Ole and xG

Discussion in 'Manchester United Forum' started by Pogue Mahone, Mar 7, 2019.

  1. Sep 1, 2019

    Amarsdd Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2013
    Messages:
    230
    I don't understand why people are questioning xG statistics itself. It is just estimating probabilities of chances based on 1000+ (if I'm correct) similar situations that have occurred before. It's a completely objective view of a team's performance in and around the goal, but maybe not so much about the domination of the game in and out of possession. Obviously, subjectively the performances might look different to different people.
  2. Sep 1, 2019

    0le Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2017
    Messages:
    1,588
    Well said.
  3. Sep 1, 2019

    El Zoido Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2013
    Messages:
    6,726
    Location:
    UK
    People are questioning it because they hate Ole and want him to fail and want him sacked.
  4. Sep 2, 2019

    Eddy_JukeZ Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    9,846
    Our performance last season vs Cardiff was one of the best by a team all season.

    Our PPDA that game was the highest from any team in Europe.

    There's no way we're playing better now than the opening 2-3 games of that run(later on - I'd agree).
  5. Sep 2, 2019

    Eddy_JukeZ Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    9,846
    It is interesting that xG has us 2nd and basically underachieving so far. Though 2 pen misses likely attribute to that heavily.

    We'll see how it looks after a larger sample size.

    I don't think we've played amazing, but we've definitely throw away points.
  6. Sep 2, 2019

    cptkeane1993 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2019
    Messages:
    4
    I’m looking forward to the regression to the mean... Ole is doing something right.
  7. Sep 2, 2019

    bosnian_red Worst scout to ever exist

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2011
    Messages:
    36,296
    Location:
    Canada
    Even that's not really true. We played well - even with xG. It's just we were in a purple patch by showing title winning form, while then we hit a rough patch of underperforming xG. In reality, we were basically 3rd in xG for Ole's time, which was how it showed overall during his time. It was just split by 2 extremes instead of an average throughout the season.
  8. Sep 2, 2019

    romufc Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2019
    Messages:
    1,423
    It doesnt matter, we could have the best xG but that doesn't correspond to points.

    Goals and clean sheet does.
  9. Sep 2, 2019

    bosnian_red Worst scout to ever exist

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2011
    Messages:
    36,296
    Location:
    Canada
    All xG does is point towards where your performance levels will average out over a long period of time. You will to through purple patches of finishing and bad runs where the opposition is clinical while you arent, but play well often enough and itll show over time and you'll regress to the mean of your performance the vast majority of time. Rarely, drastic over/underperformance lasts a whole season (United in 17/18), but then the following season we went back to shit like our xG was showing with Mourinho. It's as good of an indicator for future long term performances as anything.
  10. Sep 2, 2019

    varga92 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2017
    Messages:
    91
    First of all, 4 games is very small sample size for xG.

    Secondly, we need to look these stats in context. 1 penality equals 0.76 xG. Our xG from open play is only 4.52 and we scored 6 goals from open play.

    Our xGA from corner is 0.37 and they scored against us 2 goals from corner. That's a long-term problem. We cannot defend well these situations. And if I'm not wrong, Ole had similar problems at Cardiff.
  11. Sep 4, 2019

    ash_86 Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2013
    Messages:
    4,847


    We have the best expected goals conceded metrics in the league. So we should be conceding less and scoring more according to Xg but opposite is happening. Surely the tide should turn eventually in our favor ?
  12. Sep 4, 2019

    bucky Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2011
    Messages:
    8,040
    4 games is a small sample size though.
  13. Sep 4, 2019

    shabadu84 Mint? Berry?

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    4,540
    Location:
    Muppet Treasure Island
    We were able to outperform our xG in the past based on good finishing. Any regression to the mean is going to require some additional luck but, more importantly, significant improvement in finishing. Martial, Rashford, Lingard, etc all need to do more to put the ball in the net or we're going to need to find players that won't be as wasteful.
  14. Sep 4, 2019

    Treble Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2008
    Messages:
    10,368
    Confirms the impression that Liverpool have been a bit average at the back. It's a ridiculously small sample though. Note that the bottom 3 teams have played City. The latter create many chances and change your xGA, especially when the sample is small. We have played teams with average attacks.
  15. Sep 4, 2019

    ash_86 Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2013
    Messages:
    4,847
    Yes, i see the argument.
  16. Sep 4, 2019

    Treble Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2008
    Messages:
    10,368
    No matter the level of opposition we seem to have made progress, pressing works fine so far.
  17. Sep 4, 2019

    lysglimt Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2008
    Messages:
    8,634
    What have West Ham been doing ? Is it all because of the City-game or have they really been that poor defensively ?
  18. Sep 6, 2019

    Grande Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,393
    Location:
    The Land of Do-What-You-Will
    I’m not too crazy about xG stats normally, like attempts on goal and possesion it is sometimes interesting if you already know the context of the game, or sometimes when you see a very surprising result in a large sample. But in the end it’s goals that count, doesn’t matter if you get them by being effective or by producing a lot of half-situations.

