Michael Oliver

Jimmy Skitz

Full Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
2,585
Location
Leicester
Supports
Leicester City
sky just said they have confirmation that GDS is now working and is fully functional in the second half, Hawkeye not released a comment yet
 

izec

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
27,221
Location
Lucilinburhuc
It’s not allowed. Apparently very strict what VAR can get involved in.
That was worthy of stepping in. I mean it was a goal, that is what VAR should be used for, especially if the other technology isn't working or not powered up. No flexibility, so not surprised.

I get it for small fouls, small mistakes and yellow cards etc.. but goals, penalties and red cards should always be reviewed, no matter the circumstances.
 

Macern

Pee pee pants
Joined
May 11, 2014
Messages
13,538
Location
Oslo, Norway
That was worthy of stepping in. I mean it was a goal, that is what VAR should be used for, especially if the other technology isn't working or not powered up. No flexibility, so not surprised.

I get it for small fouls, small mistakes and yellow cards etc.. but goals, penalties and red cards should always be reviewed, no matter the circumstances.
Yeah undoubtedly worthy of stepping in, the rules should be changed.
 

montpelier

Full Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
10,637
I'm most annoyed this isn't entirely Oliver's fault, tbh.

Did he do his stupid staring into space "I've bollocksed it up again but I'm not listening" face when the players were harassing him?
 

OnlyTwoDaSilvas

Gullible
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
21,668
Location
The Mathews Bridge
Is it actually a rule that VAR can't step in and make a decision if the technology which is supposed to do that job fails?

And if so, why? It's like the rule where governing bodies can't overturn a refereeing decision if the referee saw and reported on it, why does football insist on being so difficult?


The ref didn't see it, the technology failed, VAR could have put that right in less than 30 seconds, but it supposedly wasn't allowed to. For once, I feel a bit sorry for for Michael Oliver. He'll get a lot of heat for it, yet he will have been trusting the technology which has worked perfectly up to that point.
 

freeurmind

weak willed
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
5,883
Is it actually a rule that VAR can't step in and make a decision if the technology which is supposed to do that job fails?

And if so, why? It's like the rule where governing bodies can't overturn a refereeing decision if the referee saw and reported on it, why does football insist on being so difficult?


The ref didn't see it, the technology failed, VAR could have put that right in less than 30 seconds, but it supposedly wasn't allowed to. For once, I feel a bit sorry for for Michael Oliver. He'll get a lot of heat for it, yet he will have been trusting the technology which has worked perfectly up to that point.
On the Premier League broadcast they were saying that VAR could have intervened.
 

OnlyTwoDaSilvas

Gullible
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
21,668
Location
The Mathews Bridge
On the Premier League broadcast they were saying that VAR could have intervened.
It definitely is allowed they cleared that up after the game.
That's reassuring to know, I didn't watch the post-match. It was suggested in this thread that it's not allowed, but glad that isn't the case.

I am assuming it hasn't been explained why they didn't intervene?
 

limerickcitykid

There once was a kid from Toronto...
Joined
Oct 3, 2012
Messages
14,059
Location
East end / Oot and aboot
That's reassuring to know, I didn't watch the post-match. It was suggested in this thread that it's not allowed, but glad that isn't the case.

I am assuming it hasn't been explained why they didn't intervene?
From the broadcast it sounded like they suggested that since this has never happened and goal line tech is always right the VARs just assumed it was again and didn’t care to verify it right.
 

Skeezix

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2017
Messages
431
not surprised it happened to him
Karma?

I dread him refereeing United games, especially against top 4.

He seems to take blatantly wrong decisions just to show that he is the referee and has power over the players for 90+ mins
 

SER19

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
12,646
Shouldn't be a Premier league referee. Glad to be able to say this away from united games as it gets confused for bias.

He is absolutely awful gets a free ride from the media because of some misguided idea that because he started young he must be good.

Since lockdown he's been involved in 3 of the most controversial decisions. He is a controversy magnet and seems detested by a lot of managers.

I can't speak to how he is as a man. As a referee I detest him, I think he's absolutely awful and fully suspect makes decisions based on biases and personal grudges.
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
Shouldn't be a Premier league referee. Glad to be able to say this away from united games as it gets confused for bias.

He is absolutely awful gets a free ride from the media because of some misguided idea that because he started young he must be good.

Since lockdown he's been involved in 3 of the most controversial decisions. He is a controversy magnet and seems detested by a lot of managers.

I can't speak to how he is as a man. As a referee I detest him, I think he's absolutely awful and fully suspect makes decisions based on biases and personal grudges.
What games has he officiated? I actually thought the other day how I don't recall actually seeing him post lock down
 

SER19

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
12,646
What games has he officiated? I actually thought the other day how I don't recall actually seeing him post lock down
He had the first game back where fair enough supposedly his watch was fecked but missed a ball a yards
over the line. (can he insist on var if he expects his tech was broken) then he had Brighton arsenal VAR and now tonight's VAR. Even when he's not on the pitch he's the talking point
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
He had the first game back where fair enough supposedly his watch was fecked but missed a ball a yards
over the line. (can he insist on var if he expects his tech was broken) then he had Brighton arsenal VAR and now tonight's VAR. Even when he's not on the pitch he's the talking point
Ah yes I do remember the first game now, don't tend to take any notice when they say who's manning VAR
 

Wilt

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
6,694
He seems incapable of refereeing a match without making some kind of feck up.
 

