Ruben Amorim. Fired for being crap. Full stop. Just another addition for Amol as he loves it

Status
Not open for further replies.
No its not the end, dont be so arrogant. You are just another deluded fan boy, seriously please go and support his next club as he clearly means more to than our club. Statistically the worst manager we have had since the 1970s, and by some way the worst manager in PL history at a top team. He did not get rid of any players, decisions were taken by Ratcliffe. Possible exception of Garnacho who he cost us millions by publicly denigrating. Given him longer and he would have had Mainoo out.

Let it go! You will feel better. Find closure. More on, there is zero arrogance, fanboys or delusion.

He was the manager for 14 months, lots of bad decision were made and a few good one’s happened in between.

The End.
 
Whats your point matey? I was responding to another idiot trying to big up the worst manager we have ever had. Are you another fan boy?
Any need for such childish language? I have no idea what you’re talking about.

My point was: we got a good fee for Garnacho, if that wasn’t clear from the previous post.
 
In those first 20 games? :lol:

We scored 1.05 goals per game. The ”shit” ETH season previously we scored 1.5 goals per game.

So no, it wasn’t that. His record was one any other manager of a decent side would’ve been sacked for.

For comparison, after winning the league, Raneiri matched Amorim’s first 20 league games that following season, with 21 points. He was fired 5 games later, despite taking them to the fecking title the previous season.
Not in those games, no. Our attack was primarily Hojlund, Garnacho, Zirkzee, Mount and Amad. Amad got injured shortly after Amorim took over, so where would the goals come from? Hojlund was labelled as the worst striker we've ever had by some posters on here.

I'm not interested in hearing how poor he was for us. I'm well aware of that. I only pointed out that Dansk's post was the opposite exaggeration of the guy who called Amorim a genius. Both acting as wind up merchants to each other.
 
Whats your point matey? I was responding to another idiot trying to big up the worst manager we have ever had. Are you another fan boy?
A word of advice. You’re still a newbie and you are calling people idiots and fan boys, which is not acceptable and will see your time here cut short if you persist.

Please change your tone and discuss things in the correct manner.
 
Read this evening he won't be making a statement to the fans until end of the season so there will be message after all. At least something.

I read that it was about how things went wrong, not a letter to the fans. A letter to the fans wouldn't be distracting, but if he starts claiming this player did that and Wilcox, etc. did that, then it would. Anyway whatever he says is self-serving nonsense and his behaviour and performance spoke louder than any words will.
 
The mighty Liverpool win, while absolutely great as a United fan beating your age old rivals, there is so much context in that game it's quite amazing how so many of the Amorimsexuals decided to ignore it. Gakpo hit the post THREE times in that game and then also missed an open goal. If that fixture was to be played 10 times in a row, with the same chances created for both teams, we'd have lost it 9 out of 10 times.
And we had the good fortune to face Liverpool during their worst form in a decade. Our win came in the middle of a run of something like seven consecutive losses for them. They lost to absolutely everyone they faced for a month and a half. While it's always great to beat them, that particular win has to be judged through that lens. It was not a case of Amorim leading us to beat the mighty, unstoppable Liverpool by virtue of his managerial prowess. We simply played them at a time when they were utterly broken and lost absolutely all games. And even then, we just barely beat them. Other teams that faced them during that period beat them much more convincingly than we did.

Same thing with the Chelsea game. They had a player sent off after five minutes, and we were able to score twice while it was 11v10. Then Casemiro got sent off at the end of the first half, and as soon as we didn't have an extra man on them, we were on the ropes and clung to the lead by our fingertips while Chelsea were measurably better. Another example where, far from us winning because we had Amorim coaching us, we barely scraped by despite extremely favorable conditions. At no point was it his system or game management that got us the win. I can't think of any game at all under him where you could tell that his influence was the thing that brought it home. On the contrary, we were always struggling visibly because of that and it was abundantly clear that the few wins we got came when we were able to benefit from other factors than his system.

And any talk of him raising us from 15th to 6th place should be held up against the fact that this is a crazy season where Liverpool, Chelsea, Tottenham and Newcastle are all having a disaster season. We had 31 points on matchday 20 when Amorim was sacked. Last season, 31 points on matchday 20 would have us in 9th place. Same spot the season before, and the one before that. He didn't bring us up into 6th place in any meaningful sense. For the purposes of analyzing what level he brought us to, it's 8th-9th place in nearly any other season with that amount of points. The fact that most of the top PL teams are currently having a shit season is not somehow to his credit. It made him look much better than he ever was. For all intents and purposes, the best he could accomplish with Manchester fecking United is 9th place in any ordinary season, and out of both cups in the very first round.

That would still be our worst season in decades. Worse than Moyes, LVG, Jose, OGS and ETH. Who can possibly call that progress? Who can take themselves seriously while lamenting the departure of a manager who had us on course for our worst season in the Premier League era? That's nothing short of insanity. The man won a third of his games. To do that at a club of this stature, with such good players at his disposal, is a historically unprecedented failure. Nobody else has ever had such an atrocious win rate over the course of more than a year with one of the big clubs. He is the worst manager that the PL has ever seen, when we take everything into account. And there are people who wanted to keep him. It's shameful really.
 
Last edited:
He cost us Garnacho millions? :lol:

You know we sold him for £40m, potentially rising and a 10% sell-on? We absolutely rinsed Chelsea.
Gittens went for 52m in the same window. We could have easily got 55m for Garnacho had Amorim not publicly exiled Garnacho. David Gill was right to question the logic of the 'bomb squad'.
 
Gittens went for 52m in the same window. We could have easily got 55m for Garnacho had Amorim not publicly exiled Garnacho. David Gill was right to question the logic of the 'bomb squad'.
Exactly. negotiations 101. Dont tell any buyers you are desperate to get rid. Anyway, all of this is a distraction from the clear conclusion that Amorim is the worst manager we ever had.
 
Have held myself back from commenting here ever since the fraud named Ruben Amorim got sacked, since I figured emotions (and tempers) would still be high, and I just wanted to forget about his nightmare stint here altogether.

That being said, I must admit with some of the posters above who have mentioned how this thread now feels almost therapeutic, after the shared trauma we (minus the small, but vocal Ruben cultists) all went through over the last 14 months.

It's no secret we've had some terrible managers post-SAF. Yet, if you were to build a manager combining the worst traits of David Moyes, LVG, Mourinho, Ole, Rangnick and ETH, I reckon that hypothetical Frankenstein monster of a manager would still be better than the charlatan we had gaslighting our fanbase for the last year-and-a-half.

Amorim was basically Moyes' dourness, LVG's terrible football, Mourinho's toxicity, Ole's tactical cluelessness, and ETH's arrogance all rolled into one, but much, much worse. And without half the decent results to justify such stubbornness.

Usually, my reaction to Man United managers getting sacked or players getting booted out, is just gross indifference or disappointment, rather than outright hate and anger. But with Amorim, for the first time, I found myself actively hating the man, as well as his acolytes who'd rather see their club dragged through the mud than admit they're wrong.

Among all the other bizarre excuses used to defend him, I always laughed at how his fan club basically wanted us to ignore the entire 2024-25 season, because he joined "only" in November, inheriting a squad that wasn't "his". However, if there were bright spots in that season, like drawing against Liverpool at Anfield, or beating Arsenal at Emirates, then those games counted as evidence that his system could work. Finishing 14th, breaking every lowly record, and sinking to new humiliating lows every weekend in the league didn't matter, since "all eggs were on the Europa basket". Getting to the Europa final was proof that Amorim was the real deal. However, bottling the final - to Spurs of all teams - shouldn't also be held against him, because a win would have anyway only papered over the cracks, and the squad could benefit from less mid-week fixtures, and more time in the training ground with this master tactician.

Now, we're in 2025-26 with three great attacking signings and a new solid goalkeeper. We lose to Arsenal, but the result doesn't matter because the performance is great. We lose to Grimsby on penalties, but it's just a freak result. If you complain, you're a hater who can't see the big picture unlike the top reds who believe it's only a matter of time before Amorim morphs into prime SAF. If you're keeping track, so far the results don't matter, because apparently the performances have been great via Xg, Xd and whatever else.

However, we now get some jammy wins. Beating Burnley via a last-minute penalty. Hanging on for a 2-1 victory against 10-man Chelsea. Hardly breathtaking performances, but suddenly, only the results count, apparently, and we should ignore the performances.

Then we get the greatest accomplishment in Amorim's entire tenure - back-to-back victories. Great results against Sunderland, Liverpool and Brighton. And because the standards are already at rock bottom and most people were okay excusing even relegation-level form, something like winning three straight matches suddenly seems like a miracle and worthy of a knighthood.

Of course, a dogshit manager with a dogshit system and dogshit tactics, will eventually get you only dogshit results. Which is why you lose to 10-man Everton at home. Or drop points to the likes of West Ham, Bournemouth, Nottingham Forest, and Wolves.

But here's the kicker: remember how the whole of 2024-25 didn't count? But apparently it now counts, if only to show the progress made in 2025-26, compared to the rock bottom awfulness of 2024-25 - which ironically was in large part BECAUSE of Amorim.

I could go on and on (and probably will, when I find the mental strength to remember more infuriating incidents from his spell), but I always found this line of thinking from Amorim and his fan club both hilarious and insufferable.

Beautiful writing. I absolutely enjoyed every word you wrote there!

You held every excuse accountable while also using contradictions mentioned by these Amorim Elites. Absolutely baffling how he can get any ounce of praise for what he did for 14 months. The only praise I can give to Amorim is how he managed to fool a portion of the fans into backing him. We can see how some here can be gaslit so easily. Almost like they have daddy issues or something.
 
It's not really about reflecting, though, is it? It's more about getting back at posters who were always exaggerating in the first place. You really shouldn't take it to heart being called "not a real fan" by someone who thinks Amorim is a genius. There are posters on here who are doing nothing but pointing and laughing at posters who disagreed with them, and one of them was continously trying to convince everyone that Mbeumo was no better than Antony, and that we had absolutely no need for him. People have poor takes, it happens, but there are also wums on here who enjoy exaggerating to get reactions, especially the ones who call call Amorim a genius.
Ah so they were just exaggerating. Let's pretend they were all just wums who kept wumming for almost a whole year. Alright, they got me.

There is having poor takes and there's acting all self righteous for months, acting like you're seeing something others aren't able to see. Using every excuse under the sun to argue the manager is good and we will all end up with egg on our faces when this mythical masterplan finally clicks.

Now that it has turned out everyone who vehemently defended Amorim was utterly wrong, now you guys what to shut the discussion down. But like I said, once Carrick loses his first game, certain posters who were "just exaggerating" will be back here.
 
Have held myself back from commenting here ever since the fraud named Ruben Amorim got sacked, since I figured emotions (and tempers) would still be high, and I just wanted to forget about his nightmare stint here altogether.

That being said, I must admit with some of the posters above who have mentioned how this thread now feels almost therapeutic, after the shared trauma we (minus the small, but vocal Ruben cultists) all went through over the last 14 months.

It's no secret we've had some terrible managers post-SAF. Yet, if you were to build a manager combining the worst traits of David Moyes, LVG, Mourinho, Ole, Rangnick and ETH, I reckon that hypothetical Frankenstein monster of a manager would still be better than the charlatan we had gaslighting our fanbase for the last year-and-a-half.

Amorim was basically Moyes' dourness, LVG's terrible football, Mourinho's toxicity, Ole's tactical cluelessness, and ETH's arrogance all rolled into one, but much, much worse. And without half the decent results to justify such stubbornness.

Usually, my reaction to Man United managers getting sacked or players getting booted out, is just gross indifference or disappointment, rather than outright hate and anger. But with Amorim, for the first time, I found myself actively hating the man, as well as his acolytes who'd rather see their club dragged through the mud than admit they're wrong.

Among all the other bizarre excuses used to defend him, I always laughed at how his fan club basically wanted us to ignore the entire 2024-25 season, because he joined "only" in November, inheriting a squad that wasn't "his". However, if there were bright spots in that season, like drawing against Liverpool at Anfield, or beating Arsenal at Emirates, then those games counted as evidence that his system could work. Finishing 14th, breaking every lowly record, and sinking to new humiliating lows every weekend in the league didn't matter, since "all eggs were on the Europa basket". Getting to the Europa final was proof that Amorim was the real deal. However, bottling the final - to Spurs of all teams - shouldn't also be held against him, because a win would have anyway only papered over the cracks, and the squad could benefit from less mid-week fixtures, and more time in the training ground with this master tactician.

Now, we're in 2025-26 with three great attacking signings and a new solid goalkeeper. We lose to Arsenal, but the result doesn't matter because the performance is great. We lose to Grimsby on penalties, but it's just a freak result. If you complain, you're a hater who can't see the big picture unlike the top reds who believe it's only a matter of time before Amorim morphs into prime SAF. If you're keeping track, so far the results don't matter, because apparently the performances have been great via Xg, Xd and whatever else.

However, we now get some jammy wins. Beating Burnley via a last-minute penalty. Hanging on for a 2-1 victory against 10-man Chelsea. Hardly breathtaking performances, but suddenly, only the results count, apparently, and we should ignore the performances.

