Micky Van De Ven

He feels a bit like the Sandro Tonali of Centre-Backs - can run around a lot, but not to great effect; often chasing shadows if anything. Better at running than playing football.

As with Tonali has had a period of very good form in the past, but which seems a fairly distant memory after their last year or so.

Not what you want as a marquee first choice player; not a terrible squad option but likely expensive for that.
 
Football has changed.

The era of Nemanja's and Terry's is long gone. You don't actually need defenders who can defend. You need defenders who are comfortable with the ball and can pass.

Just look at the stats and compare them to 15-20 years ago. Top 10 Prem in most completed passes, 8 out of 10 are centrebacks. VDV is in the range of Bruno Fernandes and Gabriel, with a better accuracy percentage actually. Playing for a shit team.

That, and he's fecking rapid.
Don’t agree. Imagine all your defenders being Lindelof types who can’t defend or head the ball but hey it’s ok because he can pass it now and again
Arsenal have the best CB pairing in the league and they can both defend.
 
Football has changed, but that doesn't mean that centre-halves shouldn't be able to defend. The focus has just shifted toward pro-active defending and 1v1 defensive ability. These are more highly valued qualities nowadays than just being dominant inside the box.
 
Surely that’s because of the shite of modern football with teams timidly knocking it around the back line side to side to side…

CHs get tons of touches and their pass percentage is going to be high because it’s full of sideways 15 yard passes to a defensive teammate.

I'd say it's also because there's a lack of proper centre forwards, this has meant defenders don't have to be able to handle the physical side of the game as much. So they can waltz around and play in loads of space most of the time.

Look how easily Haaland bullies 90% of defenders, I'd love to see how he'd have gotten on against players like Carvalho, Rio, Vidic, Terry, Nesta, Stam etc.
 
Mix of opinions from the last few pages in a Spurs forum:

He, like Romero, will go elsewhere level up and improve and we'll have egg on our faces again and the fans wanting him out will regret we sold him...as per.

Great for a high line team , average at defending deep in your box . Started the season well but is now unrecognisable.

VDV has very poor natural instincts and can't read the play. I honestly don't think he'll ever be an elite centerback.

After his attitude this season he can go. Not fit to lace vertonghens boots. Stood out in the ange suicide side because it utilised his one redeeming quality as a defender. Played like he doesn't want to be here so we won't be really missing much as he's clearly checked out some time ago. He may be better elsewhere but that just shows what a cnut he's been to this club this season. Toodaloo.

Yeah put him in a team that dominates the ball and doesn't have to do as much penalty box defending he'll look brilliant. He's as good at anyone in the world at mopping up in a high line, chasing down runners and running forward with the ball. It's when you want him to sit deep, make blocks and win headers in the box you're in trouble.

He's the type of player that will elevate a team that has lots of possession but isn't built for scrapping at the bottom and playing Frankball shite.

Reckon he'd be ideal for Barca (well...until his hamstrings explode again)

I reckon if he went to one of the mega-clubs he would end up playing a fair bit at full-back, yeah. A bit like Kounde at Barca who plays a lot at RB. I think in his first season under Ange he showed how effective he can be at CB in an attacking system, though.

Yes, Ange deployed him perfectly and his partnership with Romero was ideal.

Romero built from the back, and provided the pass through the opponents midfield.

VDV was there to chase down through balls and put pressure on runners. He was also able to step out from CB into midfield areas and allow our mids to push up the pitch. This worked best when Holjberg was able to drop in and back him up in case of a lost ball.

With VDV this season I've noticed he is actually pretty shit on the ball. He shines when he is asked to chase players down. His defending outside that is questionable.

He is a Hollywood player so will get lots of offers. Romero as well. I’d happily take a bet a backline of Vuskovic and Danso will be more solid than those two. Romero is erratic and VDV’s head is all over the place but VDV has insane pace and Romero is stylish.

Big clubs will definitiley come in for VDV. He is a good asset for big teams with a high line.

I don't even think he's a CB. He is poor in the air and doesn't have good positional sense. I would try converting him to a LB but in terms of if he will leave. My guess is that like Romero, regardless of our PL status, I can see him moving on for a similar fee to a top club that plays with a high line. Barca or PSG.

If we somehow pull off a miracle and stay up cash in on both and invest on a cb partnership of Marcos Senesi and Jan Paul van Hecke. Way, way better Argentine, Dutch cb partnership that can actually defender their box.

