This is the part that makes the most sense. I believe that the decision is based on cash because restructuring the other players transform non guaranteed money into paid cash. If the owner doesn't want to pay then cutting or trading the player are the only options. Which is why I questioned the tweet, I highly doubt that it's about signing rookies.I don't disagree that cutting him was a choice that Giants made, but the guy cribbing said they had only shit ones. I actually do not know either Williams or Golladay at all, but the way he said it made me think that by taking the difficult decision to cut Bradberry even though he's a Pro Bowl candidate, the Giants recoup most of the cash. I do understand it a bit better now that you have explained it though, Thank you.