I doubt it, it's already an open war, the authority are a "feck you" away from showing their true face
There's literally footage from all angle showing what happened, there's no room for misinterpretation and murder 3rd is the best they can come up with. They're not making him as an example, they reluctantly charge him. 1 out of 4 is further a joke, they have a duty of care as a policeman to stop this shit to the very least. They're talking about wanting a sure conviction, for the love of god if civilian picked jury can't indict something as clear as these than maybe just scrap the whole justice system.
Beyond a reasonable doubt is defined as “that no other logical explanation can be derived from the facts except that the defendant committed the crime, thereby overcoming the presumption that a person is innocent until proven guilty”.
The video evidence shows murder .That is unquestionable. But what it doesn’t explicitly prove is whether it was either premeditated or deliberate.
I can look at that horrible video and with 100% Certainty say that it was a deliberate murder. But I can’t prove it and neither can the prosecution.
I sat on a jury for a horrific case where a man was accused of anally and vaginally raping and beating his 7 year old daughter and his wife on multiple occasions.
The hardest thing to do in those circumstances is separate emotion from evidence.
We found that scumbag guilty of 5 of the 7 charges against him. There isn’t a doubt in my mind that he was guilty of the other two either, but there just wasn’t the evidence to convict.
The fact that juries convict on evidence rather emotion is what makes the system work in my opinion.
I think that they will make an example of him. He’ll get the full 25 year sentence imo. Not what he deserves, but better than having him walk free due to lack of murder one evidence.