We'll be lucky to make back just over what we paid at this point. Without his pace, I doubt he's a top league footballer, people have woken up to that. We paid huge money for him considering the circumstances.

No point pretending he wouldn't be a great high line defender, maybe even a full back for another side.

Becoming a good box defender can be trained into him, as could improving his balance but he's joined a low standard club that hasn't improved him with poor coaching. It would be best for him to join a side with a serious set of coaches, medical department and team mates to become the best player he's capable of - and his ceiling is high.

For us, whilst having a dreadful season, it's easy to focus on his negatives which are easier to overlook if we still win games.
His injury record won't be so bad elsewhere too, so I fully understand why he would want to leave. After 2-3 years at a better club than Spurs for his development the idea of selling him now will seem crazy.
 
Just listened to TOTD pod and it sounded like Whitwell had just put VDV’s name forward himself, rather than it coming from the club in any way. He just put together the facts we need a leader, need LB cover, and Spurs might go down, to come up with VDV as an option. We do not need a defender that can’t defend just because he’s fast.
 
Just listened to TOTD pod and it sounded like Whitwell had just put VDV’s name forward himself, rather than it coming from the club in any way. He just put together the facts we need a leader, need LB cover, and Spurs might go down, to come up with VDV as an option. We do not need a defender that can’t defend just because he’s fast.
That is not at all how it sounded like. He simply said he and Mitten have been hearing from the club for a while they need a defensive leader. And when they were discussing VDV, he mentioned that he could also play LB.

I don't agree with all the things they say on ToTD but one thing is that they don't make stuff up. When they are speculating they say it clearly. Van de Ven is a name Laurie's heard from the club, otherwise he would have said it clearly that all he's heard is a profile description and he thinks Van de Ven would fit the bill.
 
Just listened to TOTD pod and it sounded like Whitwell had just put VDV’s name forward himself, rather than it coming from the club in any way. He just put together the facts we need a leader, need LB cover, and Spurs might go down, to come up with VDV as an option. We do not need a defender that can’t defend just because he’s fast.
That’s the bit I thought interesting. I heard a Spurs correspondent on a pod saying he thought he’d go to a top club, but he’d end up playing LB and that he does it sometimes for the national team because they have 427 centre backs.

It did occur to me, given Arsenal and City deploying centre backs at full back in recent years, that you could do that with him. Like Gvardiol or a left sided Ben White.
 
Just listened to TOTD pod and it sounded like Whitwell had just put VDV’s name forward himself, rather than it coming from the club in any way. He just put together the facts we need a leader, need LB cover, and Spurs might go down, to come up with VDV as an option. We do not need a defender that can’t defend just because he’s fast.

Nah, in the actual article in The Athletic he explicitly says United are looking for a left-footed CB and VDV is a name they are considering.
 
Look how easily Haaland bullies 90% of defenders, I'd love to see how he'd have gotten on against players like Carvalho, Rio, Vidic, Terry, Nesta, Stam etc.

They would have eaten him alive. And Im not overstating that. (Well maybe a little).

Now Harry Kane vs that list of defenders would be fascinating.

On the VdV link it isnt one that fills me with a lot of reassurance to be honest. Yeah hes fast but hes not a great defender and that kind of reminds me of the whole "Onanas great with his feet but cant save a goal to save his life" approach.
 
On the VdV link it isnt one that fills me with a lot of reassurance to be honest. Yeah hes fast but hes not a great defender and that kind of reminds me of the whole "Onanas great with his feet but cant save a goal to save his life" approach.
Reminds me more of when people said Kyle Walker has nothing but pace and then he went on to become [arguably] the best right back in Premier League history.
 
On the VdV link it isnt one that fills me with a lot of reassurance to be honest. Yeah hes fast but hes not a great defender and that kind of reminds me of the whole "Onanas great with his feet but cant save a goal to save his life" approach.

Weirdly, even though I don't want the actual player, the link does reassure me. Because we've been desperate for defenders who can enable us to play a higher defensive line for years, and at least interest in VDV is an indication that we might actually target that profile of player.

I just hope the one we get is better at defending than VDV.
 
Reminds me more of when people said Kyle Walker has nothing but pace and then he went on to become [arguably] the best right back in Premier League history.
Walker was never out there trying to end other players’ careers with malicious, blundering “tackles”. Walker was also far better at his job.
 
That’s the bit I thought interesting. I heard a Spurs correspondent on a pod saying he thought he’d go to a top club, but he’d end up playing LB and that he does it sometimes for the national team because they have 427 centre backs.

