Ruben Amorim | 2025-26

Arguably we'd have crumbled and lost both games last season.

In the last two fixtures, we've taken points, yes, but it feels a bit of doom is constantly lurking. Redolent of the Solskjaer era.

Absolutely, we should be happy not to lose, as we've done thrice already this season, though the warning signs are becoming prevalent again.
 
We are definitely in a better place than we’ve been for a long time. Yes we did get a draw and no we didn’t cave in as we have done before. But Amorim does worry me when all he can do is change a couple of wing backs when we are chasing the game. Surely we can create more opportunities with some more attacking changes ?
 
That’s super and all but we’re 8th. Which is where we finished in Ten Hag’s last full season. Which was deemed by many fans to not be good enough. So what we’ve done so far is spend an additional £400m to end up where we where.

If we keep up our current points per game for this season until the end that would give us 64 points. Guess what position that would’ve achieved last season.
Except we are not 'ending up' anywhere right now, as it's not the end of the season for another 28 games.
And the 8th place right now has us 2 points behind second place and 1 point from top 4, while the 8th place finish of the 23/24 season which you claim as equivalence was 29 points from 2nd place. So, sorry, but this a monumentally moronic comparison.
Where we 'ended up' under Ten Hag, when he got sacked after 9 games last season, was 14th, and it was his third full season.
 
Except we are not 'ending up' anywhere right now, as it's not the end of the season for another 28 games.
And the 8th place right now has us 2 points behind second place and 1 point from top 4, while the 8th place finish of the 23/24 season which you claim as equivalence was 29 points from 2nd place. So, sorry, but this a monumentally moronic comparison.
Where we 'ended up' under Ten Hag, when he got sacked after 9 games last season, was 14th, and it was his third full season.
I can only base my opinion on where we are currently. 8th. Which wasn’t good enough for the last manager. I’m not sure why it’s good enough now. If we improve, I will adjust my opinion. Which would be the logical thing to do.

We’re on course for 64 points at current pace. We finished with 60 in 23/24. And won a trophy. At the same point we had just two points less than we currently have.
 
I can only base my opinion on where we are currently. 8th. Which wasn’t good enough for the last manager. I’m not sure why it’s good enough now. If we improve, I will adjust my opinion. Which would be the logical thing to do.
Weird self-imposed rule. No one is stopping you from basing your opinion also on the performances.
We’re on course for 64 points at current pace. We finished with 60 in 23/24. And won a trophy. At the same point we had just two points less than we currently have.
Sure. But the trajectories are in opposite directions. Again, requires you to watch games rather than stare at the table all season.
 
Weird self-imposed rule. No one is stopping you from basing your opinion also on the performances.

Sure. But the trajectories are in opposite directions. Again, requires you to watch games rather than stare at the table all season.

He’ll go quiet again once we improve our league position. Dude posted literally twice all week in this thread following our 3rd win in a row (and one of those was something negative) - he’s posted 20+ times already following a draw. Hilarious.
 
Yeah, I saw you say this in an earlier post - basically that as far as you are concerned the die is cast now for the rest of the season. The thing is a few weeks ago all I read on here were comments about '1 point per game' and including last season's stats to pad out the argument. Well, we now have 13 points in the last 6. That changed, so why can't our away form?
No one in their right mind would be predicting we finish on 38 points for this season, they were just venting frustration that his overall tenure has been poor.

We have a larger sample size for the season now. Good home performances and poor away performances are the pattern.

It's not impossible we become a good away side out of nowhere but I'm looking at it in terms of probability rather than wishful thinking. I don't know if it's a flaw in the system, weaknesses at wingback, lack of truly elite centre backs, lack of legs in midfield, mentality, or something else, but we just cannot seem to deal with the pressure we're put under in away games.
 
I really do not understand this argument of Amorim not having enough players on the bench to change games ,must Zirkzee replace Sesko?

