The Purley King
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2014
- Messages
- 5,498
What if I say “la” a lot in my covering letter?Place is run like North Korea. No way they'll be accepting new account sign ups on a day when they've lost 3-0.![]()

What if I say “la” a lot in my covering letter?Place is run like North Korea. No way they'll be accepting new account sign ups on a day when they've lost 3-0.![]()
Also say "Ah'm bein' sheeeeerioushhhh"What if I say “la” a lot in my covering letter?
“I don’t do ifs, buts, or maybes, I do absolutes”Also say "Ah'm bein' sheeeeerioushhhh"
We should create accounts in RAWK and vote for Slot in. We need him to stay there and destroy the club.
I tried and I got the message that I need paid email account to get registered to RAWK. So no yahoo, gmail, outlook etc to have your account registered.You have to be registered to view RAWK?![]()
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...

**Disclaimer the language is atrocious**![]()
![]()

Tbf this is the one instance you can understand that take. It's man city and it's Michael Oliver![]()
"Corrupt" Biggest bunch of crybabies. It's never that they're shite. No it's corruption from the refs. (Ignoring the amount of times the refs bailed them out in the first five games with in the amount of injury time added)
It will always be something. Going back to our glory years it was always Howard Webb and the FA (Ferguson Association) that were responsible for their mediocrity. Its funny as f88k!!!Tbf this is the one instance you can understand that take. It's man city and it's Michael Oliver
like the use of 88 there. please check your PMs for an invitation to a secretive redcafe club.It will always be something. Going back to our glory years it was always Howard Webb and the FA (Ferguson Association) that were responsible for their mediocrity. Its funny as f88k!!!
Yeah but that was baseless nonsense and sour grapes. Michael Oliver is or has been provably on the payroll of the Man City owners. There's no way he should be anywhere near their games, especially when you look at some of the calls he's given them in recent years.It will always be something. Going back to our glory years it was always Howard Webb and the FA (Ferguson Association) that were responsible for their mediocrity. Its funny as f88k!!!
Oliver has screwed us so many times glad it’s happening to someone else especially these lots. Didn’t help this morning when I told all Liverpool fans at work it was the right callTbf this is the one instance you can understand that take. It's man city and it's Michael Oliver

By the letter of the law, I believe he has to be impeding the vision of the goalkeeper to be interfering with play and therefore be called offside. There's an angle from behind the goal that makes it very hard to argue for him impeding Donnarumma's view of the ball.When does not standing in a offfside position 4 yards from goal and ducking out of the way of a goal bound shot not constitute 'interfering with play'? Dippers and the media have conflated 'impeding the GK' with 'interfering with play'.
By the letter of the law, I believe he has to be impeding the vision of the goalkeeper to be interfering with play and therefore be called offside. There's an angle from behind the goal that makes it very hard to argue for him impeding Donnarumma's view of the ball.
I'd be fuming if we had that goal taken away, to be fair. The bigger point is that Liverpool lose that game anyway.
These days?There's so many fecking idiots on the Internet these days
That’s what makes it funny!By the letter of the law, I believe he has to be impeding the vision of the goalkeeper to be interfering with play and therefore be called offside. There's an angle from behind the goal that makes it very hard to argue for him impeding Donnarumma's view of the ball.
I'd be fuming if we had that goal taken away, to be fair. The bigger point is that Liverpool lose that game anyway.

By the letter of the law, I believe he has to be impeding the vision of the goalkeeper to be interfering with play and therefore be called offside. There's an angle from behind the goal that makes it very hard to argue for him impeding Donnarumma's view of the ball.
I'd be fuming if we had that goal taken away, to be fair. The bigger point is that Liverpool lose that game anyway.
Didn't realise Everton have lost less games than them
feck sakesAren't they just! Imagine if you can being told 57 years ago( when I started following United) that one day lads would broadcast themselves watching games while the ffed and blinded and bitched and moaned like juveniles! And that they would have followers?There's so many fecking idiots on the Internet these days
No disrespect, what was the equivalent in your day? There must have been something?Aren't they just! Imagine if you can being told 57 years ago( when I started following United) that one day lads would broadcast themselves watching games while the ffed and blinded and bitched and moaned like juveniles! And that they would have followers?
Incredible.
That Fester guy is particularly stupid.
Apparently, Fester has only been to one Liverpool game in his life, and that was against United a couple of weeks ago.Aren't they just! Imagine if you can being told 57 years ago( when I started following United) that one day lads would broadcast themselves watching games while the ffed and blinded and bitched and moaned like juveniles! And that they would have followers?
Incredible.
That Fester guy is particularly stupid.
ceefax,No disrespect, what was the equivalent in your day? There must have been something?
That's quite normal over here. There are many many liverpool/United/Rangers/Celtic/Other Premier League club supporters in Northern Ireland and Republic of Ireland that have supported their clubs all their lives but have never darkened the door of their clubs stadium. That's the great thing about Sky Sports/Other TV broadcasters, they brought the football to everyones living room and you can watch most games now every week and they can support their club through their tvs, which brings in the largest slice of income to premier league clubs. I try to get over to United at least twice a season, but it's difficult with fixtures changing days/times with TV rescheduling and I do 24/7 on call 2 weeks on 2 weeks off so logistically for me personally it can be a nightmare.Apparently, Fester has only been to one Liverpool game in his life, and that was against United a couple of weeks ago.
In Irish league terms, this was still the way to voice your opinion to the masses at the turn of the millenium in the 'have a rattle' section of Irelands Saturday Night (it has since been discontinued) but then the Irish League Forums was born and it took over from print. ILF still exists today albeit with a slightly different name.Closest you got in about 1960 was letters to the editor or match reports that included fan viewpoints in newspapers.
Didn't realise Everton have lost less games than them
How was that interfering with the gk? He could see everything and wasn’t impeded in any way. Similar goals have been allowed, including against us.The letter of the law has a few more bullet points. One of them being
A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played or touched* by a team-mate is only penalised on becoming involved in active play by:
You can consider ducking under the ball as one of those things. It's like playing a dummy.
- interfering with play by playing or touching a ball passed or touched by a team-mate or
- interfering with an opponent by:
- preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or
- challenging an opponent for the ball or
- clearly attempting to play a ball which is close when this action impacts on an opponent or
- making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball