Eddy_JukeZ
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2012
- Messages
- 17,845
Subpar squad for a manager not fit for the top level.
I can only recommend Specsavers or you tuned into the wrong game.
Their team lost and it was against Utd. So obviously it was dodgy.How dodgy ? Bruno was going on goal. As clear red as it ever been. Same happened to Newcastle against Liverpool.
How well did Dean Henderson play today? Game 1 down of 30I can only recommend Specsavers or you tuned into the wrong game.
Coops, in his post match Vid, said they used the anger they were feeling after the shitty decisions at OT and took it out on ChelseaBoth the pen and the red card were correct decision in the United game.
No we were about at the same level - the difference at United was the ref and a dodgy sending off. I do agree that Chelsea are terrible, not a lot of effort or guile and a predictable team to set up against.
Coops, in his post match Vid, said they used the anger they were feeling after the shitty decisions at OT and took it out on Chelsea
No we were about at the same level - the difference at United was the ref and a dodgy sending off. I do agree that Chelsea are terrible, not a lot of effort or guile and a predictable team to set up against.
What does that even mean!!How well did Dean Henderson play today? Game 1 down of 30
Why is there a cult of Poch? He’s the ultimate failure and couldn’t even win a one horse race in France.
So glad United didn’t waste a season or two under him
Cue to the other PL teams, get angry at legitimate decisions so that you can win the next game!Coops, in his post match Vid, said they used the anger they were feeling after the shitty decisions at OT and took it out on Chelsea
He spent far too long at Spurs. It’s in the blood now. Aim low, you’ll never be disappointed.Yes. PSG were criticized for their subpar performances and he moaned about expectations being too high, that PSG shouldn't be expected to win every games. That press conference was an eye opener, he isn't a winner at least not at the level required by top clubs, where you are definitely expected to win every games, it won't happen but it's the goal and you have to do it with style in most places.
Why is there a cult of Poch? He’s the ultimate failure and couldn’t even win a one horse race in France.
So glad United didn’t waste a season or two under him
Don’t care 3pts and 9th in the table- enjoy your weekend.You were rubbish today, but Chelsea were worse.
Don’t care 3pts and 9th in the table- enjoy your weekend.
Coops, in his post match Vid, said they used the anger they were feeling after the shitty decisions at OT and took it out on Chelsea
Thought they were subpar at best today. Taking away the Jackson chance that sterling did well with, I can't remember many other chances.Thought they were ok today but they are basically like us, no real attackers you’d trust to put the ball in the back of the net. Also like us they will get countered to hell and back by direct balls and if you can’t score and make a cushion you’re dropping points most games.
Interesting...seeing a few sensible post recently. I must be dreaming or something. But, you are spot on. With the amount of outgoings, ingoings, youth in the team and injuries, a lot of managers wouldn't be able to cope, yet the performance by Chelsea has been great which points to better signs to come once those hurdles are overcome. They are playing without their best attacker, so it is common that they will look a bit toothless in front of goal. Take haaland, rashford, saka, salah out of their respective team and they won't look as strong.Think it's a bit predictable that after signing so many new players without a specific direction or vision that this would happen. I don't think it's necessarily a Poch issue, but whatever they have now isn't something that any manager could work with without being given time. I'm not his biggest fan, but they need a bit of stability.
Thought they were subpar at best today. Taking away the Jackson chance that sterling did well with, I can't remember many other chances.
Forest, scored and if elanga got his head up a few times could have punished them more.
Chelsea were pretty aimless today. They were fine against Luton, but then it's Luton. They looked poor v west ham.
I'm sure Chelsea didn't use three/five at the back in pre season unless I'm dreaming that
It’s like lying to an angry mob to get them burn the town down.Coops, in his post match Vid, said they used the anger they were feeling after the shitty decisions at OT and took it out on Chelsea
I’ll have what you’re having man. Seeing the best in any situation to this level is something I can only dream of.Interesting...seeing a few sensible post recently. I must be dreaming or something. But, you are spot on. With the amount of outgoings, ingoings, youth in the team and injuries, a lot of managers wouldn't be able to cope, yet the performance by Chelsea has been great which points to better signs to come once those hurdles are overcome. They are playing without their best attacker, so it is common that they will look a bit toothless in front of goal. Take haaland, rashford, saka, salah out of their respective team and they won't look as strong.
