Realistic transfer pricing.

Fortitude

TV/Monitor Expert
Staff
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
33,619
Location
Inside right
I can’t help but feel we’re seeing a lot of adjusted rationale, let’s call it, for players to fit into tidy, multi-buy shopping lists. For example, setting an arbitrary budget and then doing the kind of financial manipulation that could get you a job in City’s accountancy department.

I am by no means an authority on player valuations, but I think I’m in line with others who seem to assess the players, clubs and situations for what they are and then try to draw a logical conclusion to the price of the player in question. I think wages are also paramount, which is why I generally think of transfer fee as well as the wage outlay. Not many people bother with the additional costs: agent and intermediary fees, signing bonuses, PL levies, performance guarantees and so and so forth. So we’ll leave that stuff off the table.

What I would like us to attempt is a realistic muppet table of transfer valuations that aren’t pie in the sky to suit a narrative. Would be great to have a decent consensus that can be adjusted where applicable as the transfer window goes on. It would also be interesting to see how accurate it turns out to be… perhaps the perceived undercutting turns out to be correct after all. Who knows?

I’m crap with formatting, so perhaps one of you takes that to hand. The OP can be adjusted accordingly.

Dewa, prices:

Eliot Anderson:

Price: £100m - £120m. Wage: £200k p/w

Reasoning: Hottest available talent in the Premier League who has already been touted as a £120m sale by Forest’s owner. Even if that turns out to be an exaggeration, it won’t be by more than £20m, in my opinion. Said to be United’s #1 target. Also rumoured to be a sure thing for City… you’d not be surprised if other suitors appear and try their luck, namely Chelsea and Liverpool. It’s not unfair to say every single team at the top end of the table might be in for him as all need midfielders and none have settled, starting midfield units. Forest have also stayed up, which basically rubber stamps top-end valuation - nobody is getting him for cheap. I think those wages (or more) are a given unless his agent is rubbish. Anderson is also a likely starter at the World Cup; the only thing that can do is have his value go up, should he have a good tournament.

Aurélien Tchouaméni

Price
: £70m - £80m. Wage: £300k p/w

Reasoning: Rated as one of the best defensive midfielders in the world by quite a lot of you. He also starts for Real Madrid. You’re talking premium rates for sale and wage here - biggest earner of the summer if he moves to the PL (outside of attackers), in my opinion. He’s moving into his prime years now, which means his biggest contract or contract renegotiation (outside of Saudi) in his career. Tchouameni would be moving as a star, on star money from a superstar club. That doesn’t come cheap off name and reputation alone, he’s also likely to play a prominent role in a France team many expect to see in no less than the semifinals of the World Cup, which means plenty more exposure and an ever increasing financial package should he shine, which he’ll have every chance to do in such a stacked team.

Sandro Tonali:

Price
: £70m - £80m. Wage: £150k p/w - £180k p/w

Reasoning: Some rate him, others don’t, but whatever you think, he’s not going to go for less than £70m (unless it’s abroad). Like Tchouameni, fixing for his aged prime move and/or contract, which means he’s likely at the peak of his earning potential and will want monies commensurate with that. Not going to the World Cup, desperate to leave Newcastle and not leaving a particularly happy trail behind himself. This one comes down to who is prepared to fork out so much for so… he may find himself in a blink first situation with Newcastle and some brinksmanship at the end of the window to get the release he so desperately wants. I personally think a lot of clubs will shop around for other players and then come back to Tonali in the latter period of the window to see if Newcastle will be more reasonable. I don’t think there will be a scramble for him at the start of the window as there’s no reason to do that.

Mateus Fernandes:

Price
: £50m - £65m. Wage: £120k p/w - £150k p/w

Reasoning: Highly coveted with PSG, Bayern, United, Arsenal all said to be interested, and likely more top clubs will throw their hat into the ring. There are two big problems with Fernandes in terms of an above board, all out in the open sale: PSG and “super agent,” Jorge Mendes. PSG can pay in a lump sum; they can also offer more… nudge, nudge, wink, wink. Mendes is a problematic character when he wants to be, but he’s sharp as a tack, and nothing tends to get by him or go awry in terms of his clients, so smoothing his palms is likely pivotal in picking up this young prospect. Outside of that, even if PSG don’t push through, there’s increasing interest from truly top clubs to the point he’s not going cheap or for a bargain even if West Ham are relegated. Fortunately for interested parties, he’s not going to the World Cup, so you would imagine there’s lots of scrambling for him behind the scenes in preparation for the opening of the transfer window. The supposed relegation clause is said to be bunkem, so no £40m magical sale West Ham can do nothing about. We won’t know what his top end valuation might actually be until it is clear whether West Ham are a PL team in four days time. With West Ham relegated, his price is likely to drop some.

Alex Scott:

Price
: £60m - £70m. Wage: £120k p/w - £150k p/w

Reasoning: Bournemouth are flying. Alex Scott is one of the key components in the team. They have just qualified for European football and he is now most certainly one of the hottest prospects in the Premier League. Bournemouth are not quite Brighton’s or Southampton’s former standing of star factories, but if that xi was stripped for parts, they would not currently be far off, with highly coveted players dotted throughout their side. Scott may want out given Iraola’s plan to leave, but unless he wants a particular club, who also want him, he’s very likely going to go for fair market rate, which I think is currently the £60m - £70m bracket.

