Rasmus Hojlund image 9

Rasmus Hojlund Denmark flag

2024-25 Performances


View full 2024-25 profile

5.2 Season Average Rating
Appearances
14
Goals
4
Assists
1
Yellow cards
0
I personally feel like he has lost his way in terms of identity on the pitch; he came here from a functioning team with a defined role and a clear idea of what he was expected to do - he was in a clear quid pro quo that was mutually beneficial and allowed him to focus on his precise job, taking a lot of the stress out of his game as well as variance that has entered the fray since he moved here to a club struggling to get any synergy going. We also have a lot more ego and self-serving players who are not really used to playing for the benefit of one another.

That’s a difficult environment for a very young striker to come into. Højlund has been hazed some by teammates and not really passed that test. By that I mean he had the ‘new lad who has to prove his credentials to his peers’ thing going on and in a world where Rashford has completely lost his way; Garnacho wants to be the second coming of C.Ronaldo (a me-me wing-forward); Antony is Antony and Bruno is way more erratic in pass selection than he was in his first two seasons, you have a real recipe for someone whose game is not solid and certain to lose themselves and their sense of identity.

We can all see he’s less than the player he came here as. The runs he makes now are far worse than those he used to make and his preoccupation with pointlessly wrestling and fighting with CB’s instead of trying to outfox them is getting worse the more his confidence drops, which I think is understandable because right now that’s probably the time when he feels alive and like he’s contributing to the team. If you actively seek to wrestle with CB’s you at least cannot be ignored and bypassed - without that physical connection he could be feeling like a complete passenger; he absolutely does not like or have that ‘none of it matters so long as I score’ indifference to general play of the Haaland/Gomez/ Hugo Sanchez kind of #9’s who literally couldn’t care less about the game going on around them so long as they get that 1 or 2 touch opportunity to score. At Atalanta he had a clear purpose and it meant he was more involved and what he did benefitted both he and the team. It’s been a 180 on a sliding scale since he got here unfortunately.

You mention the runs he does make that get ignored and you’re not wrong, but a striker who is confident and knows exactly who he is and what will best serve himself and the team will make countless runs of quality and at that time, players ignoring them will be in big trouble. Let me cite the very best off the ball runner in the last cycle of actual #9’s in Cavani. Not only was he renowned for his ability to run lines, but the sheer frequency of his desire to make another and another and another. The thing is, he was already the best at it, but the sheer volume of runs put him into the elite category for runs that you really need to dig deep in the crates for elite runners of the line that come close. Cavani was often ridiculed for his propensity to miss seemingly easy chances and he was regularly getting stick for that, but the sheer number of those chances were forged by his elite movement meant they were his right to miss as barely any other forward would have had the cunning to be in those positions in the first place. Cavani must have made tens of thousands of ignored runs in his career and the forage rate per times found with a pass that put him in/through would be a very interesting one and a bar by which we could even measure expected rate for strikers to be found by teammates. Point here is it’s part and parcel of being a striker and they get ignored a lot more times than they are found, but what their runs do in preamble is set up the chances they do get and that constant foraging is what mentally fatigues their markers. Also, making myriad runs is important in the figuring out of your markers and their habits and tendencies. This is the way elite runners start getting the drop on the defence; they’ve worked them out and that is the time split runs and bended rubs etc. go live and are all potentially lethal. It’s a systematic process and Højlund has no concept of it at the moment. His fighting doesn’t benefit him, in fact it tires him out and makes the likelihood of constantly foraging for space remote - he comes off absolutely exhausted at around 70min most games because of pointless, wasted energy.

I don’t think there’s much point citing his touch or even his shooting because that is bound to be erratic in a distressed player. We’ve seen some very good finishes and touches from him as well as lots of bad ones. I would put forward that there’s a correlation and the less confidence and identity he has, the worse all these things become. For me they are a distant second to his movement and understanding of why he should be doing things and when he should be doing things. Unfortunately for him, he’s also at Manchester United where you have to have nerve and steel with the self belief to believe you belong so that other egos and self-serving players don’t crush you, but instead have you show even more belief in yourself. Amorim may be able to generate a reset where players are in the team to serve the team first and foremost and not their own desires. Højlund would get the chance to completely reframe and rebuild his game then and hopefully rid himself of what are frankly terrible tendencies that are not sustainable at this level.

I do actually feel for him because these onset problems were obvious to many of us remonstrating about the club not protecting the player by having a veteran be the lead so all of these growing pains could have been methodically and quietly worked on. We should not be seeing all of this in real time under the glare of the spotlight from a global audience.
Good post and I agree with much of it.

