Prime Hazard or Prime Salah?

TheMagicFoolBus

Full Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
6,567
Location
Lisboa, Portugal
Supports
Chelsea
Always find it hilarious that we hear Hazard was hampered playing for defensive minded managers or with poor strikers.

12/13, 14/15, 16/17 all seasons Chelsea were 2nd top scorers. 13/14 third highest.

Are Belgium defensive minded? 33 goals in 115 matches. 13 being penalties. Effectively he has 20 non penalty goals in 115 games for Belgium. Whats the excuse here?!
He played 5 years of his international career under the utter feckwit that is Marc Wilmots and another 5 years under the largely feckwit that is Roberto Martinez. Neither has ever come close to installing a coherent attacking system of play at any point as a coach.
 

Bearded One

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2017
Messages
1,245
I think recency bias is playing out here in favour of Salah. In terms of numbers there is only one winner but Hazard’s game was based on drawing a lot of attention from opposing players whilst creating space for teammates to exploit. Teams used to have “stop Hazard” as their game strategy.

Football is such a dynamic game that numbers cannot be the deciding factor for me. Prime Hazard ran games single-handedly. You sure cannot argue with Salad’s numbers - they are over the roof - but it you recall, Salah used to play as the furtherest of attackers whilst Firminho would drop very deep and he and Mane have had disagreements as a result of Salah putting his own scoring ahead of the team.

Personally I’d opine that before this season Hazard would get my vote ahead of Salah as I rate him as the best left winger of the last decade. However with the way Salad is going this season - getting to pure world class levels - it would be hard to argue with putting him ahead of Hazard.

My submission.
 

TheMagicFoolBus

Full Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
6,567
Location
Lisboa, Portugal
Supports
Chelsea
I think recency bias is playing out here in favour of Salah. In terms of numbers there is only one winner but Hazard’s game was based on drawing a lot of attention from opposing players whilst creating space for teammates to exploit. Teams used to have “stop Hazard” as their game strategy.

Football is such a dynamic game that numbers cannot be the deciding factor for me. Prime Hazard ran games single-handedly. You sure cannot argue with Salad’s numbers - they are over the roof - but it you recall, Salah used to play as the furtherest of attackers whilst Firminho would drop very deep and he and Mane have had disagreements as a result of Salah putting his own scoring ahead of the team.

Personally I’d opine that before this season Hazard would get my vote ahead of Salah as I rate him as the best left winger of the last decade. However with the way Salad is going this season - getting to pure world class levels - it would be hard to argue with putting him ahead of Hazard.

My submission.
He's certainly been doing (bacon) bits this season - really taken it to the next level! ;)
 

Gunnerineverylife

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 1, 2021
Messages
37
Supports
Arsenal
Hazard is a beautiful player but Salah is an efficient beast, Salah on his day is one of the best players in the world, is Hazard?
 

Mark_Barca

Full Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2016
Messages
2,268
Supports
Barcelona
He played 5 years of his international career under the utter feckwit that is Marc Wilmots and another 5 years under the largely feckwit that is Roberto Martinez. Neither has ever come close to installing a coherent attacking system of play at any point as a coach.
Yeah it's Wilmots and Martinez fault for Hazard not performing at International level to a so called world class players standard.

It's not like Belgium are the number 1 ranked team in world football, it's not like they average just under 3 goals a game under Martinez. It's not like they have been going far in tournaments either.

Belgium the poor coherent attacking system struggling to 1-0 wins each game. Poor Eden being held back as normal. :lol:
 

TheMagicFoolBus

Full Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
6,567
Location
Lisboa, Portugal
Supports
Chelsea
Yeah it's Wilmots and Martinez fault for Hazard not performing at International level to a so called world class players standard.

It's not like Belgium are the number 1 ranked team in world football, it's not like they average just under 3 goals a game under Martinez. It's not like they have been going far in tournaments either.

Belgium the poor coherent attacking system struggling to 1-0 wins each game. Poor Eden being held back as normal. :lol:
Hazard has been injured for basically the last two seasons, which coincides with Belgium's rise to the top. Also, the whole point of this discussion is that Hazard has never and will never be especially prolific so not sure why you're acting like you've stumbled onto some sort of killer argument here.

It's inarguable that at his apex he was held back by his international managers. And the last time he was properly fit and firing, he was the best player at the WC in 2018.
 