Dorgu for Dalot is understandable,but Maz for Yoro? Why didn't he sub Yoro for Zirkzee or Mainoo. Is it nit basic that when the extra player is an attacker,there's more chances of scoring than a defender.

When top Coaches are chasing games formation goes out of the window, I have seen Sir Alex and Klopp sub a CB for for an attacker when chasing games,effectively playing with one CB
 
In the last two fixtures, we've taken points, yes, but it feels a bit of doom is constantly lurking. Redolent of the Solskjaer era.

Absolutely, we should be happy not to lose, as we've done thrice already this season, though the warning signs are becoming prevalent again.
Given our last ten years of course the doom is constantly lurking. It will be until we prove over time that we don't have to worry anymore. If anything, results like those you are talking about can be seen as progress away from that feeling of doom as well.
 
Weird self-imposed rule. No one is stopping you from basing your opinion also on the performances.

Sure. But the trajectories are in opposite directions. Again, requires you to watch games rather than stare at the table all season.
I can. I think the performances have largely been mediocre.

I watch games thanks. This thread is just an echo chamber. I’ll leave you to it. Enjoy the mediocrity.
 
He’ll go quiet again once we improve our league position. Dude posted literally twice all week in this thread following our 3rd win in a row (and one of those was something negative) - he’s posted 20+ times already following a draw. Hilarious.
It will take more than three games to erase a year of shite.
 
I can. I think the performances have largely been mediocre.

I watch games thanks. This thread is just an echo chamber. I’ll leave you to it. Enjoy the mediocrity.
This thread is an echo chamber proclaiming Amorim to be a great manager?!

You cannot be serious. Many (including me) have pulled back on their criticisms a bit because we're finally getting what we desperately wanted. Wins. Including one away at Anfield, which is something we haven't seen in a long time. And our general play actually is improved from last season.

Just because the thread isn't predominantly Amorim bashing for the last few pages doesn't mean the rest of the thread doesn't exist. Just have a look at the previous few hundred pages of this "echo chamber".
 
I can only base my opinion on where we are currently. 8th. Which wasn’t good enough for the last manager. I’m not sure why it’s good enough now. If we improve, I will adjust my opinion. Which would be the logical thing to do.

We’re on course for 64 points at current pace. We finished with 60 in 23/24. And won a trophy. At the same point we had just two points less than we currently have.
Except we are not 'ending up' anywhere right now, as it's not the end of the season for another 28 games.
And the 8th place right now has us 2 points behind second place and 1 point from top 4, while the 8th place finish of the 23/24 season which you claim as equivalence was 29 points from 2nd place. So, sorry, but this a monumentally moronic comparison.
Where we 'ended up' under Ten Hag, when he got sacked after 9 games last season, was 14th, and it was his third full season.

Weird self-imposed rule. No one is stopping you from basing your opinion also on the performances.

Sure. But the trajectories are in opposite directions. Again, requires you to watch games rather than stare at the table all season.

I really do not understand this argument of Amorim not having enough players on the bench to change games ,must Zirkzee replace Sesko?

Dorgu for Dalot is understandable,but Maz for Yoro? Why didn't he sub Yoro for Zirkzee or Mainoo. Is it nit basic that when the extra player is an attacker,there's more chances of scoring than a defender.

When top Coaches are chasing games formation goes out of the window, I have seen Sir Alex and Klopp sub a CB for for an attacker when chasing games,effectively playing with one CB
You can’t really compare Fergy to now. He was one of two teams fighting for the league with a team full of superstars and most of the competition rolling over. Easy to bring on another attacker when you are totally dominant. There are several teams better than us now and several as good we have a poor defence and midfield and are trying to build momentum after a difficult season with a fanbase that would crucify their own team and manager if they lost. Bringing on players of lower quality up front and weakening that defence would have been asking for it.
 
