Morgan Rogers

All the media stories are based on little to nothing, the only variable is Do United make CL, if so does the player that United want wish to come to United just like last year, Mbeumo, Cunha and Sesko all wanted to come to United, I’m not so sure Anderson or Tonali really do?
I agree, it’s why I have very little interest in such stories.

There are some facts we know.

Casimero is leaving.
United will buy a midfielder.

That are some things that are likely.
Forest sell Anderson
Newcastle need to sell someone - but there are 4-5 players who could fetch >£50m
United sell Ugarte
United buy a second midfielder

But there are a whole lot of unknowns, difficult to make any predictions - but that’s not to say you shouldn’t!
 
I have a feeling and it’s only a feeling that we can’t get or do not wish to ruin the Squad morale with a £300-350k per week new midfielder and that Wilcox and his cronies are looking for three, yes three, not two midfielders that are all under £65m.

I believe the club are actively now looking at this so they can make Rogers or Palmer our marquee move, simply because they are both rumoured to be a huge United fans.

The club probably has a £250m budget maximum provided they reach CL and recoup £100m in player sales. I Genuinely think we are playing the waiting game with multiple midfielders?

For example if West Ham Go down, United might think we can get Mateus Fernandes for maybe £30-35m as he has a relegation release clause in his contract, if Spurs go down we might pivot to pick up Archie Gray Cheap. Ugarte and Casemiro are both definitely going.

United are not buying Elliot Anderson for £80-110m, they are not buying Tonali for £80-100m with his wage request of £300k per week.

They might well look at Wharton if he’s available for £60-65m and £150k per week wages, they may look at Carlos Baleba if he’s available at £60m and £100k per week, they might look at Stiller for £50m and £125k per week.

I genuinely see the midfield overhaul looking more like Carlos Baleba, Mateus Fernandes and Joao Gomes or Camavinga with the total spend being more frugal like
£145-155m with combined wages being £375,000 per week rather than £500,000 per week of Casemiro and Ugarte.

If you look at the yearly accounts and providing we get £25m for Ugarte then that transfer becomes neutral as we still probably owe PSG £25m on the player.

So instead of costing United £18.5m for Ugarte with wages and transfer fees every season this becomes neutral and then when you factor in Casemiro £17.5m wages savings for next season you have a saving yearly of £36m in the midfield area.


Signing Mateus Fernandes at £35m, Stiller at £50m and Baleba £65m that’s £150m on transfer fees over 5 years which is £30m per year in transfers on the books and then an added £17.5m per year on wages, if you also factor in that Christian Eriksen was never truly replaced and his wages were £180,000 per week, then the club is finally trying to purchase a sensible midfield rebuild which actually has financial room for one more marquee Player later in the winter transfer window!

Now for Morgan Rogers, United need more physicality, a left winger, a true understudy to Bruno and England’s next talisman, the two choices are Palmer and Rogers, losing out on Anderson will be spun that he doesn’t offer enough Goals and Assists for a highly inflated value of £100m but Morgan Rogers does and he will be viewed as a direct replacement for Marcus Rashford who, providing is sold for £26m would represent 100% profit and with his huge wages of £16-17m per year off the books, this would a huge create financial opportunity.

United will want one marquee English transfer to join, especially if they are returning to the Champions League!

Morgan Rogers might cost £100m or £20m per year in transfer fees and £10m per year in wages that transfer financials costs would be completely covered by Marcus Rashford leaving in the summer.

I would hazard a guess that Cole Palmer at £125m and £250k wages per week would also be covered by Rashford’s departure.

United are not going to act this summer in an obvious way but a far more opportunistic way.

If Forest go down then they can't get 100million for Anderson either. Anderson wouldn't want to stay in the Championship and will go on a strike to leave dropping his price to about 65 million depending on his England performances.

I've not been impressed with Tuchel's England management so I don't see players like Anderson & Rogers having a great tournament and for their prices to rise.

I don't think Anderson is going to get Casemiro wages. If City pay that then fine he isn't that good. Casemiro is one of the best CDM of all time after his treble CL wins for Madrid so we overpaid him and he has done well here but the club clearly still wants to clear out its cheque book of overpaying wages but not transfer fees.

We are not a poor club, we made 3x 65 mil type transfers last year + Lammens & if we qualify for the Champions League then we can get 4x 65 mil type transfers easily.

