Ole signs new contract

Status
Not open for further replies.

lysglimt

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
15,102
Until Ole wins his first trophy, people have every right to question if he is the right person for the job. Progress will only mean something if we have silverware next season
I agree - and most of us who support OGS don't have a problem with that. What we have a problem with is people who can't accept that we are improving, that he has done a great job so far. Whatever criticism he has got - he has answered. He couldn't attract players (like Varane, Sancho and Bruno) - he is too nice (ask the players he has shipped out ruthlessly how nice he is), he is not competent enough (but he can beat Pep 4 times) - so of course he has to win a trophy....but

When the only main criticism left is that he hasn't won a trophy - then clearly he has done a lot right because, my GOD - there was a lot to have a go at this team for - 3 years ago.
 

Polar

Full Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2020
Messages
1,424
This season is a big test for Ole. With the addition of Varane, Sancho, CM and possibly Trippier, it’s the first time Ole has a competitive squad.

Don’t understand why many “experts” complain about Ole’s contract. If a manager suited for United becomes available and Ole doesn’t deliver, Ole has to leave his post. That’s the norm.

I think we won’t see another foreign manager without United history the next 10y - lessons learned.

I’m pretty certain United have decided following requirements for a United manager:
  • History at the club or
  • British (new school manager), example Southgate.
 

Random Task

WW Lynchpin
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
34,503
Location
Chester
Agreed.

But whether Ole succeeds in the pitch this season or not he needs to be given credit for the way he has rebuilt the squad these last three years, gotten rid of high wage flops like Sanchez, and massively increased the team’s fitness.
Absolutely, he's done a great to get into such a strong position.

The club was deep in the shit on the day he arrived as caretaker manager. Most of the squad he inherited were a combination of unhappy, underperforming or wanting out of the club asap. But he turned it around somehow. Shaw, Martial, Mctominay, Rashford and Fred (others I may have missed) all improved under his guidance. He's brought in the right kind of player, not only in terms of their ability to perform on the pitch but also gel with the squad. That the likes of Bruno, Maguire, AWB and Cavani all appear to be leaders or carry a strong presence in the dressing room is no coincidence either.

We can't ignore what he's achieved at the club so far, no matter how this season pans out. Worst case scenario: he will have built a squad / laid the foundations for a more tactically superior manager to come in and take advantage of.
 

DRJosh

Full Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
2,845
Location
Melbourne, Australia
Supports
United minus the Glazers
I agree - and most of us who support OGS don't have a problem with that. What we have a problem with is people who can't accept that we are improving, that he has done a great job so far. Whatever criticism he has got - he has answered. He couldn't attract players (like Varane, Sancho and Bruno) - he is too nice (ask the players he has shipped out ruthlessly how nice he is), he is not competent enough (but he can beat Pep 4 times) - so of course he has to win a trophy....but

When the only main criticism left is that he hasn't won a trophy - then clearly he has done a lot right because, my GOD - there was a lot to have a go at this team for - 3 years ago.
100%. And I really hope he succeeds because he has certainly played his cards right up till this point and our blips (the Europa final) weren’t complete deal breakers as we were a team in transition.
Next season will be the determining one.
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
This season is a big test for Ole. With the addition of Varane, Sancho, CM and possibly Trippier, it’s the first time Ole has a competitive squad.

Don’t understand why many “experts” complain about Ole’s contract. If a manager suited for United becomes available and Ole doesn’t deliver, Ole has to leave his post. That’s the norm.

I think we won’t see another foreign manager without United history the next 10y - lessons learned.

I’m pretty certain United have decided following requirements for a United manager:
  • History at the club or
  • British (new school manager), example Southgate.
You have done well until the last point. Southgate? You must be joking!
 

gerdm07

Thinks we should have kept Pereira
Joined
Aug 8, 2011
Messages
2,718
Until Ole wins his first trophy, people have every right to question if he is the right person for the job. Progress will only mean something if we have silverware next season
So if DDG had saved one penalty and we had won the EL than all would be good? Would he had earned your blessings for 2 years, 3 years? That trophy would have been nice but I am far more interested in seriously competing for the EPL and CL and it looks like we are in the best position for that in years. That's the progress I like seeing. You have to seriously compete in order to get the chance to win.

Let's put it another way. If we had won the EL and not bought anyone significant (no Sancho no Varane) this summer would you be content because we got a second-rate trophy?
 

United Hobbit

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2019
Messages
8,636
I still think he's taken us as far as he can and would have held off the contract. He's done a decent job stabilising things but still don't see him winning a league.

