UnofficialDevil
Anti Scottish and Preoccupied with Donkeys.
La Gazzetta dello SportUtdJoshua… ok
La Gazzetta dello SportUtdJoshua… ok
He was very highly rated during that season at Atalanta as evidenced by the fact that PSG were competing with us for him and yes he was thought of as a future star. I don't think the opinion will have changed massively in the last two years as he will mostly have been seen in European games where his form has been quite good, basically a goal every other game and generally far more involved in build up play against European opposition. I have not seen a lot of comments on this but the little I have seen does lean towards the usual mindset of the problem being United and not the player which is why so many Italian clubs are genuinely interested in exploring a deal for him this summer.Is Hojlund considered a decent player in Italy from his Atalanta days?
Obvisouldy Inter a not interested in him from what they have seen over the last 18 months at United.
I think most fans would be hopeful he can play as good or better than how he did at Atalanta.Is Hojlund considered a decent player in Italy from his Atalanta days?
Obvisouldy Inter a not interested in him from what they have seen over the last 18 months at United.
No one in his right mind would spend €40M+ for Hojlund, let's be honest.A- Inter have 5 strikers. Lautaro (not Lautaru), Thuram, Terimi, Arnautovic and Esposito. 2 of them are mint which makes Hojlund a 40m backup striker against 2 experienced heads with Arnautovic scoring more goals this year then Hojlund did. 40m might look like loose change for us but for Inter is big money. They haven't spent so much on a player since 20/21 ie Hakimi. Since then their top signing per season was Vanheusden (16.3m euros) in 21/22, Gosens (27.40m) in 22/23, Pavard in 23/24 for 31.40m in 23/24 and Frattesi for 31.40m in 24/25). Their forward line consist of Lautaro Martinez (22.7m euros), Taremi (free), Thuram (free), Arnautovic (11m euros). Yet somehow we're made to believe that Inter will spend 46m euros in a backup striker.
Inter has Beppe Marotta at the helm who is a sly fox always in search of a bargain. The man was the brains behind Juventus resurgence and dominance in the Serie A then he moved to Inter after falling out with Agnelli over the Ronaldo deal and he performed a similar miracle there. Our DOF we brought with few months experience in the role at mighty Southampton has as much chance of outwitting Marotta as he had of outwitting Ryan Giggs back when he was a player
I think most fans would be hopeful he can play as good or better than how he did at Atalanta.
It's also pretty obvious that he was overhyped and is not a generational talent, so I'm pretty convinced no italian clubs will make a big offer to Man Utd (if at all, it's obvious he needs to go and by waiting they can expect a better offer).
I'm not 100% sure, Atalanta under Gasperini has a very peculiar attacking phase, and the striker usually doesn't need to hold the ball.From what i saw, Hojlund did his best work playing in a front two at Atalanta. Playing as a lone striker who is expected to hold the ball up hasn't been his game.
Maybe he would be a good option for Inter?
Always good to hear opinions from other fan groups.
We should be serious about getting one anywayThe sooner this guy is gone the sooner I'll breathe a bit easier for next season.
I'd still rather he went and have Zirkee and Obi for the number 9 spot next season, but if he goes it surely means we are serious about getting a proper striker in.
None of them are gonna be easy to shiftQuite an obsession over dumping him before or over jadon and marcus
Quite an obsession over dumping him before or over jadon and marcus
Hardly. Martial had two seasons where he was clearly very good, and another two where he was our best attacker when Mourinho actually gave him a run in the team but Jose constantly picked other worse-performing players ahead of him. Pre-injuries, he only had the one truly bad season and that was when he was first moved out to the left wing role (as opposed to the inside left position he sometimes played before that).Martial had just one good season in 2019/20 and was terrible for the other 9 years. Still we kept him, pray and hope that he would turn into gold.
If we could predict a motivated and hard working Rashford, I'd be for that too.I would genuinely rather have Rashford as our starting 9 this season over Hojlund.
As for Sancho. He's only got 1 year left on his contract anyway so he'll probably end up on loan and then never seen or heard from again. Sulking about in the Turkish league or something.
I would genuinely rather have Rashford as our starting 9 this season over Hojlund.
As for Sancho. He's only got 1 year left on his contract anyway so he'll probably end up on loan and then never seen or heard from again. Sulking about in the Turkish league or something.
You'd think people would learn after mediocrity like Bailly and Lindelof managed 7 and 8 years here. Shaw will have lasted 13 fecking years when we are finally rid of him on June 30th 2027.Would like to see if Real Madrid in a world where they didn't have Benzema would stick with Luka Jović for more than 2 seasons as 1st choice striker and still say "let's give him a chance in his third season", or if PSG, Bayern Munich, Man City, Barca etc. would stick with Hojlund for more than 2 seasons with the level of performances he had in the Man Utd shirt. Also the same can be said about Onana and how many big clubs would go into the 3rd season with as him the 1st choice GK after all the horror games he had in our shirt or maybe how many of those clubs would stick with Lindelof for 8 fecking years.
