I don’t believe a random person on here knows for certain why Judge was kept on to work his notice period, what exactly he’s doing, whether he’s doing a good job. I also don’t believe anyone is in a position to say whether it is correct or not when they know nothing about it and he hasn’t even finished.
Correct, Adnan doesn't exactly know what's going on himself. I've read through his past posts to you from the start of the exchange, and from what I've read, he offered you his own conjecture. The wording may not have been great, however, and that may be causing this misunderstanding.
Everything any journalist says isn’t correct
and I don’t believe any predict the future with certainty so not sure why that is a shock to you.
Correct, not everything every journalist says is correct, but other reliable journalists (Luckhurst, Duncker, Hirst, etc.) have also reported the same things about Judge.
Let's not worry about predicting the future. I'm not sure how that even factors into this discussion.
All I’ve said is the club didn’t have to keep Judge for his full notice period and that the statement it was correct decision to keep him because he is point of contact isn’t a fact. You seem another who knows it is somehow, amazing we have so many experts that need evidence to be disproved.
I appreciate you summarising your position here to make sure that your initial point doesn't get lost amidst the exchanges. You're right, the club could have stopped him from working via gardening leave if they wanted to, but they kept him around instead.
I won't proclaim myself to be an ITK of any kind, so you don't need to worry about me saying something about Judge's current situation outside of what has already been reported. However, insulting someone is out of order in this case.