Then we get the greatest accomplishment in Amorim's entire tenure - back-to-back victories. Great results against Sunderland, Liverpool and Brighton. And because the standards are already at rock bottom and most people were okay excusing even relegation-level form, something like winning three straight matches suddenly seems like a miracle and worthy of a knighthood.

Of course, a dogshit manager with a dogshit system and dogshit tactics, will eventually get you only dogshit results. Which is why you lose to 10-man Everton at home. Or drop points to the likes of West Ham, Bournemouth, Nottingham Forest, and Wolves.

But here's the kicker: remember how the whole of 2024-25 didn't count? But apparently it now counts, if only to show the progress made in 2025-26, compared to the rock bottom awfulness of 2024-25 - which ironically was in large part BECAUSE of Amorim.

I could go on and on (and probably will, when I find the mental strength to remember more infuriating incidents from his spell), but I always found this line of thinking from Amorim and his fan club both hilarious and insufferable.
Very good post and I have to admit I share the same view, not only now, after he got the sack, but during the "nightmare" period as well.

I would also like to point out the monologue from last season, at the end, after the Villa game, I felt like throwing up when I first saw it and I will never forget the impertinence of the guy that was practically insulting the entire fanbase. Also like you, I share a special hate for him, like I never had for any of our ex managers or even players.

I will always wonder, without trying to act superior, smarter or more knowledgeable than others, how on Earth this Carlos Kaiser of football coaches managed to convince the board of a club like ours, who let's be honest might not be the brightest of the bunch, but a big portion of our fanbase that he knows what he's doing, when it was clear as daylight even from the first few months that the guy was a complete fraud?
I will always wonder that for years to come...
 
Have held myself back from commenting here ever since the fraud named Ruben Amorim got sacked, since I figured emotions (and tempers) would still be high, and I just wanted to forget about his nightmare stint here altogether.

That being said, I must admit with some of the posters above who have mentioned how this thread now feels almost therapeutic, after the shared trauma we (minus the small, but vocal Ruben cultists) all went through over the last 14 months.

It's no secret we've had some terrible managers post-SAF. Yet, if you were to build a manager combining the worst traits of David Moyes, LVG, Mourinho, Ole, Rangnick and ETH, I reckon that hypothetical Frankenstein monster of a manager would still be better than the charlatan we had gaslighting our fanbase for the last year-and-a-half.

Amorim was basically Moyes' dourness, LVG's terrible football, Mourinho's toxicity, Ole's tactical cluelessness, and ETH's arrogance all rolled into one, but much, much worse. And without half the decent results to justify such stubbornness.

Usually, my reaction to Man United managers getting sacked or players getting booted out, is just gross indifference or disappointment, rather than outright hate and anger. But with Amorim, for the first time, I found myself actively hating the man, as well as his acolytes who'd rather see their club dragged through the mud than admit they're wrong.

Among all the other bizarre excuses used to defend him, I always laughed at how his fan club basically wanted us to ignore the entire 2024-25 season, because he joined "only" in November, inheriting a squad that wasn't "his". However, if there were bright spots in that season, like drawing against Liverpool at Anfield, or beating Arsenal at Emirates, then those games counted as evidence that his system could work. Finishing 14th, breaking every lowly record, and sinking to new humiliating lows every weekend in the league didn't matter, since "all eggs were on the Europa basket". Getting to the Europa final was proof that Amorim was the real deal. However, bottling the final - to Spurs of all teams - shouldn't also be held against him, because a win would have anyway only papered over the cracks, and the squad could benefit from less mid-week fixtures, and more time in the training ground with this master tactician.

Now, we're in 2025-26 with three great attacking signings and a new solid goalkeeper. We lose to Arsenal, but the result doesn't matter because the performance is great. We lose to Grimsby on penalties, but it's just a freak result. If you complain, you're a hater who can't see the big picture unlike the top reds who believe it's only a matter of time before Amorim morphs into prime SAF. If you're keeping track, so far the results don't matter, because apparently the performances have been great via Xg, Xd and whatever else.

However, we now get some jammy wins. Beating Burnley via a last-minute penalty. Hanging on for a 2-1 victory against 10-man Chelsea. Hardly breathtaking performances, but suddenly, only the results count, apparently, and we should ignore the performances.