    However it is more interesting in the context of a build up over time. This season, the points total to me will probably be less important to me than seeing if our general play is developping in a positive way. Then these stats are more interesting, and xG and xPts more so.

    My general impression from watching the games, is that we’ve played not fantastically but fairly well in each game. Chelsea result lied a bit and Palace result lied a bit, and we could have gotten more from the two other games too with a bit of margines. I’d say we played slightly better than in many of the games of our golden run last season, and much better than in the run up.

    XG seems to confirm this. Under Mou in the second place season, our ratio of xG for to xG against was about 3 to 2. In his half of last season it was almost 1 to 1. Which fits with my impression. Under Ole last season, in the golden phase it was first 3 to 1 in the first games, trailing off to about 3 to 2, while in the run up it was a little bit better than 1 to 1.

    Now it is about 2 to 1, more or less the same as Liverpool, only City are better, and the rest of the big six are well behind. All this is without pens.

    Albeit being a small sample, to me, in context, this confirms the impression from watching the games, that our general play looks to have improved and is slightly better than both Mourinho’s best season and most of Solskjær’s good run last season. And this is with the removal of several of the more experienced players (Herrera, Matic, Lukaku, Sanchez), have the youngest starting squad in the PL, and are bedding in a new back four.

    It seems an indication that we can forget the disastrous end to last season for now, and that we may well be in the process of a slow but largely consistent improval.

    Thoughts?
  19. Sep 6, 2019

    Gator Nate Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2019
    Messages:
    349
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Supports:
    Unaffiliated
    My first thought is... You're gonna get crucified for that. :lol:

    As for my own untimely demise, that's an interesting take and I'd tend to agree. It's just unpopular to admit we're probably better than we were last season when you look at W-D-L-D in the first four games. While the Chelsea game probably pads the stats a bit, there are only two teams with a better goal differential right now, City (+11) and Pool (+9) as would be expected, and Leicester is tied with us at +3. Palace and Spurs are the only other teams with a positive GD right now at +1. Also, four games in and only Watford and Wolves haven't won a match yet.
  20. Sep 6, 2019

    Cassidy No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    17,652
    Martial has hardly been wasteful. Lingard.. well. Will be interesting if James can be a real goal threat from the left because if he can that would be a great suprise
  21. Sep 6, 2019

    elmo Can never have too many Eevees

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2008
    Messages:
    6,919
    Location:
    AKA: Slapanut Goat Smuggla
    xG is a terrible stat for predicting future long term performance unless you believe that teams stay the same over the years despite multiple transfers and promotion/relegations.

    xG is a good idea in theory, but it just doesn't work in football when sample sizes are so low and teams don't play each other enough times for the numbers to be relevant at all.
  22. Sep 6, 2019

    elmo Can never have too many Eevees

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2008
    Messages:
    6,919
    Location:
    AKA: Slapanut Goat Smuggla
    Which tells you how worthless this stat is because the actual play on the pitch has been subpar mostly.

    Our position on the table reflects how we've played so far this season. Mediocre.
  23. Sep 6, 2019

    Cassidy No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    17,652
    It is not worthless. We should have scored the penalties and collected the points and we should have beaten Wolves regardless.

    Our play deserved more points than we got even if we didnt play great.

    It does show also that we are not really creating many chances or enough chances which is what we have seen
  24. Sep 6, 2019

    noodlehair "It's like..."

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    12,055
    Location:
    Flagg
    I'm not sure what this sort of stuff proves. We've dropped points the last two games because we concede ridiculously cheap goals that allow teams to score against us without needing to create chances themselves or dominate parts of the game.

    That isn't something that's going to fix itself just because we have good XG stats.

    If you take the stupid errors and pathetic set piece play out of our games the performances have actually been fairly good, barring the first half of the Palace game, which was terrible.
  25. Sep 6, 2019

    billybee99 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2015
    Messages:
    282
    Do you know what can also give you a good reflection of teams' performance over long periods? Your eyeballs; your brain. Try using them. Some of you xG guys need to close your laptops, climb the stairs from your mother's basement and go have a beer, meet some people, get laid, do something, anything.
  26. Sep 6, 2019

    Sunny Jim Full Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2007
    Messages:
    26,718
    Location:
    Warsaw...that's too far away from Edinburgh...
    Good post mate ;)
  27. Sep 6, 2019

    Grande Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,393
    Location:
    The Land of Do-What-You-Will
    It doesn’t prove anything, but it confirms exactly what you and I have seen: That our performances have generally been fairly good. Many people look at our points tally and goal results to judge the performances, and conclude that we’ve been bad, but in our present context, xG sames more relevant than these stats. Because the context now is that this season we are trying to build a team and establish a new playing style, not actually trying to win the league (in ehich case losing points when performances are good would be a more crucial flaw).