There's no reason for Anderson to come and have a higher wage than Mbeumo, Cunha, Sesko - he is at or around that level in terms of capability.

The weirdest thing for me though is replacing Rodri with Anderson basically doesn't make sense. It's like trying to stick Gerrard in to one position and making him play like Busquets. City will have to severely alter their formation if they replace Rodri with Anderson because Anderson is a player at his best is all around the pitch. Replacing Bernado Silva with Anderson does make more sense because Bernado Silva has been playing deeper as a partner to Rodri at times.

As you said - There are a lot of quality midfielders that are going to get relegated. In my opinion we have targeted to sign one CM of very high value (Anderson, Tonali, Baleba etc) to target Casemiro's position & are likely in talks now but will look at the relegated clubs or clubs from abroad to target a replacement for Ugarte which would be much cheaper.

This leaves us with enough money looking for both a LB and a LW.

To be honest I trust INEOS's recruitment now to the point I'm sure they are going to get it 75% of it right. Even though I do not think Rogers fits our system - if Ineos see something in him worth buying then they probably understand football more than we do.
 
If Forest go down then they can't get 100million for Anderson either. Anderson wouldn't want to stay in the Championship and will go on a strike to leave dropping his price to about 65 million depending on his England performances.

I've not been impressed with Tuchel's England management so I don't see players like Anderson & Rogers having a great tournament and for their prices to rise.

I don't think Anderson is going to get Casemiro wages. If City pay that then fine he isn't that good. Casemiro is one of the best CDM of all time after his treble CL wins for Madrid so we overpaid him and he has done well here but the club clearly still wants to clear out its cheque book of overpaying wages but not transfer fees.

We are not a poor club, we made 3x 65 mil type transfers last year + Lammens & if we qualify for the Champions League then we can get 4x 65 mil type transfers easily.

There's no reason for Anderson to come and have a higher wage than Mbeumo, Cunha, Sesko - he is at or around that level in terms of capability.

The weirdest thing for me though is replacing Rodri with Anderson basically doesn't make sense. It's like trying to stick Gerrard in to one position and making him play like Busquets. City will have to severely alter their formation if they replace Rodri with Anderson because Anderson is a player at his best is all around the pitch. Replacing Bernado Silva with Anderson does make more sense because Bernado Silva has been playing deeper as a partner to Rodri at times.

As you said - There are a lot of quality midfielders that are going to get relegated. In my opinion we have targeted to sign one CM of very high value (Anderson, Tonali, Baleba etc) to target Casemiro's position & are likely in talks now but will look at the relegated clubs or clubs from abroad to target a replacement for Ugarte which would be much cheaper.

This leaves us with enough money looking for both a LB and a LW.

To be honest I trust INEOS's recruitment now to the point I'm sure they are going to get it 75% of it right. Even though I do not think Rogers fits our system - if Ineos see something in him worth buying then they probably understand football more than we do.
Tonali was linked as Rodri replacement for city. Anderson for Bernardo Silva. As you said, it's a utter waste of Anderson's talent to play him as a 6.
 
This is just agent/media driven nonsense. Include United to generate clicks and try to drum up some interest.

I am entirely certain we are not signing Rogers.
 
£100m man Rogers had more possession losses last night (9) than completed passes (8) despite playing 88 minutes.

Rogers vs Chelsea earlier this season. Surprisingly this isn't a fail comp.



Where are you getting that old-school view fbref data from?
This one was just from Reddit, but you can still see the old versions by using Internet Archive (the Firefox/Chrome extension 'Resurrect Pages' makes it easy). Obviously they stop in Jan 2026.
 
This is just agent/media driven nonsense. Include United to generate clicks and try to drum up some interest.

I am entirely certain we are not signing Rogers.
I certainly hope so, and especially not at that reported price.
 
He wasn't great on loan to Blackpool, which is fair...we were a shambles, but his family and entourage were really difficult to deal with. How many free tickets in corporate (at Blackpool where capacity is around 200), can his aunties brothers sisters friends cat be a mascot, why wasn't my Morgan given the sponsors MOTM...etc.

I'm sure that's the case for many young players but hopefully he has a more professional set up around him if he got a move to United.
 
Read the next two sentences then.
You still led with "resale value" in your argument, and the next 2 sentences doesn't not account for the time a 24 yo or a 21 yo needs to develop to get to the desired level (Rogers is maybe in better position due to his PL experience), again I still think getting younger players is usually the better choice but at times, 70m Mbeumo could be the superior choice than 100m Rogers.
 