Carlos Baleba:

Price
: £60m - £80m. Wage: £120k p/w - £150k p/w

Reasoning: Brighton. Old hands at making big money off of their production line. Have already shown they are prepared to keep players if their valuations aren’t met. What fans think he’s worth doesn’t really matter - and opinions on him are polemical to say the least - this is poker with at least one skilled player at the table. Whilst his valuation is difficult, I don’t think his wage would be as he’s not done anything to move that particular needle and if sold, is going to his new club with a lot to prove.

Lewis Hall:

Price
: £50m - £60m. Wage: £120k p/w - £150k p/w

Reasoning: A potential world class left back who has supposedly fallen out with his manager. He’s one of the jewels in the Newcastle crown and one that lowers their bar and raises that of the club that lands him so there’s no way he comes cheap. Newcastle’s financial woes are said to be prohibitive in terms of keeping their current squad together; Hall is most certainly a player that anyone with the cash who needs a left-back, will be in for in a flash.

Ederson:

Price
: £35m - £45m. Wage: £100k p/w - £150k p/w

Reasoning: Coming from Serie A from a low profile club, mostly on radars as a cheap, 3rd or 4th piece for a squad.Nobody is looking at him as a starter, unlike all the other players on the list, so he is judged differently. His biggest selling point is potentially getting a lot for relatively little

——

I think that’s it for now, or am I missing anyone else we’re seriously linked with?

The intention is to put some realism to the prices you can expect to see these players go for; counter reasoning welcomed.

I hope the list becomes more extensive as the window opens as it’s quite narrow at the moment.
 
Last edited:
Only point I'd change is Tonali is on a packet now that can hit up to £190k so don't think your range there is likely.

You could also add players like Diomande, Ndiaye, Wharton etc
 
Good idea. I know 200K a week is a lot, but given City are also chasing him, I'd assume Anderson is in a position to ask for more (rightly or wrongly). I'd also doubt Real would dispense with Tchouaméni for 70-80m.

Have we not been linked with a single centre back yet?
 
if money is not an issue and we are greedy and dream big.
Signing Anderson, Tchouaméni, Mateus Fernandes, Diomande, a LB and a backup striker. Then we should be a flying.
But I wonder how lineup Anderson, Tchouaméni, Mateus Fernandes, Mainoo and Bruno together in the midfield.
 
Theres no way Nottingham Forest are turning down £90 million for Anderson. Theres speculation that several clubs want him, but if in actual fact only 1 might bid for him. In that case I bet they'd take £80 million. The other prices seem more realistic
 
I'm completely against a wage cap. Having a Bruno or Casemiro on high wages wasn't/isn't the problem. The problem was giving high wages to everyone. These numbers might be a little off but Antony was on 30K per week at Ajax. Nobody else was going to pay his transfer fee and he wanted to come here. There was zero reason to give him 190K per week to start. He would have snapped our hands off at 90K. Baleba is on around 12.5K per week. If we end up signing him he should be at 65K max.
 
I'm completely against a wage cap. Having a Bruno or Casemiro on high wages wasn't/isn't the problem. The problem was giving high wages to everyone. These numbers might be a little off but Antony was on 30K per week at Ajax. Nobody else was going to pay his transfer fee and he wanted to come here. There was zero reason to give him 190K per week to start. He would have snapped our hands off at 90K. Baleba is on around 12.5K per week. If we end up signing him he should be at 65K max.

This has already been debunked. Its Capology nonsense.

You also have to factor in that he will have other offers from elsewhere. It's not like It's United or no one.
 
I guess contract length is the big differentiator vs salary alone. hence why Forest are asking silly money for Anderson as he's got a deal until 2029. There's no way he goes for £100m though - especially with how all clubs have embraced data + there are plenty of alternatives for much cheaper. I think he'll go for like £70m + £10m add ons.
 
if money is not an issue and we are greedy and dream big.
Signing Anderson, Tchouaméni, Mateus Fernandes, Diomande, a LB and a backup striker. Then we should be a flying.
But I wonder how lineup Anderson, Tchouaméni, Mateus Fernandes, Mainoo and Bruno together in the midfield.
I think you’re missing the point of the thread
 
Theres no way Nottingham Forest are turning down £90 million for Anderson. Theres speculation that several clubs want him, but if in actual fact only 1 might bid for him. In that case I bet they'd take £80 million. The other prices seem more realistic
Why do forest have to accept any bid other than their asking price? They don't want to lose either Anderson or Gibbs White this summer. If someone is stupid enough to pay the premium price then fair enough, they may reconsider.

However if I'm forest and I'm being offered £80mil or £90mil for Anderson, I might turn it down and stick to my £100-125mil valuation. If Anderson kicks up a fuss, it's simple, you want to go? Get your agent to get club X to meet our asking price, if they want you that badly, they can pay our valuation.
 
