Agree again. fecking football in the assCLASSIC VAR feckery there. Minor irritation without VAR. Referees are human after all. Incandescent rage with VAR.
The stupid fecking poxy load of shite has ruined goal celebrations in return for supposedly getting rid of obvious unfair decisions like that. It really is ruining the game.
That's the thing isn't it.CLASSIC VAR feckery there. Minor irritation without VAR. Referees are human after all. Incandescent rage with VAR.
The stupid fecking poxy load of shite has ruined goal celebrations in return for supposedly getting rid of obvious unfair decisions like that. It really is ruining the game.
VAR didn't look at it. Ref blew the whistle instantly, so VAR can't review it.I honestly don’t understand how VAR looks at that and goes “yes maguire fouled the keeper”.
InfuriatingThey couldn’t be less consistent if they tried. It’s unbelievable.
I wish people would stop saying this. It completely misses the point. VAR has pros and cons. The cons are the way they mess with the flow of the game and make most goals scored a little less joyous in real time. These are BIG cons.This isn't vars fault though! Var showed both incidents perfectly and in slow motion. It's the officials
I disagree with the weight you put on cons, and think clear footage to correct major decisions is worth it's weight in gold. The officials are rubbish.I wish people would stop saying this. It completely misses the point. VAR has pros and cons. The cons are the way they mess with the flow of the game and make most goals scored a little less joyous in real time. These are BIG cons. The pros are supposed to be an end to obvious errors or unfairness in those games. If we’re not getting those pros then the system is the problem because every system is only as good as its weakest link. If the system isn’t working, the system has failed.
Eh? Why not? I thought the ref stopped to let VAR look at it?VAR didn't look at it. Ref blew the whistle instantly, so VAR can't review it.
Of course it can.VAR didn't look at it. Ref blew the whistle instantly, so VAR can't review it.
Why do you keep trying to treat officials as distinct from VAR? They’re an integral part of it.I disagree with the weight you put on cons, and think clear footage to correct major decisions is worth it's weight in gold. The officials are rubbish.
What do you think VAR is?This isn't vars fault though! Var showed both incidents perfectly and in slow motion. It's the officials
It’s mental, I honestly don’t get how you call that a foul, like you said some consistency.Just don’t see how you can’t have at least consistency in the same football match.
It was checked by VAR.VAR didn't look at it. Ref blew the whistle instantly, so VAR can't review it.
The clue is in the A!What do you think VAR is?
Not sure if that was enough though.Fuming and a joke. Anywhere else on the pitch the push in De Gea’s back is a foul.
And the R.The clue is in the A!
The fact that he didn't makes me think he didn't really think it was much of a push.Why de gea isn't making more of a deal out of that and at least bringing it to the refs attention is beyond me.
Football is there for the enjoyment more than the winning. Sure winning is great but kind of pointless if the sport has turned to shitI disagree with the weight you put on cons, and think clear footage to correct major decisions is worth it's weight in gold. The officials are rubbish.
Yeah I’m not too sure how that was a foul. Maguire literally tried to challenge for the ball, no intent to go to the keeper. Don’t think he even touched Ramsdale, Ramsdale was the one made the contact.I honestly don’t understand how VAR looks at that and goes “yes maguire fouled the keeper”.
Maybe thought it was one of his own players?The fact that he didn't makes me think he didn't really think it was much of a push.
If he felt he'd been fouled you know he'd have been irrate.
