Red Indian Chief Torn Rubber
Thus says Kemo
Fred cost us 3 points.
Van de beek should have started.
Van de beek should have started.
He didn't.Fred cost us 3 points.
Van de beek should have started.
Fred costs us 15 points a season he wouldn’t get in Southampton Brighton Everton sides, enfact I doubt he’d start for Fulham or Bournemouth in the championship ! And there is the problem , a player clearly out of his depth to play for an elite club just like our manager , out of his depth managing a super club !Fred cost us 3 points.
Van de beek should have started.
You don't think his insane play to give them the ball just before their goal was a huge factor in us not winning today?He didn't.
Nonsense. There are a half a dozen players to blame for that goal. Which makes it all the more depressing. And McTominay is the one who should be rooted to the bench.Fred cost us 3 points.
Van de beek should have started.
Maybe, but we didn't lose, so he cost us two points. It was a poor moment, but don't think it can be pinpointed as the sole reason we drew.You don't think his insane play to give them the ball just before their goal was a huge factor in us not winning today?
He certainly will play more attractive football with this team. Hasn't he won the FA Cup with Leicester? Also the Charity Shield?Rodgers takes this team no further than Ole already has. Guaranteed.
Rodgers is in a zero pressure position at Leicester, and the moments there have been real league pressures, he's bottled it.
He's a fine EPL top half manager, but he's not elite. And unless Ole is being replaced by an elite manager, it's not worth it. We all know where that road leads. It's been the case for the last 8 years.
I hope Ole is enough of a man and fan that he'd go before he was kicked so as not to taint his legend. He'll always be a legend, as much as he pisses me off in these days. But maybe he'll go if he realizes he can't take us any further. His absolute stubbornness suggests otherwise though. It will be such a shame if it comes to that.Of course the last few weeks have made doubters out of believers, myself included, but Ole's at the wheel was still being sung today and he wasn't booed off. I do worry the board may allow it get bad and he may see the match going fans turn on him but we are still very far from that.
What's your definition of good CF play? Getting nice chances?Tbf he wasn’t good today besides the nice attempt with the header
I agree. I thick Lingard would have been the better option and it is not saying with hindsight. His movements are better than Pogba and is quicker than Pogba.What's your definition of good CF play? Getting nice chances?
Spent the entire game playing with his back to goal and pinning back their defensive line, which gave us space between the lines to work with the ball.
Greenwood was having a good game, feck me, Martial was having a good game, they all knew what they were playing at.
Then we made the subs and went back to being a confused mess.
Because neither of McFred are actually DMs, the run around a lot rushing into bad positions but neither actually covers dangerous spaces well. The players obviously aren’t capable but what are our coaches up to?How can we play two defensive midfielders to protect the defense and give away the same chances game after game. They're either not cut out for that role or other players around them are letting them down.
Sitter? Have you ever headed a ball? It was a floated cross and it had no pace on it whatsoever. When Cristiano got a similar cross from Fred on Wednesday he knocked it down for Lingard, that's as much as he could realistically do with that. Cavani was in a better position in the box, granted, and there was nobody to knock it down to, but it is to his credit he actually put some pace on it and forced a good save.So Ronaldo plays for 40 minutes.. why couldn't he play for 60 minutes, get the game won and then sub him off? He's burying that Cavani headed sitter in the first half that's the difference between the goats and a good striker. Ronaldo never got a decent chance like that created for him
Yeah, maybe but I doubt itOne of these days, I’ll get the right channel and will be able to watch football “properly”
I thought he played well overall but it’s fashionable to kick a man when he’s down.Fred cost us 3 points.
Van de beek should have started.
Mate a top DM isn't a magician. He'd get exposed and we'd ask for a new one inside a year.It was always zero because we didn't buy a top DM. That would have given us an outside chance. To have a good chance you need to play high press.
Come on, he lets the team down time and time again in big moments. It’s not good enough to play well overall (which he did) but today he, arguably, was the main reason the goal was conceded.I thought he played well overall but it’s fashionable to kick a man when he’s down.
Jadon Sancho was hardly involved and certainly didn’t have a fantastic game. No goals or assists, no big involvements except for maybe a pass to Pogba unleashing a shot outside of target. Come on man, I want him to shine as much as you, but he was barely involved after coming on for 30 mins.It was a horrible result. A game we should have won comfortably. McFred was abysmal again, but amongst all of that negativity I think people are missing something very positive:
Jadon Sancho was VERY VERY GOOD! He played a fantastic game. Varane was also phenomenal but that is not a major news, while Sancho I think played his best game with us. Absolutely beautiful.
I respectfully disagree. He was very lively - full of tricks, harassing their defense, making fantastic crosses into the box (including that one to Pogba, but others as well), and landing practically every pass. As a winger, I think that qualifies for a great game. Scoring goals is not primary function of a winger, and as far as assists - well, he made great crosses that should have lead to something, but if then Bruno, Pogba, McT, Ronaldo and others he was setting up, were unable to finish - is that really Sancho's fault?Jadon Sancho was hardly involved and certainly didn’t have a fantastic game. No goals or assists, no big involvements except for maybe a pass to Pogba unleashing a shot outside of target. Come on man, I want him to shine as much as you, but he was barely involved after coming on for 30 mins.
Realistic and true.I think he’d really improve us as well, he’s a good manager. Obviously people will say his CV isn’t as good as Pep or Klopp’s but nobodies is. If we’re waiting for another one like them we’ll be waiting forever.
That’s it really.Poor. We never do enough to win games and again looked pretty clueless in possession. It’s not good enough anymore, this.
doubt you’ve actually been to any matches this season seeing as you’re so out of date.. But here match going fansWell no, most match going fans are behind him still actually, like it or not pal!
They had other chances and we didn’t create anywhere near enough (especially in the second half). If we won, it would’ve been a Villarreal-style win, and those are not sustainable.You don't think his insane play to give them the ball just before their goal was a huge factor in us not winning today?
I was at the Villa game last week and large “youre my Solskjaer” chants were very loud around the ground, so yeah in general they’re very behind him still.doubt you’ve actually been to any matches this season seeing as you’re so out of date.. But here match going fans
Michael Oliver