Rank the English talent

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,588
Location
London
It's weird always weird to me when people don't understand that each position is hugely important to a teams success. Strikers and wingers aren't the only positions.
Or maybe you don't understand that some positions are more important than others. A great striker helps the team more than a great defender. There are clear reasons why strikers cost more, earn more, win more individual trophies and are more in all-time lists than defenders.
 

RC89

Full Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2010
Messages
2,967
How can you have more than one generational talent? Can't use words and then pretend they mean something other than they are.
You can in sports apparently. Just look around and see how many G.O.A.T's there are :lol:
 

Suedesi

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
23,868
Location
New York City
What's laughable about it?

Which national sides have a collection of talent coming through at roughly around the same time to where you can classify it as a potential WC favorite? I think very highly of France as well, and Netherlands/Portugal have potential to be considered there for that world cup. Age difference has to be more concentrated because for example VVD will be in his 30s when Unuvar, Gravenberch, and Ihattaren are nearing primes. That age difference matters as it can potentially weaken a side depending on the world cup year.
This thread reminds me of Steven Gerrard’s “Joe Cole is better than Messi” claim almost ten years ago.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2010/aug/10/joe-cole-messi-gerrard-liverpool
 

van Persie

Full Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2012
Messages
3,180
I'm seeing this "generational" talent all over these days. Almost out of nowhere, everyone knows and can identify this. Boggles my mind really.
But hey, seems lots of people are able to see it. Would like to know, when did people realize what Ronaldo and Messi were one of a kind and generational talents for their time? When they were teenagers? Or more as they shared the top accolades year after year.
With Cristano it was clear as day when he played against us in 2003 with Sporting Lissabon already. Messi.. I think he was 16 years old. Ronaldinho while he was at PSG in Champions League. Ronaldo in the world cup 98. Haven't seen any talents like it since.

People like to assume that there will always be someone like that but there's a reason they are generational talents. I don't see anyone that will sperate themselves from the rest to that degree right now.
 
Last edited:

Suedesi

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
23,868
Location
New York City
How can you have more than one generational talent? Can't use words and then pretend they mean something other than they are.
Apparently England have 3, right now.

Could have had Adnan Januzaj too if he didn't waste his career with Belgium instead.
 

In Rainbows

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
6,751
I did if you bothered to read.
No you did not. You think just listing 1 or 2 names was an appropriate response to my question that came after that post/question?

You offered nothing. I asked which national teams could be considered favorites as a collection of talents coming through? Or you could give a response where you believe it's not possible to name a national team as a principle. Any of the two will do.

Apparently England have 3, right now.

Could have had Adnan Januzaj too if he didn't waste his career with Belgium instead.
Was never even possible anyways due to the Home nations rule, but that's beside your point.
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
Based on the shear number of young England players who are labelled as excellent, world class, or even generational talents; we can expect England to be huge favourites for the 2026 World Cup right?
You could make the same thread for other nations, France and Holland especially. It won’t necessarily translate into international success though. Spain bossed youth football whilst they were bossing senior international football but have failed to produce an international tournament winning side from those groups of players yet.
 

V.O.

Last Man Standing finalist 2019/20
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Messages
7,982
You can in sports apparently. Just look around and see how many G.O.A.T's there are :lol:
It's funny how these daft new terms that spring up quickly become entirely meaningless. Saw somebody referred to as "the GOAT of the decade" not long ago.
 

SAFMUTD

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
11,787
Whats al this people arguing TAA is not worldclass, at the moment he's the best RB in the world, like actually the literal definition of worldclass.
 

spaceboyRSA

Full Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2014
Messages
1,653
Location
South Africa
Whats al this people arguing TAA is not worldclass, at the moment he's the best RB in the world, like actually the literal definition of worldclass.
Sure. Except in this "tier" system, there is a level higher... "generational" (whatever that means). No problem with calling TAA World Class... but in my understanding of "generational", he is not that.
 

SAFMUTD

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
11,787
Sure. Except in this "tier" system, there is a level higher... "generational" (whatever that means). No problem with calling TAA World Class... but in my understanding of "generational", he is not that.
Its because you cant call someone generational as a youngster, that term is given after that generation played. Its just impossible to predict if he will be a "generational" player because we dont know if another player from that generation will be better.
 