    Gaffes by players in new constallations are easier to iron out than if we constantly let opponents through on david, which we’ve seen a bit of in previous seasons. I take it as a good sign, nothing more.
  28. Sep 6, 2019

    Gator Nate Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2019
    Messages:
    349
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Supports:
    Unaffiliated
    See, that's where I disagree. Our finishing has been poor.

    vs. Wolves - we win possession 66/34, we win shots 9/6, we tie shots on target 2/2 - game ends in draw

    vs. Palace - we win possession 71/29, we win shots 22/5, we tie shots on target 3/3 - we lose 2-1

    vs. Southhampton - we win possession 59/41, we win shots 21/10, we win shots on target 8/2 - game ends in draw

    In three matches, we've done no worse than 59% possession, taken 52 shots with 21 shots on target and have 4 goals to show for it.

    That's a lack of finishing. For all the criticism of what's going on on the field, 4 of 21 is the problem.
  29. Sep 6, 2019

    noodlehair "It's like..."

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    12,055
    Location:
    Flagg
    I think it's more thna gaffes though. The lethargic first half against Palace was very concerning and the lack of any organisation or generally having a clue in certain situations (crosses, set pieces) is really very poor. There are positive elements in it too which ties in to what you are saying. The second half of the Chelsea game, first half at Wolves, and periods of the Southampton game, I think we've looked quite good. It's unrealistic to expect us to look good for 90 minutes of every game but we need to start using these periods in games to win them by not completing switching off in other parts or ignoring basic fundamentals.

    Think I've changed my opinion a bit. at the time I said the Palace and Southampton performances were too similar to under Jose, but on reflection I don't think they were. We are just having different kinds of problems. If we can iron them out then at the very least it'll be much easier to get behind this team, even if the results are still a bit hit and miss. if some of the rest of the team can show somewhere near the work ethic of James that will also help.
  30. Sep 6, 2019

    Sky1981 Fending off the urge

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    21,977
    Location:
    Under the bright neon lights of sincity
    We're close becoming rawk
  31. Sep 6, 2019

    chromepaxos Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2015
    Messages:
    129
    This is complete nonsense. xG is better predictor of points achieved than pretty much any other stat. The fact that you think it depends upon the number of times each team plays another shows that you're a bit clueless about how it works.
  32. Sep 6, 2019

    SAFMUTD Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2018
    Messages:
    1,118
    I think people are misinterpreting the xG statistic, if we got a higher xG than goals scored it doesnt mean that magically our strikers will get more goals, its not luck its about ability.

    Thats why Aguero always has more goals that xG expected, he is world class and thats what worldclass players do. They get goals in situations other strikers dont. At the end of the day the xG is a value given from many different players under many different chances but if you have a striker who misses a lot if wont matter if a thousand players would had scored, we will still struggle.

    The same applies for our defence.
  33. Sep 6, 2019

    chromepaxos Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2015
    Messages:
    129
    Because if there's one thing that the Caf proves, it's that everyone's subjective opinions are the same? That's frickin' hysterical.

    Hey Ole! What you really need to do to analyse team performance is go down the pub and ask billybee99!

    I mean, it's okay to be scared of maths, but pretty funny to sneer at people who aren't.
  34. Sep 6, 2019

    adexkola Arsenal supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    35,719
    Location:
    The CL is a glorified FA Cup set to music
    Supports:
    orderly disembarking on planes
    :lol:
  35. Sep 6, 2019

    elmo Can never have too many Eevees

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2008
    Messages:
    6,919
    Location:
    AKA: Slapanut Goat Smuggla
    My problem with xG is sample size and inconsistency in the data being compared to come out with inaccurate conclusions.

    You've people coming to conclusions based on stats to fit their own narrative without actually proving that their shit is even relevant and people are just lapping it up because it's much easier to blame it on bad luck than to admit that there's something really wrong with the fact that underperforming players aren't being held accountable.

    We aren't unlucky so far this season, we've only played well for 60 mins max each game so far, hence our results.
    Last edited: Sep 6, 2019
  36. Sep 6, 2019

    SteveW Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2013
    Messages:
    5,611
    You shouldnt need xg to know that we've been very unlucky so far. It's been blatantly obvious.
  37. Sep 6, 2019

    shabadu84 Mint? Berry?

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    4,540
    Location:
    Muppet Treasure Island
    Always amazed that people like this are able to find time to share responses like this in between the copious amounts of sex they're undoubtedly having.
  38. Sep 6, 2019

    Classical Mechanic Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2014
    Messages:
    24,598
    Happened when we became Liverpool.
  39. Sep 6, 2019

    Cassidy No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    17,652
    Not playing well doesn't mean you have not been unlucky
  40. Sep 6, 2019

    bosnian_red Worst scout to ever exist

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2011
    Messages:
    36,296
    Location:
    Canada
    Not over years, but throughout the years for sure and between seasons if there are no drastic changes sure. Also useful to see how a team improves/declines between season as a result of transfers or a lack thereof. By long term I mean over the course of a season. The longer the season goes on, the more accurate the xG should get and it points to the general state of the team, if things are working, if they are broken, or if you're getting lucky or unlucky. Nobody is saying it's the be all and end all, but it's definitely a very useful stat and something that I would guarantee the vast majority of football clubs actually use in some way.