Because if he was found not guilty of any offence they can't charge him.
Ronaldo (37) Slaps Phone Out of Child’s (14) Hand | Charged after 5 months of deliberation
- Thread starter BenitoSTARR
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik and Imran hold a long overdue conversation about United's awful league form with 1 win in 7. They discuss a disappointing draw at Bournemouth, a not so disappointing draw against Liverpool and a crushing defeat at Chelsea - Is time nearly over for Erik Ten Hag?
Then in a special second half of the pod, Nik welcomes Natalie ( https://twitter.com/natalie_17) to discuss the fortunes of Manchester United Women as they booked a place in the FA Cup Final after a historic first ever win vs. Chelsea.
"Equally" Jesus wept.
I’m not usually a conspiracy theorist or anything like that but timing is interesting with us on the up and the small matter of the derby at the weekend… Quite a big headline Ronaldo missing the derby and does pose us problems with Rashford and Martial injured the last few games…
He does however deserve to be reprimanded for his actions.
He does however deserve to be reprimanded for his actions.
That's not at all true.
They also said back in April that they'd do the same. I don't think Ronaldo would even say he'd do the same again. Some people go to extraordinary lengths to defend people who play for a sports team they like. It's feckin weird.
Apparently enough to get Ronaldo mad enough, booing in his face with the phone up in it as well.
You know what they say about opinions, right?
people who advocate violence against children are 'opinions' in my book
Should he not?
I don’t condone people doing what either of them did but it’s not quite equal now is it?
You're really not covering yourself in glory here.
Jesus, what's next, ban him for celebrating too wildly against spurs back in 09?
You’re wrong.
The FA couldn’t act until this month as it was a police matter, who are significantly above the FA in the pecking order of punishments. He only got cautioned last month.
Can't really comment on the child but parents who allow their children to behave as hooligans don't rank high in my book.
Never said he shouldn't. It's actually sad that it took the authorities 5 months to react. Shows where their priorities are (unless waiting to see if there will be other charges against Ronaldo).Should he not?
I don’t condone people doing what either of them did but it’s not quite equal now is it?
If that was ever my intention...
You're having a mare in this thread. Do you actually remember hooligans?
Taking a photograph is proper hooliganism
I do, and there are nuances as with everything. Similar to the 'assault', compare to Cantona's reaction to hooligans...
You're absolutely chock full of false equivalences aren't you?
Hooligans?
.14y old autistic kid who wanted to take a photo of a player is a hooligan now? Oh my God, this is pure gold comment.Ffs people, what is the matter with some of you?! On kids you don't lay a finger on. Period. Full stop. No if or but.
Seriously, what the feck is with some of you?
Went for a walk at weekend and I was being a proper hooligan. Took loads of photos.
Not related to this particular case, but that will be a dumb take when it comes to teenage kids. They are not exactly innocent like a toddler. They can do some serious damage if they want to.Hooligans?
Ffs people, what is the matter with some of you?! On kids you don't lay a finger on. Period. Full stop. No if or but.
Seriously, what the feck is with some of you?
Thread title needs changing; Ronaldo fights a hooligan/needs a medal/
By taking a photo?
Which is why I started with "Not related to this case".
So a completely pointless post.
Teenagers can be naughty, shock horror. You'd think some of you didn't go through adolescence.