Paul Scholes: Give Ole Until The End Of The Season

Rood

nostradamus like gloater
Scout
Joined
Jun 21, 2008
Messages
21,290
Location
@United_Hour
Are you sure?

That was quite possibly and legitimately both the worst result and performance in our modern history...and not only that but it was entirely predictable, entirely because our manager's ineptness has become entirely predictable.

If you have a squad that allows you to leave Sancho, Cavani and Pogba on the bench, then really any defeat prior to achieving success should be bringing questions about your managerial ability. We're not talking about that. We're talking about a situation where we lose 5-0 at home and it's barely even a surprise.
I wouldnt complain about Ole getting the sack after this horrific performance, in fact I did wonder if he might even resign since he knows very well how important this particular game is, but PL managers never resign nowadays as there is too much money at stake

He's in Last Chance Saloon now and the odds are against him leaving there alive but the fat lady isn't singing just yet !
 

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
49,879
Location
W.Yorks
The longer this season goes on, the more this season just becomes pointless.

With the squad at have we could actually maybe do something in the Champions League ala Chelsea (provided we get a midfielder in Jan)... But it requires someone competent in charge
 

Rood

nostradamus like gloater
Scout
Joined
Jun 21, 2008
Messages
21,290
Location
@United_Hour
Is that more to protect the interim/new manager or do you think if he wins a game or two he deserves to stay? Also is midseason" just "until we're essentially eliminated from top 4"? I don't get the logic in waiting.
A bit of both

I believe that when you have invested in a manager's vision and he built a top squad over 3 years that he should get every chance to fix any problems

I said previously in this thread that he gets to International Break (so another 3 matches) to prove he can fix the issues

I can understand why you are but sometimes it just simply has to happen.

The more time he gets means even top 4 will be in danger.

Things just cannot keep going on like this we need a change.
Absolutely things have to change and for me Ole gets a couple more weeks to change it before I call it a dead cause
 

NZT-One

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
2,364
Location
Berlin
Realistically looked at, what would happen, if Ole gets sacked? Either there is another interim, maybe one of Carrick, McKenna, you know the names I guess. That isn't a great outlook I'd say. If we sack Ole and want to go for an actual manager we have made a difficult decision even more difficult because we limit ourselves to the managers, who are available right now. (The better ones will value their integrety and switch clubs three month into the season.) The available ones would be Conte and Zidane. What if those two aren't suited for us? What if their vision doesn't align with the one of Fletcher and Murtough? What if we haven't scouted them properly, not done background checks.

I totally understand the feeling of needing a change, but is that really the smartest decision now? If there is a contingency plan, now is the time to execute it. If there isn't such a plan, people should work massive overtimes to create that plan. But going forward without an actual plan is what got us here in the first place. Got us Mourinho after LVG. Got Ole the permanent job prematurely. At some point we have to stop making decisions based on feelings, be that euphoric ones or very bad ones. We have to act smart - City waited something like a year for their man and prepared everything, then he came in and the journey started. Not saying we have to wait only for sake of waiting but a short-term decision may cost us even more time. Going without a plan has the potential to damage the current squad. Now it is Murtoughs time to shine, he needs to do the dirty work to find the suitable candidates and make a decision.
 
Last edited:

RazorOz

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2014
Messages
252
You can't really give any credence to what his ex-teammates say in terms of giving him time. At the end of the season they'd probably still say give him more time if we finished 10th. The season can actually be resurrected if you take action now, you only need to look at Chelsea last year for that, it can't be resurrected after the season is finished.

The thing is the same ex-teammates can often see all the problems, like Gary Neville will normally point out all the tactical mistakes, talk about surprise at the same 11 being picked as mid-week, but then still say give them more time. There's no actual reason to believe the latter point though outside of blind loyalty, it doesn't tie in with what they otherwise say tearing our performances to shreds.
 

FatTails

New Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
1,859
A bit of both

I believe that when you have invested in a manager's vision and he built a top squad over 3 years that he should get every chance to fix any problems

I said previously in this thread that he gets to International Break (so another 3 matches) to prove he can fix the issues



Absolutely things have to change and for me Ole gets a couple more weeks to change it before I call it a dead cause
I am so confused as to what you are realistically expecting to happen in 3 matches. He's been here for almost 3 years. This is it. There are no big changes that will suddenly happen. I mean even if I believed in him (which I don't at this point), I think you're asking a lot of him if you expect any meaningful change in approach over 3 matches. For example, today we tried to press and did it badly; can we realistically become a good pressing side over the next 3 matches? It is far too little time. When we play City, I guess he can go back to the sit-deep-and-counter approach, but even if he does and we do win that game, it is one game and doesn't change much in the grand scheme of things.

