AfonsoAlves
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2023
- Messages
- 3,681
Now I'm just confused. Please explain how that post is not "an uncontroversial bit of data" or "illustrates a different point that you've tried to illustrate"? That post didn't say 'military spending' (as in everything), it says procurement, referring to equipment, its a specific bit of data from a valid source, also known as a fact.
European countries are spending more than the US on military equipment for the first time since 1945, that's it. I've not said or suggested any other point. The chart clearly shows that's because of an increase in European spending, not because of a reduction in US spending. Maybe the US should be procuring more or R&D'ing less, but that's a different discussion. If Alfonso wants to show us the spend distribution of the US military budget between R&D/Other/Procurement vs European for the last 80 years then I'm sure that would also make for an interesting chart.
I'm not sorry if I offended anyone by comparing his response to that of a twitter bot, because it would fit in perfectly alongside all the other comments that you get on twitter whenever a fact is posted that goes against Russian propaganda. I get that he's full of interesting info he wants to spill out, but it strikes me as odd he jumps to defend against a simple uncontroversial fact with a semi-irrelevant bit of info, as if someone has just slagged off his favourite football team.
Also, what is MY narrative? I mean I know what it is, its remained fairly consistent since mid-late 2023 I think and it continues to play out before our eyes. I'd be surprised if you didn't somewhat agree with it tbh, so maybe it comes across as something different as I'm usually annoyed by something whenever I post on here nowadays (just the nature of the topic) so probably more ranting rather than articulating. I don't think you've ever engaged me on it though, you just cherry-pick the occasional random innocuous post to have a go at me with.
That is an absurd suggestion. Absolutely absurd.