This season he's got nowhere to hide as the board have done what we all wanted and backed him, especially if we get another midfielder and the Verane deal goes through

Hence why I'd have left his contact a little longer... obviously it would be great if we could win things with him, unfortunately I think he is willing but not able.
 

Strelok

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
5,279
This season is a big test for Ole. With the addition of Varane, Sancho, CM and possibly Trippier, it’s the first time Ole has a competitive squad.

Don’t understand why many “experts” complain about Ole’s contract. If a manager suited for United becomes available and Ole doesn’t deliver, Ole has to leave his post. That’s the norm.

I think we won’t see another foreign manager without United history the next 10y - lessons learned.

I’m pretty certain United have decided following requirements for a United manager:
  • History at the club or
  • British (new school manager), example Southgate.
Good post until Southgate. Lord NO.

If Ole doesn't deliver and Zidane would like to come here for example I'd love to have him. This history at the club or is British is simply daft. It's more about we putting a good, solid structure at the top than placing all our hope in a manager. That good solid structure would choose the best candidate and work with him to develop the club. Like how all the top clubs are currently run.

Not every manager is SAF and lesson learnt with LVG and Mourinho I think.
 
Last edited:

Polar

Full Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2020
Messages
1,424
Good post until Southgate. Lord NO.

If Ole doesn't deliver and Zidane would like to come here for example I'd love to have him. This history at the club or is British is simply daft. It's more about we putting a good, solid structure at the top than placing all our hope in a manager. That good solid structure would choose the best candidate and work with him to develop the club. Like how all the top clubs are currently run.

Not every manager is SAF and lesson learnt with LVG and Mourinho I think.
You have done well until the last point. Southgate? You must be joking!
:annoyed: Upsy daisy…. I’m not a fan of Southgate and don’t think he is our future manager, but he is an example of a British new school manager. Hopefully we’ll see more young talented British managers in the future, and once in the future (when we change manager), someone really stands out:)
 

NZT-One

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
2,342
Location
Berlin
Agreed but I’m not saying we should have got rid. I’m simply saying that I think a one year contract with one year possible extension made more sense when this is such a pivotal season. We finished 5 points ahead of Liverpool who were without their best player and had a truly terrible season. I don’t think last year was as cut and dried as some think. Ole did a good job yeah. But I don’t think it’s proof that we’re the second best team in England. It was exceptional circumstances that we just handled better than most and had fewer injuries despite not really rotating. I think this season is a big test and if he did well this year with a good squad fair enough. But 1+1 made more sense in terms of not having to pay off if he fails.
I fully agree. I think, our positions (debate-wise) are pretty much identical despite the extension length.

Great post.

Add to that both Ole and Maguire stating that there was no time to work on or train new tactics. Training sessions were centered around recuperation from the preceding game and preparation for the next.

Let's strawman a strawman, strawman. Strawman!
We had a very difficult schedule, I don't think, anybody would deny that. But other teams were still able to change stuff (and I intentionally don't go into detail). Just have a look at Chelsea. It is possible to change the football a team plays. Is there a chance, that some sort of Honeymoon effect took place? Yes, sure. But the team didn't just work more, were more aggressive, more cohesive. They changed their approach plus formation.

How are you judging his coaching ability? It is, probably, the one aspect of a manager's skillset that is most difficult to judge from the outside. You have no idea what goes on the training field and similarly what other managers can or can not do. What has been perfectly evident, however, is the immense improvement in Shaw, Rashford, Fred, Lindelof and McTominay, to name a few. But I guess that's not due to coaching, probably just a change in diet?

...

Who is the best manager in the world for you? Pep? Why did he lose the CL final? He couldn't read and react quickly and proactively? Why did he lose against us several times?
Tuchel? Why did he got himself fired from PSG? Why did he lose against Bayern in the previous CL final?
Klopp? Why did he not react quickly and proactively to the CB injuries? Why did he lose all those finals in his first years at Liverpool?
Who is the best manager in the world for you? Pep? Why did he lose the CL final? He couldn't read and react quickly and proactively? Why did he lose against us several times?
Tuchel? Why did he got himself fired from PSG? Why did he lose against Bayern in the previous CL final?
Klopp? Why did he not react quickly and proactively to the CB injuries? Why did he lose all those finals in his first years at Liverpool?

The bolded parts are supposed to help you answering your own question. These managers were successful in the past on the biggest of stages. And sometimes they lose out. But they are able to get into promising positions over and over again with changing environments.