Genuinely trying to understand what the best case scenario is for the next 3 matches that would make it seem that we are on the right track again, and if that is at all realistic.
 

Red_toad

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
11,601
Location
DownUnder
Clubs usually struggle when they made major changes to their first 11. Here, we have 3 major disruptions.

But things will get better especially with CR7 around.
Be a valid point if it were not 10 players who started when fit last season plus Ronaldo.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,583
Location
india
A bit of both

I believe that when you have invested in a manager's vision and he built a top squad over 3 years that he should get every chance to fix any problems

I said previously in this thread that he gets to International Break (so another 3 matches) to prove he can fix the issues



Absolutely things have to change and for me Ole gets a couple more weeks to change it before I call it a dead cause
He isn't going to prove anything. It'll be the usual over the next couple of months, a few good results that get fists pumping and a few crop ones that expose us. We're never going to be a top class side under this manager and hanging on to a few wins /runs of form will do nothing but delay the inevitable.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,140
Wining the next 3 matches would prove jack shit.

Ole is not good enough to manage a club of this level and we won't be finishing in the top four if he stays in charge this season. Even if we beat Spurs and City.
 

NewYorkRed

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 11, 2021
Messages
1,609
Wining the next 3 matches would prove jack shit.

Ole is not good enough to manage a club of this level and we won't be finishing in the top four if he stays in charge this season. Even if we beat Spurs and City.
Agree with the first part of the post: even if we win the next 6, it still proves nothing. He has shown he is not the right man.

But the second part- to hell with top 4. With the squad we have, top 4 should be a given. I’m tired of hearing about it. I’m tired of talking about it. We are becoming liverpool. With the talent we have, we need to start talking titles again.

The performances this year are straight out garbage so far. Bring a new coach in and lets try to actually win something this year and change the mood around the club.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,140
Agree with the first part of the post: even if we win the next 6, it still proves nothing. He has shown he is not the right man.

But the second part- to hell with top 4. With the squad we have, top 4 should be a given. I’m tired of hearing about it. I’m tired of talking about it. We are becoming liverpool. With the talent we have, we need to start talking titles again.

The performances this year are straight out garbage so far. Bring a new coach in and lets try to actually win something this year and change the mood around the club.
I agree, anyone trying to make the argument that just finishing top four this season would be good enough to warrant more time wasted on Ole should be laughed out the room.

My point is that, without a shadow of doubt, if we stick with Ole to the end of the season we won't even be talking about top four. We'll be fighting it out for the Europa League places with Arsenal and Spurs, and we'll lose. That's the situation Ole has brought us to in the space of just 9 league games.
 

Hughie77

Full Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
4,128
No matter what players you've got if the set up is not right it's not right, slow slow slow, then to quick with the ball, it's a shambles .
It's not a coincidence that the errors in games are coming from a lack of awareness intensity not reacting to different things on the pitch.
Imo that comes down to to many prima Donna's on the pitch, who all want the attention.

Now I'd dropp at least 5 of those 11 from Sundays game. Maguire being 1 Shaw the other his fecking head has gone back to what it was, under Jose, complacency he's in the England fold now happy days. Bruno out , Jesse lingard in , Sancho in Greenwood out, and Cavani in Ronny out , Fred out DVB in.

The predictable 11 ole picks when all fit he goes with the 2 CM . This hasn't worked properly most of the time, and has gone to pot since Ronny came in. Paul Scholes called thus outcome on Wednesday night , because like most UTD followers can see its a Shambles.

Oles getting until next International break . Then he's out, unless fortunes change .?
 

Josh 76

Full Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
5,582
Realistically looked at, what would happen, if Ole gets sacked? Either there is another interim, maybe one of Carrick, McKenna, you know the names I guess. That isn't a great outlook I'd say. If we sack Ole and want to go for an actual manager we have made a difficult decision even more difficult because we limit ourselves to the managers, who are available right now. (The better ones will value their integrety and switch clubs three month into the season.) The available ones would be Conte and Zidane. What if those two aren't suited for us? What if their vision doesn't align with the one of Fletcher and Murtough? What if we haven't scouted them properly, not done background checks.

