Sell Onana and Altay to Saudi and Turkey and bring this guy back to back up Lammens
Sell Onana and Altay to Saudi and Turkey and bring this guy back to back up Lammens
Why?
Wouldn't it make more sense for him to get a full season in the Championship under his belt?
We are out of the Carabao cup so he wouldn't gey many (if any) minutes here.
Surely the speed and physicality of the Championship is a level above the Austrian Bundesliga (and more similar to the PL), so it'd be helpful for him to get a full year playing in England before giving him a chance as our number 2?He's already had a full year in Austria under his belt, which by all accounts he did very well in. The only reason we haven't brought him back is because we have Onana and Altay here, both of which need to be moved on.
Completely agree, and if (and I could never advocate this as a north Bristolian) Coty get promoted, a year in the PL with a newly promoted club would be good for him.Surely the speed and physicality of the Championship is a level above the Austrian Bundesliga (and more similar to the PL), so it'd be helpful for him to get a full year playing in England before giving him a chance as our number 2?
Absolutely.Surely the speed and physicality of the Championship is a level above the Austrian Bundesliga (and more similar to the PL), so it'd be helpful for him to get a full year playing in England before giving him a chance as our number 2?
Surely the speed and physicality of the Championship is a level above the Austrian Bundesliga (and more similar to the PL), so it'd be helpful for him to get a full year playing in England before giving him a chance as our number 2?
How was Amass?I was in the stadium today, watching him and Amass.
He had nothing to do whatsoever (he made zero saves) but did claim two crosses really well. The fans absolutely love him and rightly so.
He scored….How was Amass?
An own goal, which was very unfortunate not his fault.He scored….
Come on!He scored….
Very similar to what we saw here last season - tidy on the ball but struggled a bit with physicality. Understandable as he's so young.How was Amass?
MOTM again today apparently
Remains to be seen how Lammens performs, but would it be better for Vitek to get another season or two playing first team football before fighting it out for the number one spot?Hopefully the club does the right thing and brings him back to OT instead of loaning him yet again.
Remains to be seen how Lammens performs, but would it be better for Vitek to get another season or two playing first team football before fighting it out for the number one spot?
No it doesn’t. Reserve keepers don’t get game time, it’s absolutely the wrong thing for a promising young keeper.Lammens as starter, Vitek as backup. Makes all the sense in the world.
For a young goalkeeper, it is much better to loan him out than to keep as back-up if we think he’s worth anything. Back up keeper is for experienced GK who are fully developed and satisfied with being bit-part players.Hopefully the club does the right thing and brings him back to OT instead of loaning him yet again.
For a young goalkeeper, it is much better to loan him out than to keep as back-up if we think he’s worth anything. Back up keeper is for experienced GK who are fully developed and satisfied with being bit-part players.
No it doesn’t. Reserve keepers don’t get game time, it’s absolutely the wrong thing for a promising young keeper.
In an ideal world City would get promoted and he gets a season starting in the PM.
Lammens is the starter. For the rest of the season Vitek should stay on loan and we can re assess in the summer. If Lammens does well then Vitek needs another loan next season at a higher levelHe's already had plenty of game time in each of his three loans. Time to bring him back to United and see what he can do, either as back up or potentially as starter.
Lammens is the starter. For the rest of the season Vitek should stay on loan and we can re assess in the summer. If Lammens does well then Vitek needs another loan next season at a higher level
Why should we bring him back to sit on the bench when we can get him experience at a higher level? There is nothing wrong with loan, he should continue his developmentNo doubt Lammens is the starter. I wasn't suggesting bring Vitek back to replace him this year. But given that he's already had 3 loans, next year its time to bring him back.
Why should we bring him back to sit on the bench when we can get him experience at a higher level? There is nothing wrong with loan, he should continue his development
No it’s not. The highest level he’s played at is The Championship.He's already had plenty of game time in each of his three loans. Time to bring him back to United and see what he can do, either as back up or potentially as starter.
No it’s not. The highest level he’s played at is The Championship.
He’s not much good as back up at his age. He’s far better off getting gametime he’s still learningLammens as starter, Vitek as backup. Makes all the sense in the world.
Of only you could play two goalkeeper at the same time, eh!Who cares ? We just bought Lammens from the Belgian league, which isn't among the big 5 and he's already starting. Vitek has played at year in the Austrian league and by all accounts been very good, so between that and a year in the Championship I'd say that's more than enough game time and development. At some point its time to sink or swim
Of only you could play two goalkeeper at the same time, eh!
You clearly don’t understand the concept of a young goalkeeper needing to play rather than sit on the bench.
There is not an exact number is there. It’s clearly dependent on player, situation and experience.He's already played substantially so I guess that checks your box. How many more loans would you like him to go on before you deem him adequate to be United's back up keeper ? 3, 4, 5 ? Whats your number ?
He should be loaned out until the point where the GK coach and the other sporting leadership think he has developped so far they think he will be better than our no 1 GK and be a likely starter for us.Well yes, but he's already been loaned out several times already to positive reviews. At some point, the club do need to bring him back to see what he can do at United.
I think if Lammens has a good season it is a relatively bleak future for Vitek at United at least. Very hard to get a shot at being a No. 1 for a top club as it is and spending €21 million on a keeper of a similar age/profile isn't a great gesture of faith in his ability to replicate his loan form for our first team in the near future. It is one of the reasons I was surprised we didn't go for a more experienced goalkeeper than Lammens in the first place as I believed Vitek would have warranted a shot; who knows, maybe he'll still get one.
At the very least he'll command a fee if moved on as he definitely has some promise, if not we can loan again and because he has some pedigree we can at least command a decent loan fee for his services provided he continues to have a good season at Bristol. I am friends with a few Bristol City fans and they are very keen to keep Vitek around if there was any possibility of it happening, so who knows what happens.