Superunknown
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2019
- Messages
- 10,948
Watching the game again. Does he actually have a shot in the game? Think Dorgu had more attempts than he did.
Hard to look like scoring when your teammates are Garnacho who would rather die than pass to himI thought his link play was fine, but he doesn’t ever remotely look like scoring.
I said it months ago, Maguire at 9 would outscore Hojlund. He needs to go.
Hard to look like scoring when your teammates are Garnacho who would rather die than pass to him![]()
Hard to look like scoring when your teammates are Garnacho who would rather die than pass to him![]()
Literally all of our outfield players except the centre halves managed shots at goal against Lyon. Both wing-backs. Both ‘10s’. Both holding midfielders. Just not Hojlund. And of course, this is not a rarity. So unless people are trying to float this idea that everyone hates him, it’s obviously down to the fact that he’s a bit rubbish.
Nah next time watch Rasmus and count how many times he's open. Believe me he's not useless and shite like people think. You could make a full on compilation of the amount of times he's ignored this season. Last season he basically had to score goals by himself. He was open about 3 times during that Lyon game or if Garna just held the ball for Rasmus to catch up but instead he of course shoots it. Rasmus would have about 15 goals and Garnacho would have have 15+ assists if he ever passes it. I forget he's still a kid but no kid should be that greedy.Literally all of our outfield players except the centre halves managed shots at goal against Lyon. Both wing-backs. Both ‘10s’. Both holding midfielders. Just not Hojlund. And of course, this is not a rarity. So unless people are trying to float this idea that everyone hates him, it’s obviously down to the fact that he’s a bit rubbish.
Yeah. Literally our CB, DM, and sub CM all not just shot, but scored. If he can't even get a shot off, you can't chalk all that up to just service, even if that's an issue too.Literally all of our outfield players except the centre halves managed shots at goal against Lyon. Both wing-backs. Both ‘10s’. Both holding midfielders. Just not Hojlund. And of course, this is not a rarity. So unless people are trying to float this idea that everyone hates him, it’s obviously down to the fact that he’s a bit rubbish.
Last night also, especially in the first half, Lyon were very vulnerable to balls in behind. That's where we got our 2 goals from. Surely a striker is thinking, I'll come deep, swivel and make a run in behind. Did he do it even once?
Well he did make runs. For the first goal he made the exact near post run that he has been repeatedly slated for not making and was in front of the defender for the ball across the face of goal. No criticism of Garnacho as the pull back to Ugarte worked but it did so in part because of the intelligent run Rasmus made. Good run on the second goal as well when again he pulled the defenders with him and was in the right spot if Dalot had crossed or to profit from a rebound and he could also have had a couple of assists.
His movement and his link up play were better than they have been in most games this season and he can consider himself a little unlucky that he was not found on a couple of occasions when he was in space. I am still baffled by his complete lack of ability in the air as he is a unit and has the physique that makes you think it would be a strength but he seems to have no idea at all of how to time a jump, he is also still naive in his wrestling with defenders who are using his size against him although he has been blatantly fouled numerous times and never gets the decision.
He has been horrible at times this season.
But you have give him and any striker in our team a benefit of doubt with the current setup. We are very deep in our own half most of the times with the current setup.
In the opposition box, we dont have many players to score goals. We are setup to defend not to attack. May be next season , Amorim will ask the 5-man defense to move few yards up and then we will see more players in the box.
Right now, its way too easy for opponents to stop/mark him.
I think unless the striker is R9 who can dribble multiple players and score, any striker would struggle.
Not that I am defending Rasmus , he does not seem to be the awesome player we hoped for, but still current setup does not allow him to be average striker either.
@Schmeichels pinky
It is easier to take a shot when the actual ball goes in to the box, and at the end of games when we are panicking, chasing a result, we do put more people forward and just put balls in the box. Something we are very reluctant to do in earlier phases.Literally all of our outfield players except the centre halves managed shots at goal against Lyon. Both wing-backs. Both ‘10s’. Both holding midfielders. Just not Hojlund. And of course, this is not a rarity. So unless people are trying to float this idea that everyone hates him, it’s obviously down to the fact that he’s a bit rubbish.
Thought he was good against Lyon, good link up and created chances for others but no one really returned the favor when he had taken up good positions.