We are definitely in a better place than we’ve been for a long time. Yes we did get a draw and no we didn’t cave in as we have done before. But Amorim does worry me when all he can do is change a couple of wing backs when we are chasing the game. Surely we can create more opportunities with some more attacking changes ?
Can you define 'a long time'. ETH first season was really promising, I think most of us were behind them despite concerns I had on transfers. We came third, won EFL and lost FA Cup final. That's two years ago. We are a long way from that right now. Second season with ETH was poor and tactics a mess and his awful signings really exposed us. But last season was the worst in living memory, and I am not going to ignore that the worst results of the PL era came under the current manager. Sure we are clearly better than last season, after spending another £250m plus. But still below that first ETH season. Let's see. My fundamental concerns about Amorim are his obsession about a single system and refusal to adapt. No other top manager, certainly in the PL era, has ever shown such dogmatic approach. Refusing to sub off a CB when we are chasing a goal is just insane. So I see his ceiling as quite low. The whole mantra in modern management is now adaptation and flexibility, and how you get the best out of the players you have, look at Glasner as an example. He was not a fixed 3 at the back manager before Palace. There is a wider point as well at United, unlike other clubs, that every manager seems to need to spend £0.5bn and buy half a team before being judged. I really worry at the lack of youth progressing at the moment as well, other than players we bought in its gone super quiet.
 
No one in their right mind would be predicting we finish on 38 points for this season, they were just venting frustration that his overall tenure has been poor.

Are you kidding? There was all kinds of talk about relegation.
We have a larger sample size for the season now. Good home performances and poor away performances are the pattern.

We have had 5 league away games (6 if you want to include Grimsby - which I'm sure you do - but that was a weakened side with a terrible goalkeeper, in terrible weather, which we still should have won) as a sample size, so not that large really. Of those 5 we have won at Anfield, and drawn at Forest and Fulham (hardly awful results). Of our two away losses one came at City, and the other at a Brentford ground that we have struggled at over bthe last few years. The two losses were with Bayindir in goals. To extrapolate those 5 results (plus a one-off aberration against Grimsby) and say that must mean that we will remain poor away from home for the entire season is a stretch. It's fine for that to be your opinion, but don't state it like it's a fact.

It's not impossible we become a good away side out of nowhere but I'm looking at it in terms of probability rather than wishful thinking. I don't know if it's a flaw in the system, weaknesses at wingback, lack of truly elite centre backs, lack of legs in midfield, mentality, or something else, but we just cannot seem to deal with the pressure we're put under in away games.

There is truth in some of those things, but it's also been a run of very tough away games at a time when the team has had extremely fragile confidence and appalling goalkeeping options. I see no reason why that cannot improve in the same way our home form has improved. I don't think you can underestimate the difference that confidence can make, particularly away from home.
 
I really do not understand this argument of Amorim not having enough players on the bench to change games ,must Zirkzee replace Sesko?

Dorgu for Dalot is understandable,but Maz for Yoro? Why didn't he sub Yoro for Zirkzee or Mainoo. Is it nit basic that when the extra player is an attacker,there's more chances of scoring than a defender.

When top Coaches are chasing games formation goes out of the window, I have seen Sir Alex and Klopp sub a CB for for an attacker when chasing games,effectively playing with one CB
Yes, but the other side of the coin is that we are trying to build something here. There is a risk to throwing formation out of the window, and I'm not sure that Forest away (with Dyche newly in place) was the time to throw the kitchen sink at it. We got an equaliser and came close to winning the game - a win would have been nice, but a loss would have put an end to our undefeated run and cracks in our fragile confidence. This wasn't a cup semi-final or the end of the season with a European spot up for grabs, it was a very tricky game for loads of reasons. I was a bit disappointed at the time, but looking back I think it will prove to be a decent point.
 
I really do not understand this argument of Amorim not having enough players on the bench to change games ,must Zirkzee replace Sesko?

Dorgu for Dalot is understandable,but Maz for Yoro? Why didn't he sub Yoro for Zirkzee or Mainoo. Is it nit basic that when the extra player is an attacker,there's more chances of scoring than a defender.