You still led with "resale value" in your argument, and the next 2 sentences doesn't not account for the time a 24 yo or a 21 yo needs to develop to get to the desired level (Rogers is maybe in better position due to his PL experience), again I still think getting younger players is usually the better choice but at times, 70m Mbeumo could be the superior choice than 100m Rogers.


You are right. So if we were not talking about Rogers, but someone else, that would be an excellent argument.

But in this case, where the player has played regulary for a top six PL-side for a few years, have more than 1 000 min in the CL and is an England international with 13 games for England you would probably think he could contribute from day one.
 
He's an interesting option and Villa could get 80 million for him if he has a good world cup. He played 10 games for England last year so it seems likely that Tuchel will give him a fair bit of playing time in the tournament.
 
Good player. I do like him but I’m sceptical about whether he will truly step up from Villa to one of the club’s he’s being touted to join.

I feel like signing him with the left wing in mind makes no sense too. A bit similar to Arsenal signing Eze as their left wing upgrade when that’s not where he’s best utilised in the slightest.

Signing Rogers for £80m when we have Bruno is terrible business and not clever squad planning. A bit similar to when we signed Mount with no clear pathway into the starting eleven.
 
Based on the comments in here, he’s massively underrated. He’s absolutely class in most departments, however he’s just not what we need right now. Our team is crying out for proper central midfielders and a completely different in attack (somebody pacey and able to beat a man). Rodgers would be a dream Bruno replacement but for the money Villa will demand it’s not the right timing for us.
 
Anytime I watch him he seems like a player that plays for himself rather than his team. No thanks.
 
Based on the comments in here, he’s massively underrated. He’s absolutely class in most departments, however he’s just not what we need right now. Our team is crying out for proper central midfielders and a completely different in attack (somebody pacey and able to beat a man). Rodgers would be a dream Bruno replacement but for the money Villa will demand it’s not the right timing for us.

I've seen some strange posts in this thread, but suggesting hes a dream Bruno replacement takes the cake.
 
I'm not buying these links at all. He's an attacking player, we don't need him when we have Bruno in his position, it would be a very inefficient way to spend limited funds. He's also strikes me as a goalscorer ala Dele Alli than a creative player and passer, he's not the kind of 10 I like.

We need proper, deep lying midfielders.
 
We are going nowhere fast if our transfer tactics are this uninspired obsession with "Prem proven" players at extortionate prices.

Cunha and Mbeumo were genuinely some of the best in the league, Rogers, Wharton and Tonali are not.

Can we please look to bring in proper ball players that can control, dictate and unlock defences with some creativity and magic. I want to see us dominate and be fun to watch.
 
I have a feeling and it’s only a feeling that we can’t get or do not wish to ruin the Squad morale with a £300-350k per week new midfielder and that Wilcox and his cronies are looking for three, yes three, not two midfielders that are all under £65m.

I believe the club are actively now looking at this so they can make Rogers or Palmer our marquee move, simply because they are both rumoured to be a huge United fans.

The club probably has a £250m budget maximum provided they reach CL and recoup £100m in player sales. I Genuinely think we are playing the waiting game with multiple midfielders?

For example if West Ham Go down, United might think we can get Mateus Fernandes for maybe £30-35m as he has a relegation release clause in his contract, if Spurs go down we might pivot to pick up Archie Gray Cheap. Ugarte and Casemiro are both definitely going.

United are not buying Elliot Anderson for £80-110m, they are not buying Tonali for £80-100m with his wage request of £300k per week.

They might well look at Wharton if he’s available for £60-65m and £150k per week wages, they may look at Carlos Baleba if he’s available at £60m and £100k per week, they might look at Stiller for £50m and £125k per week.

I genuinely see the midfield overhaul looking more like Carlos Baleba, Mateus Fernandes and Joao Gomes or Camavinga with the total spend being more frugal like
£145-155m with combined wages being £375,000 per week rather than £500,000 per week of Casemiro and Ugarte.

If you look at the yearly accounts and providing we get £25m for Ugarte then that transfer becomes neutral as we still probably owe PSG £25m on the player.

So instead of costing United £18.5m for Ugarte with wages and transfer fees every season this becomes neutral and then when you factor in Casemiro £17.5m wages savings for next season you have a saving yearly of £36m in the midfield area.