Craig Ward

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2016
Messages
2,117
With Cristano it was clear as day when he played against us in 2003 with Sporting Lissabon already. Messi.. I think he was 16 years old. Ronaldinho while he was at PSG in Champions League. Ronaldo in the world cup 98. Haven't seen any talents like it since.

People like to assume that there will always be someone like that but there's a reason they are generational talents. I don't see anyone that will sperate themselves from the rest to that degree right now.
If Mpabbe moves to a more competitive league, he's the only one with that kind of ceiling i think
 

TheNewEra

Knows Kroos' mentality
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
8,187
TAA is in great form, and he's definitely one of if not the best RB in the world.

He's certainly not generational though, he needs to stay hungry over 10-15 years. He has a very long career ahead of him.

It's very much unlikely he will become a Cafu because I doubt that Liverpool will be dominant for that long, I'd say he's world class but for how long.

Greenwood, let's see how he develops, he could be world class, he could be generational, but he could also just end up being a brilliant finisher like an Owen.

It's sad to say but we generally don't know what injuries will happen, if a player will stagnate, at 18 years old you can't see a players entire trajectory.

Mbappe for instance relies heavily on pace, when he gets to 25-26 he will have to slow down a bit and he won't be the same 'explosive' player, for that reason he would never reach the heights of Messi. It's why I never understood when France beat Argentina how the media and pundits were saying 'the changing of the guard, the next great' with them shaking hands, when it was far from the truth.

We would love to say that Greenwood is going to be the next big thing, and I as a United fan would love for that to happen, but let's judge that in 3-4 years after he's had a few seasons under his belt.
 

TheNewEra

Knows Kroos' mentality
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
8,187
With Cristano it was clear as day when he played against us in 2003 with Sporting Lissabon already. Messi.. I think he was 16 years old. Ronaldinho while he was at PSG in Champions League. Ronaldo in the world cup 98. Haven't seen any talents like it since.

People like to assume that there will always be someone like that but there's a reason they are generational talents. I don't see anyone that will sperate themselves from the rest to that degree right now.
Agreed, you don't see any 19 year olds doing what Messi did against Getafe


If a 19 year old does this, or scores a hat-trick against Real Madrid at age 20 and just ghosts past defenders in their prime that's when I take notice.

Someone with strong 2 feet and that's a good finisher I wouldn't say 'generational talent' we'll definitely have to see.

plus some 'generational talents' are lesser ones to previous eras, for instance if you have a player better than a current batch of players, it doesn't mean they'll be another Messi or Pele.
 

In Rainbows

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
6,751
Agreed, you don't see any 19 year olds doing what Messi did against Getafe


If a 19 year old does this, or scores a hat-trick against Real Madrid at age 20 and just ghosts past defenders in their prime that's when I take notice.

Someone with strong 2 feet and that's a good finisher I wouldn't say 'generational talent' we'll definitely have to see.

plus some 'generational talents' are lesser ones to previous eras, for instance if you have a player better than a current batch of players, it doesn't mean they'll be another Messi or Pele.
We should make things clear. To say someone is potentially something doesn't mean they are at that level or they will be at that level guaranteed. It's only to say they have a chance to do it given their talent. For example, if people say Haaland, Mbappe, and Greenwood can potentially be that, they're not saying all 3 will do it or that any of them will do it. Just that there is a possibility of them getting to that stage in a way that say someone like Abraham (I like Tammy btw) will likely not be. Some talents you're able to say you can potentially see them fulfilling a certain amount of promise, where as other ones are completely unrealistic.

And I guess the other contention is the definition of generational. Do we literally mean the best footballer over a long span of years? Or do we mean someone like Iniesta, Xavi, Neymar, Rio, etc...? Maybe people can define what they believe generational, world class, etc... mean.
 

paraguayo

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 24, 2019
Messages
1,339
Supports
neutral
You could make the same thread for other nations, France and Holland especially. It won’t necessarily translate into international success though. Spain bossed youth football whilst they were bossing senior international football but have failed to produce an international tournament winning side from those groups of players yet.
who are the generational talents coming from holland?
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
who are the generational talents coming from holland?
Personally I don't like the term 'generational talent' but they've been very successful at youth level in recent years: Mohammed Ihatteran, Ryan Gravenberch, Myron Boadu, Naci Unuvar and Jayden Braff at City has been one of the best players in the English youth leagues recently. It won't be a surprise if they are one the the very elite international sides once again in a few years.
 

