Spark
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2012
- Messages
- 2,490
Two toast
Emotions run high in the immediate aftermath of a game like Sunday's, which is why the journalists time the release of these quotes as they do. They know it'll enrage people, its what they bank on.Some silly comments here. Do you expect him to say the manager does not have our full backing?
Very true. Seems like our new world class management did the same. Comments from the CEO earlier in the thread:The majority of this forum does exactly that. The turnaround on the sack Ten Hag vote after the FA Cup final was ridiculous.
Very true. Seems like our new world class management did the same. Comments from the CEO earlier in the thread:
“We have had a busy summer so far, with transformation on and off the pitch. We welcome Joshua Zirkzee, Leny Yoro, Matthijs de Ligt and Noussair Mazraoui to the club; four excellent talents with a bright future here. We are delighted that club captain, Bruno Fernandes, has put pen to paper and committed his future to United and Erik ten Hag has extended his contract on the back of our FA Cup success. Dan Ashworth has joined as Sporting Director and Jason Wilcox as Technical Director. We are building a strong and talented football structure to work with Erik and ensure that we are focused on long-term success. We are also looking to build a world-leading non-football leadership team, which I know will help us to thrive.”
FA Cup success is the new benchmark at Manchester United folks.
Pep Guardiola has entered a season on an expiring contract. Someone should tell him and City that they can't do that.Rightly or wrongly, we made the decision to keep ETH for this season and give him another go. If we're backing him, we can't have him enter the season with an expiring contract. Triggering a 12 month extension was absolutely the right call in the circumstances.
If you think the situations are even remotely comparable then I don't know what to tell you.Pep Guardiola has entered a season on an expiring contract. Someone should tell him and City that they can't do that.
Pep Guardiola has entered a season on an expiring contract. Someone should tell him and City that they can't do that.
"If we're backing him, we can't have him enter the season with an expiring contract."If you think the situations are even remotely comparable then I don't know what to tell you.
As always with United fans it's someone else's fault. Those pesky journos and media only wanting clicks. If United fans put half this effort into demanding answers from the club we might've not been in this mess in the first place.
The club has been a laughing stock for over a decade. The new management had the chance to set this straight and start with a clean slate. Instead they backed a flop and have continued on the same path as before with a Dutch invasion of players and staff.
Time to look at ourselves in the mirror. The media and journos aren't responsible for us being shit.
This.Some awful donkeys around!If you think the situations are even remotely comparable then I don't know what to tell you.
They are probably covering their backs from a legal perspective. Find it very hard to believe they would not have been in the decision making loop at the end of last season.I find it astonishing that the new CEO and Sporting Director had no say in ETH's contract extension. Surely that could've waited till they joined?
I wouldn't interprete to much in those statements. It's well possible that they gave green light to that, but they will never confirm that in public as formally they were not yet working for United. So legally they weren't allowed to be involved in that decision at that time, but inofficially they still could have had (limited) input.I find it astonishing that the new CEO and Sporting Director had no say in ETH's contract extension. Surely that could've waited till they joined?
How did they make him look like a fool?Or how about this, don't make utterly daft comments about the manager having your full backing before a home game against your main rivals that you're expected to lose. If those comments can make you look like a fool after one game, simply don't make those in the first place.
I wouldn't interprete to much in those statements. It's well possible that they gave green light to that, but they will never confirm that in public as formally they were not yet working for United. So legally they weren't allowed to be involved in that decision at that time, but inofficially they still could have had (limited) input.
They are probably covering their backs from a legal perspective. Find it very hard to believe they would not have been in the decision making loop at the end of last season.
Do you know Pep has ultimate authority and respect from hierachy at City and total authority in the dressing room? He is bugger than any player at City and is the one deciding if he will extend not City? On one hand he is having them at the balls, on the other he can stop whenever he feels like it. He will decide not the club. So situation is totally different to United's where United had to extend managers contract if not for uncertainty it would generate, loss of whatever he has left of the authority in the dressing room and pure fact they were able to trigger extension for one year on the base of original contract."If we're backing him, we can't have him enter the season with an expiring contract."
Try telling me why we can't do that?
So, why wasn't he sacked in the summer if he barely has any authority left?Do you know Pep has ultimate authority and respect from hierachy at City and total authority in the dressing room? He is bugger than any player at City and is the one deciding if he will extend not City? On one hand he is having them at the balls, on the other he can stop whenever he feels like it. He will decide not the club. So situation is totally different to United's where United had to extend managers contract if not for uncertainty it would generate, loss of whatever he has left of the authority in the dressing room and pure fact they were able to trigger extension for one year on the base of original contract.
So he's buggering the players and having them at the balls with one hand?Do you know Pep has ultimate authority and respect from hierachy at City and total authority in the dressing room? He is bugger than any player at City and is the one deciding if he will extend not City? On one hand he is having them at the balls, on the other he can stop whenever he feels like it. He will decide not the club. So situation is totally different to United's where United had to extend managers contract if not for uncertainty it would generate, loss of whatever he has left of the authority in the dressing room and pure fact they were able to trigger extension for one year on the base of original contract.
Someone should tell him to stop winning.Pep Guardiola has entered a season on an expiring contract. Someone should tell him and City that they can't do that.
If he replied no comment to that question, the media will run out of ink. "Berrada coy on Ten Hag Future", "CEO doesn't comment - Ten Hag future in doubt", "Man Utd CEO has no say in manager's future", "Ten Hag's job may be on the line - CEO declines to comment".Don't say anything at all then. Silence is better than "we are very happy with him".
Nah only having City management at the balls. Should be a chargeable offense just for shits and giggles to make it 116 offenses.So he's buggering the players and having them at the balls with one hand?
Is that part of the 115 charges?
Shits turning into a John Le Carre novelHow can we be sure he is not City spy?
How can we be sure he is not City spy?
Because if they were going to spy or sabotage, they probably wouldn't waste their time targeting us.
Never bought it in my life but Elon Musks algorithm obviously noted my interest in United and a United poster I follow quoted it which pushed it to me…. third hand.Reading the Daily Mail and expecting high journalistic standards is pretty silly.
"If we're backing him, we can't have him enter the season with an expiring contract."
Try telling me why we can't do that?
It's always funny to me when people say "how can XYZ defend the current position and be happy with the team/game/state of the club?" Seriously, what do people want them to do? Say "Yeah, ten Hag is an incompetent fool and Ratcliff is an idiot for extending his contract." Already when Ole was defending the team, what do people want, him shitting on his players in public, I know Mou did that but he had the whole team against him after just one season. We as fans can complain about decisions and call players shite all day long but if you work for the club you simply can't without causing major internal conflict or getting fired. I'm almost certain that any of the people who are making positive statements towards the press will talk a lot more critical behind closed doors but you don't do that in public.