I think Amorim arriving will benefit him in a number of ways.
 
Great post. Agree with all of this. I do think he has the pure ability to be great (pace/strength/good ball striking off either foot/good carrier of the ball) but he’s sorely lacking the intangibles right now and hasn’t looked to have developed that side of his game at all which is discouraging.

Good post and I agree with much of it.

I think Amorim arriving will benefit him in a number of ways.
I don't trust the coaching he - or any of the youngsters - was getting, if I'm honest and I think it's been a longstanding problem here. I really hope that's about to change for not only Rasmus, but all of our young players (in particular) as well as the wider squad.

His capacity for taking on, and adapting to new information is what I hope becomes the talking point in a few months. If he's still mindlessly wrestling with CB's etc. by then, I think there'll be real cause for concern. Let's see where things go in the intervening period and hope for the best.
 
His hold up play and passing is really underwhelming. I cant see him personally bringing more than Chicharito, and he was a better finihser then Hojlund too. I mean let's wait for a run of games under the new manager, I am sure he will improve anyone, but early signs of Hojlund just being too raw again going into the season.

Zirkzee showed in 10 minutes much better hold up play spraying the balls around than Rasmus all game with all the heavy touches. Bets thing is that we sacked ETH so early that the new manager has a long season to asses his strikers and most definitely will have nice first full season budget to spend on a WC striker/Gyokeres to add even more competition and experience to the front line, then we will see how hard both strikers can work to establish themselves. About time we had options.
 


Hahaha standard Rasmus action these days! I still have hopes for him. I know he’s raw but he’s got potential and great attributes but he needs to put it all together. I do see us going for someone else highly rated like Sesko or Ferguson if he doesn’t pan out this season but I think he’ll become more consistent if we stick with him and try and find him in more dangerous positions.
 
With Amorim coming in, I'm most excited by what improvements we can see from Hojlund. With ETH, for some weird reason, Hojlund was asked to play mostly with his back to the goal and as a pure hold-up target man; always asked to come to the ball (moving away from the goal) to make space for the AMs and the wingers to run in behind. So basically, negating all his best qualities that we saw from him at Atalanta i.e. pace, running the channels and running behind the defenders. Instead, was made to hold up the ball and play intricate passes, which evidently are not his best qualities.
 
Last edited:
Hahaha standard Rasmus action these days! I still have hopes for him. I know he’s raw but he’s got potential and great attributes but he needs to put it all together. I do see us going for someone else highly rated like Sesko or Ferguson if he doesn’t pan out this season but I think he’ll become more consistent if we stick with him and try and find him in more dangerous positions.

For all of the criticisms Zirkzee has received, he seems to be found in dangerous positions far more frequently. He’s missing chances regularly, which at least gives hope. Garnacho manages several shots on goal every game. Hojlund consistently, for club and country, manages to be a centre forward that stays away from danger. This isn’t down to everyone else. We have a #10 that posts record chance creating figures but somehow - our centre forward is never on the end of anything. Cristiano was either scoring pr missing chance after chance here. The issue is Hojlund. He’s a long way from good enough and may never be.
 
For all of the criticisms Zirkzee has received, he seems to be found in dangerous positions far more frequently. He’s missing chances regularly, which at least gives hope. Garnacho manages several shots on goal every game. Hojlund consistently, for club and country, manages to be a centre forward that stays away from danger. This isn’t down to everyone else. We have a #10 that posts record chance creating figures but somehow - our centre forward is never on the end of anything. Cristiano was either scoring pr missing chance after chance here. The issue is Hojlund. He’s a long way from good enough and may never be.
I agree that more often than not it is down to Højlund, but he gets into dangerous positions for an easy goal, but keeps being ignored. That is a fact. And you know very well that Bruno's chance creation is generally not through the middle.
 
I agree that more often than not it is down to Højlund, but he gets into dangerous positions for an easy goal, but keeps being ignored. That is a fact. And you know very well that Bruno's chance creation is generally not through the middle.

Bruno’s chance creation is wherever the forward in space is. He created plenty for Ronaldo, plenty for Rashford through the middle. If Hojlund regularly made obvious and sensible runs, Bruno would find him.

I still can’t forget when Bruno DID find him open in the box against Coventry at Wembley last season either and he fecked it up spectacularly (random memory).
 