In Rainbows

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
6,751
who are the generational talents coming from holland?
The biggest talents are Frenkie, De Ligt, Ihattaren, Gravenberch, and Unuvar. I don't think you can slap the latter 3 with that potential label until they do more at first team level. You could label the first 2 with that potential a year or so ago, but De Ligt started the season not as strong compared to his reputation and I haven't kept up with Barca to think Frenkie is potentially world class in midfield. Therefore it's a bit iffy to still be able to use that, especially with someone like Frenkie.

Someone who watches these talents a little more closely could give a better assessment than me. They would have to be consistently great year in year out and with certain ability to be able to project a player to be generational (depending on the definition).
 

In Rainbows

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
6,751
What's wrong with that? Can't wait to hear this.
People are judging him based on what he is right now. Someone like me is judging his talent and what he could be should he get it right. It's not far fetched to say he's in that elite bracket in terms of potential.

It's not the same situation, but Ravel is the perfect example of this if we were to be transported to the year 2013. If he were to get it right, with his ability, it's reasonable to think he could have become that world beater. Meanwhile, most would agree the more successful Lingard would have no hope in reaching that level because of ability lacks compared to someone like Ravel.

I don't get why some people don't understand the logic, given that we're on a United forum with clear memories of Ravel's ability.
 

JNicholas

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Messages
93
Supports
Arsenal
Saka is in the same tier as Foden + Greenwood without a shadow of doubt.
 

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,406
Supports
Chelsea
People are judging him based on what he is right now. Someone like me is judging his talent and what he could be should he get it right. It's not far fetched to say he's in that elite bracket in terms of potential.

It's not the same situation, but Ravel is the perfect example of this if we were to be transported to the year 2013. If he were to get it right, with his ability, it's reasonable to think he could have become that world beater. Meanwhile, most would agree the more successful Lingard would have no hope in reaching that level because of ability lacks compared to someone like Ravel.

I don't get why some people don't understand the logic, given that we're on a United forum with clear memories of Ravel's ability.
If we base it on right now only Trent deserves to be put above excellent.

Got no issue with people saying he's got it all to prove still, ofcourse he does infact apart from Trent everyone on that list do to varying degrees.

I do however take objection to people trying to deny his talent, which would be at this point based on nothing more than a poor couple months of form while returning from a serious injury.
 
Last edited:

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,577
Location
india
Whats al this people arguing TAA is not worldclass, at the moment he's the best RB in the world, like actually the literal definition of worldclass.
Yes but there's a wide gap between Messi and Ashley Cole, for example. You can't put them on the same padestal in any shape or form. I'm not saying England have a Messi level talent or even someone who belongs on a higher tier, but an argument can be made that a top RB isn't on par with potentially great forward.
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
There are other 2001s starting to get minutes that are not on the list in this thread

Curtis Jones at Liverpool


Anthony Gordon at Everton too, already looks a better player than the likes of Iwobi and Bernard.

The problem that England have is how top heavy this talent is. All wide forwards and attacking midfielders.
 

duffer

Sensible and not a complete jerk like most oppo's
Scout
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
50,284
Location
Chelsea (the saviours of football) fan.
Yes but there's a wide gap between Messi and Ashley Cole, for example. You can't put them on the same padestal in any shape or form. I'm not saying England have a Messi level talent or even someone who belongs on a higher tier, but an argument can be made that a top RB isn't on par with potentially great forward.
I'd say those are really good examples of "world class" and a "generational talent".
 

mancan92

Full Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Messages
10,211
Location
Loughborough university
Or maybe you don't understand that some positions are more important than others. A great striker helps the team more than a great defender. There are clear reasons why strikers cost more, earn more, win more individual trophies and are more in all-time lists than defenders.
Again this a very simplic and poor view imo. Especially in a system like Liverpool play where literally the full backs are the creative hub of the team. You can't just put any player there. I think alot of people would argue trents involvement is on par with the likes of mane and Salah especially in their system.
 

