Samid
Not a Mod (thank God)
Pool are a bunch of cheapskates. PSG bound?
likely neither will be here in 1/2 seasons anywayI'd love for us to offer him a contract but with Rashford and Ronaldo we don't really need him
I'd love for us to offer him a contract but with Rashford and Ronaldo we don't really need him
I'd love for us to offer him a contract but with Rashford and Ronaldo we don't really need him
There's also Lindelof who can cover for the RW position if required. Enough strength in depth right there.I'd love for us to offer him a contract but with Rashford and Ronaldo we don't really need him
OutstandingI'd love for us to offer him a contract but with Rashford and Ronaldo we don't really need him
AgreedBeen saying it for a while, PSG to replace Mbappe
Could actually work since Salah replaces the pace that Mbappe brings. Messi would have to play in a false 9 position with Neymar on the left.Been saying it for a while, PSG to replace Mbappe
Post of the dayI'd love for us to offer him a contract but with Rashford and Ronaldo we don't really need him
Boom! He has you there @VidyoyoThere's also Lindelof who can cover for the RW position if required. Enough strength in depth right there.
Im sure hel have no problem being an Mbappe replacement at PSG.Liverpool are never going to pay 400k a week. That’s bonkers even for us and we bring in a lot more money in sponsorships etc. Salah needs to understand what club he’s at and adjust his expectations. I doubt even Madrid would pay 400k a week for someone at his age. That will be reserved for the very best young players that they can get money back on later if they need too such as Mbappe or Haaland
Yep but even there I doubt they pay 400k.Im sure hel have no problem being an Mbappe replacement at PSG.
They offered Mbappe reportedly 500k with a stupid signon bonus for 2 years.Yep but even there I doubt they pay 400k.
but back to my point, he’s not (rightfully so) gonna get that at Liverpool
I can understand them offering a 21 year old Mbappe that. Salah on the other hand is coming up on the age where he starts to decline little by little. I just don’t see them offering 400k a week. I think most teams learned a financial lesson the last 2 years.They offered Mbappe reportedly 500k with a stupid signon bonus for 2 years.
Quite sure they wont have an issue throwing 400k at Salah, who is arguably the best player in the world and like for like in position. Salah probably has more than 2 years at peak left in him.
And they regretted it ever since. The football works has changedJuventus paid Aaron Ramsay £400k per week.
Salah needs to hold firm with his demands. He has earned every penny of it.
If Salah moves, he will easily get a club to pay him £400k per week. No doubt.
Salah is 28? Sadly there’s no decline for another 4/5 years and even then nobody is saying Salah signing this contract means he can’t be sold sooner than the end dateI can understand them offering a 21 year old Mbappe that. Salah on the other hand is coming up on the age where he starts to decline little by little. I just don’t see them offering 400k a week. I think most teams learned a financial lesson the last 2 years.
I see him compromising and staying at Liverpool
It does mean that he'd be next to impossible to sell though as he'd be on 400K per week and the buying club would be unwilling to match that wage if he declines. Similar to the headache we had with Sanchez and Real had with Bale.Salah is 28? Sadly there’s no decline for another 4/5 years and even then nobody is saying Salah signing this contract means he can’t be sold sooner than the end date
Age doesn't matter when its a 2 year deal. They just want Mbappe to hold on whilst Messi and Neymar are around in achieving the CL goal.I can understand them offering a 21 year old Mbappe that. Salah on the other hand is coming up on the age where he starts to decline little by little. I just don’t see them offering 400k a week. I think most teams learned a financial lesson the last 2 years.
I see him compromising and staying at Liverpool
How much will he decline at 30/31? Even then that’s 3 odd years of having the best player on the planet in your side, they’ll be paying a lot more to replace him if they do at all.It does mean that he'd be next to impossible to sell though as he'd be on 400K per week and the buying club would be unwilling to match that wage if he declines. Similar to the headache we had with Sanchez and Real had with Bale.
That being said, I think he is worth breaking their wage structure for. In addition to his on pitch ability his commercial value is huge (he's probably the most recognisable athlete in Africa by far).
I don’t think Liverpool will be half the team without Salah. The way they play doesn’t depend on one player. (Unlike Utd in 2008 with Ronaldo).Arguably the best player in the world right now, at worst a top 3 player in the world. Insane that they’re even considering letting him leave while he’s still at his best. He is the sort of player you make an exception for, regardless of your wage structure and such. Liverpool become half the team they are now if they lose Salah.
I think top left footers are a much rarer breed, as we've found out with the gaping hole in our RW over the last 7 or so years. There seems to be a million right footed forwards but a real dearth of left footers. Who are the best ones available? Raphina, Bowen? All would cost a lot and still be a noticeable down grade.Liverpool have already gotten Luiz Diaz and Jota who seem to be doing great. Liverpool may realize that cashing in on Salah at this stage would bring in more money to invest elsewhere. Yes, Salah is probably Liverpool’s best player but the style they play, you could bring anyone in Salah’s place and the team would still excel.