Eyepopper
Lowering the tone since 2006
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2006
- Messages
- 66,918
I would in me hole!
I'm assuming @Number1 is basing it on the fact we pretty much had an agreement with Morata in principle until Raiola told us Chelsea were dithering on the Lukaku deal and we pulled a Dirty Sanchez on them. Common sense would suggest that, that would then make Lukaku our first and preferred choice but common sense is few and far between on here which is why we have to suffer through stupid threads like this on a weekly basis.Source please.
We have the most fans, the most turnover (despite not being at our best footballing wise)One of the biggest clubs in the world! On topic, morata has struggled at Chelsea but I’m sure he will come good. I wouldn’t swap him for lukaku though.
All the bids to Real Madrid in the summer? Contrary to belief it wasn’t a smoke screen to get Lukaku, I’m sure Manchester United and powerful men like Ed Woodward, have better things to do than waste their own time/agents time/the clubs time/Jose’s time/Real Madrid’s time/the clubs money (lawyers/clubs representatives + any other fees) and bid serious money (3 separate bids that we know about, highest being £70m) for a player they have no real interest in getting.Source please.
There’s no doubt we were in for morata. Was he first or second choice? Maybe we will never know. Maybe we were under the impression rom was going Chelsea so we focused on morata or maybe real were being difficult to deal with so we switched our focus to lukaku.All the bids to Real Madrid in the summer? Contrary to belief it wasn’t a smoke screen to get Lukaku, I’m sure Manchester United and powerful men like Ed Woodward, have better things to do than waste their own time/agents time/the clubs time/Jose’s time/Real Madrid’s time/the clubs money (lawyers/clubs representatives + any other fees) and bid serious money (3 separate bids that we know about, highest being £70m) for players they have no real interest in getting.
So you've no proof he was first choice, other than your assumption. We've no real idea if he was or wasn't. The speed at which we pulled out of bidding for Morata and then signed Lukaku for more than Real wanted for Morata, puts paid to thoughts of him being first choice for me.All the bids to Real Madrid in the summer? Contrary to belief it wasn’t a smoke screen to get Lukaku, I’m sure Manchester United and powerful men like Ed Woodward, have better things to do than waste their own time/agents time/the clubs time/Jose’s time/Real Madrid’s time/the clubs money (lawyers/clubs representatives + any other fees) and bid serious money (3 separate bids that we know about, highest being £70m) for a player they have no real interest in getting.
So you were perfectly fine when we sold Japp Stam?
His doors are bigger, too.Lukaku is the better player with the higher ceiling.
Why do we need to imagine it? We've already seen him play for Real Madrid.He’s pretty much crumbled at Chelsea. He doesn’t look mentally strong enough.
Imagine him at the biggest club in the world?
How did it turn out there?Why do we need to imagine it? We've already seen him play for Real Madrid.
Pretty good summary I reckon.The difference between the two is not as big as the reactions above indicate. Both started well, both have since stagnated massively and been deemed flops by the general public, both have struggled for goals in the Premier League. However, one has played in the PL for a long time, the other in his first season - one playing for a club in good spirits and one seemingly in turmoil, Conte acting like a fool.
It’s 50/50 for me, Morata is a better and smarter player, but with doubts to his physical and mental side - will he stay here «forever»? Lukaku is a very limited, technical player - but a very strong and loyal one, I believe. Scores goals, but not nearly enough for me.
To conclude, I don’t want any of them. Would Lukaku start every game for City, Bayern, PSG and Real? Hell no.
Username checks out.Why do we need to imagine it? We've already seen him play for Real Madrid.
Chelsea had Diego Costa last season and They won the league. He was no better than Lukaku and older.Obviously very few people are going to pick Morata now that he's been out injured for a while and no-one knows when he'll be back, and his form prior to the injury was poor.
Two poor options. An elite club aspiring to win league/CL should have someone better.
Morata have an advantage over Lukaku. He is more capable connecting with the other players, make the plays more fluids and has more mobility. But he also has a hugue problem, his lack of consistence.Obviously very few people are going to pick Morata now that he's been out injured for a while and no-one knows when he'll be back, and his form prior to the injury was poor.
Two poor options. An elite club aspiring to win league/CL should have someone better.
I wonder why you never asked yourself why Jose decided on Lukaku over Morata in the summer and also did you not ask yourself if you really should make this thread?First of all i know this probably would never happen, but just after a deal involving 2 of England's biggest clubs and 2 great players (Sanchez and Mkhitaryan) in a straight swap deal, if Chelsea proposed a similar deal in the summer for a straight swap Morata for Lukaku would you take it? Would Mourinho take it?
I think it's fair to say Morata hasn't settled well at Chelsea, only showed glimpses of his talent, but was Jose Mourihno's first choice striker in the summer. Similar story with Lukaku, was Chelsea's first choice target and whilst his goal ratio is good this season he's had his critics.
So yeah Morata for Lukaku straight swap would you take it?
Chelsea had Diego Costa last season and They won the league. He was no better than Lukaku and older.