Then we get the greatest accomplishment in Amorim's entire tenure - back-to-back victories. Great results against Sunderland, Liverpool and Brighton. And because the standards are already at rock bottom and most people were okay excusing even relegation-level form, something like winning three straight matches suddenly seems like a miracle and worthy of a knighthood.

Of course, a dogshit manager with a dogshit system and dogshit tactics, will eventually get you only dogshit results. Which is why you lose to 10-man Everton at home. Or drop points to the likes of West Ham, Bournemouth, Nottingham Forest, and Wolves.

But here's the kicker: remember how the whole of 2024-25 didn't count? But apparently it now counts, if only to show the progress made in 2025-26, compared to the rock bottom awfulness of 2024-25 - which ironically was in large part BECAUSE of Amorim.

I could go on and on (and probably will, when I find the mental strength to remember more infuriating incidents from his spell), but I always found this line of thinking from Amorim and his fan club both hilarious and insufferable.
I'm not sure it can be proven, but I'm pretty sure if WW3 breaks out, it's probably also down to that fraud snake oil salesman with a heart full of pure hatred. :lol:
 
I will always wonder, without trying to act superior, smarter or more knowledgeable than others, how on Earth this Carlos Kaiser of football coaches managed to convince the board of a club like ours, who let's be honest might not be the brightest of the bunch, but a big portion of our fanbase that he knows what he's doing, when it was clear as daylight even from the first few months that the guy was a complete fraud?
I will always wonder that for years to come...
He was very good at interviews. He could smooth talk his way out of abject performances and multiple losses in a row. I fell for it for the first 2-3 months, but it started wearing thin around February last year. For others, it seems they were so enchanted by his charm that they were willing to overlook all of the evidence staring them in the face right up until he was sacked.

It is also why he got such a free ride from the press. If he looked and spoke like Ten Hag then he would have been torn to shreds in the media after a couple of months in the job.
 
He was very good at interviews. He could smooth talk his way out of abject performances and multiple losses in a row. I fell for it for the first 2-3 months, but it started wearing thin around February last year. For others, it seems they were so enchanted by his charm that they were willing to overlook all of the evidence staring them in the face right up until he was sacked.

It is also why he got such a free ride from the press. If he looked and spoke like Ten Hag then he would have been torn to shreds in the media after a couple of months in the job.
His smooth talking was lost on me as soon as that horror show of a performance in the UEL Final came to a close. I was sick to the back teeth of listening to this man talk-the-talk but drastically failing to walk-the-walk. It was stomach churning and would fill me to the brim with rage.

Your last sentence is something I've echoed quite loudly in my own personal circles, group chats and even work conversations. Amorim was awarded a certain level of "pretty privilege" by the cultists that clung on to every word he uttered (and still are now), to portions of the media and even as far as own footballing hierarchy. His suave and fashionable appearance eased peoples view on him, as subconsciously his appearance almost provided lenience with his poor results or manner. He constantly wore the brand new club merchandise, which I'm sure he was asked to do, but he essentially became INEOS' very own catwalk model of all new pieces of apparel, conveniently all available to purchase directly off the United store as soon as the match ended.

His appearance afforded him all of this worship from his acolytes and I refuse to believe anything different.
 
He was very good at interviews. He could smooth talk his way out of abject performances and multiple losses in a row. I fell for it for the first 2-3 months, but it started wearing thin around February last year. For others, it seems they were so enchanted by his charm that they were willing to overlook all of the evidence staring them in the face right up until he was sacked.

It is also why he got such a free ride from the press. If he looked and spoke like Ten Hag then he would have been torn to shreds in the media after a couple of months in the job.

No doubt. As I posted earlier, Christian Gross had a better record than him but Gross came across as a bit of a dork and the media ridiculed him from day one.
.
The Portuguese Bloke looked good and had a good grasp of English, which seemed to take him a long long way.
 
He was very good at interviews. He could smooth talk his way out of abject performances and multiple losses in a row. I fell for it for the first 2-3 months, but it started wearing thin around February last year. For others, it seems they were so enchanted by his charm that they were willing to overlook all of the evidence staring them in the face right up until he was sacked.

It is also why he got such a free ride from the press. If he looked and spoke like Ten Hag then he would have been torn to shreds in the media after a couple of months in the job.
Ole and Van Gaal also were decent in interviews, Ole was always positive and spoke nicely, while LVG was more of a Hollywood actor but both came under criticism from the fan base and NEITHER was as abject in terms of results like Amorim.
I would tend to believe it had more to do with the fact that he managed to con everyone into the belief that his system will eventually work, the dreaded 3 atb, which obviously didn't, if we were to use a system with 4 at the back his excuses wouldn't have been that convincing.
 