Signing Mateus Fernandes at £35m, Stiller at £50m and Baleba £65m that’s £150m on transfer fees over 5 years which is £30m per year in transfers on the books and then an added £17.5m per year on wages, if you also factor in that Christian Eriksen was never truly replaced and his wages were £180,000 per week, then the club is finally trying to purchase a sensible midfield rebuild which actually has financial room for one more marquee Player later in the winter transfer window!

Now for Morgan Rogers, United need more physicality, a left winger, a true understudy to Bruno and England’s next talisman, the two choices are Palmer and Rogers, losing out on Anderson will be spun that he doesn’t offer enough Goals and Assists for a highly inflated value of £100m but Morgan Rogers does and he will be viewed as a direct replacement for Marcus Rashford who, providing is sold for £26m would represent 100% profit and with his huge wages of £16-17m per year off the books, this would a huge create financial opportunity.

United will want one marquee English transfer to join, especially if they are returning to the Champions League!

Morgan Rogers might cost £100m or £20m per year in transfer fees and £10m per year in wages that transfer financials costs would be completely covered by Marcus Rashford leaving in the summer.

I would hazard a guess that Cole Palmer at £125m and £250k wages per week would also be covered by Rashford’s departure.

United are not going to act this summer in an obvious way but a far more opportunistic way.

Yawn..

accountantball
 
I certainly hope so, and especially not at that reported price.
Whenever these sources pop up they should be noted and banned from here as anyone with any sense would know it is absolute bollocks!
 
You are right. So if we were not talking about Rogers, but someone else, that would be an excellent argument.

But in this case, where the player has played regulary for a top six PL-side for a few years, have more than 1 000 min in the CL and is an England international with 13 games for England you would probably think he could contribute from day one.
Agreed, Rogers is definitely in a bracket of the quality PL players who you would expect to perform from day 1, and is only 24 yo, I don't like him as a LW, but regardless of what position our club is thinking about for Rogers, he is certainly an excellent player, don't think he is worth 80m or 100m though.
 
If Forest go down then they can't get 100million for Anderson either. Anderson wouldn't want to stay in the Championship and will go on a strike to leave dropping his price to about 65 million depending on his England performances.

I've not been impressed with Tuchel's England management so I don't see players like Anderson & Rogers having a great tournament and for their prices to rise.

I don't think Anderson is going to get Casemiro wages. If City pay that then fine he isn't that good. Casemiro is one of the best CDM of all time after his treble CL wins for Madrid so we overpaid him and he has done well here but the club clearly still wants to clear out its cheque book of overpaying wages but not transfer fees.

We are not a poor club, we made 3x 65 mil type transfers last year + Lammens & if we qualify for the Champions League then we can get 4x 65 mil type transfers easily.

There's no reason for Anderson to come and have a higher wage than Mbeumo, Cunha, Sesko - he is at or around that level in terms of capability.

The weirdest thing for me though is replacing Rodri with Anderson basically doesn't make sense. It's like trying to stick Gerrard in to one position and making him play like Busquets. City will have to severely alter their formation if they replace Rodri with Anderson because Anderson is a player at his best is all around the pitch. Replacing Bernado Silva with Anderson does make more sense because Bernado Silva has been playing deeper as a partner to Rodri at times.

As you said - There are a lot of quality midfielders that are going to get relegated. In my opinion we have targeted to sign one CM of very high value (Anderson, Tonali, Baleba etc) to target Casemiro's position & are likely in talks now but will look at the relegated clubs or clubs from abroad to target a replacement for Ugarte which would be much cheaper.

This leaves us with enough money looking for both a LB and a LW.

To be honest I trust INEOS's recruitment now to the point I'm sure they are going to get it 75% of it right. Even though I do not think Rogers fits our system - if Ineos see something in him worth buying then they probably understand football more than we do.
That isn't how things work.
Transfers are paid over a period of time, and rarely ever are a lump sum up front.
What you buy 2 seasons ago can affect how much you can spend going forward. Last season the club took up a line of credit to afford spending so much. We'll be able to spend a fair lot in the summer, but it isn't as straight forward as you make it seem.
 
£100m man Rogers had more possession losses last night (9) than completed passes (8) despite playing 88 minutes.

Rogers vs Chelsea earlier this season. Surprisingly this isn't a fail comp.


