InspiRED
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2014
- Messages
- 2,218
- Supports
- Outraged snowflakes
1) In an ideal world, this wouldn't happen. But I imagine it's a fairly impossible task, being the public face of years of mismanagement and underinvestment and board feck-ups. Managers know they need fans onside because that's what moves the needle ultimately.Pointing out the problems in the squad is a good thing. But the only people you need to do this to are the people running the club, not the media and fans. If you're doing it in public it's a self serving attempt to deflect criticism and pander to the fans.
As manager you're supposed to be motivating and inspiring the squad we do have, not throwing them to the wolves in public because you want the squad we don't have. It's weak leadership borne of insecurity.
Being against his sacking is one thing. I don't begrudge anyone thinking he needed more time. I actually agree to some extent (although his rigidity meant it was always going to take a long time to get the exact right players) . What I do find odd is how some people refuse to acknowledge the very valid reasons why he deserved to be sacked and cling on to our flimsy league position as some kind of definitive proof that he's the man worth backing.
2) I think it was ill-advised how he went about it, so I agree with you on at least some of this point.
3) Here's where we mainly disagree. First, I would say that definitive proof of anything in life is rare. The evidence around the time of his sacking, for me, was that at the least it was an utterly foolhardy time to sack the guy. As for very valid reasons why he deserved to be sacked. I just don't agree with this. He had his vision of how to get the club back on top, and he pursued it relentlessly, regardless of the short-term pain (shipping out Rashford goals), being left with the worst attack any of us can remember. I think he definitely underestimated the league and the turmoil that would be created, but he was on the way to fixing it. Things like that aren't gonna get fixed overnight; there's going to be erratic results and form, but all the signs were that the system was stabilising (we had stopped losing far less than the last season and the previous ETH one). So, no definitive proof, but plenty of evidence that the sacking was hideously badly timed.