I will always wonder, without trying to act superior, smarter or more knowledgeable than others, how on Earth this Carlos Kaiser of football coaches managed to convince the board of a club like ours, who let's be honest might not be the brightest of the bunch, but a big portion of our fanbase that he knows what he's doing, when it was clear as daylight even from the first few months that the guy was a complete fraud?
I will always wonder that for years to come...
the whole world thought the guy was something special, don’t get why people are rewriting history.

People can complain but the main issue was the formation. We could see he didn’t have the personnel for a 3 at the back but he still had us creating the most in the league and scoring around third. If he just did a 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1 he would have won way more. Also the defensive subs:

I honestly think he thought he had more time which went against him. Ineos should have told in he had to play a certain way until the signings came in.

In all reality why the fk would they sign a manager who plays 3 at the back. i understand it’s supposed to be an attack over load system but those possession dominating systems are so ugly to watch. It’s not how we are meant to play
 
I read that it was about how things went wrong, not a letter to the fans. A letter to the fans wouldn't be distracting, but if he starts claiming this player did that and Wilcox, etc. did that, then it would. Anyway whatever he says is self-serving nonsense and his behaviour and performance spoke louder than any words will.
Here’s the kicker: Amorim still doesn’t know why things went wrong. The performances, or rather the defeats, didn’t seem to have any affect on how he did things. He didn’t change tactics based on learning something the previous week. He just persisted with the same broken plan week after week. Maybe he really was getting high on his own supply and he still doesn’t see the error of his ways, he thinks nothing of how Carrick has us playing, and regards the 3 wins from 3 games as irrelevant. Remember, in his mind he was playing 4-d chess while the other coaches were playing checkers.
 
Here’s the kicker: Amorim still doesn’t know why things went wrong. The performances, or rather the defeats, didn’t seem to have any affect on how he did things. He didn’t change tactics based on learning something the previous week. He just persisted with the same broken plan week after week. Maybe he really was getting high on his own supply and he still doesn’t see the error of his ways, he thinks nothing of how Carrick has us playing, and regards the 3 wins from 3 games as irrelevant. Remember, in his mind he was playing 4-d chess while the other coaches were playing checkers.
You just know we'll get some long drawn out bitching about broken promises, no backing, players not adapting, Redcafe lunatics doubting him, media mocking him about Mainoo and so on
 
the whole world thought the guy was something special, don’t get why people are rewriting history.

People can complain but the main issue was the formation. We could see he didn’t have the personnel for a 3 at the back but he still had us creating the most in the league and scoring around third. If he just did a 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1 he would have won way more. Also the defensive subs:

I honestly think he thought he had more time which went against him. Ineos should have told in he had to play a certain way until the signings came in.

In all reality why the fk would they sign a manager who plays 3 at the back. i understand it’s supposed to be an attack over load system but those possession dominating systems are so ugly to watch. It’s not how we are meant to play
To me framing this as "he just didn't have enough time" is wild. Like at what other club would a manager be given as much time as he was already given here to show anything? If you "don't have the personnel" then adapt. Who in their right mind would think it's a good idea to play in a suboptimal way for over a year? And how could you expect anyone to be sucessful in the long run with such methods?
 
I read that it was about how things went wrong, not a letter to the fans. A letter to the fans wouldn't be distracting, but if he starts claiming this player did that and Wilcox, etc. did that, then it would. Anyway whatever he says is self-serving nonsense and his behaviour and performance spoke louder than any words will.

He won't be able to release any letter (or make a public statement of any kind) in which he criticises the club, the staff or the players, because he'll be bound by the non-disparagement clause in his settlement agreement. The club can't slag him off publicly, either.

If he says or releases anything now or in the summer, it will only be the usual generic, "the fans were great", "goodluck for the future" type platitudes.
 
To me framing this as "he just didn't have enough time" is wild. Like at what other club would a manager be given as much time as he was already given here to show anything? If you "don't have the personnel" then adapt. Who in their right mind would think it's a good idea to play in a suboptimal way for over a year? And how could you expect anyone to be sucessful in the long run with such methods?
You didn’t read what I said, i never framed it as he didn’t have enough time.
 
