One of those fat macho alcoholic types that needs 'the lads' around them in the pub every day to feel significant. Not surprising he's waking up in 2018 not only with a sore head but with financial nightmares, marriage nightmares and no one to listen to his old Liverpool hardman stories now that his 'mates' have moved on since the free pints on Razor days are over.
Neil Ruddock 'deliberately broke Andy Cole's legs'
- Thread starter dbryan
- Start date
As far as I'm concerned Ruddock was little better than a Sunday League Pub player.
I don’t care whether he played as a pro. He was an overweight unfit animal then and is now an even more obese disgusting animal.
Or when he scored that 3-3 equalizer at Anfield,I was raging after that.
Well they called him Razor for a reason! Am I right lads!!??
What a cnut. Cole has had more winners medals than Ruddock has hot dinners, and that takes a hell of a lot.
What a cnut. Cole has had more winners medals than Ruddock has hot dinners, and that takes a hell of a lot.
You sure about that,look at the size of him,the boy likes food like
This was from 8 years ago, why is it a story again now?
Collymore in his autobiography relayed one story where Ruddock was training on a treadmill, the coach left, he got off, and started eating some junk food instead.
When he clocked the coach coming back in, he splashed some wateron his forehead, got back on the treadmill, and the coach sees this and says "top professional"
Probably not laughing when he got booted out of Liverpool for being massively out of shape, and ending up at Swindon, where I remember he was so fat they had to make special XXXXXX shorts!
When he clocked the coach coming back in, he splashed some wateron his forehead, got back on the treadmill, and the coach sees this and says "top professional"
Probably not laughing when he got booted out of Liverpool for being massively out of shape, and ending up at Swindon, where I remember he was so fat they had to make special XXXXXX shorts!
That's the most eloquent, accurate summary of Neil Ruddock I've ever seen. 110% accurate, bravo.
In fairness, he played in the era just before wages got to the incredible levels.
Seems a bit of a thicky as well, so probably didn't make great decisions and was rinsed by his "people"
Keane's challenge on Haaland looked much worse that it actually was, and it has become one the biggest myths in the game that his career came to an end because of it.
Fat irrelevant skint cnut
You just reminded me that a poster here mentioned going up to Sheringham looking for an autograph when he was a kid only to be asked words to the effect of "What sort of name is that? You need a proper English name."
Sheringham is a twat. I saw him push in front of a taxi queue outside of a club and utter the immortal words "do you know who I am?"
Andy Cole is a bit of a sensitive guy to really give a shit about a handshake but Tedward is a bellend.
Despicable act by a despicable human whom was a shit player. I hope Cole sues him to add to his financial woes.
This forum is obsessed with racism. Absolutely obsessed. How in God's name do you conclude racism out of that?
You've got 2 guys in Ruddock and Sheringham who are outgoing cocky and arrogant and Cole who is quiet and introverted. It's as obvious a personality clash as you will see, but your first thought is "two white guys, one black guy, must be racist".
Jesus wept.
Ruddock has always been a poor excuse for a mouth breathing shit eater.
Swap Ruddock with Steve Bruce and Cole with Fowler and imagine the furore in the media.
this is old news.
but yeah Ruddock is a cnut. and a pathetic excuse to assault a fellow footballer
Sheringham was a flash, big time charlie twat
but yeah Ruddock is a cnut. and a pathetic excuse to assault a fellow footballer
Sheringham was a flash, big time charlie twat
Sheringham and his mates got Matty Etherington into gambling and then basically took him for everything he had.
cnut
Prick.
Spot on, this injury happened before Sheringham and Cole had even had their issue. Ruddock is basically justifying his dirty fat twat antics.
Andy Cole fell out with Teddy before either of them signed for United, when Andy Cole was making his England debut in 1995.
I like Ruddock, he's a bit of a nutcase and a bit funny. Love seeing him on League of their own. But make no mistake. If you're calling him scum or Whatever, then you have to say the exact same thing for Roy Keane who did the same. Otherwise it's just hypocritical.
Cnut.
Whose legs did Keane break?
Agree. Although Roy Keane isn't boasting about it 20 years on.
Wanker.
This. Our own (ex) player did it, but the fans look the other way. Both actions were scummy for me.
Everyone thought it was hilarious when the Nevilles kicked lumps out of JA Reyes. The outrage here is very hypocritical.
I think fans (and indeed players) see a big difference between deliberately hurting a player and deliberately injuring a player. Maybe it's a stupid distinction but it exists.
If he had just said he loved kicking Cole I doubt anyone would care. It's the suggestion that actually breaking Cole's legs was a deliberate choice that gets a reaction.
I don't recall Keane deliberately breaking player's legs?
Utter pish. Explain to me how you do a leg-breaker tackle and then explain how you temper it to make it just one that hurts a bit.
I bet he didn t really do it on purpose and he s just talking shi7 about it.
Really? What about Haaland? He litterly said "Take that you pr*ck after the tackle.
I did say it was a stupid distinction tbf but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
In reality most leg breaker tackles aren't certain to break someone's legs. They're dangerous tackles that carry a risk of breaking someone's leg. Sometimes the player getting tackled gets lucky, sometimes they don't. The tackle remains the same so it's not a case of tempering it exactly.
The point is intent. I think it's a reality that a lot of players make dangerous tackles with the intent to hurt, intimidate or bully their opponent out of a game. I also think most footballers would see a difference between that intention and the intention to deliberately break their leg, thus putting them out for months or longer. That would remain the case even if the offending tackle was exactly the same.
It doesn't mean they'd be okay with the former, just that they'd see the latter as a greater offence because their opponent actively wanted the worst possible outcome.
Waste of cum, mother should have swallowed him. cnut.