Lets just stick with Ole while debating. These comparisons only stir up the mud and helping nobody. Ole did well. Others did also well and a few did even better. Everybody can decide for him/herself, for how long it feels right to stick to "well" instead of risking it and going for "even better".

"What has been perfectly evident, however, is the immense improvement in Shaw, Rashford, Fred, Lindelof and McTominay, to name a few."

And while we are at it, I totally disagree with you on this. Either you have a completely different definition of the word "immense" or you clutching straws here. I mean, I'll give you Shaw, he has done very well. But Rashford didn't improve at all - I'd even argue that he stagnated and in some aspects went back a bit. His decision making is getting worse, his touches are erratic and he seems to have stopped trying to create from time to time. How is that improvement? McTominay - McTominay is a reliable squad member, nothing more. He was a young useful player before - there is no immense improvement to be seen. A positive trend but still - noone names him when talking about potential starting 11s. I don't know, what you see in Lindelof. He has stabilized himself as a relatively reliable CB. But thats it - no one I know rates him for a tad more than that.

I understand, there is a feeling to list positives about the manager but to me, this sort of stuff feels disingenuous.

How can you seriously say that that when we just had a historic season in terms of points won from losing positions?
If we want to put this to his positive account, we have to add to his negative accounts that so often we found ourselves in losing positions. How often last year has it been stated that we completely missed out the first half only to then be forced to act. Thats good as long as it lasts. But it is a dangerous route and I am sure, that isn't something that Ole wants.
 

NZT-One

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
2,342
Location
Berlin
This thread becomes more and more funny:lol:

Our 2th place last season was a result of:
  • Liverpool’s injuries
  • Covid-19 - The other teams underperformed
  • Lampard’s bad management

wasn’t a result of:
  • Good work from Ole and the players
  • Bad management from Kloop

Other:
  • Ole’s good result in the beginning = honeymoon
  • Tuchel’s good result in the same timeframe = good management
  • Ole’s failure in final/semifinals = he is clueless tactically
  • Tuchel’s failure in CL and league = [quiet]
  • Our squad was good enough to fight for the trophy [wouldn’t be surprise if the same people want to offload Lingard, Martial, Mata, James, Bailly, Pereira and say Lindelof and McFred are ok squad players]
Regarding Liverpool: I think we completely disagree here, I think the number and concentration in defense had a very bad effect on the team and the way they approached it, wasn't the best probably (taking their DMs to defense mostly led to their issues spreading to even more parts) but I guess we will never agree on that.

Maybe a different angle makes it easier to agree that we had some things going our way more than other teams: this year for the first time we were pretty injury free. Almost no long-term injuries. No major player involved (Pogba was a bit in and out and for a while not part of the "best eleven for big games" and Cavanis injury came before he started to contribute a lot). This might be down to our good work in the physio department but considering the gruesome schedule, I think we can agree that it is also a fair bit of luck. It was often said, how much we would struggle without Maguire or Bruno and the time without Maguire was problematic.

So even if we say that Liverpool wasn't as dragged down by injuries, we were fairly uplifted by being able to work with the strongest eleven for the most part. A luxury that isn't common and might be gone next year.
 

NZT-One

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
2,342
Location
Berlin
If that is the case, then what does that say for the 18 other managers in the league last season, or the 17 other managers the season before? Even if it is true, and tbh I don't believe it is to the extent that you hold it to be, does it actually matter? At the top level, man management goes a heck of a long way further towards having sustained success than tactical acumen does. Just look at Pep's CL record, and compare it to Zidane's: which one would you rather have? If the likes of Sancho and Varane are tempted and persuaded by the project we have (of which Ole is absolutely the sole visionary of, btw) then quite frankly who the feck are we to poo poo it? Even the very best tactical managers need the tools to ensure their systems work. Klopp's Liverpool were going nowhere and were reaching their plateau of 4th until fate intervened and Barca gave them £150m for Coutinho, which was reinvested into Alisson, VVD, and Fabinho, to add to their clever purchase of Salah, and to a lesser extent Mane (I say lesser extent, because to me, he was an obvious player to get, and I couldn't believe how many on here were turning their noses up at him when we were linked the season before). Yet, for all the good that Klopp has done, when just one or two of those important cogs were missing, his team went to absolute shit without them in circumstances that were much less trying for his team than they were for others (of which we are the best example of).
Understandable position but you just chose to decide that man management is superior to tactical acumen. Which is obviously fine but there is no right and wrong here. Plus Zidane wasn't a zero tactics-wise as well even if he clearly isn't as known for as Pep is.