It did occur to me, given Arsenal and City deploying centre backs at full back in recent years, that you could do that with him. Like Gvardiol or a left sided Ben White.

It would be a cost-effective way of killing two birds with one stone - instead of having to sign both a new CB and LB, have VDV who could cover both.

It would save money for the midfield and LW this summer, while still meaning United can get a specialist LB if still required the following summer to fully replace Shaw.
 
It would be a cost-effective way of killing two birds with one stone - instead of having to sign both a new CB and LB, have VDV who could cover both.

It would save money for the midfield and LW this summer, while still meaning United can get a specialist LB if still required the following summer to fully replace Shaw.
How good is he at LB though is the question, would it be better targeting a natural one like Hall or Diouf
 
It would be a cost-effective way of killing two birds with one stone - instead of having to sign both a new CB and LB, have VDV who could cover both.

It would save money for the midfield and LW this summer, while still meaning United can get a specialist LB if still required the following summer to fully replace Shaw.
He can only play one position at a time (obviously), and he’s quite injury prone. Luke and up solving nothing when he’s on the treatment table with half of our other defenders.

Has he even played LB in the PL?
 
Transfermarkt suggests he plays left back once or twice a season for Spurs. Very much just filling in there rather than it being a position he knows.

I think people assume he'd be good there cause hes quick and he enjoys coming forward but that's not really the same thing.
 
If Liverpool enter the race, van der Ven would without a doubt turn us down to go to Liverpool.
Liverpool could end up with a back four of Frimpong, Konate, Van de Ven and Kerkez. :lol:

All the pace in the world, not two brain cells to rub together between them.
 
Liverpool could end up with a back four of Frimpong, Konate, Van de Ven and Kerkez. :lol:

All the pace in the world, not two brain cells to rub together between them.
Yeah that is so true
 
Transfermarkt suggests he plays left back once or twice a season for Spurs. Very much just filling in there rather than it being a position he knows.

I think people assume he'd be good there cause hes quick and he enjoys coming forward but that's not really the same thing.
He generally plays there for the Netherlands.
 
Highlights reel player. People remember those powerful runs and the few goals he scored. He's a god awful defender. No thanks.
 
Any ideas which games, maybe need to go and have a look at some footage of him playing there

14/05/24 - Home vs Man City - 90'

19/05/24 - Away vs Sheffield United - 90'

22/03/26 - Home vs Nottingham Forest - 45'
 
The Athletic said recently that our Data Analytics and Scouting department is now amongst best in class in PL.

Cant help think as with Baleba, Utd are looking at a player who if he was on top form this season would be much more expensive. Maybe its a case of get them in cheaper and trust in our coaching department to get to regularly hit 7-8 out of 10 performances. Just a thought.
 
The Athletic said recently that our Data Analytics and Scouting department is now amongst best in class in PL.

Cant help think as with Baleba, Utd are looking at a player who if he was on top form this season would be much more expensive. Maybe its a case of get them in cheaper and trust in our coaching department to get to regularly hit 7-8 out of 10 performances. Just a thought.
Well, the Baleba of last season was a wholly different proposition to this one. The question is whether that or this is the outlier and which version is the foreshadowing of his future potential.

If he comes here and plays like he did last season, it’ll look like great business getting him in for cheap. If he’s this season’s bad, it’ll look like a terrible pursuit.
 
Football has changed.

The era of Nemanja's and Terry's is long gone. You don't actually need defenders who can defend. You need defenders who are comfortable with the ball and can pass.

Just look at the stats and compare them to 15-20 years ago. Top 10 Prem in most completed passes, 8 out of 10 are centrebacks. VDV is in the range of Bruno Fernandes and Gabriel, with a better accuracy percentage actually. Playing for a shit team.

That, and he's fecking rapid.
Yeah, football has changed so much!

Peak Terry was almost among the top passers (both in volume and accuracy) in the league. Also, comparing the accuracy of a centre back's passing to that of a number 10 is a hilarious thing to do :lol:

GmAQuIKWoAAuKCk
 
The Athletic said recently that our Data Analytics and Scouting department is now amongst best in class in PL.

Cant help think as with Baleba, Utd are looking at a player who if he was on top form this season would be much more expensive. Maybe its a case of get them in cheaper and trust in our coaching department to get to regularly hit 7-8 out of 10 performances. Just a thought.

This defeats the entire purpose of having a half decent data analytics and scouting department

Have a good one, ignore all the data and hope that a player will do better here