Feed Me

I'm hungry
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
29,319
Location
Midlands, UK
What's wrong with that? Can't wait to hear this.
He’s on over 100k a week and his manager is saying that he lacks consistency. The latter point is okay for a young player, but can you honestly say he’s produced the output of a Greenwood, Sancho or Haaland? At this point there’s a great deal of hype for a player who has delivered very little.
 

SirAnderson

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Messages
24,363
Location
Johannesburg, South Africa
Its because you cant call someone generational as a youngster, that term is given after that generation played. Its just impossible to predict if he will be a "generational" player because we dont know if another player from that generation will be better.
Apparently there is a difference between a generational talent and a generational player :houllier:
Talent can be there but the potential not realized.
While player will be as you mentioned, in hindsight.
I'll rather stick to not using the terms at all.
 

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,406
Supports
Chelsea
He’s on over 100k a week and his manager is saying that he lacks consistency. The latter point is okay for a young player, but can you honestly say he’s produced the output of a Greenwood, Sancho or Haaland? At this point there’s a great deal of hype for a player who has delivered very little.
You on about what he said after the Watford game? He said the same thing almost word for word about Pulisic in September and that's turned out allright.

And no ofcourse he's not better than the likes of Sancho right now, but this whole thread is mainly about potential ceilings of young players and his is very high.
 

Adamsk7

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
2,706
So IMO only Greenwood and Sancho have a chance in the “generational talent” section but only because they are still both under 20 so their ceiling is less apparent than someone like Rashford who is a few years ahead so we can see at his current rate of improvement would be likely to max out in the “world class” category.

Sancho and Greenwood have a lot of the X factor things you look for in players that become top 3 or 4 in the world - they are both very good decision makers already, both have certain features to their game that make them very unpredictable to opponents and both are already getting plenty of games right at the top. Obviously though, it’s too early to tell and they’ll need to get to 22-23 before we have a better idea.

Surprised also to see no Ben Godfrey of Norwich. I think he’s got every chance of being in and around the England first team in a couple of years
 

bondsname

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
1,056
Foden and Greenwood have potential to become legends of the game. Don't think they'll reach Cristiano and Messi numbers (doubt someone ever will).

Tier 1: Messi, Cristiano, Maradonna, Pelé, Gerd Muller,
Tier 2: Zidane, Brazilian Ronaldo, Kaká, Iniesta
Tier 3: Rooney, Ibrahimovic, Pirlo, Robben, Aguero,

Don't think Greenwood and Foden will join Messi and Cristiano in Tier 1. I think if it all goes well they will end up in tier 3, players with world class abillity and a great addition to any team. Players who can decide a game by themselves on a good day, but lack that little bit of magic that tier 2 has.
 

RooneyLegend

New Member
Joined
May 3, 2013
Messages
12,963
I’d say Greenwood is slightly overrated here. He’s not a generational talent...
True, but that's also true for Foden, Sancho and especially Trent. They, well outside of Trent certainly have ballon d'or potential. Not era defining potential though imo.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,577
Location
india
What's wrong with that? Can't wait to hear this.
I've never seen the talent in him to be the equal of someone like Sancho. Maybe he hasn't shown his qualities yet.


Messi is beyond generational. Zidane is generational. Messi is GOAT level.
Alright but the same logic applies.

Generational should be the rarest of rare kind of player IMO
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,577
Location
india
Foden and Greenwood have potential to become legends of the game. Don't think they'll reach Cristiano and Messi numbers (doubt someone ever will).

Tier 1: Messi, Cristiano, Maradonna, Pelé, Gerd Muller,
Tier 2: Zidane, Brazilian Ronaldo, Kaká, Iniesta
Tier 3: Rooney, Ibrahimovic, Pirlo, Robben, Aguero,

Don't think Greenwood and Foden will join Messi and Cristiano in Tier 1. I think if it all goes well they will end up in tier 3, players with world class abillity and a great addition to any team. Players who can decide a game by themselves on a good day, but lack that little bit of magic that tier 2 has.
Oh I love this. Why is Kaka in Tier 2?!