Why do forest have to accept any bid other than their asking price? They don't want to lose either Anderson or Gibbs White this summer. If someone is stupid enough to pay the premium price then fair enough, they may reconsider.

However if I'm forest and I'm being offered £80mil or £90mil for Anderson, I might turn it down and stick to my £100-125mil valuation. If Anderson kicks up a fuss, it's simple, you want to go? Get your agent to get club X to meet our asking price, if they want you that badly, they can pay our valuation.

Because they're running a business. Its not their asking price, its their initial bargaining price. Nobody says their actual price at the start
 
Because they're running a business. Its not their asking price, its their initial bargaining price. Nobody says their actual price at the start
West Ham and Brighton did exactly that with their £100m sales? Brighton also did that with Baleba. Few clubs actually bluff or haggle these days when setting their price. They don’t have to.
 
Because they're running a business. Its not their asking price, its their initial bargaining price. Nobody says their actual price at the start
It might be better for their business not to tell for lower.
 
West Ham and Brighton did exactly that with their £100m sales? Brighton also did that with Baleba. Few clubs actually bluff or haggle these days when setting their price. They don’t have to.

Brighton put that price because of the late interest and not having much time to replace him. That was the penalty

We also had a penalty for Antony because Ajax were unhappy with us taking their manager and now one of their players. These are specific examples. They dont apply to every transfer
 
Brighton put that price because of the late interest and not having much time to replace him. That was the penalty

We also had a penalty for Antony because Ajax were unhappy with us taking their manager and now one of their players. These are specific examples. They dont apply to every transfer
They don’t have to. We’re talking about massive transfers here, and the price was set each time. You skipped West Ham entirely, who made it clear from the outset what they wanted.
 
They don’t have to. We’re talking about massive transfers here, and the price was set each time. You skipped West Ham entirely, who made it clear from the outset what they wanted.

West Ham wanted that from Arsenal another London club. He was also wanted by multiple clubs and Chelsea had shelled out the money for Caiceido. They asked and Arsenal paid it. I dont think Anderson has the same profile that Rice had at the time and I'm not sure multiple clubs want to spend the majority of their budget on a central midfielders. We need to because Casemiro is going. Most of the other clubs are fine and Anderson would be an improvement, but they have other weaker areas to address
 
Has the Gordon price already broken the market before it has even opened?
It hasn't helped

United seems to have not exacerbated matters with Ederson but it was at the high end of the price point. Previous expectations was around 35+mil. Seems prices will be high for when big teams are in play, unfortunately. I'm resigned to the probability that we'll be paying 70+mil for Mateus as the market has been criminally set by Barca.

Shocking that Barca paid so much. Were Bayern seriously sniffing around?
 
Have we not been linked with a single centre back yet?

I mean, rate them or not, we have De Ligt, Martinez, Maguire, Yoro and Heaven on the books. By almost every modern clubs standards, we have 1 too many. So at least 1, probably 2, need to go before another comes in.
 
Premier league clubs are so wealthy they don't need to sell and won't be bullied anymore. Either pay up or shut up is their answer when asked about a player.
 
Yeah certainly looks that way
Generally the case but I'd say not for West Ham this summer. They simply have to sell, Fernandes is their best asset and so they're coming out hot.

It's the right thing to do for them for now. As we get towards August, everyone knows he has to leave so that'll push the price down again.

I don't see a bidding war, and certainly not at 85m.

Annoying for us and the player, but it is what it is is.

Young players going to mid level prem clubs have to start putting in release clauses now that clubs are showing they'll keep them if a dream move comes along.
 
Generally the case but I'd say not for West Ham this summer. They simply have to sell, Fernandes is their best asset and so they're coming out hot.

It's the right thing to do for them for now. As we get towards August, everyone knows he has to leave so that'll push the price down again.

I don't see a bidding war, and certainly not at 85m.

Annoying for us and the player, but it is what it is is.

Young players going to mid level prem clubs have to start putting in release clauses now that clubs are showing they'll keep them if a dream move comes along.
This only the case if no one bids for him before August, I'm not sure that's going to be the case.

Totally agree on the release clause part, seems this is going to have to be the norm in the prem if you don't want to be priced out a move.
 
I mean, rate them or not, we have De Ligt, Martinez, Maguire, Yoro and Heaven on the books. By almost every modern clubs standards, we have 1 too many. So at least 1, probably 2, need to go before another comes in.
On paper, perhaps that looks like one too many. However, Martinez has been at United for several years and averages less than half a season in appearances(!), de Ligt is out for an unknown lengthy absence and Maguire is another year older & thus likely to feel the strain even more so with the previous two mentioned as his only experienced sidekicks.

Basically, United have Maguire, possibly Martinez although he is made of glass and two youngsters that in Heaven, have recently showed that they look up for it and in Yoro, did better in his first year before regressing last season.

You absolutely cannot rely on Martinez, that is such a risk with de Ligt out. Despite his talent - and I do like him as a player - if he has a decent showing in the next few weeks, I'd look to sell Martinez and bring in another quality CB.