I might have said this before. But some games I watch Rogers and the player he best reminds me of is Kaka. Other times I think he’s clearly the worst player on the pitch and doesn’t belong at this level.

Strange player, can’t make my mind up on him. I think Emery uses him very well, and I think it would be a big mistake for him to leave Villa.
 
It would be such a United move to sign another 10 and ignore midfield
 
Based on the comments in here, he’s massively underrated. He’s absolutely class in most departments, however he’s just not what we need right now. Our team is crying out for proper central midfielders and a completely different in attack (somebody pacey and able to beat a man). Rodgers would be a dream Bruno replacement but for the money Villa will demand it’s not the right timing for us.

It would be such a United move to sign another 10 and ignore midfield

Really don’t understand this logic that just because we are linked with a versatile forward means we’re neglecting the CM position, A position might I add has been drummed down our throats since last summer that this summer it will be a priority position, along with a few other positions.

Any other time we’re complaining that we “cant do multiple deals at once”

Yes we’re prioritising a midfielder but that doesn’t mean we can’t look elsewhere at other positions simultaneously.
 
We don’t need to be just “prioritising a midfielder”, though. We need two new ones as a bare minimum. Three, probably.

Two of those have to be starting XI worthy. The third a rotational option. We should be prioritising that over a pseudo winger who scores a couple ridiculous goals a season.
 
Would be an 80m mistake. Cunha is miles better and he’s above him in ball carrying and dribbles etc. don’t need him
 
Really don’t understand this logic that just because we are linked with a versatile forward means we’re neglecting the CM position, A position might I add has been drummed down our throats since last summer that this summer it will be a priority position, along with a few other positions.

Any other time we’re complaining that we “cant do multiple deals at once”

Yes we’re prioritising a midfielder but that doesn’t mean we can’t look elsewhere at other positions simultaneously.
That's absolutely fine, as long as getting him doesn't mean we don't get at least 2 new midfielders
 
Would be an 80m mistake. Cunha is miles better and he’s above him in ball carrying and dribbles etc. don’t need him
Yet teams like City have incredible depth and we look like ass whenever we have an injury, i think having multiple talented players in one position is totally fine.

We’re gonna be in an extra comp next season if all things go to plan, we will need Rogers if we want to win the league again
 
If Forest go down then they can't get 100million for Anderson either. Anderson wouldn't want to stay in the Championship and will go on a strike to leave dropping his price to about 65 million depending on his England performances.

I've not been impressed with Tuchel's England management so I don't see players like Anderson & Rogers having a great tournament and for their prices to rise.

I don't think Anderson is going to get Casemiro wages. If City pay that then fine he isn't that good. Casemiro is one of the best CDM of all time after his treble CL wins for Madrid so we overpaid him and he has done well here but the club clearly still wants to clear out its cheque book of overpaying wages but not transfer fees.

We are not a poor club, we made 3x 65 mil type transfers last year + Lammens & if we qualify for the Champions League then we can get 4x 65 mil type transfers easily.

There's no reason for Anderson to come and have a higher wage than Mbeumo, Cunha, Sesko - he is at or around that level in terms of capability.

The weirdest thing for me though is replacing Rodri with Anderson basically doesn't make sense. It's like trying to stick Gerrard in to one position and making him play like Busquets. City will have to severely alter their formation if they replace Rodri with Anderson because Anderson is a player at his best is all around the pitch. Replacing Bernado Silva with Anderson does make more sense because Bernado Silva has been playing deeper as a partner to Rodri at times.

As you said - There are a lot of quality midfielders that are going to get relegated. In my opinion we have targeted to sign one CM of very high value (Anderson, Tonali, Baleba etc) to target Casemiro's position & are likely in talks now but will look at the relegated clubs or clubs from abroad to target a replacement for Ugarte which would be much cheaper.

This leaves us with enough money looking for both a LB and a LW.

To be honest I trust INEOS's recruitment now to the point I'm sure they are going to get it 75% of it right. Even though I do not think Rogers fits our system - if Ineos see something in him worth buying then they probably understand football more than we do.
Solid assessment especially with Elliot Anderson, why is he a £100m player and Alex Scott is £40-50m, I see very little difference in both players and would actually prefer Alex Scott.

They are both about 5’10/11 both mobile, both need more goals and assists but both have elite potential, I’m not sure £100m is worth elite potential?
 