BalanceUnAutreJoint

Full Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2017
Messages
1,522
I feel like if you're making a comparison between both players in general, you simply can't ignore Hazard's terrible record in the CL,

17/18 Salah scored more CL goals than Hazard did in his entire career
 

UweBein

Creator of the Worst Analogy on the Internet.
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
3,729
Location
Köln
Supports
Chelsea
Huge fan of Hazard. But it's Salah. He is the better player.
 

DWelbz19

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
33,977
Always find it hilarious that we hear Hazard was hampered playing for defensive minded managers or with poor strikers.

12/13, 14/15, 16/17 all seasons Chelsea were 2nd top scorers. 13/14 third highest.

Are Belgium defensive minded? 33 goals in 115 matches. 13 being penalties. Effectively he has 20 non penalty goals in 115 games for Belgium. Whats the excuse here?!
He doesn’t want to score. Just like how he never wanted the ballon d’Or
 

DWelbz19

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
33,977
I feel like if you're making a comparison between both players in general, you simply can't ignore Hazard's terrible record in the CL,

17/18 Salah scored more CL goals than Hazard did in his entire career
Not to mention those goals actually led to him winning it
 

CM

Full Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2014
Messages
7,328
How is this a debate? It's Salah and it isn't even close
 

PSV

Full Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
1,171
Peak? Probably quite close between 2017/18 Salah and 2018/19 Hazard.
Prime? Definitely Salah.
 

thepolice123

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
12,210
Salah.

They need to check the water he's drinking. This guy is in supreme condition every single game.
 

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,406
Supports
Chelsea
I feel like if you're making a comparison between both players in general, you simply can't ignore Hazard's terrible record in the CL,

17/18 Salah scored more CL goals than Hazard did in his entire career
And its valid to favour Salah based on UCL record and thats exactly what I think edges it for him overall but when people cite numbers alone I find that ridiculous. On the same basis Lampard and Gerrard were superior to Iniesta, Xavi and Zidane, Kevin Phillips was superior to Bergkamp....
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,356
Supports
Chelsea
Huge fan of Hazard. But it's Salah. He is the better player.
I mean yeah, Hazard is in my top 3 favourite players of all time. Love the bloke dearly, but Salah is getting up there with Henry in the best player in PL history conversation.
 

kaiser1

Full Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2018
Messages
2,009
Supports
Bayern Munich
Currently Salah is approaching greatest PL player of all time territory with players like Ronaldo Henry Shearer

Hazard was never close
 

BalanceUnAutreJoint

Full Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2017
Messages
1,522
And its valid to favour Salah based on UCL record and thats exactly what I think edges it for him overall but when people cite numbers alone I find that ridiculous. On the same basis Lampard and Gerrard were superior to Iniesta, Xavi and Zidane, Kevin Phillips was superior to Bergkamp....
Numbers simply matter a lot more when it comes to attackers I feel.
 

gibers

Full Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2017
Messages
1,065
Location
UK
Currently Salah is approaching greatest PL player of all time territory with players like Ronaldo Henry Shearer

Hazard was never close
Agree wit this. If Pool win the CL and the Prem, he would go top of that list. He already has the all time goal record for 38 games.
 

Cascarino

Magnum Poopus
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
7,616
Location
Wales
Supports
Swansea
Always find it hilarious that we hear Hazard was hampered playing for defensive minded managers or with poor strikers.

12/13, 14/15, 16/17 all seasons Chelsea were 2nd top scorers. 13/14 third highest.

Are Belgium defensive minded? 33 goals in 115 matches. 13 being penalties. Effectively he has 20 non penalty goals in 115 games for Belgium. Whats the excuse here?!
Undoubtedly (at least in terms of pure productivity). He played mostly for Conte and Mourinho, both managers who are undeniably pragmatic. His numbers are pretty good as well (bar that one season), when you consider where a lot of his play took place on the pitch and his role it's really weird that he gets judged on a similar basis to Salah. You can watch Hazard and Salah and instantly see their different roles and the positions they take up. Even in the simplest appraisal, it'll be obvious that Hazard spends more time on the ball in terms of dribbling, passing and chance creation, whereas Salah will spend more time running in behind and making a difference in key moments, relatively to the teams they're playing in.
 

