mu4c_20le
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2013
- Messages
- 43,417
He's on the decline. Come on, we are not that desperate.
Tuchel isn’t to be fairIt would be hilarious if Matic left and we went and signed Kante from Chelsea. The mere fact that Chelsea are apparently happy for him to leave tells you everything
No, Kante has not been consistent and outside of a couple of great CL performances in 2021 has been poor and inconsistent. It's just not reported so people just assume he is great based off his past reputation and name.That last sentence, don’t be ridiculous. I’m going to assume it’s a joke?
If we sign Kante for name recognition value, then obviously nothing has changed with the club's philosophy and we will continue to fail. I'm fairly hopeful that they've finally realised this way isn't going to work though. If we sign Kante because ETH wants him and thinks he can do a job, then I'm fully behind it.Who says we're second guessing ETH? We know he doesn't have sole control over the transfers at this club, just a say in them. Which may well see him acquiescing to club signings he isn't overly keen on due to limited alternatives as presented to him by the club, as previous managers like LVG told us he had to. It doesn't follow that just because we're interested in or indeed sign a player that he was one ETH was overly keen on or that it's a reflection of what he actually wanted us to do in the transfer market.
You mention Perisic but we could equally point to Cavani, a player who was barely able to play due to injury issues in just his second season at the club and has added to our transfer issues this season as a result. A signing Rangnick reportedly pointed to as an example of the sort of short-sighted approach we shouldn't be taking in the transfer market.
These are the mistakes we were supposed to be learning from, yet some people seem keen to make them again for the sake of another aging injury-prone player with name recognition value.
On the cheap? That's not Woodward's style.This feels like a Woodward signing. Big name past his prime available on the cheap.
On one hand it's Kante, who has been one of the best at what he does for years.No way Chelsea let him go, surely? He's had some injuries and some struggles coming back from injuries, but I don't think that constitutes this "decline" a lot of people are going on about. People thought he was in decline a couple of years ago and he came back stronger than ever - I wouldn't bet against him doing it again.
Completely different physique on the two of them. Look at Modric at 36 who is much more similar physically to Kante.On one hand it's Kante, who has been one of the best at what he does for years.
On the other hand we bought Matic in similar circumstances at a younger age, with Chelsea fans saying he was on the decline, and while he had some good spells, we spent most of the time moaning that he didn't have the legs, and would have been better years before.
Chelsea midfielder past his peak is the link.Completely different physique on the two of them. Look at Modric at 36 who is much more similar physically to Kante.
I’m not particularly for this move, but comparing to Matic seems wrong.
Is Kante at 31 past his peak? I think Ronaldo was past his peak from 28-36.Chelsea midfielder past his peak is the link.
Conte wasn't with Matic either at the timeTuchel isn’t to be fair
And he was right, they shouldn't have sold him that year when the plan was to sign Bakayoko.Conte wasn't with Matic either at the time
It's not an age thing it's a personal situation thing.Is Kante at 31 past his peak? I think Ronaldo was past his peak from 28-36.
On the cheap? That's not Woodward's style.
And injury prone*Some people here would honestly give out about any signing. Outside the box signings are unproven, someone from a weaker league is a ‘hipster signing’ or ‘know it alls’ want him. And then the most decorated and proven midfielder we could possibly buy and he’s too old…
I Kante believe itPeter Walton stuttering to make up this shit sound like the referee's decision is correct
Did you see him against Liverpool ? He was basically the same as he was the last 3-4 years. He did things in terms of pressing and harassing no player in our team is close to doingKante is on his way down as an all-action harasser and haranguer of the ball and opposing players - continually using him in this way will only hasten his injuries and degrade his output even more. He'll roll back the years and still have some performances Fred can only dream of per season, but they will not be the norm.
Like we did with Van Persie ?One of Ralf's issues was signing older players for short term gain...i have to agree with him and Kante would fall into that category.
Improving the United midfield isn't difficult, there is so many options which would improve the team. No need to take a risk on Kante imo.
RVP finished a full season uninjured and was still peakLike we did with Van Persie ?
He was also the best player and big match performer during a CL winning run just a year ago. Like I've said, we could do so so much worse than Kante this summer.He played more for Chelsea this season than mctominay did for us. The idea that he's washed up and utterly past it is ludicrous.