Berrada is known to think that two years is plenty to show one's worth. If that's right, the pressure is on Rasmus now. He's got to start showing something under Amorim. I think he can, but he's going the wrong way about it. All that feigned effort in grappling with defenders is no better than hiding from the ball. Let's see if Amorim can sort him out. Gasperini knew what to do with him, and it might just be that he needs better direction. He's got some weaknesses in his game, but Amorim might be able to work around them.
 
I've not seen Hojlund's stats but like others say, he rarely seems to get on the end of anything in and around the box, or create opportunities himself. He has pace and mobility but doesn't seem to use it at the right times. Frustrating. He might be great to watch in training matches on small pitches etc, but we just don't see it translate to match day.
 
So why is it he had goalscoring instincts at Atalanta (often scoring in the box from cutbacks) and co but all of a sudden this has absolutely vanished at United despite him being one of our top scorers last season? Did the ability just dribble out of his body when he touched down in Manchester or something
He scored like 10 goals from a chances worth of 8 goals (or something similar). His finishing isn't a problem, the problem is he doesn't find himself in good goalscoring positions. Obviously part of it is how the team is set up, A) other players seem to get at the end of chances more often than him (even McTominay last season) and B) he somehow seems to be getting away from the action, many users on here have already raised this isse - he seems to have "wrong instincts":
The Australian channel I saw this on were commenting on the Denmark situation and saying it's becoming a bigger concern than it was because he has looked increasingly poor for them. I don't watch Denmark, but it doesn't surprise me to hear that.

A lot of talk in this thread is about service and what not, but if you watch Hojlund, and Hojlund alone, his movement, choices, reading of play, hesitancy and overall game in complete isolation you see these are not the actions of a striker who is doing the right things to suddenly burst into life - he isn't being unlucky; his actions are not conducive to scoring or even being constructive and it is reflected in what can be seen in and of himself.

You can throw in external factors after the above, not before. If a striker is doing the right things, all the negative attention and criticism will go toward those letting him down by not providing, but if the striker isn't doing what he's supposed to, those factors are effectively redundant because other forwards and attack-minded midfielders will simply select another option or go it alone bypassing the poor option who isn't working toward a constructive end.

If a striker is constantly making good-great runs or is open and others ignore him, they'll be benched or severely bollocked. If he isn't, the spotlight turns back on the striker.

Watching Hojlund here and at the Euros, the lack of guile and cunning is a real standout in the way he plays his football. He effectively takes himself out of games so far as being an offensive threat. The wrestling with CB's thing is baffling; he does it more than actual bruiser CF's who were exceptional at it, the likes of Duncan Ferguson, Alan Shearer or Didier Drogba, what's more, it's a style from a bygone era - you don't see CF's doing it to that extent in this day and age as it serves little purpose with the way teams set up these days; slickness and elusiveness is far more valuable. I don't believe anyone is instructing him to do it, in fact, you'd think he's been actively told not to do that as it is a waste of energy and doesn't benefit him or the team as it isn't being done tactically.

You'd hope Amorim sits him down, gets out the footage and goes through the things he shouldn't be doing with a fine-toothed comb. He's harming himself and his opportunity to lockdown the position with the way he is playing his football.

I am a bit baffled by the number of posters that seem to think Amorim is going to change much in Hojlund's game. You'd think Ruud would be the guy to work with Rasmus, that didn't work out very well did it? So, how is a head coach going to impact a striker that does so many weird choices on the pitch? I think it's wishful thinking.
 
I agree that more often than not it is down to Højlund, but he gets into dangerous positions for an easy goal, but keeps being ignored. That is a fact. And you know very well that Bruno's chance creation is generally not through the middle.

:lol: No it isn’t. Don’t be ridiculous. Professional footballers see a team mate in a dangerous position, ready to score an easy goal if they pass it to him and think… “nah, feck that guy…” Pull the other one.
 
:lol: No it isn’t. Don’t be ridiculous. Professional footballers see a team mate in a dangerous position, ready to score an easy goal if they pass it to him and think… “nah, feck that guy…” Pull the other one.
What happened against PAOK when Bruno made an excellent pass to Amad who went for the shot? Was that not in a position for a tap-in? Or against Chelsea when he positioned himself for a cut back goal but Garnacho opted for the "shot" himself from a ridiculous angle.

I agree that he doesn't make them enough. He is obviously very raw and not exactly Cavani in terms of movement, but your point on our players not ignoring each other despite being in clear goal scoring positions is extremely obvious and doesn't just apply to Højlund. They have shocking decision making and are consistently rightfully called out for it, both in the matchday thread and the player performance one.
 
