PL W FA Premier League

Manchester United 4:1 Chelsea

Post-match discussion


Thu, 25 May 2023

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
5,861
I must of watched a different game than you 8-8 at half time?
We'll be fine in the cup final stop this nonsense that we'll get battered
.
I despair with the caf sometimes so feckin negative all the time no matter what thread I go in.
Normally I would sympathise with that sentiment, but in this case there's good cause. Because that really was a somewhat worrying performance, in many respects. Our midfield was cut through like butter, we were frequently a shambles at the back and there was that telltale sign present in all of our big defeats this season; the half-second-too-lateness in duels and lack of sharpness and precision for long stretches. If we played like that against a good team it'd be us walking off the pitch with a lopsided loss, and against a competent one it'd be at best a toss-up how the points fell. Luckily, Chelsea were neither.
 

Djemba-Djemba

Full Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
21,157
Location
Manchester
A bogey team? We're unbeaten in 11 against them.
It's weird, loads on here see them as a bogey side.

They probably were 10 years ago but in recent history they aren't, we're their bogey side if anything.

Haven't beaten us at all for over 3 years, haven't beaten us in the League for nearly 6 years, haven't won at Old Trafford in over 10 years.
 

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
5,861
That Chelsea team is hideously organised. Every attack they're throwing six or seven players in or around the box and none of them can score or create. Then when they inevitably give the ball away they've got 3 defenders.
They were pretty good in patches today, usually in parts of the pitch that dont matter in the slightest.
They're not a very good team but they're playing in an utterly stupid way.
They were astoundingly bad. Good at one thing: Moving the ball from their own third to the attacking third. And then, as you say, they create chances by overloading, only they can't finish them and are so exposed when they lose the ball. Can't defend on transition, can't defend their own box. Fofana in particular was just awful. Considered as a tactical approach against Manchester United, it ticks pretty much every "don't do" box. Well done, Super Frank.
 

mitchmouse

loves to hate United.
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
17,361
Forget one thing: I do hope Liverpool enjoy the slog of Thursday nights! :):devil::devil::devil:
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,350
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
It's weird, loads on here see them as a bogey side.

They probably were 10 years ago but in recent history they aren't, we're their bogey side if anything.

Haven't beaten us at all for over 3 years, haven't beaten us in the League for nearly 6 years, haven't won at Old Trafford in over 10 years.
The fortress Stamford Bridge scars take a long time to heal!
 

dalriada

Full Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2019
Messages
594
Location
A Mancunian living in Surrey
Enjoyable but frustrating game at the same time. Great to see a game that isn't a laboured 1-0 but alarming how easily Chelsea were allowed to maraud through the midfield in the first half. They were very bad on the night, we were lucky to catch them at what must be their lowest point, as there are the makings of a good sign once Poch gives them some spine.
Paul Scholes was speculating on whether ETH will be more pragmatic against City and play with an extra midfielder, which you almost feel is essential if we're not going to get massacred. Except, as he says, ETH tends to stick with his attacking philosophy and you wonder where the goals will come from if he plays a midfield three.
 

Eurotrash

Full Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2005
Messages
1,804
Location
Cake or Death?
Astonished at how poor Chelsea were. And for parts of the game, we matched them at being shit. For other parts, we were pretty good.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,206
A bogey team? We're unbeaten in 11 against them.
Maybe its just bad memories from years gone by. I've hated playing Chelsea since the oil money came.

Anyway, they're abysmal now and will be back to mid table again.
 

Jeffthered

Full Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2015
Messages
2,678
Sancho improving. Still not there but promising
Sorry, Sancho was rubbish. No more rubbish at United please. He seems lost. He doesn't affect the game, it's like he's had a lobotomy and has forgotten how to play football. Nothing to his game, no authority, nothing.

Big wages though.
 

GueRed

Full Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2020
Messages
2,849
Location
London
Delighted with the result, nice to see them score a few goals for a change :)

The game was too open for my liking though, we weren't compact enough as a team...

I'd be surprised if ten Hag sets the team up like that against City in the Cup Final...otherwise we could get battered again.
 

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
5,861
Sorry, Sancho was rubbish. No more rubbish at United please. He seems lost. He doesn't affect the game, it's like he's had a lobotomy and has forgotten how to play football. Nothing to his game, no authority, nothing.

