Television Racist comedian fired from SNL

Oldyella

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
5,834
Comedians need to focus on being funny. Not being crusaders against PC culture.
Yep. Especially this guy. It looks so much worse as there is just no joke there. Just saying the bad words is not a joke.
 

SteveJ

all-round nice guy, aka Uncle Joe Kardashian
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
62,851
Comedy is about the taboo
This is pretty debatable. Taboo subjects are low-hanging fruit for comics regardless of their ability; the subject attracts the imaginatively lazy and the unskilled as well as the best.
 

2 man midfield

Last Man Standing finalist 2021/22
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
46,017
Location
?
Comedians need to focus on being funny. Not being crusaders against PC culture.
Comedians are like any other person, I guess. They talk about the things they experience. I can see why some comedians would draw material from being told that they can’t say a certain thing, or tell certain jokes. It makes sense that they’d talk about their pushback to the whiners on twitter.

If it’s focused it can make for genuinely funny material. But if it’s just rallying against PC for the sake of it, you start to wonder what the point is. At least be funny with it.
 

WensleyMU

New Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2018
Messages
1,664
Ah see, what he should have done is make some off colour jokes about child abuse. That's acceptable comedy.
 

WensleyMU

New Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2018
Messages
1,664
What's this about then?
Last year, when James Gunn was fired for his "edgy" comedy which boiled down to jokes about raping children, he received support from celebrities, comedians and the public. Eventually getting rehired by Disney.

This guy has been condemned for his equally "edgy" comedy. I doubt a string of Hollywood celebrities nor the public will be defending him.

For "edgy", read shite, because that's what it is, in both cases.

So it would appear that making jokes about ethnicity is a no no, but jokes about child abuse, paedophilia and rape is ok.

One of the celebrity cries for Gunn was that "this zero tolerance policy was wrong".
 

adexkola

Doesn't understand sportswashing.
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
48,396
Location
The CL is a glorified FA Cup set to music
Supports
orderly disembarking on planes
Comedians are like any other person, I guess. They talk about the things they experience. I can see why some comedians would draw material from being told that they can’t say a certain thing, or tell certain jokes. It makes sense that they’d talk about their pushback to the whiners on twitter.

If it’s focused it can make for genuinely funny material. But if it’s just rallying against PC for the sake of it, you start to wonder what the point is. At least be funny with it.
I agree.
 

WensleyMU

New Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2018
Messages
1,664
Not sure what's funny. I though Gunn being fired was ridiculous, but that if that's allowed then surely there are no real limits.

The video in the OP seems like a Podcast of people trying to be funny by being offensive. It's not funny but then all comedy is subjective.

All seems very hypocritical, but then again what's new?
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Last year, when James Gunn was fired for his "edgy" comedy which boiled down to jokes about raping children, he received support from celebrities, comedians and the public. Eventually getting rehired by Disney.

This guy has been condemned for his equally "edgy" comedy. I doubt a string of Hollywood celebrities nor the public will be defending him.

For "edgy", read shite, because that's what it is, in both cases.

So it would appear that making jokes about ethnicity is a no no, but jokes about child abuse, paedophilia and rape is ok.

One of the celebrity cries for Gunn was that "this zero tolerance policy was wrong".
There are quite a few differences between the two though.

Gunn's jokes were from a decade before when he was in a different phase of his career making schlock films, Gillis' were from just last year. Gunn's jokes were generalised, Gillis called someone who is currently trying to get a presidential nomination a chink jew. Gunn's jokes were constructed as obvious jokes (i.e one liners on twitter), Gillis' were part of rambling conversations. Gunn apologised, Gillis didn't. The backlash against Gunn was instigated by someone with a political grudge against him who had done similar to other people he disagreed with politically, the backlash against Gillis was just a standard twitter backlash.
 

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
49,917
Location
W.Yorks
Sorry, but how can anyone defend this bloke? He's being openly and obviously racist as part of a normal conversation... it's not like he's doing a sketch or telling jokes (which by the way I still wouldn't be on board with) he's just being racist in a conversation.

Seriously, if you're defending this clown I suggest you pick a different hill to die on.
 

Dante

Average bang
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
25,280
Location
My wit's end
If you watched that clip without knowing any context about the participants or the medium, I would defy anyone to come to the conclusion that it's comedy being delivered by a comedian.

It's a racist screed that deserves to be called out as such. The sort of thing you might hear on KKK TV.

Although I'll defend it as free speech, there's absolutely no way to defend it as being intellectually genuine.
 

