as a group there.
I mean you have to count him in your squad while he's here, it's not going to be a perfect scenario no matter what. If we look at it like a midfield 3, he'd be the 5th choice for the midfield 3 behind Bruno, Mainoo and the 2 new signings. It's unrealistic to expect us to sign 3 players there and just ignore his wages when we have lots of positions to address I'd say.Problem with seeing him as one of the three midfielders excluding Mainoo, is that he’s never reliably fit, which means we’re potentially risking playing with 3 senior midfielders for parts of next season. That’s too risky given the intensity of the season we’ll likely be having.
It’s unrealistic to expect he would be fit. Will be madness to go into next season with 3 fit midfielders for two spots.I mean you have to count him in your squad while he's here, it's not going to be a perfect scenario no matter what. If we look at it like a midfield 3, he'd be the 5th choice for the midfield 3 behind Bruno, Mainoo and the 2 new signings. It's unrealistic to expect us to sign 3 players there and just ignore his wages when we have lots of positions to address I'd say.
He should be asking Luke Shaw a few questions (who has somehow managed to play every single game this season.) He was never injury prone at Chelsea and played games nonstop, maybe it was coming. We just need to get him on that Luke Shaw 2026 serum.It’s unrealistic to expect he would be fit. Will be madness to go into next season with 3 fit midfielders for two spots.