No doubt. As I posted earlier, Christian Gross had a better record than him but Gross came across as a bit of a dork and the media ridiculed him from day one.
.
The Portuguese Bloke looked good and had a good grasp of English, which seemed to take him a long long way.
What was mad was that despite his strong grasp of English that kept him in the job longer than he deserved, when he decided to throw Amass under the bus to protect his ego, the Amorim apologists on here blamed it on English being his second language.
 
What was mad was that despite his strong grasp of English that kept him in the job longer than he deserved, when he decided to throw Amass under the bus to protect his ego, the Amorim apologists on here blamed it on English being his second language.
Or attacked Amass for responding, because of course that makes him another "bad apple"
 
I really couldn’t give a feck what he did in a tin pot league where he appeared to strike gold. I’m willing to bet he’ll never find such success ever outside of Portugal and I’m very doubtful he could replicate it even there.
He managed United for 14 months, and there’s a huge argument to be made for him being the worst Premier League manager in history, only counting those who managed at least 30 games.
His record is worse than Christian Groß for fecks sake, a man notoriously at the top of many worst PL managers list, a man who turned up in London showing his tube ticket like Alan Sugar had just found him on the underground.

I’ll just say that again to let it sink in, Groß also started his job in November, and in his 30 PL games Groß won 33.3% compared to Amorim’s 31.9%, took 1.27 ppg compared to Amorim’s 1.23 and had the same GD.
Gross spent (adjusted for football inflation), about 41 million quid, Amorim 240m quid.
Did he take over a club in 14th and leave them 6th?
 
That's the thing in particular. There have obviously been other managers in the PL who did poorly, but the worst ones mostly did it at small clubs with minimal resources and very little chance of success. Amorim came to a club that, while not quite a well-oiled machine primed for conquest, makes the degree of failure that he brought so much worse than if he had done it at, say, Burnley or Wolves. Even if things aren't perfect at United, we have the players and resources to where it should be a surprise when we don't beat small clubs. Instead he made it a surprise anytime we won at all, which he rarely did.

We absolutely have one of the five strongest squads in the league, but his influence was so ruinous that there was no team we could comfortably roll over. We had to salvage a hard-fought draw at home against one of the very worst teams to ever play in the PL. We lost at home to a mid-table team that had a player sent off after ten minutes. We lost to fecking Grimsby. Amorim was so awful that his presence caused this team to drop from a 7.5/10 to a 3/10.
As above. He took us over in 14th and left us 6th. There were great results and poor results as he turned the ship around?
 
Did he take over a club in 14th and leave them 6th?

No.

He took over a club that had just won the FA Cup and finished 8th.
In November, just 12 weeks into the season, he took over.

He actually took over a side who had played just 11 games and were in 13th, but were just 4 points from top 3 and averaging 1.36 ppg with a win rate of 36.36%.

He took that and feck me did he make it worse, took them down to a historic low of 15th, tanked the win rate to 22.22% and tanked the points per game to 1 ppg. Finishing an astonishing 29 points off top 3.

After spending 240 million, he managed to improve his absolutely shite ppg to a little bit less shite 1.55 (and trending sharply downwards at the time of his dismissal ).
Most fans wanted ETH sacked after finishing 8th with 1.57 ppg and an FA Cup win.
:lol:

Oh, and then Carrick came in and made even more of a fool of him, showing us all what an absolutely horrendous ego maniac of a manager he was.
 
Last edited:
No.

He took over a club that had just won the FA Cup and finished 8th.
In November, just 12 weeks into the season, he took over.

He actually took over a side who had played just 11 games and were in 13th, but just 4 points from the CL places and averaging 1.36 ppg with a win rate of 36.36%.

He took that and feck me did he make it worse, took them down to a historic low of 15th, tanked the win rate to 22.22% and tanked the points per game to 1 ppg.

After spending 240 million, he managed to improve his absolutely shite ppg to a little bit less shite 1.55 (and trending sharply downwards).
Most fans wanted ETH sacked after finishing 8th with 1.57 ppg and an FA Cup win.
:lol:

Oh, and then Carrick came in and made even more of a fool of him.
So ETH took over a half decent team. Made them worse after his first summer. Then made them worse again. The worst squad I can remember.


Ruben came in said we needed to purge a rotten squad. Purged it. Results suffered as a matter of the course we were taking. Then Ruben had a summer to improve things and he did. Now we're looking quite healthy.

Thanks for providing stats to help with the narrative. And generally you would think the worst manager in history would make things worse, not better.

Thanks Ruben
 
So ETH took over a half decent team. Made them worse after his first summer. Then made them worse again. The worst squad I can remember.