I totally understand the feeling of needing a change, but is that really the smartest decision now? If there is a contingency plan, now is the time to execute it. If there isn't such a plan, people should work massive overtimes to create that plan. But going forward without an actual plan is what got us here in the first place. Got us Mourinho after LVG. Got Ole the permanent job prematurely. At some point we have to stop making decisions based on feelings, be that euphoric ones or very bad ones. We have to act smart - City waited something like a year for their man and prepared everything, then he came in and the journey started. Not saying we have to wait only for sake of waiting but a short-term decision may cost us even more time. Going without a plan has the potential to damage the current squad. Now it is Murtoughs time to shine, he needs to do the dirty work to find the suitable candidates and make a decision.
You can’t keep a crap manager if there is no obvious replacement.

You sack a manger if they are crap at their job.

I have my own business and if the manager was ruining my business, I wouldn’t keep them on and ruin it even more.

What’s obvious to everyone seems is not obvious to Ole. I know exactly what happened at OT yesterday. Ole basically bottled it. He firstly bottled dropping Ronaldo again after the stick he got after the Everton game. Secondly he bottled sticking to his way of playing (counter attacking ) and tried to change into a pressing team without actually working on it.

There was so much more wrong with the performance against Liverpool that I can’t write it all down. To summarise, Ole has taken Utd as far as he can. He has put Utd into the best position to hand over to the next manager, than any other manager at this club (Including Fergie). If Utd are not careful and don’t do anything now, all that hard work this club has put in the last 3 years will all be a waste and we will be back where we were when Mourhino was sacked.
 

PaulRich

Full Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
899
He isn’t going to get sacked unless we fall right down the table.
Spurs and City up next alongside a what could be defining CL trip to Italy. Watch this space. Going into the Europa after the Groups would be the icing on it to be fair.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,781
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Are you sure?

That was quite possibly and legitimately both the worst result and performance in our modern history...and not only that but it was entirely predictable, entirely because our manager's ineptness has become entirely predictable.

If you have a squad that allows you to leave Sancho, Cavani and Pogba on the bench, then really any defeat prior to achieving success should be bringing questions about your managerial ability. We're not talking about that. We're talking about a situation where we lose 5-0 at home and it's barely even a surprise. The fact this situation exists in the first place is as damming a verdict as there will ever be for any united manager.

At no point under Moyes, Lvg or Jose would I have expected something as bad as that. Today I did because it wasn't really any worse than anything else we've served up recently
You know things are bad when noodles is in full hyperbolic rant mode and you don’t disagree with a word he says.
 

Raw

Full Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2013
Messages
25,421
Location
Manchester, UK
The longer this season goes on, the more this season just becomes pointless.

With the squad at have we could actually maybe do something in the Champions League ala Chelsea (provided we get a midfielder in Jan)... But it requires someone competent in charge
Yeah that's what's so frustrating for me. Every day with Ole in charge is another day wasted with this squad. It won't be too long before we have to address the striker problem, I'd rather not have us waste what's left of Ronaldo and Cavani on this shite.
 

Ixion

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2003
Messages
15,275
The stick Scholes got pointing out the obvious on Wednesday was annoying. Head in the sand stuff because Atalanta bottled it.
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
29,894
Location
Austria
Are you sure?

That was quite possibly and legitimately both the worst result and performance in our modern history...and not only that but it was entirely predictable, entirely because our manager's ineptness has become entirely predictable.

If you have a squad that allows you to leave Sancho, Cavani and Pogba on the bench, then really any defeat prior to achieving success should be bringing questions about your managerial ability. We're not talking about that. We're talking about a situation where we lose 5-0 at home and it's barely even a surprise. The fact this situation exists in the first place is as damming a verdict as there will ever be for any united manager.

At no point under Moyes, Lvg or Jose would I have expected something as bad as that. Today I did because it wasn't really any worse than anything else we've served up recently
Can't disagree with any of that
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,797
Location
Somewhere out there
The only thing I hate in all this is the “give him to the end of the season” nonsense. We’re 9 games in, a change now, as Tuchel proved, could turn this from a nothing wasted season for the likes of Ronaldo and Cavani, to a successful one.

I can never agree with throwing away a season just to show loyalty to an extremely well paid manager who’s been given a chance he never earned.
 

NZT-One

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
2,364
Location
Berlin
The only thing I hate in all this is the “give him to the end of the season” nonsense. We’re 9 games in, a change now, as Tuchel proved, could turn this from a nothing wasted season for the likes of Ronaldo and Cavani, to a successful one.

I can never agree with throwing away a season just to show loyalty to an extremely well paid manager who’s been given a chance he never earned.
But what if it isn't to show loyalty but because you doubt the current options and want to make sure, the next steps are taken well prepared?

