I question this vibe of the forum concept. Isn’t this forum stand out even for opposition team posters to come here because it allows free thought as long as it is in good faith? So the low time like last season would naturally bring negative opinions and somebody need to take a break from the forum. Why would the admins and mods want to dictate the vibe, instead of letting the nature of opinion flow.
This forum should not be RAWK like, where we have a set of vibe to follow. It’s more questionable if people start writing poems and resort to alternative table to keep the vibe.
In good faith is the key point. There are posters who argue in bad faith, who can’t wait for us to have a bad result.
It’s a good thing to track some of these posters and hopefully ban them.
Newbies should be scrutinized more; I notice a lot of Newbie agenda posters. They are not looking to
get promoted, so
ban away mods.
There is no way you can frame yesterday’s game as a poor one: we were outplaying Arsenal in every metric (except gk).
It got really bad during Ten Hag era to the point the thread was closed several times.
Back to the game: we improved in playing out the back, the runs from Cunha and Mbeumo were great, Mount put in a massive performance, Casemiro was great, the players look fitter. Matthijs was a gladiator, Shaw looked great, Dorgu awesome.
Negatives: still haven’t solved our set piece vulnerability, Ugarte was poor (in hindsight Mainoo should have been brought on). I don’t think we should write off Ugarte, just don’t bring him on when we are chasing a game.
Basically I’m happy even though we lost, up to a point. After last season, we want to see the team putting it together, and it is happening.
We are a midfielder and gk away from having a great squad.
Arsenal aren’t going to win anything.