Ruben came in said we needed to purge a rotten squad. Purged it. Results suffered as a matter of the course we were taking. Then Ruben had a summer to improve things and he did. Now we're looking quite healthy.

Thanks Ruben
:lol: maybe he should consider a role as Director of Football as his next job, if that's all he's good for. Because he's not any good at winning football matches.
 
So ETH took over a half decent team. Made them worse after his first summer. Then made them worse again. The worst squad I can remember.

Ruben came in said we needed to purge a rotten squad. Purged it. Results suffered as a matter of the course we were taking. Then Ruben had a summer to improve things and he did. Now we're looking quite healthy.

Thanks for providing stats to help with the narrative. And generally you would think the worst manager in history would make things worse, not better.

Thanks Ruben


1. José Mourinho: 1.89 PPG


2. Ole Gunnar Solskjær: 1.81 PPG


3. Louis van Gaal: 1.79 PPG


4. Erik ten Hag: 1.72 PPG


5. David Moyes: 1.68 PPG


6. Ralf Rangnick: 1.54 PPG


7. Ruben Amorim: 1.27 PPG

“Thanks for being absolutely fecking shite”
 
Last edited:
I’ll post this cause it’s



1. José Mourinho: 1.89 PPG


2. Ole Gunnar Solskjær: 1.81 PPG


3. Louis van Gaal: 1.79 PPG


4. Erik ten Hag: 1.72 PPG


5. David Moyes: 1.68 PPG


6. Ralf Rangnick: 1.54 PPG


7. Ruben Amorim: 1.27 PPG

“Thanks for being absolutely fecking shite”
We had to suffer after ETH left us in ribbons. Now we're looking good.
 
The case for sacking Amorim was overwhelming and it can even be argued that INEOS waited too long to stop the rot. For me, what I saw in the Forest, Spurs and then Everton matches was shocking beyond belief and it was at that point, the defeat to 10-man Spurs, when the sack had to be dropped on Amorim.
 
So ETH took over a half decent team. Made them worse after his first summer. Then made them worse again. The worst squad I can remember.


Ruben came in said we needed to purge a rotten squad. Purged it. Results suffered as a matter of the course we were taking. Then Ruben had a summer to improve things and he did. Now we're looking quite healthy.

Thanks for providing stats to help with the narrative. And generally you would think the worst manager in history would make things worse, not better.

Thanks Ruben
I'm sorry but there's no way this isn't a windup. There's no possible reality where someone actually believes that Amorim was good at United. Either your just winding everyone up, Amorim himself, or being paid by Amorim. So which is it?
 
We had to suffer after ETH left us in ribbons. Now we're looking good.

Due to ineos signings and the removal of an absolutely shite manager.

I’d also argue that not only did ETH massively outperform Amorim in every single metric, and won two trophies, he was also there when we signed our two best central defenders and our best (by far) midfielder, he’s also fully responsible for our second best midfielder (you know, the academy lad your crush wanted to flog).

By all accounts Amorim was thankfully ignored and overruled on Lemmans / Martinez and Mbeumo / Semenyo. Ignored on Mainoo, and he was caught slagging off Dorgu. :lol:

But sure, you keep pretending to yourself he was responsible for anything positive you can grasp to la’.

I’d say Ineos came in, took over a team with plenty of problems and has slowly been resolving them since. They then fecked up with a horrendous managerial appointment and fans everywhere were still claiming United shite and Ineos clueless, it just took removing and absolutely dog shite manager to see some of their positive moves.

Our best current side is likely:

Lammans (Amorim didn’t want)

Maz (ETH) De Ligt (ETH) Martinez (ETH) Shaw (LVG)

Mainoo (Amorim wanted rid) Casemiro (Amorim attempted to shift and freeze out his first January).

Bruno (Ole: Amorim thought he was a CM :lol:)

Amad (Ole: Amorim thought him a WB) Dorgu (Amorim slagged him off in front of players and media as a bag of nerves)

Mbeumo (Amorim want Semenyo)
 
Last edited:
We had to suffer after ETH left us in ribbons. Now we're looking good.
Hilariously, because he's not here anymore.
You didn’t read what I said, i never framed it as he didn’t have enough time.
I don't know why he would have though he'd have more time though. He wasted an absurd amount of time playing in suboptimal way, time that he never would have gotten anywhere else. To the point he was probably surprised himself that he was still here. With all the comments about quitting it seems he had been looking for an exit for some time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.