Mateus Fernandes | Spurs player

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not sure - depends how Carrick wants his midfield to operate which I'm not privy to of course. To be clear this isn't me advocating for Scott as the third - it's just me saying that if he is the third on top of Fernandes, then I wouldn't find it "sad", I'd find it quite exciting. My preference for the third is still Tchoumeni, but it's not that likely to happen.
Oh yeah he would be the ideal partner for this guy, however like you say there's no chance he wants to leave sadly
 
He's tall and powerful and yet always very fast. Can't wait to see him at United!
 
It's not born out in his stats, he's good, but can be a bit inconsistent. Hard to tell with someone like him if that's due to how Nuno plays, the quality of his team mates or due to his experience not quite being there. It's easy to forget he's only a year older than Mainoo, with way less experience. He's coming into replace an absolute seasoned veteran in Casemiro. It's probably best to temper expectations to begin with and be pleasantly surprised. I hope he steps up without skipping a beat, but that's probably a little unreasonable.

Sorry to reply late and revisit this. I may be pretty bias as everyone tends to have some anchorong or fixation toward certain player targets at some point, and this is probably mine.

That being said, I think his passing is very good, he stands out in the PL as one of the rare players who sprays 50 yard passes into the path of running wingers for fun. He has his moments of vertically passing across the floor too into the feet of attackers with their back to goal, which Casemiro did too.

I also think he gets stuck in and loves the battle in midfield like Casemiro did. I genuinely wouldn't be surprised if before long he was a Casemiro of last season with legs. Probably not the big headed goals, but everything else.
 
If we can get this over the line and sign Lewis hall. I’d be buzzing with the window so far.
 
It's not born out in his stats, he's good, but can be a bit inconsistent. Hard to tell with someone like him if that's due to how Nuno plays, the quality of his team mates or due to his experience not quite being there. It's easy to forget he's only a year older than Mainoo, with way less experience. He's coming into replace an absolute seasoned veteran in Casemiro. It's probably best to temper expectations to begin with and be pleasantly surprised. I hope he steps up without skipping a beat, but that's probably a little unreasonable.

That's not true:

Mainoo career so far: 78 PL appearances, 5260 minutes (7 G/A in case you're interested)
MF career so far: 72 PL appearances, 5948 minutes (13 G/A)

So MF actually has more PL minutes, it's just that Mainoo's are spread over one extra season with him gradually breaking into the team. MF also had 33 appearances in the Portuguese league before signing for Southampton. Of course, we'd still be be at an experience deficit with Case leaving.
 
That's not true:

Mainoo career so far: 78 PL appearances, 5260 minutes (7 G/A in case you're interested)
MF career so far: 72 PL appearances, 5948 minutes (13 G/A)

So MF actually has more PL minutes, it's just that Mainoo's are spread over one extra season with him gradually breaking into the team. MF also had 33 appearances in the Portuguese league before signing for Southampton. Of course, we'd still be be at an experience deficit with Case leaving.
I meant that Mainoo has played in international finals, cup finals and European football. Fernandes hasn't played in a game of anything close to that magnitude yet.
Sorry to reply late and revisit this. I may be pretty bias as everyone tends to have some anchorong or fixation toward certain player targets at some point, and this is probably mine.

That being said, I think his passing is very good, he stands out in the PL as one of the rare players who sprays 50 yard passes into the path of running wingers for fun. He has his moments of vertically passing across the floor too into the feet of attackers with their back to goal, which Casemiro did too.

I also think he gets stuck in and loves the battle in midfield like Casemiro did. I genuinely wouldn't be surprised if before long he was a Casemiro of last season with legs. Probably not the big headed goals, but everything else.
No worries.

Fair enough, hopefully you're right. Personally when I've watched him, I've found him a bit more erratic with his passing, I've not watched masses of him though and maybe anchoring to the games he played against us.

That's where I think he'll thrive, the amount of recovery tackles and pressure I've seen him do in the games I've watched, were very impressive. Technically looks very sound too, I think if we can be more consistent in the passing you're describing, I agree he'll be very close to the same effect as Casemiro and allow us to play much higher up the pitch.
 
If we can get this over the line and sign Lewis hall. I’d be buzzing with the window so far.

Really hope this will be the case. If they could even add a 3rd midfielder it would be the perfect window.
 
Where are the tweets :) are we signing him. I have turned into a transfer junkie, need constant updates that the move is ticking along.
 
I have two Newcastle supporting friends who are laughing that we might pay £80m for him, yet both of them think Hall is worth £70m and Tonali is worth £120m. Pretty ridiculous.
 
I have two Newcastle supporting friends who are laughing that we might pay £80m for him, yet both of them think Hall is worth £70m and Tonali is worth £120m. Pretty ridiculous.
My brother is a huge Saints fan and says They have a 15% sell on profit only not the whole transfer fee, he also said that Fernandes is good but not worth anywhere near £80m, of course he was judging him in a team that got relegated and said he held onto the ball too long, however he admitted that what he’s seen of him at West Ham , he’s definitely improved an awful lot and £55-60m is probably his true value.

For the record £60m would only give the saints about £3.5m on sell on clause and West Ham £56.5m so a healthy £18.5m profit. I think we’ll end up doing what we do as a club and end up paying £72.5m plus £10m in add ons!
 
Guys. If we do end up paying 80m at least relax that we value him at close to that. We might end up paying around 20% more than we value him at and I'm okay with that...

Because i still remember signing a player for about that when our own scouts valued the player at 20-25m
 
wharton-pass-chart.png


I guess this would essentially explain it? Low volume of touches overall so probably won't have that impressive pass numbers based on quantity alone, but very progressive with the amount of the ball he has.