Solius

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Staff
Joined
Dec 31, 2007
Messages
86,449
Lost all respect for him as a ref after this happened and he did f*ck all about it.

 

izec

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
27,221
Location
Lucilinburhuc
He is garbage IMO. I think i dislike him the most. The others have some issues as well, but Oliver is a proper twat. It changes weekly which ref is more incompetent, but Oliver is far up my list consistently.
 

Rooney in Paris

Gerrard shirt..Anfield? You'll Never Live it Down
Scout
Joined
Mar 11, 2010
Messages
35,893
Location
In an elephant sanctuary
I’m unsure how that decision is his fault when he followed the rules correctly.
I feel the same way. The rule is idiotic, there's nothing wrong with Oliver following it. Also the ball over the line incident, I'm not quite sure how he's at fault there - in his position, if I'm relying on a technology that has been fullproof until then, even if I had a doubt, I'd have made the same call as him.

People talk about his bias, but they're just as bad in the sense that there's a narrative that he's awful, and every controversial decision made will be seen as a feck up by him and never perceived the other way around.

I don't think he's an amazing referee by any means, but he's not as bad as people are making him out to be.
 

Baneofthegame

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2019
Messages
3,009
I feel the same way. The rule is idiotic, there's nothing wrong with Oliver following it. Also the ball over the line incident, I'm not quite sure how he's at fault there - in his position, if I'm relying on a technology that has been fullproof until then, even if I had a doubt, I'd have made the same call as him.

People talk about his bias, but they're just as bad in the sense that there's a narrative that he's awful, and every controversial decision made will be seen as a feck up by him and never perceived the other way around.

I don't think he's an amazing referee by any means, but he's not as bad as people are making him out to be.
Completely agree.
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,202
Location
Salford
We need to pray to the football Gods that he isn’t named referee vs Leicester.

If he is, we’re done. Bloke absolutely loathes United.

I don’t think he’s ever given us a pen or a red card to the team against us. And our record with him as referee is abysmal. Without looking I think we’ve won only like 30% of matches.
 

matys

Full Member
Joined
May 17, 2008
Messages
269
Location
Poland
We need to pray to the football Gods that he isn’t named referee vs Leicester.

If he is, we’re done. Bloke absolutely loathes United.

I don’t think he’s ever given us a pen or a red card to the team against us. And our record with him as referee is abysmal. Without looking I think we’ve won only like 30% of matches.
Oliver vs United

So in how many games we didn't win because of him?
 

sewey89

Incorrectly predicted the de Jong transfer 2022
Joined
Jun 15, 2011
Messages
10,677
Location
Chesterfield
Martin Atkinson is the ref on Sunday.

Oliver has West Ham/Villa.

I do still find it strange he's only reffed us for one match this season.
 

Fitchett

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
1,601
Location
Manchester
Martin Atkinson is the ref on Sunday.

Oliver has West Ham/Villa.

I do still find it strange he's only reffed us for one match this season.
Strange, but I'm not complaining. Instead, we've had Jon Moss three times since the return last month.
 

Fitchett

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
1,601
Location
Manchester
That was another horrendous howler from Michael Oliver on Saturday. No action against Pickford, wtf?
Martial gers a red card and a 3 match ban for tapping Lamela's face after being elbowed in the throat. Pickford wipes out Van Dijk for the season and nothing given.
Let's not forget that Oliver was the ref who failed to give a clear goal in the Aston Villa v Sheffield United match in the summer.
I wonder when we will have to suffer him reffing a United match again. I always dread him being in charge of our games.
 

Fitchett

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
1,601
Location
Manchester
How can Michael Oliver and VAR not give a red card to Ashley Barnes? Led with his elbow, caught Alderweireld in the face, cut above his eye. Lengthy delay whilst patched up.

Nothing given, while Martial serves a three match ban ...
 

Sweech

Full Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Messages
783
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
How can Michael Oliver and VAR not give a red card to Ashley Barnes? Led with his elbow, caught Alderweireld in the face, cut above his eye. Lengthy delay whilst patched up.

Nothing given, while Martial serves a three match ban ...
The decision I couldn’t understand was how the player who hauled Son down didn’t end up with a card.

Pope was waaaaay out of goal and if Son gets a shot or even a pass to Lucas it’s an easy score into a wide open net.

Yet the Burnley player hauls Son down and nothing is given.
 

PickledRed

Full Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
5,499
Supports
Liverpool
Discussions about any referee are wrought with fan-bias and a sense of persecution. It’s usually completely unfair in terms of the way fans watch and remember football matches.

How often can we name refs who made big decisions in our favour? How often do we discuss refs who remained pretty anonymous throughout the 90?

In general, ref chat is utterly glib and goes nowhere other than towards dull sanctimonious witterings.