I mean, I am the last one not to be happy about Tuchel last year. He helped in arguments big time because here you had a manager showing that it is possible to implement something without needing 6 new players and months and years. But that, and that is the deciding factor in my eyes, isn't the question anymore: back then, people argued, that we shouldn't expect this and that because the manager didn't have enough time and backing. The proved answer was, some managers can make it work without time and backing.

The question now is different, it should be how likely is it, that a new manager comes in and gets us on track in a short time. It is possible. But is it likely? Is it so likely, that the potential gains (trophies, titles) would outweigh going for a manager now who might not be the first one on the list?
 

OmarUnited4ever

Full Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Messages
3,435
But what if it isn't to show loyalty but because you doubt the current options and want to make sure, the next steps are taken well prepared?
Simple, fire Ole, bring new manager, with short term contract (6 months) or interim basis, and a mandate to turn things around, if said manager fails, then wait till contract expires and look at other candidates.
 

Rajma

Full Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Messages
8,577
Location
Lithuania
The only thing I hate in all this is the “give him to the end of the season” nonsense. We’re 9 games in, a change now, as Tuchel proved, could turn this from a nothing wasted season for the likes of Ronaldo and Cavani, to a successful one.

I can never agree with throwing away a season just to show loyalty to an extremely well paid manager who’s been given a chance he never earned.
Couldn’t agree more. I keep hearing on the foundations Ole is going to leave for the next manager once he leaves next summer totally ignoring the reality that Ronaldo/Cavani are not getting younger and are likely to depart at the end of the season. Then you have Lingard/Donny/Pogba/Martial who are all nailed on to feck off in the summer without getting a taste under a new manger. Just let someone competent in through that door right now and this can still be turned into a decent season giving manager time to assess these players for the upcoming summer.
 

NZT-One

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
2,364
Location
Berlin
Simple, fire Ole, bring new manager, with short term contract (6 months) or interim basis, and a mandate to turn things around, if said manager fails, then wait till contract expires and look at other candidates.
Simple, look where the last manager with a 6 month contract got us :)

I understand the motivation, I'd still consider it too big of a risk. Not the sacking part, but the replacement part. Quality wise, I don't doubt Conte or Zidane, but are they a progressive choice? I don't know... Plus I'd be not just a little worried about Conte bringing his winger-less system with him. Could have serious effects on our brightest young players.
 

OmarUnited4ever

Full Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Messages
3,435
Simple, look where the last manager with a 6 month contract got us :)

I understand the motivation, I'd still consider it too big of a risk. Not the sacking part, but the replacement part. Quality wise, I don't doubt Conte or Zidane, but are they a progressive choice? I don't know... Plus I'd be not just a little worried about Conte bringing his winger-less system with him. Could have serious effects on our brightest young players.
It's too risky to keep Ole, you are not wrong in being worried about the replacement, but at this moment, Ole remaining in place is very risky in itself and there might be mutiny from some players downing tools.
 

R'hllor

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
15,414
Simple, fire Ole, bring new manager, with short term contract (6 months) or interim basis, and a mandate to turn things around, if said manager fails, then wait till contract expires and look at other candidates.
Yea just last time we had a interim manager, he got a perma job after 2-3 months and this place went full in ":drool::drool::drool:" "Ole at the wheel weeeee" "Quick someone post a picture of happy Fergie after PSG win, United DNA baby, Ole is the man" , best part this type of shit was spouted when performances already dropped off.
 

OmarUnited4ever

Full Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Messages
3,435
Yea just last time we had a interim manager, he got a perma job after 2-3 months and this place went full in ":drool::drool::drool:" "Ole at the wheel weeeee" "Quick someone post a picture of happy Fergie after PSG win, United DNA baby, Ole is the man" , best part this type of shit was spouted when performances already dropped off.
so, should Ole stay now or not? we talking about what should be done next, why do you care about how Ole got the job?
 

NZT-One

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
2,364
Location
Berlin
Because the last time we had an interim we were pretty quick and happy to extend with him as soon as everybody felt happy. What does prevent a scenario like that to happen again? Thats the issue with such short-term-thinking driven by emotion. They can turn out problematic.
 

Sviken

New Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2021
Messages
2,450
Because the last time we had an interim we were pretty quick and happy to extend with him as soon as everybody felt happy. What does prevent a scenario like that to happen again? Thats the issue with such short-term-thinking driven by emotion. They can turn out problematic.
The interim idea wasn't bad, per se. What was bad is giving Ole a contract before the season even ended rather than evaluating the performance after. Basically screwed us royally. We wouldn't be in this mess if the board didn't have a happy trigger finger when it comes to extending and giving contracts at whim.
 