What happened against PAOK when Bruno made an excellent pass to Amad who went for the shot? Was that not in a position for a tap-in? Or against Chelsea when he positioned himself for a cut back goal but Garnacho opted for the "shot" himself from a ridiculous angle.

I agree that he doesn't make them enough. He is obviously very raw and not exactly Cavani in terms of movement, but your point on our players not ignoring each other despite being in clear goal scoring positions is extremely obvious and doesn't just apply to Højlund. They have shocking decision making and are consistently rightfully called out for it, both in the matchday thread and the player performance one.

Individual players make bad decisions all the time. Which will affect all their teammates to a similar extent. You were implying that Hojlund is suffering from this to a unique extent. Which is clearly not happening because that would be nuts. Why would there be an agenda against him scoring??
 
Individual players make bad decisions all the time. Which will affect all their teammates to a similar extent. You were implying that Hojlund is suffering from this to a unique extent. Which is clearly not happening.
They regularly make these mistakes, though. It is unique in terms of how many big chances missed it leads to (I think we're top 1 in the league) There are various reasons for this, but some clear ones are that they don't trust each other - which sometimes make sense in the light of our awful finishing - or that they want to score themselves (Garnacho, Rashford, I'm looking at you). Watch this change with Amorim. He is not going to go easy on these mistakes.

I implied no such thing, any way. He suffers from it occasionally, which is enough to bring out the brigade of negativity in this thread.
 
:lol: No it isn’t. Don’t be ridiculous. Professional footballers see a team mate in a dangerous position, ready to score an easy goal if they pass it to him and think… “nah, feck that guy…” Pull the other one.
I wouldn't bother if I was you mate. It's zaafi's latest account.
 
He's one of the worst footballers I've ever seen play for us. Not an exagerration (tho i did add him into my fantasy team before Leicester out of hope, big mistake..). My issue with him is his movement. You see it when we counter attack, or play the ball forward from the half way line, and he 's always way behind everyone. Bruno/Rashford lead the charge and look up for that killer pass, and he's never there. He's trying to run back from... something? Way behind the passage of play.

That's the thing, he's never there. He's never available. He makes the wrong runs, enters the wrong space. It's constantly happening. He's the only player of ours where i have completely focussed on his movements in a game, out of the fact that its so noticeably bad. The bad service thing is overplayed, as its more his bad movement IMO. Bruno is an assist machine, it's his main asset. Hojlund can never find space for himself in the box, when Garnacho or Bruno leave a man on the side and look for the cross, low or high, he is never in the best position.

It's a huge problem imo, as this should be a natural thing for players in his position? Not sure if its a lack of footballing IQ. Feel like that 5-game run of his (where fixtures were easier, Luton etc) was a spell where everything was falling perfectly for him. The goal in the second game vs Villa (i think?) was nice I guess.

But yeah, long story short: his movement and positional awareness is so far off the pace, it's ridiculous. He's never in the right place.
 
If he is yet to sign a new deal, I would be tempted to go £100m on Alexander Isak in the summer if we manage to qualify for the CL and Newcastle don’t. He’s the best 9 in the PL for me, and still at a good age. A good goalscoring centre forward is a huge plus for any team trying to win things. We can make some money back by selling Hojlund and hopefully Rashford.
 
Individual players make bad decisions all the time. Which will affect all their teammates to a similar extent. You were implying that Hojlund is suffering from this to a unique extent. Which is clearly not happening because that would be nuts. Why would there be an agenda against him scoring??

It has happened to him a lot from our wingers. Not that there is an agenda but more that there seemed to be real lack of understanding between our forwards under Tem Hag.
 
It has happened to him a lot from our wingers. Not that there is an agenda but more that there seemed to be real lack of understanding between our forwards under Tem Hag.

Is the situation the same with the Danish NT where he's also been struggling for goals and consistency?
 
Is the situation the same with the Danish NT where he's also been struggling for goals and consistency?

Or Atalanta. Clear pattern with every team he turns out for that he is barely involved in goalscoring situations, yet others in those teams appear to get chances.
 
Still have faith he will come good. I think we will start playing a style of play that will be better for him.
 
If he is yet to sign a new deal, I would be tempted to go £100m on Alexander Isak in the summer if we manage to qualify for the CL and Newcastle don’t. He’s the best 9 in the PL for me, and still at a good age. A good goalscoring centre forward is a huge plus for any team trying to win things. We can make some money back by selling Hojlund and hopefully Rashford.
I've wanted Isak since his Sociedad days so I'd be happy with this.

