Bastian
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2015
- Messages
- 20,225
- Supports
- Mejbri
I hope the hierarchy will get busy here.
Eriksen, Casemiro, Rashford, Dalot, Lindelof, Bayindir, Malacia, and reluctantly Garnacho.
Reckon we'll end up keeping Antony and Zirkzee through lack of serious offers.
For 60m I'd say take the money and reinvest. He's an awkward fit in this formation and though he's showed a ton of promise, is far from a sure fire player at the top level.There's already rumours of a 60m bid from Atletico for Garnacho. That's quite a tricky situation. Obviously one of the most talented players at the club and one of the 2-3 best performers last season (Mainoo, Dalot). Could become a superstar player, could also not kick on. Main question really is will he fit into this formation/tactic properly, or does that nullify his positives. It's a big enough bid to make you wonder, but I'd personally rather keep him.
Lindelof, Evans, Rashford, Bayindir, Sancho and Eriksen will all go. Maguire will likely have to take a pay cut to stay, I think Zirkzee will go back to Serie A as well.
After that there aren’t many players it’s financially viable to sell. The exceptions are Garnacho, Dalot and Martinez and be interesting to see if we would accept bids for any of those.
Surely you’d keep Mazraoui too ? He’s probably been our best player over the whole season and I’d keep Hojlund as a back up striker as well as Martinez but I agree on the rest mateI hope they all go except for De Ligt, Mainoo, Ugarte, Amad, Yoro.
Even if Garnacho end up become superstar, 60m is no brainer if the offer comes. That’s a lot of money to reject for someone who hasn’t been developed yet, has been in disciplinary issue twice (first one was with ten hag in pre season), and there is uncertainty whether we can develop him in this Amorim’s 3421 system. The money would also boost our budget as he’s from our academy product.There's already rumours of a 60m bid from Atletico for Garnacho. That's quite a tricky situation. Obviously one of the most talented players at the club and one of the 2-3 best performers last season (Mainoo, Dalot). Could become a superstar player, could also not kick on. Main question really is will he fit into this formation/tactic properly, or does that nullify his positives. It's a big enough bid to make you wonder, but I'd personally rather keep him.
If he gets a new contract i will give up on this club.I think Maguire will get that extra year triggered in the next few days. Another 190K per week until '26. The alternative is to lower his wages and give him a longer deal, and that would really be unpalatable. I'd rather have a player who can run and doesn't take 3-4 touches on the ball every single time, but we've got so much to do, and Amorim made it work with Coates (although, it is a very different league environment) so maybe it'll be OK.
The ironic thing is is that in a few years time when we sack Amorim we'll need a winger for our new manager. And Garnacho will be first in our transfer list.I cant see a future here for Garnacho. He's not a wingback, he's definitely not a number 10 and he certainly isn't ever going to be a striker in Amorim's set up.
Best to take a good offer if we get it.
I cant see a future here for Garnacho. He's not a wingback, he's definitely not a number 10 and he certainly isn't ever going to be a striker in Amorim's set up.
Best to take a good offer if we get it.
I remember we got big offers for Januzaj that we turned down. I'd take 60m.There's already rumours of a 60m bid from Atletico for Garnacho. That's quite a tricky situation. Obviously one of the most talented players at the club and one of the 2-3 best performers last season (Mainoo, Dalot). Could become a superstar player, could also not kick on. Main question really is will he fit into this formation/tactic properly, or does that nullify his positives. It's a big enough bid to make you wonder, but I'd personally rather keep him.
He was described as 'the jewel of Athleticos youth' when he was there. I dont remember that kind of praise for Dan James.I find him very 1 dimensional. He’s not going to be any of those things and unless the opposition push really high up the pitch exposing themselves to his pace he is an empty shirt. Theres nothing more to him than there was Dan James in my view except that he is Argentinian and a bit more trendy.
He was described as 'the jewel of Athleticos youth' when he was there. I dont remember that kind of praise for Dan James.
Maybe they’re betting that the slower and less intense style in Serie A will allow him to stay injury free.This is insane to me. Do they have some legendary shaman onsite that they’re betting on to fix Shaw?
I remember we got big offers for Januzaj that we turned down. I'd take 60m.
Not if the new executive team are ruthless in shipping out duds, which is yet to be seenThose thinking Zirkzee will be sold let alone leave on loan after less than 6 months are living a pipe dream......
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manchester_United_F.C.#Players
Looking on there, the only players (aside from Amass, Collyer and Gore who haven't played) I'd actually like to see stay are;
Mazraoui
De Ligt
Yoro
Amad
Ugarte
Mainoo
Garnacho, if he pulls his head out of his arse.
The rest are either shit, past it or will never be good enough.
I disagree. He isn't good enough. The most basic footballing skills seem a struggle with him. His runs are poor. 18 months here now and he can barely control a football when it's passed into him. He excels at nothing.Add Rasmus and i agree. I think it's unfair to expect a 21 year old Who feeds on scraps to be able to excel in this team.
We do need an experienced top striker though and let Rasmus develop without the pressure of being our main striker.
They won't ever be that inane. Most people's views about Zirkzee's time at the club thus far are laughably delusional and tinged with ludicrous and disingenuous hyperbole.Not if the new executive team are ruthless in shipping out duds, which is yet to be seen