NZT-One

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
2,364
Location
Berlin
The interim idea wasn't bad, per se. What was bad is giving Ole a contract before the season even ended rather than evaluating the performance after. Basically screwed us royally. We wouldn't be in this mess if the board didn't have a happy trigger finger when it comes to extending and giving contracts at whim.
I agree with you. But does that change anything? We have the same people sitting there still, don't we? I have trouble trusting their decisions at all, yet so many on here even want them to decide as fast as possible. Which makes a difficult thing even more difficult. And for what? For not having to see a certain guy in dugout anymore. I don't get it. If Conte the is best possible candidate for the job, after a thorough background check and deep talks, fine, do it. If he isn't lets not get talked into a reality where only he and Zidane are existing. Which interim do people have in mind? I think, the most likely one to take over is somebody from the current coaching team, if that happens what have we gained?
 

laughtersassassin

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,435
I'm sure he has changed his opinion. There isn't a single argument for keeping Ole beyond the international break
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,666
Because the last time we had an interim we were pretty quick and happy to extend with him as soon as everybody felt happy. What does prevent a scenario like that to happen again? Thats the issue with such short-term-thinking driven by emotion. They can turn out problematic.
A rational managerial appointment. My expectations are so low given how poor Ole's football has been, all I want is a manager who has built a single attacking team in a big 5-6 European league. That's literally it.

You hire someone, you give them the year (unless it's a disaster) and you can very easily see if they have been able to coach their style into the team. If not, goodbye and go again, if they have done well you back them with a select couple of good players and repeat. Within 2-3 years you'll know if they'll be able to challenge. It really is that simple.
 

NZT-One

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
2,364
Location
Berlin
A rational managerial appointment. My expectations are so low given how poor Ole's football has been, all I want is a manager who has built a single attacking team in a big 5-6 European league. That's literally it.

You hire someone, you give them the year (unless it's a disaster) and you can very easily see if they have been able to coach their style into the team. If not, goodbye and go again, if they have done well you back them with a select couple of good players and repeat. Within 2-3 years you'll know if they'll be able to challenge. It really is that simple.
A rational appointment is a prerequisite, isn't it? Surely, nobody won't want that.

I have some trouble seeing the simplicity there to be honest. I mean, of course sounds good if it works out with the first candidate, if not, things start to get more difficult. Different candidates might play different player types, different formations. You simply cannot afford a) the manager to take these decisions AND b) exchange managers on a constant basis. As long as some sort of continuity is provided by the structure (something we hope but do not know regarding Fletcher and Murtough) it looks different. A bit at least because a certain idea how you want to play reduces the number of potential candidates.

I get the frustration. I really do but we are not allowed to take a shortcut this time. We have to go the hard way for once because we never did after Moyes, it was always the obvious and easy choice.
If the top 1 or 2 of our shortlist* is available, alright strike as fast as it gets. But if none of those two is available, there is no point in sidestepping just for the (realistically only small) chance of completely changing the course of the season.

*Shortlist done by excessively thorough background checks and alignments in terms of visions and goals
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,666
A rational appointment is a prerequisite, isn't it? Surely, nobody won't want that.

I have some trouble seeing the simplicity there to be honest. I mean, of course sounds good if it works out with the first candidate, if not, things start to get more difficult. Different candidates might play different player types, different formations. You simply cannot afford a) the manager to take these decisions AND b) exchange managers on a constant basis. As long as some sort of continuity is provided by the structure (something we hope but do not know regarding Fletcher and Murtough) it looks different. A bit at least because a certain idea how you want to play reduces the number of potential candidates.

I get the frustration. I really do but we are not allowed to take a shortcut this time. We have to go the hard way for once because we never did after Moyes, it was always the obvious and easy choice.
If the top 1 or 2 of our shortlist* is available, alright strike as fast as it gets. But if none of those two is available, there is no point in sidestepping just for the (realistically only small) chance of completely changing the course of the season.

*Shortlist done by excessively thorough background checks and alignments in terms of visions and goals
No, honestly it really is that simple as long as you don’t just throw darts blindfolded as we’ve done with the mish mash of coaching styles we’ve enjoyed.

Let’s say you want organised press and direct football. You stick to that and simply find the best available candidates and hope your 1st pick becomes available. You can’t wait around for coaches who might not even be good when they arrive.