Big wages though.
If you're seeing "not enough", you're watching attentively. If you're seeing "nothing", you're not. Even if you don't mean it literally. There's an assist, for starters. Quite a few other good offensive involvements too - as well as quite a few bad ones. All in all, at most a relatively okayish performance. Which is not enough, but also not "lost" or "nothing".
 

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
5,861
Thought we were very good in the second half although part of that was down to how truly awful Chelsea were - I had no idea there were that bad.

Casemiro was excellent and I think this was close to Bruno's best game of the season (possibly the best). Also very good yet again was Lindelof (he must be the back-up next season) and Varane is just so calm it's crazy. Comparing him to Maguire is like comparing Einstein to Trump. rashford woke up after half time and was good, and Sancho was more involved in the second half too. I thought Antony worried them before he got injured and Fred and McT were OK when they came on.

Negatives? Martial was awful yet again and I can't help thinking DDG should have got a hand on Felix's shot - on that front, felix looks good... I do wonder if he could play alongside Kane!

All in all, a much easier night than I was expecting and not in my wildest dreams did I think we could finish third (not that we have yet) this season. 41 wins for ETH is remarkable, just a shame a few more weren't in the PL (or europa).

one final point: what a differnece Garnacho made when he came on - so direct, so pacy. needs to play in the cup final
I really don't think that was Bruno's best game (or even a particularly good game from him), and I think Antony mainly worried ETH. But otherwise agree.

I'd add that Shaw had a lousy game, before being substituted. And that Eriksen was excellent in his forward passing, but also somewhat overmatched defensively.
 

Maticmaker

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
4,617
4-1 home win, next to last game of the season, moves us up to third, will take that any day.

However there were worries, in particular when we were on the offensive in the first half we wasted chances yet again and were vulnerable to breakaways. In truth in the first half Chelsea might had at least three goals, despite De Gea not having to make one save, but they were not just bad but awful in front of goal.

Second half we worked the counter-attack massively well and this time notched up the goals. De Gea did finally have to make some good saves and he did. Reckon Newcastle will give Chelsea lots more pain on Sunday. So a one goal win, going in off somebody's backside will do against Fulham
 

red woppit

Full Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2017
Messages
2,229
Location
Buchebi
Supports
Northampton Town
They were astoundingly bad. Good at one thing: Moving the ball from their own third to the attacking third. And then, as you say, they create chances by overloading, only they can't finish them and are so exposed when they lose the ball. Can't defend on transition, can't defend their own box. Fofana in particular was just awful. Considered as a tactical approach against Manchester United, it ticks pretty much every "don't do" box. Well done, Super Frank.
I'd noticed that. Between the boxes they look quite a decent team, but in each box they are appallingly bad.
I'm sure with a proper manager/coach they will improve next season, but they certainly need to get rid of a whole host of players, and I'm pretty sure that whoever the new boss is, he will have his own ideas about players required for the team.
 

Redbandito

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 29, 2019
Messages
165
Mudryk should have scored, Gallagher should have slotted his away in The far post as well imo.
Havertz header was a sitter
Mudryk’s was the only sitter imo. Havertz should have done better, but the ball was low and behind him a bit. Don’t think that was a clear sitter. Definitely don’t think Gallagher’s was an expected goal opportunity. Wouldn’t be shocking for a player to score from that position, but it wasn’t a gimme either.
 

jackal&hyde

Full Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2018
Messages
4,220
First half was like a game between 2 teams with issues in defending, the second we were very good.

Just the perfect result. Bruno deserves special mention and also Sancho.
 

alexthelion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2019
Messages
3,601
Mudryk’s was the only sitter imo. Havertz should have done better, but the ball was low and behind him a bit. Don’t think that was a clear sitter. Definitely don’t think Gallagher’s was an expected goal opportunity. Wouldn’t be shocking for a player to score from that position, but it wasn’t a gimme either.
This.

Only one of the three was a sitter.
 

mitchmouse

loves to hate United.
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
17,361
I really don't think that was Bruno's best game (or even a particularly good game from him), and I think Antony mainly worried ETH. But otherwise agree.

I'd add that Shaw had a lousy game, before being substituted. And that Eriksen was excellent in his forward passing, but also somewhat overmatched defensively.
It's odd... I think Bruno's been quite poor this season while others have hm close to player of the year. I thought he was very involved with build-up play last night, without doing anything superb - and, generally speaking, got on without without moaning too much.

I agree about Shaw... I'm still not 100% convinced by him or AWB... have a feeling they were why Chelsea created so many chances

Did you think we should have had a penalty earlier in the game?
 

