Carrick or Iraola for me. I like what Carrick's done so far in general, and he's a really admirable, calming character to lead our club. He manages the media well and transmits quiet authority. That being said, Middlesbrough fans' criticisms of him seem to faintly ring true based on the last performance against West Ham. I don't want to be reactive based on one substandard result after four great ones, but there were warning signs of Ten Hag and Amorim very early on that ended up becoming massively amplified, so slight alarm bells about Carrick are worth some exploration.
Here are some of the criticisms I saw -
- Chooses an inexperienced coaching team - one of the criticisms but countered massively with Steve Holland's inclusion
- Lack of in-game management - tactical tweaks really helped in most, if not all, of the games so far so not so sure on this one
- Makes subs too late - arguably last game against West Ham confirmed that this might be an issue
- Can be a bit negative tactically - I would say the balance has largely been good and we needed to get more solid, but this seems a fair criticism in the last match
- Struggles to form a plan B - potentially this might be true. We don't know yet
- Starts well but loses steam - not enough data on this
My sense is that a lot of Carrick's weaknesses are made up by Holland's strengths. Yet his strengths are arguably Holland's weaknesses - understated charisma, close connection to the players and so on.
I feel like a good backroom team is equally, if not more important than a strong head coach. Carrick seems to fit in well with everything. But Iraola shows signs of this too, and may have more about him. From what I know, Iraola only took one person with him from Vallecano - Pablo de la Torre, the sports scientist. He was going to take Inigo Perez but he couldn't get a work permit and is now the Rayo manager. This shows adaptability and ability to work within a club led structure.
Maybe Woodgate and Carrick go and Iraola comes in with de la Torre and maybe some new club picks. Maybe we get some of the best coaches in their respective areas in the world and dispel the jobs for the mates notion.
Like Carrick, I also really admire Iraola's character. He doesn't moan or blame others. He's fairly circumspect and calm. He won't meltdown and make it all about himself like Amorim. He's not super engaging or charming but he's a good persona. The type of person we can be proud of as the figurehead of our club, I feel. And also, he's out of contract at the end of the season.
I'd be happy with either, from what I currently know. I probably lean more to Iraola, but ultimately what has to work is the fit and overall chemistry of the coaching staff. We'll learn a lot about Carrick over the coming weeks and the job is very much his to lose. It makes sense to loosely court Iraola too and really get a sense of him and how he works.