Bearded One

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2017
Messages
1,245
Undoubtedly (at least in terms of pure productivity). He played mostly for Conte and Mourinho, both managers who are undeniably pragmatic. His numbers are pretty good as well (bar that one season), when you consider where a lot of his play took place on the pitch and his role it's really weird that he gets judged on a similar basis to Salah. You can watch Hazard and Salah and instantly see their different roles and the positions they take up. Even in the simplest appraisal, it'll be obvious that Hazard spends more time on the ball in terms of dribbling, passing and chance creation, whereas Salah will spend more time running in behind and making a difference in key moments, relatively to the teams they're playing in.
Salah is more like an outside forward while Hazard was more like an attacking midfielder. Both play at similar sides of the pitch but they are very different players. The reason why I wouldn’t just dismiss Hazard has a fair shout for me in this debate is how he dominated the premier league. I know Salah has been very effective, scoring consistently and relentlessly season after season and doing the business quietly but he has never struck me as a player that teams would want to put their whole strategy in nullifying him the way teams did to Hazard.

If it were down to numbers then Salah is the clear winner. Both have written their names in the sands of premier league history, I only hope that players like Sancho would toe that path in the near future.
 

RUCK4444

New Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
9,553
Location
$¥$¥$¥$¥$
The thing that blows my mind with Salah is that he is a completely different player to the one we saw at Chelsea and before then, like entirely different in his level of effectiveness.

I know he started to turn it on at Roma before going to Liverpool but I have never seen a player be so night and day different in terms of effectiveness. I'm still waiting for him to return to the player he was back then, with every season I get angrier that he hasn't!

Then again I never really believe Harry Kane is a top player, I always think he will revert to a bang average forward, that's one I got majorly wrong.
 

Gunnerineverylife

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 1, 2021
Messages
37
Supports
Arsenal
Yeah it's Wilmots and Martinez fault for Hazard not performing at International level to a so called world class players standard.

It's not like Belgium are the number 1 ranked team in world football, it's not like they average just under 3 goals a game under Martinez. It's not like they have been going far in tournaments either.

Belgium the poor coherent attacking system struggling to 1-0 wins each game. Poor Eden being held back as normal. :lol:
:lol: brilliant sarcasm mate, kudos
 

B20

HEY EVERYONE I IGNORE SOMEONE LOOK AT ME
Joined
Aug 23, 2003
Messages
27,591
Location
Disney Land
Supports
Liverpool
It wasn't long ago that every pundit said they'd take Mane over Salah.
They were pretty close at one point. Right down to them sharing the topscorer title in the premier league one season. Mane at his best was amazing.

I think Salah suffered in those comparisons due to Mane steadily ascending to world class levels, whilst Salah descended from Balon D'or level to 'merely' world class. And of course, Salah got called greedy whilst ignoring how good he was (and is) in the buildup and how many assists he gets. Also never really got credit for carrying us through some bad periods for the whole team, scoring goals through sheer perseverance and attacking intensity (last season included).

Last season, Salah was one of the few in our team who kept a high level whilst Mane fell off a cliff. Mane is still recovering, whilst Salah is getting back to Balon D'or levels.
 

Aljib

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 7, 2021
Messages
4
Salah has better end product, footballing terms, he is better.
 

Suedesi

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
23,868
Location
New York City
Stylistically, I prefer Mo. I think Salah is vicious in front of goal, he's got the drive, ambition, ego that pushes great players into being god-tier. Hazard was a pretty boy, all bark and no bite. He should have won more given his talent.
 

Daslogisch

Full Member
Joined
May 21, 2014
Messages
654
Location
Holland
Supports
Ajax
Purely based on prime? Maybe Hazard. He is more skillfull and in his prime at least as unstoppable. I do believe Salah is a little bit more one dimensional although he is obviously great.

Obviously judging a whole carreer definitely going for Salah, given he's sustained his level for a longer period of time. At this point I don't see Hazard getting back to that level.

I wonder more, how would people compare Salah to Robben? Sounds like a more appropriate comparison given their position and qualities. As a Dutch definitely still going for Robben, who eventhough he had many injuries had an insane carreer with many extraordenary seasons despite his injuries and did very well basicly everywhere he played.
 

JuriM

New Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
2,266
Location
Estonia
Hazard was the player who could take the pall himself and do magic - Salah have done it on some goals but most been still part of amazing teamplay. They are different, both amazing, but different.
 

KingCavani

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2021
Messages
1,264
Salah and it isn’t close.

Hazard probably had more talent but always felt he could impose himself more on games, even at his peak. Salah is just a relentless force who keeps coming with every attack. A different class.