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
5,861
It's odd... I think Bruno's been quite poor this season while others have hm close to player of the year. I thought he was very involved with build-up play last night, without doing anything superb - and, generally speaking, got on without without moaning too much.

I agree about Shaw... I'm still not 100% convinced by him or AWB... have a feeling they were why Chelsea created so many chances

Did you think we should have had a penalty earlier in the game?
On balance, probably more no than yes. It wouldn't have been wrong, but it would have been pretty soft, by the standards refs are currently applying.

I thought the whole back 4 looked pretty messy as a unit, like they were trying to play man-marking against a Chelsea team who kept overloading. There was constantly a lot of space on the flanks, but that may have been by design rather than through any sins of omission by the FBs. AWB got caught upfield a few times, but he also had some strong, decisive interventions, and at least a little bit of presence going forward. Shaw looked very passive in his defending to me, was played past a few times and as far as I registered contributed almost nothing of note on the ball. An uncharacteristically weak game from him.
 

Mockney

Not the only poster to be named Poster of the Year
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
40,954
Location
Editing my own posts.
Normally I would sympathise with that sentiment, but in this case there's good cause. Because that really was a somewhat worrying performance, in many respects. Our midfield was cut through like butter, we were frequently a shambles at the back and there was that telltale sign present in all of our big defeats this season; the half-second-too-lateness in duels and lack of sharpness and precision for long stretches. If we played like that against a good team it'd be us walking off the pitch with a lopsided loss, and against a competent one it'd be at best a toss-up how the points fell. Luckily, Chelsea were neither.
I can see both sides to this tbh, because parts of the first half were worrying, but I think a lot of the negative people are ignoring that part of the reason Chelsea were able to look so dangerous in that period is because they committed a ridiculous amount of people forward, which meant they were always exposed to a 3 on 2 when we won the ball back… I mean we could’ve been further up in the first half if our attackers weren’t idiots, because no sensible team plays like that … because they end up conceding 4 goals even if they do look quite threatening.

Basically Chelsea played the whole first half like the last 10 minutes of a game they were losing. It made them look quite good, but also directly contributed to why they lost and no “good team” is going to approach a game like that.
 

Andrew Richmond

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 4, 2019
Messages
149
We scored 4, should have scored 3 or 4 more.

At the same time, there were times when they took us apart easily and the result could have been different.

The thing I take out of this game despite a positive result is how they dominated possession. There were times again when we could barely string more than three passes together before gifting possession back to them.

In the cup final, to have any chance of winning we need to secure at least 50% of the ball. If we gift more than an even share of the ball to City they will make us pay. They will surely take there chances whereas Chelsea did not.
 

Bogga

Full Member
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
1,817
Location
Sweden
Feels weird to complain when we win... and also manage to score 4 goals in one single game. But hell, even Southampton would've scored 2-3 goals on the chances they had in the first half... thank f*ck it was Chelesa!
 

TwoSheds

More sheds (and tiles) than you, probably
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
12,741
I'd noticed that. Between the boxes they look quite a decent team, but in each box they are appallingly bad.
I'm sure with a proper manager/coach they will improve next season, but they certainly need to get rid of a whole host of players, and I'm pretty sure that whoever the new boss is, he will have his own ideas about players required for the team.
Top centre forward and a decent coach will go a long way towards sorting them out. Bit like us really. Question is, can their American halfwit owners do better than our American halfwit owners in the summer?
 

Hughie77

Full Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
4,090
After the 2 games previously were we controlled these games and scored 1 in each this game was so so different, Chelsea imo were very good at times, and should have scored more, as of us we should have wrapped it up early doors again ,scoring in added time in 1st half was against run of play.

The 4 goals were great to see and should have been more, the inconsistencies in the 3 games is a bit of a worry, maybe it's the way Eth wanted to go in this game? I don't think so. Happy were in CL for next season. The Antony injury is a big miss. FA cup we need to turn up.
 

gerdm07

Thinks we should have kept Pereira
Joined
Aug 8, 2011
Messages
2,718
We needed goals and we finally got some. Hopefully this will give us confidence vs City.

- I can't think of one striker who would not shoot first time for that great opportunity by Martial in the first half. The pass was accurate with good pace and somehow he thinks he can take a touch with two defenders near him. I really hope we sell him in the summer and I hope he gets lucky and gets a goal in the final.
- Sancho is almost a fun player to watch.
- I hope some rest for Bruno will see him in good form vs City. If he plays like that I don't think we have a chance. A good Bruno will give us a slight chance.
- Too bad for Antony. The good news is this will likely mean Garnacho will start the final. Why not? He'll provide a better threat than Sancho on the right.
- Casemiro almost back to his best...just a few misplaced passes.
 