@Schmeichels pinky
This is what I meant by Hojlund still needs to practice his shooting technique. All of these 40 shots show that his ball striking technique is still very lacking and need practice to improve. No power and no precision.
In comparison, look at Mateta’s goal vs Brighton. This is good ball striking technique with power and precision and not the only time I had seen him scoring this type of goal.
The only time that I have ever seen Hojlund demonstrate good ball striking was his goal vs spurs. When a striker has a good ball striking technique, he can score in tight angle.
Yeah, because Garnacho is only a selfish player when the pass to Højlund is on..Can't help but feel the main reason for that is that none of his teammates rate him at all and believe passing to him is a great way of wasting the opportunity.
I don't even think the formation is defensive, we just don't have enough attacking quality in positions which matter.What horrible, lazy analysis: oh, it's a back five, so it must be defensive and deep.
Before his unfortunate injury, Martinez had begun to understand the Amorim system. A spare CB pushes into midfield, progresses the play and maybe even gets goals. We've seen Yoro do that recently as well. In fact, he gave an interview a week or so ago saying that Amorim wants the back three to be playmakers, dictate the game and instigate attacks. Seen even Mazroui do it, and Maguire with his big switches.
Dalot constantly finds himself in dangerous areas, as does Dorgu. They need to run with the ball more, and Dalot especially needs to stay high as often as possible.
These excuses for a mediocre player simply must stop.
I also think that because he's so bad we overrate what really should be the bare minimum from a striker at United.Can't help but feel the main reason for that is that none of his teammates rate him at all and believe passing to him is a great way of wasting the opportunity.
I'd go as far as saying thats a given. I am not sure whether a formation itself is attacking or defensive, it all depends on the playstyle and what kind of risks you take (are allowed to take). Lets face it, we lack quick thinking up front, very good dribbling, quick feet in tight spaces and only Bruno is capable of dangerous passes - if we can't attack with long balls in behind the defence we are lacklustre and sluggish, have been for quite some time. That makes attacking very difficult which then emphasizes the missing "quality" even more.I don't even think the formation is defensive, we just don't have enough attacking quality in positions which matter.
I agree. I'd add that he seems to not get the balance right between keeping the CBs occupied and getting himself in space. Too often, he is seen in physical battles with the CBs who deal with him reasonably well and make sure, he is never really in promising positions. I think, he is asked to do so, to push opposition away to give more space for the rest to play in but it seems that he is taking himself completely out by doing so. And given that the rest of the attacker don't show much, this engagement doesn't have anything to show for.Hojlund really struggles because he's bad on the ball but particularly bad at finding the spaces needed to shoot.
Thats the tricky part. At the end of the day, isolating players and thinking about what should they be able to do and what not is difficult because it is a team game. But no doubt, this season has been a hot mess particularly for Hojlund and some of the hopes about his potential have gone. I'd say though, that we are still a team that is pretty bad in generating high calibre chances on a regular basis and seem to rely a lot on moments and individual moments. Which is obviously a very very risky take when your players not even on paper are considered very good as it reduces the chances for those moments of brilliance.I also think that because he's so bad we overrate what really should be the bare minimum from a striker at United.
My point is not to compare Hojlund and Mateta. My point is to demonstrate that Hojlund still needs to improve his ball striking. I only used Mateta’s goal as example of what good ball striking look like because the original poster didn’t understand what I meant by good ball striking.You would have to look at these 40 Højlund shots and Mateta's last 40 shots for the comparison to be meaningful in any way. And there are obviously good strikes among these 40 shots by Højlund, although not enough. If the only good Højlund strike you've seen was his Spurs goal, you haven't even watched the entire clip shared, let alone all his goals from last season.
Fair enough. I don't think anyone disputes that Højlund needs to improve his ball striking, but I would probably say it's one of the least concerning aspects of his game. I think he is being held back much more by his movement, first touch, and balance.My point is not to compare Hojlund and Mateta. My point is to demonstrate that Hojlund still needs to improve his ball striking. I only used Mateta’s goal as example of what good ball striking look like because the original poster didn’t understand what I meant by good ball striking.
Genuinely. I think I could do better.It’s beyond a joke now.
At the point where I think I could probably sneak a goal.
You just know he’s going to do feck all when you see his name on the line up.
Start Obi