Suedesi

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
23,870
Location
New York City
I don't know how repeatedly using racial epithets in the context of a simple conversation can be explained away as being edgy. There was no wit, no punchline, no subtlety, just two white dudes spewing ignorance and racial superiority over another race. Fuuck this guy, I'm not having that. He can go back to being racist in the bumblefeck hills of Pennsylvania where he rode from.
 

Florida Man

Cartoon expert and crap superhero
Joined
Jan 24, 2014
Messages
13,906
Location
Florida, man
If you say so. Sure he shouldn't be saying chink but there's millions of other comedians who make similar jokes and they haven't had an online witch hunt essentially end their career.

Happens all too frequently now. Someone gets upset by a controversial comedian and next thing there's an online lynching.

Comedy will always tread the line, it's TV producers job to make sure the comedians they hire fit their ideals rather than hiring people and then firing them when they find out they once said something a little bit controversial.
I’m all for an edgy joke but chink isn’t one of those grey areas. It’s been a no go word for a long time in the public eye. There are also certain ways to present jokes that are actually funny. This guy is just being a cynical cnut. And racist.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
I’m all for an edgy joke but chink isn’t one of those grey areas. It’s been a no go word for a long time in the public eye. There are also certain ways to present jokes that are actually funny. This guy is just being a cynical cnut. And racist.
It's not even about presenting a joke as funny, just presenting it as an actual joke would help.

It's one thing saying something offensive on stage or tweeting something offensive as a one liner as people will (generally) get from the context and structure that there's a level of performance involved and it's not to be taken at face value. A chat on a podcast isn't the same thing. Something that should be obvious to a professional comedian.
 

Florida Man

Cartoon expert and crap superhero
Joined
Jan 24, 2014
Messages
13,906
Location
Florida, man
It's not even about presenting a joke as funny, just presenting it as an actual joke would help.

It's one thing saying something offensive on stage or tweeting something offensive as a one liner as people will (generally) get from the context and structure that there's a level of performance involved and it's not to be taken at face value. A chat on a podcast isn't the same thing. Something that should be obvious to a professional comedian.
I’d say he was trying to be funny in a casual conversation as opposed to doing a routine. Cynical asshole is not what’s hot anymore.
 

Grinner

Not fat gutted. Hirsuteness of shoulders TBD.
Staff
Joined
May 5, 2003
Messages
72,287
Location
I love free dirt and rocks!
Supports
Arsenal
Seems like a good decision since SNL needs actual funny people to save it from being shit. This bloke just looks like a boorish twat rather than a comedian.
 

Grinner

Not fat gutted. Hirsuteness of shoulders TBD.
Staff
Joined
May 5, 2003
Messages
72,287
Location
I love free dirt and rocks!
Supports
Arsenal
I’m all for an edgy joke but chink isn’t one of those grey areas. It’s been a no go word for a long time in the public eye. There are also certain ways to present jokes that are actually funny. This guy is just being a cynical cnut. And racist.
I thought that Sarah Silverman joke was ok:

It is an uncomfortable truth that a joke can be both funny and racist, which is different than saying that racism is funny. Consider the time Sarah Silverman went on Conan O'Brien and joked about being told to write "I hate chinks" on a form to weasel out of jury duty: "I said, 'I'm not going to put that on there just to get out of jury duty. I don't want people to think that about me. ' So instead I wrote, 'I love chinks.' And who doesn't?"
 

Dante

Average bang
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
25,280
Location
My wit's end
I thought that Sarah Silverman joke was ok:

It is an uncomfortable truth that a joke can be both funny and racist, which is different than saying that racism is funny. Consider the time Sarah Silverman went on Conan O'Brien and joked about being told to write "I hate chinks" on a form to weasel out of jury duty: "I said, 'I'm not going to put that on there just to get out of jury duty. I don't want people to think that about me. ' So instead I wrote, 'I love chinks.' And who doesn't?"
That works because it lampoons racism by subverting expectations. Importantly, it does it without generalising the inferiority of the socially disempowered.

Louis CK, Bill Burr, Dave Chappelle all do the same when they make jokes about race.

The sacked SNL guy didn't.
 

Grinner

Not fat gutted. Hirsuteness of shoulders TBD.
Staff
Joined
May 5, 2003
Messages
72,287
Location
I love free dirt and rocks!
Supports
Arsenal
That works because it lampoons racism by subverting expectations. Importantly, it does it without generalising the inferiority of the socially disempowered.

Louis CK, Bill Burr, Dave Chappelle all do the same when they make jokes about race.

The sacked SNL guy didn't.
The point being that the word chink is not out of bounds. This new guy just said it to be derogatory, it wasn't funny. So feck him.
 

WensleyMU

New Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2018
Messages
1,664
There are quite a few differences between the two though.