X axis is progressive passes per 100 touches and he appears to be higher than any other midfielder in Europe's top 5 leagues in this metric.

EDIT: Highlighted some of the other midfield links and Bruno for comparison.

Great chart that - which website did you get it from?
Thanks.
 
Really hope this will be the case. If they could even add a 3rd midfielder it would be the perfect window.
Would be delighted with this guy and Hall, however still a long way from the perfect window. Mind you hard to fund that unless your name is Man City or PSG of course.
 
Yes he did. He had a persistent pelvic injury at Chelsea, having surgery to try and address it in April 2023 - a few months before he joined us.
Mount lost 6 games for Chelsea the three years prior to that in total, two from illness. He had one pelvic injury the last year at Chelsea that took 11 games, playing 35 games for them that year. He never had a pelvic injury at United.

You don’t call what he had a Chelsea ‘persostent injuries’. You could have called the pelvic injury the last year at Chelsea a ‘current injury’, if he had suffered from it at United, but it’s been other issues at United, calf etc.

At any rate, when he came to United, he had a very decent injury record for Chelsea.
 
I'm not sure - depends how Carrick wants his midfield to operate which I'm not privy to of course. To be clear this isn't me advocating for Scott as the third - it's just me saying that if he is the third on top of Fernandes, then I wouldn't find it "sad", I'd find it quite exciting. My preference for the third is still Tchoumeni, but it's not that likely to happen.
Whatever fee we pay for Fernandes, would be the expectation from Bournemouth. That's how it works apparently in the PL.
Not sure we would be able to get in two 65-70 mil midfielders.
 
Whatever fee we pay for Fernandes, would be the expectation from Bournemouth. That's how it works apparently in the PL.
Not sure we would be able to get in two 65-70 mil midfielders.
Not unless we manage to sell better than expected, clearly this guy is top target now Anderson off table
 
Mount lost 6 games for Chelsea the three years prior to that in total, two from illness. He had one pelvic injury the last year at Chelsea that took 11 games, playing 35 games for them that year. He never had a pelvic injury at United.

You don’t call what he had a Chelsea ‘persostent injuries’. You could have called the pelvic injury the last year at Chelsea a ‘current injury’, if he had suffered from it at United, but it’s been other issues at United, calf etc.

At any rate, when he came to United, he had a very decent injury record for Chelsea.

That pelvis injury was reported in the media as a persistent injury at the time. Make of that what you will.

That doesn’t change the original point though - that Camavinga has had a very poor injury record, and that we should be especially wary of that having already been burned by signing other injury prone players like Mount (because whatever his Chelsea record was there’s absolutely no doubt he has become a very injury prone player since that surgery).
 
You have to read through the content to why I said this, not arguing if he's a top footballer, just don't think he's in the league of Vitinha and João Neves right now. The option of Mateus Fernandes and Alex Scott is a little sad. Guess it's just the market we are in now.

Yes it means nothing, just mentioned our options are a player relegated in successive seasons and a Bournemouth player, it's just a little sad for our club that's all I was getting at.
Fernandes can definitely do a job, especially surrounded by better players but he is no 85m player.
He isn't. You've just named two of the best midfielders in the world, that play for the best team. We're likely going to need to unearth a world class midfielder as clubs typically dont want to sell them.
 
You have to read through the content to why I said this, not arguing if he's a top footballer, just don't think he's in the league of Vitinha and João Neves right now. The option of Mateus Fernandes and Alex Scott is a little sad. Guess it's just the market we are in now.

Yes it means nothing, just mentioned our options are a player relegated in successive seasons and a Bournemouth player, it's just a little sad for our club that's all I was getting at.
Fernandes can definitely do a job, especially surrounded by better players but he is no 85m player.
Buying a Bournemouth player never worked out for anyone. Ronaldo was an unknown teenager who had one good preseason game against us. Bruno Fernandes was a big fish in small pond. Vidic and Evra were basically nobodies, etc…
 
Buying a Bournemouth player never worked out for anyone. Ronaldo was an unknown teenager who had one good preseason game against us. Bruno Fernandes was a big fish in small pond. Vidic and Evra were basically nobodies, etc…

Turns out all you need to keep caf posters happy in muppet season is a crystal ball and a Time Machine.
 
I have two Newcastle supporting friends who are laughing that we might pay £80m for him, yet both of them think Hall is worth £70m and Tonali is worth £120m. Pretty ridiculous.
Pretty lame that you’re letting two geordies laugh at you given their history and that we signed 3 attacking players last summer that they all wanted to sign. Laugh at them!
 
It's a bit frustrating that we let them get their act together with the ownership issue, feel like we could have snagged a bargain. I reckon it still gets done at about 70m all in, which does seem a tad expensive, but at least he's got the most time on his side.
 
It's a bit frustrating that we let them get their act together with the ownership issue, feel like we could have snagged a bargain. I reckon it still gets done at about 70m all in, which does seem a tad expensive, but at least he's got the most time on his side.
It’s probably hard to buy a player from a club thats ownership model is in limbo.
 
It's a bit frustrating that we let them get their act together with the ownership issue, feel like we could have snagged a bargain. I reckon it still gets done at about 70m all in, which does seem a tad expensive, but at least he's got the most time on his side.
I don’t think that makes sense. Take all your thoughts and 180 them for the angles West Ham will be coming at the window from. Stalling, protracting, looking for any possible avenue to benefit themselves. When you’re in trouble and have bills to pay, you don’t leap at the first opportunity to pay them, you do your damnedest to find ways to find the least troublesome way out and hedge your bets. It can leave you in a deeper hole, or maybe you are blessed enough to be saved in some manner. Either way, those circling will have to wait their turn. Perhaps they can then whittle you down.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.