When top Coaches are chasing games formation goes out of the window, I have seen Sir Alex and Klopp sub a CB for for an attacker when chasing games,effectively playing with one CB
True, but this was not a cup game. We probably would have lost had we done this.
 
Yes, but the other side of the coin is that we are trying to build something here. There is a risk to throwing formation out of the window, and I'm not sure that Forest away (with Dyche newly in place) was the time to throw the kitchen sink at it. We got an equaliser and came close to winning the game - a win would have been nice, but a loss would have put an end to our undefeated run and cracks in our fragile confidence. This wasn't a cup semi-final or the end of the season with a European spot up for grabs, it was a very tricky game for loads of reasons. I was a bit disappointed at the time, but looking back I think it will prove to be a decent point.
I think we need to stop obsessing about formations. When you are losing a game you try something new or throw on some different players. The most simple thing is to take off a spare CB and put an attacker on. Its not like we looked threatening before Amad scored, so we were on course to lose. What does 'throwing the formation out the window' even mean. Every other manage in the league changes formation, we are not talking about a religious gospel here. Amorim has thrown Maguire up front on occasion for example. The lenghts people will go to excuse him not making simple changes is staggering
 
I think we need to stop obsessing about formations. When you are losing a game you try something new or throw on some different players. The most simple thing is to take off a spare CB and put an attacker on. Its not like we looked threatening before Amad scored, so we were on course to lose. What does 'throwing the formation out the window' even mean. Every other manage in the league changes formation, we are not talking about a religious gospel here. Amorim has thrown Maguire up front on occasion for example. The lenghts people will go to excuse him not making simple changes is staggering

It was one of your fellow naysayers that mentioned throwing formations out of the window actually - see below. I was just responding to him and giving my view about why - in my opinion - throwing caution to the wind would have been a risky move in that particular game. You joined the forum in January 2025, your first post was a negative one about Amorim (when he'd been in post for a couple of months), and pretty much every post since then has been a rewrite of that first post, just with more and more words. We get it, you'd made your mind up about him back in January and you will continue to bang that drum up until he either gets sacked or we are doing well enough that your position becomes untenable. I mean saying that we were 'on course to lose' even after ACTUAL EVENTS proved otherwise is a strange one. Is it now a thing where a game ends in a draw and we say 'so what, we were on course to lose at one point'? If he had made changes and we'd equalised and then had a potential winner cleared off the line in the dying moments your argument would presumably be that it was the changes that won us the point (actually your argument wouldn't be that because that would entail saying something positive about the manager), and yet it apparently doesn't count if it's the existing players that score the equaliser?

When top Coaches are chasing games formation goes out of the window, I have seen Sir Alex and Klopp sub a CB for for an attacker when chasing games,effectively playing with one CB
 
Last edited:
You can’t really compare Fergy to now. He was one of two teams fighting for the league with a team full of superstars and most of the competition rolling over. Easy to bring on another attacker when you are totally dominant. There are several teams better than us now and several as good we have a poor defence and midfield and are trying to build momentum after a difficult season with a fanbase that would crucify their own team and manager if they lost. Bringing on players of lower quality up front and weakening that defence would have been asking for it.

Fergie hardly had a team "full" of superstars, aka Mourinho's Madrid or Pep's Barca. That's just nonsense. He had very good and deep squads that would run through brick walls for him and the shirt. The likes of Park, O'Shea, Nani, Evans, Hernandez, Valencia and so many many more over the years were not superstars.
 
I think we need to stop obsessing about formations. When you are losing a game you try something new or throw on some different players. The most simple thing is to take off a spare CB and put an attacker on. Its not like we looked threatening before Amad scored, so we were on course to lose. What does 'throwing the formation out the window' even mean. Every other manage in the league changes formation, we are not talking about a religious gospel here. Amorim has thrown Maguire up front on occasion for example. The lenghts people will go to excuse him not making simple changes is staggering

Playing 3 at the back allows our wingbacks and Bruno to attack so much. You’re suggesting we take off another CB leaving just 2 defenders against their counter attack. That would be suicidal. We’d run the risk of the game turning into 3-1 down and then it’s truly over.