Yet teams like City have incredible depth and we look like ass whenever we have an injury, i think having multiple talented players in one position is totally fine.

We’re gonna be in an extra comp next season if all things go to plan, we will need Rogers if we want to win the league again
We won’t need him to win the league. What we need is a very well balanced and functioning midfield that will allow our current attack to flourish even more. Once that’s sorted then we can start looking at squad depth for each position.
 
Morgan Rogers to "win us the league" :lol:, wouldn't even make the starting XI.

It is proper grim when a player like Rogers is commanding a valuation of £80-100m.
 
Last edited:
Villa can dream but can not see any top club offer 80m for him.
He is good but not sure he even starts for any of the big clubs.
 
Rogers won't be signed to replace Bruno. Rogers is a LM/LAM which is why many people say he is too similar to Cunha for us to sign.

By the way, Rogers has similar stats to Diomande's current season for 2 seasons now & I'm not sure how that's a purple patch.

Rogers is performing less because Aston Villa has gone downhill after January, its not just because he is average in a well performing team.

He has 18 g/a PL last season, 6 in 12 CL games, 13 this season with some more games to go. Diomande sits at 15 in the Bundesliga.

I feel like a lot of English players get called average when they perform to more flashy players out of the Premier league. They usually cost us the same amount because the price is represented mostly by the club that's interested. For example the signing of Sesko wasn't much different to signing Mbeumo or Cunha.
It's the same thing that happened with Declan Rice and many calling him overrated at a time we could have got him around 60million.

Rogers doesn't currently suit our tactics - if we hadn't signed Cunha - I would have all been up for signing Rogers instead and considering his age and output might have had a higher ceiling. But we don't need him now.

We need Amad like player on the left.

Diomande is a player to me who looks better on the right than the left because he is harder to read on the right. He has the ability to take a man on the outside and on the inside on the right whilst on the left he is much more likely to cut inside. He is much more predictable.

I notice this in players like Semenyo & even Dorgu. I find them better players when they play on the side of their stronger foot.

Right footed right wingers that can cut in and cut out are better than left footed RW's that can only cut in. With all due respect to Mbeumo sometimes as a RW his game looks a bit predictable and the positions he wants to move in to.
Hey… who knew. You’re right, They get found out every time, Rashford, Garnacho, Antony.. “oh, I wonder what he’s gonna try, here”?
 
With 5 years left on his contract Rogers would really have to kick off at Villa and put in a transfer request and go on strike so I don’t see anything in this for this summer, it may be a ruse from Rogers agent for an improved deal seeing as he’s become Villa’s best player.

If as expected Casemiro and Ugarte both go then we’ll bring in three midfielders and depending on whether Dorgu is going to be a left back or left winger we’ll bring someone in to play the position Dorgu isn’t playing so most likely a left back as Dorgu offers a different threat to Cunha.
 
Seems quite a few fans on here are falling in the classical trap of overrating their own players.

The notion he wouldn't start for you is hilarious.
 
Seems quite a few fans on here are falling in the classical trap of overrating their own players.

The notion he wouldn't start for you is hilarious.
Who does he clearly start over?

Matheus Cunha who has been a key performer in all of our biggest wins this season, and has 1 less goal than Rogers in 800 less minutes, or Bruno Fernandes who is arguably the best player in the league?
 
Seems quite a few fans on here are falling in the classical trap of overrating their own players.

The notion he wouldn't start for you is hilarious.

I don’t think it’s hilarious, even though I really rate him. The likes of Kamara and Tielemens would certainly start for us in midfield, but in a typical 4-2-3-1, it’s 50-50 for Rogers.

I think Cunha is fantastic and is capable of the sublime. He isn’t starting over Bruno in the 10, and he isn’t moving to the right hand side to play over Mbeumo.

He would be a fantastic option to have to rotate in those two former positions, but he isn’t a guaranteed starter.

The fact there were signs we might have something serious happening with Dorgu as an attacker; means the priority is clearly deeper in midfield.
 
Seems quite a few fans on here are falling in the classical trap of overrating their own players.
Yeah, it's you.
The notion he wouldn't start for you is hilarious.
Doesn't regularly start over Bruno, Cunha or Mbeumo. Dealers choice on Amad. Mount fixture dependent.

So minimum 3 that start over him - and we're still hopefully looking for an actual left winger (a proper one, not Morgan Rogers)