Sparky_Hughes
I am Shitbeard.
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2008
- Messages
- 17,539
Slapnuts record is crumbling around his ears.......... only bayern left, and thats nothing a load of other managers havent also achieved.
At this rate Bayern should be looked at
Slapnuts record is crumbling around his ears.......... only bayern left, and thats nothing a load of other managers havent also achieved.
Hell, I even know quite a few of them that think the Chelsea Barca match was favoured towards Chelsea!!!They say that even for the games vs Inter Milan in 2010
What a past 10-15 years this is turning out to be for us, 2 extra league titles, 2 Champions Leagues.Should take away their CL wins between 1994 and 2018 and award it to the runners up ...
Not surprised one bit
plus where are these blood samplesIsn't this just for La Liga? The Chelsea game while pretty obviously fishy shouldn't fall into this investigation ?
Pretty obvious by now that Pep took them and has been sustaining himself on them ever since. Explains why he always looks so scatty.plus where are these blood samples
A guy who was caught twice cheating with anabolics, is binded by fate to manage clubs that cheat.
Slapnuts record is crumbling around his ears.......... only bayern left, and thats nothing a load of other managers havent also achieved.
Can they do the drugs thing now too, or does that feck the Spanish national team too much?
The Spanish courts ruled that the Fuentes blood bags be destroyed. They basically got rid of the evidence while FIFA twiddled their thumbs.plus where are these blood samples
Deleted.
The charge is a logical step after those leaks of course. No one is denying this payment. Now we'll see if barca broke the rules by bribing the refs or really just payed him for consultation as the club tells. If our club bribed the refs, then punishment is neccessary according to the law as well as take away the trophies from that period. If there was no bribing, everyone needs to move on.
You love to see itAt this rate Bayern should be looked at
Partidazo] Extract from the Public Prosecutor's complaint against FC Barcelona for the payments to Enriquez Negreira. "Barça reached an agreement in exchange for money to obtain actions tending to favour the club in the decision making of the referees in the matches".Deleted.
Well then.Partidazo] Extract from the Public Prosecutor's complaint against FC Barcelona for the payments to Enriquez Negreira. "Barça reached an agreement in exchange for money to obtain actions tending to favour the club in the decision making of the referees in the matches".
yeah i’m sure the 7 million was just to ask the head of refs to explain the offside rule.The charge is a logical step after those leaks of course. No one is denying this payment. Now we'll see if barca broke the rules by bribing the refs or really just payed him for consultation as the club tells. If our club bribed the refs, then punishment is neccessary according to the law as well as take away the trophies from that period. If there was no bribing, everyone needs to move on.
FC Barcelona, Negreira (former ref VP), Rosell and Bertomeu (fomer Barca presidents), Óscar Grau and Albert Soler (two fomer Barca executives) have been charged with:
-continued business corruption, in its sports fraud version.
-breach of trust
-false business records.
The Prosecutor's Office points out: "through the presidents Sandro Rosell and Josep Maria Bartomeu, Barça reached and maintained a strictly confidential verbal agreement with the accused Negreira, so that, in his capacity as vice president of the referee technical committee and in exchange for money, he would carry out actions tending to favor Barcelona in the decision-making of the referees in the matches played by the Club, and thus in the results of the competitions; referees whose designation for each match of the official Spanish competitions is carried out carried out within this referee committee. This committee is also in charge of the evaluations -in which the defendant participated- for the promotions and demotions of the referees as well as the proposal of candidates for international refereering".
Other presidents such as Laporta, Gaspart and Nuñez are equally involved but are not charged as It has prescribed. Laporta and Gaspart have been called to testify.
Barca paid 6.6M€ to Negreira since 2001, but only the 1.2M€ they paid him between 2014 and 2015 and the 1.6M€ they paid him during 2016 and 2018, for a total of 2.9M€, have not prescribed.
Little extra info coming from this tweet.
Between 15/16 and 17/18 (114 games) Barca paid 1.6M to the ref VP. They had:
33 penalties for them 3 penalties against
23 red cards in favor 4 expulsions against
Between 18/19 and 20/21 (114 games) Barca made no payments to the ref VP. They had:
23 penalties for them 14 penalties against
15 red cards in favor 10 red cards against
Picture if you can, the final scene in The Road Runner - There they Go Go Go.But… mes que un club
Wonder what levers they’ll pull out of their arse to get out of this.
Are we talking just finals, because what about the teams they knocked out on the road to winning those finals. I'm thinking specifically 2009?Should take away their CL wins between 1994 and 2018 and award it to the runners up ...
Let's not complicate thingsAre we talking just finals, because what about the teams they knocked out on the road to winning those finals. I'm thinking specifically 2009?
That's a real world take. And those sums are extraordinary and the logical assumption is that it cannot have been for mere specialised information. I'd love to get info on the general income that ex ref and his "company" made from other clients.The charge is a logical step after those leaks of course. No one is denying this payment. Now we'll see if barca broke the rules by bribing the refs or really just payed him for consultation as the club tells. If our club bribed the refs, then punishment is neccessary according to the law as well as take away the trophies from that period. If there was no bribing, everyone needs to move on.