We are sticking too long with players who don't perform.
We are agree to disagree. Beside the good season where he had 17 Premier league goals, the only two seasons where he had two digits were 10 and 11 goals. His assist rates isnt really high either. I think he showed potential but never really hit the high.Hardly. Martial had two seasons where he was clearly very good, and another two where he was our best attacker when Mourinho actually gave him a run in the team but Jose constantly picked other worse-performing players ahead of him. Pre-injuries, he only had the one truly bad season and that was when he was first moved out to the left wing role (as opposed to the inside left position he sometimes played before that).
Even after the injuries he had some seasons where he was fairly good when he could get on the pitch, although obviously not at the level he previously was. Of course, he did also have a couple of shockingly bad seasons at that point as well.
This is what happens when you have not watched him play for United for a while...we start thinking he could do a job.
He was given the chance when Amorim first came in.. his hold up and back to goal play is just as bad if not worse than Hojlunds.
He is not a CF, he cannot play in tight spaces and needs space to run.
Yeah fed up of these clubs pleading poverty, certainly wouldn't accept it from Leverkusen after their windfallInter already bought two players for 40 mil euros. Italian clubs have money (not saying that they are loaded with it) but they pretend to be poor.
I hope that we will hold our ground here and refuse any loan offer.
I read they already signed a striker from Parma (I think) named Bony (I think) and will no longer be going for Hojlund.Inter already bought two players for 40 mil euros. Italian clubs have money (not saying that they are loaded with it) but they pretend to be poor.
I hope that we will hold our ground here and refuse any loan offer.
Napoli bought Scottie from us just last season.When was the last time an Italian team bought a player outright? 2003? They love a loan.
Bargain of the century. How much could they sell him for now?Napoli bought Scottie from us just last season.
You'd think people would learn after mediocrity like Bailly and Lindelof managed 7 and 8 years here. Shaw will have lasted 13 fecking years when we are finally rid of him on June 30th 2027.
And still you have people like; "No no, just give him another year." and this coming off the back of a historically shit season with him leading the line and he still had someone like Bruno behind him putting up numbers and he could do feck all.
Why are people so clingy with shit footballers?
He will have eclipsed Jones' 12 years by that time.he's been here THAT long?!
And we've still stuck with him another two years?!
Unbelievable.He will have eclipsed Jones' 12 years by that time.
Bailly 7.
Lindelof 8.
Jones 12.
Shaw 13.
40 years of wages pissed down the drain on them.
Unbelievable.
I'm convinced the old senior management team were hell bent on sabotaging us intentionally. There's just no other excuse for such horrendous incompetence.
He will have eclipsed Jones' 12 years by that time.
Bailly 7.
Lindelof 8.
Jones 12.
Shaw 13.
40 years of wages pissed down the drain on them.
A loan with an obligation to buy is a difficult deal because if the club can’t come to terms with the player how does the deal get finalizedSancho's loan was loan with an obligation to buy (or that's how it was reported back then, we all thought Sancho is gone and the club is getting £25m until they reported Chelsea can pay 5m to escape the obligation), so I would think straight up sale or no deal.
Exactly that's why we shouldn't get involved with oneA loan with an obligation to buy is a difficult deal because if the club can’t come to terms with the player how does the deal get finalized
But a better team wants him?You’ve already proved yourself lad, to be completely and utterly useless! Time to move on.
And all of them had next to no impact in that time. Cantona was here 4 years, look at the mark he left.He will have eclipsed Jones' 12 years by that time.
Bailly 7.
Lindelof 8.
Jones 12.
Shaw 13.
40 years of wages pissed down the drain on them.
I think he’d have scored far more than Hojlund you’re right. So would Sancho, but the two of them have burned all bridges.I don't disagree but I'm beginning to think we're stuck with Rashford for the foreseeable and honestly I think I'd rather have him on the bench than pay him to play somewhere else.
A front 3 of Cunha, Rashford, Mbuemo might work... maybe. I'd back him to score more goals than Hojlund anyway.
Gonna be near impossible to shift Sancho because of being unwilling to take any pay cut, in terms of Hojlund it's finding a team with money and not Inter pleading poverty for loan.I think he’d have scored far more than Hojlund you’re right. So would Sancho, but the two of them have burned all bridges.
It’s a real predicament. Sell them for peanuts or keep them here and not use them. I am aghast at how far Rashford has fallen. Personally and professionally.
If we can get £50 million for the pair, I’d take that and draw a line under it. That money could be well used and it would be two top earners off the books.
I think Sancho will have enough suitors, especially from German sides. I expect even someone with a terrible work like Sancho will eventually realise that he needs to work and he’ll have to accept a pay cut to remain employed.Gonna be near impossible to shift Sancho because of being unwilling to take any pay cut, in terms of Hojlund it's finding a team with money and not Inter pleading poverty for loan.
Yeah only if he's a backup to a new number 9
They’re right though