Serious question and I’m not trolling. How do you spend so much of your time and energy debating with other people about an individual football manager who isn’t even related to the team you support in any way?Interesting...seeing a few sensible post recently. I must be dreaming or something. But, you are spot on. With the amount of outgoings, ingoings, youth in the team and injuries, a lot of managers wouldn't be able to cope, yet the performance by Chelsea has been great which points to better signs to come once those hurdles are overcome. They are playing without their best attacker, so it is common that they will look a bit toothless in front of goal. Take haaland, rashford, saka, salah out of their respective team and they won't look as strong.
There were a couple nearly chances, that frustratingly went begging because of a needless extra touch or a bad first touch or a great last ditch tackle. Sterling and Jackson probably had sitters if it weren’t for some great last ditch defending. I think a bit of luck and/or a bit of composure and finesse in the final third is what were lacking. Forest offered nothing really apart from a couple of counters when the game became stretched with us chasing the game.
But yeah, we played 4231 mostly in preseason and we looked good. This back 3 stuff is very annoying.
If performance was like Chelsea the past few season, it would be hard to see the best in any situation that is going on there. But chelsea are playing much better than they have the last few season. A lot of their fans acknowledged that. Only real problem so far is turning those performances into result, which will happen once they have a natural goalscorer.I’ll have what you’re having man. Seeing the best in any situation to this level is something I can only dream of.
Serious question and I’m not trolling. How do you spend so much of your time and energy debating with other people about an individual football manager who isn’t even related to the team you support in any way?
I’ve known about fanboys of players before (Ronaldo/Messi for example) but I’ve never known someone get so attached to a manager before and especially a manager who hasn’t ever won a European trophy.
Again, genuine question as I’m curious. I would probably understand if it was Pep, Sir Alex, Klopp or Clough. But Pochettino? It just makes no sense to me.
Though it's 3 defenders, I would love to see Chilwell's average position.
One of them needs to change their name.Chilwell is basically a LW in this system and Colwill plays the LB.
Said these before:
- Chelsea should get an experienced Maguire if they're going to play deep, or in back 3. He's not expensive, either. They shouldn't rely on a 38 y.o. Silva.
- Chelsea would struggle as they lack of creativity in their attack. Liverpool's Sterling was creative, but then he was 'transformed' into more about goalscoring at City.
Enzo, Caceido and Gallagher or Case, Amrabat and Bruno?Chelsea won't be top 4, midfield with Enzo, Caicedo and Gallagher has not enough creativity. I think Pot will start dropping one of them for an attacking midfielder. I think Sterling is done at this level, seems like an average winger and he will slowly be replaced.
Not even Poch himself would play such a tiresome and worn out WUM routine.I wonder if it’s Poch himself. Probably gets bored and searches forums to big himself up
Chelsea won't be top 4, midfield with Enzo, Caicedo and Gallagher has not enough creativity. I think Pot will start dropping one of them for an attacking midfielder. I think Sterling is done at this level, seems like an average winger and he will slowly be replaced.
Chelsea won't be top 4, midfield with Enzo, Caicedo and Gallagher has not enough creativity. I think Pot will start dropping one of them for an attacking midfielder. I think Sterling is done at this level, seems like an average winger and he will slowly be replaced.
Enzo, Caceido and Gallagher or Case, Amrabat and Bruno?
Interesting...seeing a few sensible post recently. I must be dreaming or something. But, you are spot on. With the amount of outgoings, ingoings, youth in the team and injuries, a lot of managers wouldn't be able to cope, yet the performance by Chelsea has been great which points to better signs to come once those hurdles are overcome. They are playing without their best attacker, so it is common that they will look a bit toothless in front of goal. Take haaland, rashford, saka, salah out of their respective team and they won't look as strong.