After the humiliating defeat by Grimsby some people, too many people, were it seemed trying to claim the match should be replayed because Grimsby fielded a player who hadn't been properly authourized; well, if that player had been Ronaldo or Messi in their pomp then, maybe, there might have been an argument worth having, but the stark, reality was that United should never have lost to a team 3 tiers below them. And now there are people trying to convince themselves that if, against Brentford, the referee had given us a penalty the result might have been different. It wouldn't have been. Brentford were 2 up in 20 minutes and were never really put under any real pressure. Stark reality chaps...we were not and are not good enough. Harry Maguire is a shell of the player he once was, and has been for years; Luke Shaw has been dire for even longer, when, that is, he could even be bothered to get off the treatment table to play; Dalot can be good going forward and has his moments as a defender, but not nearly enough, and to cap it all we buy a new keeper to replace Onana but then keep him on the bench! Is Senne Lammens fit enough to play or not? Is he even good enough to play? And if the answer to either question is "No" why did we buy him? Wasn't Jim Ratcliffe going to change our broken transfer policy and cut out waste?
Manchester United, on and off the field, are a shambles and have been for over 10 years despite trying 7 different managers, various "Directors of Football" and other positions since SAF retired and spending countless millions on transfers and wages. People say United are "too big" to go down....once we were, but not any longer...if things don't change radically, and soon, relegation from the Premiership could very well become another stark reality.