Maguire would be the problem in that made up scenario.
Van Hecke is a better and more intelligent player overall, better defender, technically a much better footballer and more awareness and variety in his use of the ball. Plus he's pretty good at breaking forward and linking up higher up the pitch when needed.
VDV has a bit more pace, that's really it.
And is left-footed, which as per the article is what we want.
It's time we moved on from this LVG obsession.
Yeah, it's crap. I hate that Moyes wants to do it too.Can't be arsed with playing a backline of all centrebacks like Arsenal do. Makes for atrocious football.
All Van men or only white Van men?
It's hardly just an LVG obsession. Almost every top side ideally wants a left-footed LCB, as it changes how you play out from defence and how the opposition can press you.
Thing is, that pace is what we need. Being able to play s higher line is a huge upgrade to balance against his negatives.Undoubtedly an incredibly powerful runner but I feel like his pace masks a lot. Add it that his explosiveness makes him susceptible to hamstring injuries and not sure it's worth it.
Being able to play a high line as well as Spurs have over the last couple of years?Thing is, that pace is what we need. Being able to play s higher line is a huge upgrade to balance against his negatives.
Have you seen him tackle…?Van De Ven is a weird one. He's 6ft4 but he's shit in terms of aerial duels. Despite his size he's incredibly fast and he's an amazing dribbler yet most of that pace is used to cover for his clumsiness. He's almost in the wrong role.
I can understand why United would want him. He's built for a high line defense and his speed would compliment Maguire and De Ligt beautifully. Yet his lack of aerial prowess and his injuries is a major red flag. Thus I wouldn't want him at our club
Van de Ven is playing in a struggling Spurs side. He’s got an unreliable keeper behind him, Romero is a flight risk, full-backs aren’t great defensively I could go on.Maguire would be the problem in that made up scenario.
Van Hecke is a better and more intelligent player overall, better defender, technically a much better footballer and more awareness and variety in his use of the ball. Plus he's pretty good at breaking forward and linking up higher up the pitch when needed.
VDV has a bit more pace, that's really it.
and is in talks to sign a new one, but even if he decides not to sign and we sell him in the summer instead, he'll cost more than van de venHe only has 12 months on his deal.
I think you underrate the unrealistic amount of money Spurs would want for VDVIf you're thinking of Van Hecke - he's going to cost a hell of alot more than Van de Ven
Van de Ven is playing in a struggling Spurs side. He’s got an unreliable keeper behind him, Romero is a flight risk, full-backs aren’t great defensively I could go on.
He’s quick, strong, young, good on the ball. Injuries are a concern but if he stay fit, there’s a good player there.