I read the question "what does it say about the rest of the league" a few times. I think, this question is misleading. Look at the player pool we have. In terms of that our competitors are City, Liverpool and Chelsea - the other 14 not so much. These are the ones to have a look at because the frame factors are more comparable and individual factors therefor at least theoretically easier to dissect. Is Graham Potter tactically better as Ole? We don't know but his work with Brighton on a smaller budget might indicate something. Thats what it is, indications. Indications that get stronger the closer the player material is.

And if we still insist to have a look into that side of the store: we could discuss how Leicester with less ressources and with a few injury troubles was able to stay so close to us during most of the season, should we? I haven't seen their season praised a whole lot around here. While being fairly close to ours...

The fact of the matter is, before Ole came in to the role, we finished outside of the top 4 more often than we did in it. Our record since SAF left in the league was: 7th, 4th, 5th, 6th, 2nd. Those teams were much better than the one Ole had up until this summer. I don't think anyone can argue otherwise on that, surely? They also had managers who had much better track records than Ole. LvG was fresh off guiding Holland to the World Cup semi final in 2014, and Jose had won the title at Chelsea just one year before he joined. There was little sign of both being past it, yet the basket case that we are, we excentuated their faults and they were both gone at the point Ole is now. And Ole is the only manager who has sustained a respectable league position, despite arguably having the weakest squad of the post-SAF era at the time he started his first full season (that they are now seen as a respectable Utd side, is down to him and his coaching staff improving the like of Shaw, Rashford, McFred, and Martial).
I think, this argument has been discussed a lot. I don't think, that there are more indicators for the fact that "LVG and Mourinho were upper echelon managers" when they joined than there are indicators against. Same goes for squad quality that many (often Ole fans) see as of lower quality than others. Which again is something that never can be proven somehow so both sides have equally less substance in a debate.

Now, let's consider Ole. First summer he had in the job, he took a sledgehammer to the squad selling or letting go of Sanchez, Lukaku, Smalling, Herrera, Valencia, Darmian, Fellaini (6 months earlier). In return, he brought in 3 players: AWB, Maguire, James (followed by Bruno in January) and brought through Greenwood and Williams. It was a massive risk to go into that season without strengthening the midfield and attack when our most expensive striker and arguably best midfielder left without being replaced. When Ole came in Fred and Shaw were borderline joke figures on here. Rashford and Martial were squad players. The likes of DDG and Pogba wanted to leave. And because we didn't get replacements for the players who left, we had to put our faith in the likes of Williams and Greenwood who had the sum total of 2 appearances in the first team at the time. The fact that, that squad, which was arguably the weakest Utd squad in the PL era, was able to eke out Top 4 was a credit to the management team (no doubt helped by Bruno - but then, you have to consider, if Ole didn't already have his system in place, then no matter how good Bruno was, he wouldn't have had the influence he had from day one without it). That squad was not considered Top 4 quality at the time, and it was borne out in the BBC's pundits predictions that year, where I think it was only 3 out 24 pundits who had us in the Top 4 that season. It was horribly imbalanced, and it still was the season after. With the same 4-5 glaring holes still not filled until 2 seasons after they were first highlighted.
Rashford was a squad player under Mourinho? My memories look differently but I guess that doesn't matter. How the players were rated when Ole took over, was effected by the subsequent events. And I am sure, we agree, that Mourinho had a negative effect on almost everybody. So while I agree with you, that Ole did well to be brave and to rely on the particular players he did, I don't think, he did anything otherworldly. I mean, the players he sold were the ones most managers would have sold. I know, I would and I don't consider myself a manager :) . I hadn't get rid of Smalling so fast. Surely debatable. I probably would have thought about selling Lukaku because seeing the football we played from when Bruno was introduced, I think it could have suited Lukaku pretty much. But for the cash we got, I would have sold as well. So all in all: A good job. But not an awesome job. A good job that looked great because we were used to so much worse. Which isn't a dig at Ole at all - but I am sure you agree overrating is just as wrong us underrating.

