So it is indeed "the bottom of the armpit" and makes absolutely no mention of the bottom of the sleeve, like I said.
We are probably arguing semantics.
It isn't semantics as they are two completely different things. One is specifically mentioned in the laws and the other is completely made up. They are also a good 4-5 inches apart.
The bottom of the armpit ruling and the picture they are using is basically the bottom of the sleeve in football tops.
And here begins the making stuff up. No, it is not basically the bottom of the sleeve, it makes no mention of it being the bottom of the sleeve nor does the picture even show a sleeve on the left arm. You've decided to make that conclusion up yourself, that isn't a law of the game.
And further to that, if for some bizarre reason we followed the laws not based on the actual words of the laws but some basic drawing, then you'll still see that the green ends on the left arm well above where the sleeve indent is on the right arm. So unless you're now trying to argue football shirts all have shorter left arms than right arms then it quite clearly isn't the bottom of the sleeve. Additionally if you own any football top, or basically any t-shirt at all, and applied just an ounce of common sense you'd know that the bottom of your sleeve most definitely doesn't end at your armpit.
So if it hits the top part of your arm like delli alli against us last year it would now stand.
So if it hits the outer part of your shoulder in line with your arm pit it would stand. If it hits your bicep which is covered by a sleeve and most certainly below your armpit, it is handball. Laws are based off of body parts, of which a shirt sleeve is not.
This one against Jesus hit his arm. So it's a fk
Yes, I agree.