It’s frankly bizarre the line of argument you lot are making despite reality showing we actually did get a goal back, despite not putting on Zirkzee, who has apparently turned into our new Ole just this week. I could see at least the rationale for the argument if we didn’t end up getting a goal back, but, uh… we did.
 
Last edited:
No one in their right mind would be predicting we finish on 38 points for this season, they were just venting frustration that his overall tenure has been poor.

We have a larger sample size for the season now. Good home performances and poor away performances are the pattern.

It's not impossible we become a good away side out of nowhere but I'm looking at it in terms of probability rather than wishful thinking. I don't know if it's a flaw in the system, weaknesses at wingback, lack of truly elite centre backs, lack of legs in midfield, mentality, or something else, but we just cannot seem to deal with the pressure we're put under in away games.
I actually think our inability to contest the midfield with legs in the midfield, this is nothing to do with playing the 2 or a 3 in CM, we just don't have the profile, you look at the profile difference between Anderson and all our CMs, his work rate and passing created one of Forests goals on Saturday and his ball recoveries stopped our transitions and put us on the back foot.

The main issue is when we created space and time for our WBs particularly at LWB there is no threat, neither Dorgu or Dalot are good enough to be a top class wingback, with Amad being more of an inverted wingback, we need our LWB to provide the width and look to hit accurate crosses in which neither do, we would need a back up RWB possibly the same profile as LWB to add some alternatives to our attack.

I don't think our CBs are that far off, Yoro needs to work on a aerial presence, De Ligt has been our best CB, Maguire is aerially dominant but lacks the pace but is fine for certain games, Shaw is playing well now but for how long, no idea on Martinez after his latest injury and Heaven is developing.

I would look to sign a top level LCB such as a Guehi would take that pack line to another level, but unless we can find the right one it would be a priority after CM & LWB.
 
I think we need to stop obsessing about formations. When you are losing a game you try something new or throw on some different players. The most simple thing is to take off a spare CB and put an attacker on. Its not like we looked threatening before Amad scored, so we were on course to lose. What does 'throwing the formation out the window' even mean. Every other manage in the league changes formation, we are not talking about a religious gospel here. Amorim has thrown Maguire up front on occasion for example. The lenghts people will go to excuse him not making simple changes is staggering

Aren't you the one who is constantly on about the 3-4-3 but now saying we need to stop obsessing over it?

Why is it the most simple thing? So what if every other manager in the league changes formation?

Amorim sometimes goes with a 3-4-3 and sometimes with a 5-3-2.. so he does change it too?
What formation changes does Arteta have in the last 3 seasons btw?
 
Fergie hardly had a team "full" of superstars, aka Mourinho's Madrid or Pep's Barca. That's just nonsense. He had very good and deep squads that would run through brick walls for him and the shirt. The likes of Park, O'Shea, Nani, Evans, Hernandez, Valencia and so many many more over the years were not superstars.
To be fair, every one of Fergie's teams had at least 4 or 5 who were strong candidates for PL team of the season. In the earlier years, Schmeichel, Giggs, Becks, Cole, Keane, Neville. In the later years, Rooney, Vidic, Ferdinand, Carrick, Scholes, arguably VDS, with a sprinkle of RVP, Ronaldo etc inside. (Btw, Nani, Fletcher and Valencia were included in past PL teams of the season before). In recent memory, all squads challenging for the title had at least 4 or 5 such PL team of the season candidates. During this time, the only consistent candidates that we have would be Bruno and De Gea.