Let's consider that second season. We had a) the most number of games during project restart and the resumption of European football; b) we had the shortest break between the seasons starting; c) we had the least amount of rest between games out of every team in the league (and within Europe); d) we had the least rest period during the Xmas break; & e) we had a shockingly shit window. a) to b) ensured that we also had a poor start to the season, where we had to catch up to everyone else, while the poor window was one where we didn't improve our starting XI (other than Cavani - who didn't join up with the team until October/November and was then MIA due to injury/suspension for 2 months). If someone told you that we would be 2nd when the season started, you wouldn't have believed them, but we did, And it was under this manager during the most challenging of circumstances. Better managers, with a better recent track record than Ole, who also had better squads, didn't do as well as we did last year.
Credit where credit is due. I wouldn't want to take something away from the management team. What they achieved in the light of the mentioned events was very good. But your paragraph uses context to underline the positive achievements (rightly so) but if context is important, we have to take into account the events in other teams as well. That ManCity didn't start clicking until X-mas. That Liverpool had issues with injuries and poor management of injuries. That Tottenham imploded. Chelsea changing managers in midseason and with problems bedding in the many new players.

Context is very relevant but I think, you shouldn't stop looking only at context aspects that favour your current position (debate-wise).

He's also improved the likes of Martial, Shaw, Rashford, McTominay - all of whom have had their career-best seasons under him. He got a tune out of Fred when so many had written him off. He also got Pogba onside despite all his issues (and he also had his career-best performances under Ole). A poor manager doesn't do that, and I'd wager that he has in fact got us performing to more than sum of our parts for large portions of his reign. The issue is that as it is a young squad, it is prone to peaks and troughs in form.
Martials big hit was the season before the last, which damages your argument a bit. Last season Martial was completely shit which at least raises the question if "the player has been improved" or if he was benefitting somewhat from other teams not taking us serious enough (which is a pretty plausible explanation for coincidentally 4 out of 4 attacking players (one an 18yo) looked for so long but stopped looking so great from a certain point onwards).

Still I agree to a big extent with you, he handled the squad pretty well (but not better that I would expect it from any more-than-decent manager). The larger-than-sum part is dangerous - he certainly made individuals play better and therefor more useful to the team. But on a group level, in terms of organized moves of more than one player like in pressing or off-the ball runs, we were for the most part relatively bad which is somewhat backed (I know, only to some extent) by the xG stats that our individuals outperformed while as a team we are pretty clearly behind City and Liverpool (I think also Chelsea).

We badly needed a window like the one we're looking to have now, where our starting XI was improved, rather than just adding more squad filler. Especially after Chelsea blew everyone away with Havertz, Werner, Silva, et al. People complain about Ole's use of subs, but when you look at the bench, where are the options? When he does try and rotate, he still has to bring them on because the players who have come in have tended to shit the bed. If we get Varane, Sancho and a DM this summer, you will see a marked change in our use of subs, I'm sure. Sancho coming in means one of Martial or Greenwood will be on the bench more often than not. Varane coming in means Lindelof is a bench and squad player. And a DM means Fred or McTominay are similarly, squad players. Ole trusts those players I've named. He doesn't trust many of the others who have tended to be on the bench. Either because they are unreliable (Bailly) or too green (Williams) or a bit of both (Axel).
A fresh player still is better than burning-out a starter for 90min. Of course it is better to have more options but even if you have two world-class players in each position, you still have to keep them in form. The way Ole did this was not good in my eyes. I agree, the options aren't great but to some extent, Ole made his position even worse himself. For example in the EL Final where he easily could have had either Pogba or Rashford on the bench to bring on later to change the game.

We'll see where we end up this season, but considering his track record of the past two years with an inferior set of players, and an imbalanced squad, I'd back him to do better than what a lot of people on this forum are expecting. The expectations will rise, and understandably so, but the means of achieving that success will be much more readily available to him when previously, they simply hadn't been.
I am optimistical as well. Nevertheless, a few of the bad pre-conditions of last season will be around again as well as new ones:
"Sancho and Varane need time to bed in"
"European Cup disturbed pre-season"
"Heavy schedule"
"ManCity best squad"
"Young United team"
There are no season where the stars align before. There will always be something that blocks your path. But thats the thing - we shouldn't be expecting the team to develop only by transfers and therefor two times per year. If a manager isn't able to provide that, the club has to act. Not because of being impatient - but because our competitors assemble great teams as well plus they add great managers to maximize the effect of these players.

So next to me being interested, how the season goes (I am really buzzing to be hones) I am also curious how this place will fare and how the reactions will turn out. A few people on either side invested so much in their positions (debate-wise) I am almost certain they will not change their minds even if it is the sensible thing to do.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,009
It was always a bad decision for anyone who could look past the league's position.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.