Gunn's jokes were from a decade before when he was in a different phase of his career making schlock films, Gillis' were from just last year. Gunn's jokes were generalised, Gillis called someone who is currently trying to get a presidential nomination a chink jew. Gunn's jokes were constructed as obvious jokes (i.e one liners on twitter), Gillis' were part of rambling conversations. Gunn apologised, Gillis didn't. The backlash against Gunn was instigated by someone with a political grudge against him who had done similar to other people he disagreed with politically, the backlash against Gillis was just a standard twitter backlash.
Both were examples of being offensive and passing it off as comedy. There was no substance to either, in both cases they were being offensive for the sake of it.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Both were examples of being offensive and passing it off as comedy. There was no substance to either, in both cases they were being offensive for the sake of it.
Right. But all the other stuff I pointed out was different, which is why people didn't react the same way. Context matters.
 

WensleyMU

New Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2018
Messages
1,664
Right. But all the other stuff I pointed out was different, which is why people didn't react the same way. Context matters.
The only context that really matters is that Gunn made his "jokes" during a different time.
 

Suedesi

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
23,870
Location
New York City
The point being that the word chink is not out of bounds. This new guy just said it to be derogatory, it wasn't funny. So feck him.
That word is pretty offensive to people of Chinese ethnicity, and it is out of bounds. Silverman said it in 2001, so different times - but even then there was backlash.

Sarah Silverman controversy
In July 2001, Guy Aoki became embroiled in a public controversy stemming from his objection to a joke told by comedian Sarah Silverman, which involved her use of the ethnic slur "chink", in an interview on the July 11, 2001 episode of Late Night with Conan O'Brien.[5]

In the interview, Silverman explained that a friend had advised her on how to avoid jury duty by writing a racial slur on the selection form, "something really inappropriate, like, 'I hate chinks'." However, Silverman said that she ultimately decided that she did not want to be thought of as a racist and instead wrote, "I love chinks." The Associated Press quoted Aoki: "There is no excuse for something like this to have made the air. The term is the most offensive possible reference to a person of Chinese descent." NBC and Conan O'Brien issued an apology, but Silverman did not, insisting later on the July 26, 2001 episode of Politically Incorrect that she did not believe that Aoki was genuinely offended, but exploiting the opportunity for publicity.[6]

Silverman and Aoki later appeared together on the August 22, 2001 episode of Politically Incorrect, along with host Bill Maher and panelists David Spade and Anne-Marie Johnson, the latter of whom was chair of the Screen Actors Guild Ethnic Employment Opportunity Committee. After Silverman repeated the joke for exposition's sake, she opined that it made an implicit statement about the wrongness of racism, rather than legitimizing it. Johnson, however, questioned the humor in the joke, and Aoki opined that such slurs should not be used in an off-the-cuff manner because it legitimized their use, and that use of the word "chink" was no better than the use of the word "nigger". Aoki, while acknowledging that satire was a legitimate practice, asserted that Silverman's execution of it was not successful because it ran the risk that people would assume she actually subscribed to the racist viewpoint of her character.

 

Florida Man

Cartoon expert and crap superhero
Joined
Jan 24, 2014
Messages
13,906
Location
Florida, man
I thought that Sarah Silverman joke was ok:

It is an uncomfortable truth that a joke can be both funny and racist, which is different than saying that racism is funny. Consider the time Sarah Silverman went on Conan O'Brien and joked about being told to write "I hate chinks" on a form to weasel out of jury duty: "I said, 'I'm not going to put that on there just to get out of jury duty. I don't want people to think that about me. ' So instead I wrote, 'I love chinks.' And who doesn't?"
Now that’s actually funny and a good example of how to do a race/culture joke. Chappelle, Desus & Mero, Jeff Ross are in that ball park too. And really, you can say almost anything if you prepare it the right way.
 

WensleyMU

New Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2018
Messages
1,664
I had assumed Chappelle's Michael Jackson schtick was going to be the example.
It wasn't because it was different. The reason Gunn was the example is because as is the case here, his "jokes" were done with the sole purpose of causing offense.

As is being discussed by others here, it's perfectly acceptable to make offensive jokes and for them to be funny. It's when you are being offensive and passing it off as a joke where there's a degree of hypocrisy around it.
 

Brophs

The One and Only
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
50,434
Has Ricky Gervais weighed in with his canned statement on taking offence to things yet?
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,837
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Has Ricky Gervais weighed in with his canned statement on taking offence to things yet?
Surprisingly, his take is a bit more nuanced than that.


I actually listened to him on the Sam Harris podcast recently and didn’t disagree with most of what he said. He’s a bit of a bore though. Loves the sound of his own voice.