The link to check this out is https://www.thepfa.com/pfaawards/ptoty?league=PremierLeague&year=2003
 
Last edited:
To be fair, every one of Fergie's teams had at least 4 or 5 who were strong candidates for PL team of the season. In the earlier years, Schmeichel, Giggs, Becks, Cole, Keane, Neville. In the later years, Rooney, Vidic, Ferdinand, Carrick, Scholes, arguably VDS, with a sprinkle of RVP, Ronaldo etc inside. (Btw, Nani, Fletcher and Valencia were included in past PL teams of the season before). In recent memory, all squads challenging for the title had at least 4 or 5 such PL team of the season candidates. During this time, the only consistent candidates that we have would be Bruno and De Gea.

The link to check this out is https://www.thepfa.com/pfaawards/ptoty?league=PremierLeague&year=2003

I'm not disputing that at all. What I don't buy is that he always had some kind of galactico squad. SAF was always known for getting the best out of lesser talents, but obviously you still needed talent.
 
You would think a certain few in this thread are actively praying that we lose games, so their pre determined opinions are proven correct!

It can't be any clearer at the moment that the team is on an upward trajectory, but it's strangely being discredited because it would mean going against their agenda's.. That's sad.

Just for the sake of it, imagine Amorim would have made the changes that some are using as weapons for him not making. And while, we are still playing make believe, then those changes would have caused United to concede another goal, making it 3-1. Would those same people then blame the manager for making the changes that led to us conceding another and thus getting us beat? Truthfully, I'm pretty confident that they would and it's genuinely sad to see the negativity in here at the moment.

I was disappointed that we started the 2nd half in the way that we did, but if that was last season, I think we would have went on to lose that game and so I'm glad that although it was only a draw in the end, we didn't give up and kept on pushing. That's all that I want to see from the team. That never die attitude to come back.
 
I really do not understand this argument of Amorim not having enough players on the bench to change games ,must Zirkzee replace Sesko?

Dorgu for Dalot is understandable,but Maz for Yoro? Why didn't he sub Yoro for Zirkzee or Mainoo. Is it nit basic that when the extra player is an attacker,there's more chances of scoring than a defender.

When top Coaches are chasing games formation goes out of the window, I have seen Sir Alex and Klopp sub a CB for for an attacker when chasing games,effectively playing with one CB

He does have options on the bench. He can go two up top with Zirkzee, he can take a CB off for a midfielder or striker. He chooses not to.
 
He does have options on the bench. He can go two up top with Zirkzee, he can take a CB off for a midfielder or striker. He chooses not to.

As I said before, this would be suicidal. You realise we push both wingbacks forward already as it is right? We are already attacking with 6 players with Bruno getting forward too. So you want to remove a CB and add another striker, exposing us massively at the back with only 2 actual defenders. Cue us conceding again and you blaming the manager for being too naive or some shite.

Again: we actually did equalise and almost won it.
 
As I said before, this would be suicidal. You realise we push both wingbacks forward already as it is right? We are already attacking with 6 players with Bruno getting forward too. So you want to remove a CB and add another striker, exposing us massively at the back with only 2 actual defenders. Cue us conceding again and you blaming the manager for being too naive or some shite.

Again: we actually did equalise and almost won it.

What you described is what United and loads of teams have done if they are chasing a game or going for the win near the end. Nothing unusual in it.
 
