Heardy
Full Member
thick / perfect looking black hairWhy lego?
thick / perfect looking black hairWhy lego?
Why lego?
thick / perfect looking black hair
How much would he cost do you think?Just my predictions (can see him there) because someone asked where he could go next year. He has to be crazy to stay at Arsenal but who could pay his wages though.
He wants a 3 yrs extension. He's 31 already.I think when we were linked with him befor he joined Arsenal I was dismissive because of his age, how wrong I was, arguably the best striker in the league. Arsenal's best piece of business this summer will be keeping hold of him.
Benzema won them the title and was their key player this season + Zidane loves him (and rightly so).How much would he cost do you think?
Maybe Madrid would want him to replace Benzema?
agree that I'd take him as we did RvP.. and agree it won't happenI can still see him scoring 30+ at age 34, I'd take him at Old Trafford, but it's not going to happen.
A. Sanchez?agree that I'd take him as we did RvP.. and agree it won't happen
He is 31.This is a tricky situation for Arsenal and Aubamayeng. Giving a 350k contract to Aubamayeng, already 29, puts them at serious risk of him underperforming given his age and therefore having to continue to pay him because other clubs would not want to give Aubamayeng the same contract (essentially an Ozil situation over again). Maybe they can give him a short term high wage contract, something like 350k for 2-3 years, as he would likely still play a high level for the next season, and prepare Martinelli to take over when it expires. You can get value out of him without running to risk of carrying his wages beyond his decline period.
Aubamayeng himself should be more ambitious though given that he still hasn't won a league trophy and most likely won't if he stays at Arsenal. Atmost they will target a top 4 finish but going for the title is far beyond them for the near future. While non of the traditional big clubs today might be interested, I can imagine AC Milan wanting a new striker since they currently have only Ibra, and they would have a better chance of winning the Serie A than Arsenal would.
Oh yea that's true. Bugger. Less of a reason to give him a massive multi year (more than 2) contract.He is 31.
Yeah very tricky situation for Arsenal. He has 1 year left on contract, obviously he would command huge wages and length of the contract will be a problem, on the other hand they cant afford to lose him. He is their best player by a mile and also they won't be getting huge fee either due to age, wages, length of contract and covid financial difficulty.Oh yea that's true. Bugger. Less of a reason to give him a massive multi year contract.
If Arsenal can get something like 20 ME for him (along with a lower wage bill), then they should try and strengthen the squad with that money and continue with Lacazette-Martinelli. I like Laca and think he can score 20+ goals if given a chance consistently, Martinelli is young but can develop given the minutes.
It's certainly a tough choice for Arsenal. Aubamayeng is clearly their best player, but really old and would obviously want more than 2 years on a high wage contract to secure himself financially, that would be high risk for Arsenal.
The best situation for Arsenal would be a 2 year 350k contract. For the next two years you can continue to play Auba-Laca with Martinelli developing with continuous minutes. After 2 years when Auba would probably not be at the same high level, he can go for free and Martinelli would be immediately ready to take over and be their lead striker.Yeah very tricky situation for Arsenal. He has 1 year left on contract, obviously he would command huge wages and length of the contract will be a problem, on the other hand they cant afford to lose him. He is their best player by a mile and also they won't be getting huge fee either due to age, wages, length of contract and covid financial difficulty.
Yeah but Auba should agree to 2 year extension, that would be the problem.The best situation for Arsenal would be a 2 year 350k contract. For the next two years you can continue to play Auba-Laca with Martinelli developing with continuous minutes. After 2 years when Auba would probably not be at the same high level, he can go for free and Martinelli would be immediately ready to take over and be their lead striker.
Ofcourse, if Auba continues to play amazing at 33 (like Lewandowski and Benzema have shown), then he can get an extension.
He's not asking nor are we offering him 350k. The figures thrown around are 250k with bonuses wich is a 50/70k raise on his current contract.The best situation for Arsenal would be a 2 year 350k contract. For the next two years you can continue to play Auba-Laca with Martinelli developing with continuous minutes. After 2 years when Auba would probably not be at the same high level, he can go for free and Martinelli would be immediately ready to take over and be their lead striker.
Ofcourse, if Auba continues to play amazing at 33 (like Lewandowski and Benzema have shown), then he can get an extension.
that was a straight swop, whereby Arsenal were as stupid as as in thinking they'd got a bargainA. Sanchez?
Last year in here you had a transfer thread named Aubameyang yay or nay? It was very clear he was underrated with comments like "he is so meh", "I rather take Lacazette" etc. I even got jumped on by a few posters when I suggested he is a clinical striker.I marvel that there are people who still doubt his quality.
He's world class, the elephant in the room is his age obviously with him being somewhat pace-reliant but he'd improve any squadLast year in here you had a transfer thread named Aubameyang yay or nay? It was very clear he was underrated with comments like "he is so meh", "I rather take Lacazette" etc. I even got jumped on by a few posters when I suggested he is a clinical striker.
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/aubameyang-yay-or-nay.448615/
I'm sure he still has his doubters, even if he keeps banging the goals in, year after year.
Yeah that is a valid concern. That is why I could understand those who didn't want him because of those reasons.He's world class, the elephant in the room is his age obviously with him being somewhat pace-reliant but he'd improve any squad
IndeedLast year in here you had a transfer thread named Aubameyang yay or nay? It was very clear he was underrated with comments like "he is so meh", "I rather take Lacazette" etc. I even got jumped on by a few posters when I suggested he is a clinical striker.
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/aubameyang-yay-or-nay.448615/
I'm sure he still has his doubters, even if he keeps banging the goals in, year after year.
People who said no may also justify saying Martial has stepped up for the 9 role.Yeah that is a valid concern. That is why I could understand those who didn't want him because of those reasons.
Sanchez was available on a free, so the fact that the club got a player for him was good business.that was a straight swop, whereby Arsenal were as stupid as as in thinking they'd got a bargain
I think that's more that only 2 clubs will challenge for the title.And Charlie Nicholas apparently wrote that there only are 2 better clubs in England for Aubameyang right now - Liverpool and City. He apparently thinks that Arsenal are better than United.
OMG!