Fitchett

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
1,591
Location
Manchester
I was there last night and it was a really good open game to watch. Both sides missed a bag full of chances, but fortunately United defended better than Chelsea did. Great to secure CL qualification, especially at the expense of the Scousers. We even gave them a 7-0 win and they still couldn't qualify :lol::lol::lol:
 

Belisarius

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2021
Messages
655
Location
Ontario, Canada
We needed goals and we finally got some. Hopefully this will give us confidence vs City.

- I can't think of one striker who would not shoot first time for that great opportunity by Martial in the first half. The pass was accurate with good pace and somehow he thinks he can take a touch with two defenders near him. I really hope we sell him in the summer and I hope he gets lucky and gets a goal in the final.
- Sancho is almost a fun player to watch.
- I hope some rest for Bruno will see him in good form vs City. If he plays like that I don't think we have a chance. A good Bruno will give us a slight chance.
- Too bad for Antony. The good news is this will likely mean Garnacho will start the final. Why not? He'll provide a better threat than Sancho on the right.
- Casemiro almost back to his best...just a few misplaced passes.
I don't think Garnacho will start. He doesn't know his defensive responsibilities well enough to start against City. Shaw would get over-run behind him. Antony's injury will make the problem of wingers not tracking back even worse.
 

londonredmaniac

I suffer delusions of grandeur
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Messages
18,635
Location
Mid life crisis
Normally I would sympathise with that sentiment, but in this case there's good cause. Because that really was a somewhat worrying performance, in many respects. Our midfield was cut through like butter, we were frequently a shambles at the back and there was that telltale sign present in all of our big defeats this season; the half-second-too-lateness in duels and lack of sharpness and precision for long stretches. If we played like that against a good team it'd be us walking off the pitch with a lopsided loss, and against a competent one it'd be at best a toss-up how the points fell. Luckily, Chelsea were neither.
I thought it was a strange performance in that regard.

If Chelsea had got 3 first half we couldn't have complained. Though we could have had the same...3-3 at half time wouldn't be have been a ridiculous score line.

A piss poor Chelsea side came to Old Trafford and had more of the call and got at our back 4 on numerous occasions...all while walking through our midfield.

I really don't know what some people were watching tbh. I will take that big win all day long...but there were significant worrying periods that show that we are far from being anywhere near the finished article.

We can be got at very easily, by bang average teams.
 

EliasRavelino

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 13, 2023
Messages
37
Supports
Sevilla
Congratulations to Manchester United on qualifying for the Champions Leauge next season. Casemiro has been a rock in your team, world class.
 

Man of the Match

 Casemiro image Casemiro 84% of 259 votes

Runners-up

Player Ratings

6.5 Total Average Rating

Highest Rated Player

Lowest Rated Player

Compiled from 238 ratings.

Score Predictions

139,14,42
  • Man Utd win
  • Chelsea win
  • Draw

Detailed Results

  • 24% Man Utd 2:0 Chelsea
  • 16% Man Utd 1:0 Chelsea
  • 13% Man Utd 2:1 Chelsea
  • 11% Man Utd 1:1 Chelsea
  • 8% Man Utd 0:0 Chelsea
  • 6% Man Utd 3:0 Chelsea
  • 6% Man Utd 3:1 Chelsea
  • 3% Man Utd 0:1 Chelsea
  • 3% Man Utd 2:2 Chelsea
  • 2% Man Utd 3:2 Chelsea
  • 2% Man Utd 1:2 Chelsea
  • 2% Man Utd 0:2 Chelsea
  • 2% Man Utd 4:1 Chelsea
  • 2% Man Utd 5:0 Chelsea
  • 1% Man Utd 4:0 Chelsea
  • 1% Man Utd 0:4 Chelsea
  • 1% Man Utd 0:9 Chelsea
  • 1% Man Utd 8:0 Chelsea
Compiled from 195 predictions.
Show more results Score Predictions League Table

Match Stats

  1. Man Utd
  2. Chelsea
Possession
41% 59%
Shots
18 14
Shots on Target
9 5
Corners
3 4
Fouls
12 6

Referee

Stuart Attwell