Can you define 'a long time'. ETH first season was really promising, I think most of us were behind them despite concerns I had on transfers. We came third, won EFL and lost FA Cup final. That's two years ago. We are a long way from that right now. Second season with ETH was poor and tactics a mess and his awful signings really exposed us. But last season was the worst in living memory, and I am not going to ignore that the worst results of the PL era came under the current manager. Sure we are clearly better than last season, after spending another £250m plus. But still below that first ETH season. Let's see. My fundamental concerns about Amorim are his obsession about a single system and refusal to adapt. No other top manager, certainly in the PL era, has ever shown such dogmatic approach. Refusing to sub off a CB when we are chasing a goal is just insane. So I see his ceiling as quite low. The whole mantra in modern management is now adaptation and flexibility, and how you get the best out of the players you have, look at Glasner as an example. He was not a fixed 3 at the back manager before Palace. There is a wider point as well at United, unlike other clubs, that every manager seems to need to spend £0.5bn and buy half a team before being judged. I really worry at the lack of youth progressing at the moment as well, other than players we bought in its gone super quiet.
It’s always been an issue blooding young talent. In the past the League Cup was often used but that’s no longer an option. I suspect the FA Cup will be deemed too important to risk inexperienced players just like the PL has become. Amorim did put Heaven on as one of his changes against Brighton which was promising but then things got a tad sticky so he might be less inclined to do that again.

Not great because if they don’t get some playing time then we will depend on buying more proven players. However, we do keep buying young players so it must be the intention to bring them through. Perhaps just less so this season due to circumstances ?
 
You can’t really compare Fergy to now. He was one of two teams fighting for the league with a team full of superstars and most of the competition rolling over. Easy to bring on another attacker when you are totally dominant. There are several teams better than us now and several as good we have a poor defence and midfield and are trying to build momentum after a difficult season with a fanbase that would crucify their own team and manager if they lost. Bringing on players of lower quality up front and weakening that defence would have been asking for it.
Forest are not better than us,Mount,Mainoo and Zirkzee were on the bench,they are decent options.
One of the reasons managers make sub is to give the opposition a different profile of players to think about,bring fresh legs and minds.

You don't need to be Sir Alex to throw the kitchen sink. Fir example Silver changed his shape in the in the match against us in second half ,and Fulham were the more likely of the two teams to get a second goal .

Against Liverpool,Brighton and Sunderland our plan A worked,and credit to Amorim. The worrying thing is that we don't make tactical switch if our Plan A isn't working ,or if our PLAN A was countered mid game.
 
Playing 3 at the back allows our wingbacks and Bruno to attack so much. You’re suggesting we take off another CB leaving just 2 defenders against their counter attack. That would be suicidal. We’d run the risk of the game turning into 3-1 down and then it’s truly over.

It’s frankly bizarre the line of argument you lot are making despite reality showing we actually did get a goal back, despite not putting on Zirkzee, who has apparently turned into our new Ole just this week. I could see at least the rationale for the argument if we didn’t end up getting a goal back, but, uh… we did.
Dorgu/Dalot are not as good attackers as Zirkzee or Mount. It's a negative comparatively.
 
Dorgu/Dalot are not as good attackers as Zirkzee or Mount. It's a negative comparatively.

Dorgu gives us width from LWB that Mount and Zirkzee can not. If you put 2 up front you probably have to sacrifice Cunha or Mbeumo and clearly Amorim felt he could trust those two more. Mount is oniy back from injury.

In the end we equalised anyway and almost won so you’d think it was a moot point. But nope, apparently not.
 
I really do not understand this argument of Amorim not having enough players on the bench to change games ,must Zirkzee replace Sesko?

Dorgu for Dalot is understandable,but Maz for Yoro? Why didn't he sub Yoro for Zirkzee or Mainoo. Is it nit basic that when the extra player is an attacker,there's more chances of scoring than a defender.

When top Coaches are chasing games formation goes out of the window, I have seen Sir Alex and Klopp sub a CB for for an attacker when chasing games,effectively playing with one CB

He plays with 3 CBs regardless of the situation. I think he believes we're more likely to pull one back with that structure remaining in place rather than upsetting the balance by throwing on another attacker, which would probably affect the build up and defensive stability. After all, you still need to make the chance for the attacker and not crumble at the back whilst chasing a goal. To sub a CB for an attacker would require the team to be trained in a different formation for those situations and he probably feels that they particular sub isn't the only way to chase a game. To take your argument to it's logical conclusion, when chasing a game we should sub all our attackers on for as many defenders as possible. It's too basic.