Isak
Viktor G
Guirassy
Watkins
Boniface

Probably would be my top 5 wishlist for strikers.
 
Or Atalanta. Clear pattern with every team he turns out for that he is barely involved in goalscoring situations, yet others in those teams appear to get chances.
He missed 13 big chances in the league last season, and also scored 10 in 2158 minutes, so I'd say he was quite heavily involved in potential goal scoring chances if you compare him to many other strikers in the league. Clearly, he has this movement bit in his locker and showed it much more last season. I just don't understand what happened this season, but one of the factors is surely confidence.

Not sure why you mention Atalanta? He was involved a lot for them, and ran the channels playing as the sole striker in a 3-4-3 formation, same as Amorim is playing.
 
Let’s see what Amorim can do with Højlund, he’s good at developing players. His system might also suit Højlund.
 
Is the situation the same with the Danish NT where he's also been struggling for goals and consistency?
Its more than a year since his last goal, his 7 goals is in 4 games (3-2-1-1).. He has been just as bad for Denmark, at Euro24 he was among our 2 worst players, and we seem to play better without him.. Our best game in 2024 was NL home against Serbia, where he didnt play.. And he has the same problems as he has for United, never to be found when the ball is in the box
 
Its more than a year since his last goal, his 7 goals is in 4 games (3-2-1-1).. He has been just as bad for Denmark, at Euro24 he was among our 2 worst players, and we seem to play better without him.. Our best game in 2024 was NL home against Serbia, where he didnt play.. And he has the same problems as he has for United, never to be found when the ball is in the box

You're not the first Danish (I'm assuming) poster/follower of Denmark NT to mention this. It's a huge flaw in his game. Casemiro gets in better positions in the box for headers and positions himself to shoot more often, which is a joke. Mctominay put him to shame for getting to dangerous balls in the final third last season as well. Who's your next best option in attack for Denmark, out of curiosity? Or rather who would you play instead?
 


Clearly our players look to set up Casemiro and not Hojlund. I remember last season there was a point where Martial had received more passes than Hojlund in half the minutes - people need to stop giving Hojlund excuses for not getting involved in games and also stop acting like a strikers job is to just wait for tap ins to be provided. The world's best forwards will score goals and get chances no matter where they play. There's a reason that Spurs haven't had anyone score the amount of goals Kane scored since he left, and it's not because the wide players stopped bothering to supply the forwards.

I hope that Hojlund becomes great, but he is far from it right now and should never have been brought in to be Manchester United's number 1. Players like Vinicius and Rodrygo were brought in and nurtured behind players in their prime until they were ready to take on the mantle, that is how players like Hojlund should be brought in, not given the keys to the Kingdom despite having no proven pedigree anywhere. Madness.
 
You're not the first Danish (I'm assuming) poster/follower of Denmark NT to mention this. It's a huge flaw in his game. Casemiro gets in better positions in the box for headers and positions himself to shoot more often, which is a joke. Mctominay put him to shame for getting to dangerous balls in the final third last season as well. Who's your next best option in attack for Denmark, out of curiosity? Or rather who would you play instead?
Atm moment Kasper Dolberg, just scored 3 goals last game, is our second striker, and there is talk about him starting tomorrow vs Spain.. At the moment I would play him or Yussef Poulsen before Højlund. For me it seems that Højlund cant handle the pressure of being a Manchester United player, I remember an interview after our 2-3 defeat to Kasakhstan, where he scored 2, he was livid after the game and in that interview, and some of the older players needed to calm him down.. He had fire in his eyes, thats has all changed since he came here. Now he look more the player he was at FCK, both for Denmark and United.. For me he will never be good enough to be top striker for a club like United, if we want to get back to the top, but he is better than he is showing atm.

I see many here blame our style and his teammates, but those problems we see atm is the same for Denmark and back at FCK.. I also would say that our way of play is not suited for him and dont get the best out of him, but still i dont think he will ever be good enough for United
 
Or Atalanta. Clear pattern with every team he turns out for that he is barely involved in goalscoring situations, yet others in those teams appear to get chances.

Tell me you never watched him at Atalanta
 
Or Atalanta. Clear pattern with every team he turns out for that he is barely involved in goalscoring situations, yet others in those teams appear to get chances.
Uhm, he played a little less than 1900 minutes (roughly 20 full matches) and scored 10. He was 19 and their second best goal scorer after Lookman. But don’t let facts interfere with your fairytale