Russian invasion of Ukraine

Now I'm just confused. Please explain how that post is not "an uncontroversial bit of data" or "illustrates a different point that you've tried to illustrate"? That post didn't say 'military spending' (as in everything), it says procurement, referring to equipment, its a specific bit of data from a valid source, also known as a fact.

European countries are spending more than the US on military equipment for the first time since 1945, that's it. I've not said or suggested any other point. The chart clearly shows that's because of an increase in European spending, not because of a reduction in US spending. Maybe the US should be procuring more or R&D'ing less, but that's a different discussion. If Alfonso wants to show us the spend distribution of the US military budget between R&D/Other/Procurement vs European for the last 80 years then I'm sure that would also make for an interesting chart.

I'm not sorry if I offended anyone by comparing his response to that of a twitter bot, because it would fit in perfectly alongside all the other comments that you get on twitter whenever a fact is posted that goes against Russian propaganda. I get that he's full of interesting info he wants to spill out, but it strikes me as odd he jumps to defend against a simple uncontroversial fact with a semi-irrelevant bit of info, as if someone has just slagged off his favourite football team.

Also, what is MY narrative? I mean I know what it is, its remained fairly consistent since mid-late 2023 I think and it continues to play out before our eyes. I'd be surprised if you didn't somewhat agree with it tbh, so maybe it comes across as something different as I'm usually annoyed by something whenever I post on here nowadays (just the nature of the topic) so probably more ranting rather than articulating. I don't think you've ever engaged me on it though, you just cherry-pick the occasional random innocuous post to have a go at me with.

That is an absurd suggestion. Absolutely absurd.
 
"For the first time, the Government building was damaged by an enemy strike — its roof and upper floors," Ukraine's Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko, said on the Telegram messaging app.

 

823 UAV/missiles being reported last night. Lots of civilian casualties from the looks of things :/

Hopefully this is the extent of their stockpiling and we're not going to see an extended period with these numbers. Its not helping their war effort though, regardless.
 
Ukrainian cruise missiles hammering a target in Donetsk. Not Flamingo, something else.

 
More than 20 dead in Russian attack on Ukrainian village, Zelensky says
More than 20 people have been killed in a Russian air strike on a village in eastern Ukraine, President Volodymr Zelensky has said, citing initial reports.

The victims were ordinary people collecting their pensions in the Donetsk settlement of Yarova, he said. Donetsk regional leader Vadym Filkashkin said emergency services were at the scene, adding there were as many people wounded as killed.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1jz08j8313o
 
Now I'm just confused. Please explain how that post is not "an uncontroversial bit of data" or "illustrates a different point that you've tried to illustrate"? That post didn't say 'military spending' (as in everything), it says procurement, referring to equipment, its a specific bit of data from a valid source, also known as a fact.

European countries are spending more than the US on military equipment for the first time since 1945, that's it. I've not said or suggested any other point. The chart clearly shows that's because of an increase in European spending, not because of a reduction in US spending. Maybe the US should be procuring more or R&D'ing less, but that's a different discussion. If Alfonso wants to show us the spend distribution of the US military budget between R&D/Other/Procurement vs European for the last 80 years then I'm sure that would also make for an interesting chart.

I'm not sorry if I offended anyone by comparing his response to that of a twitter bot, because it would fit in perfectly alongside all the other comments that you get on twitter whenever a fact is posted that goes against Russian propaganda. I get that he's full of interesting info he wants to spill out, but it strikes me as odd he jumps to defend against a simple uncontroversial fact with a semi-irrelevant bit of info, as if someone has just slagged off his favourite football team.

Also, what is MY narrative? I mean I know what it is, its remained fairly consistent since mid-late 2023 I think and it continues to play out before our eyes. I'd be surprised if you didn't somewhat agree with it tbh, so maybe it comes across as something different as I'm usually annoyed by something whenever I post on here nowadays (just the nature of the topic) so probably more ranting rather than articulating. I don't think you've ever engaged me on it though, you just cherry-pick the occasional random innocuous post to have a go at me with.
For all the joshing and jokes some of us dickheads do on these CE threads, @AfonsoAlves provides great insight and he's not one to cherry pick info like a bot.
 
Sounds like the drones may have errantly gone off course. That's the charitable interpretation at least.
Let's hope that's all there is to it because it appears that US has also scrambled aircraft now.
 
I haven't been following the war very closely, but I'm assuming this is a new first, being attacks on Poland/Nato Member soil?
 
They are shooting the drones down, good, anything military that Russia sends over NATO-territory should be shot down.
 
I haven't been following the war very closely, but I'm assuming this is a new first, being attacks on Poland/Nato Member soil?
Happened before when Russia attacked Western Ukraine, something went off course.
 
Happened before when Russia attacked Western Ukraine, something went off course.
It was an Ukrainian missile that inadvertently was shot down into our airspace and killed two farmers. I think we haven’t had Russian units in our air space since the war started. Lots of panic around here now (Krakow isn’t that far from the border and my hometown is in the East too).
 
Last edited:
Several of them were armed, some were not. 19 of them entered our airspace.

You would have to be concerned that this was a test of your defensive response in preparation for later actions. It can't be a simple mistake at that level of incursion.
 
You would have to be concerned that this was a test of your defensive response in preparation for later actions. It can't be a simple mistake at that level of incursion.
Nah, they won't attack us, they have no reason to and very little to gain from a military operation. They just want to destabilize us further, these are Russian tactics and they are succeeding at that as you already have people here somehow blaming Ukraine for 'pulling us into their war'. Russia have done tremendous job over the last 3 years at spreading misinformation and shifting Poles against Ukraine/EU/anything west of Russia. They don't really need to encroach on our territory to build up their influence, pro-Russian parties are already polling at 20% combined.
 
Nah, they won't attack us, they have no reason to and very little to gain from a military operation. They just want to destabilize us further, these are Russian tactics and they are succeeding at that as you already have people here somehow blaming Ukraine for 'pulling us into their war'. Russia have done tremendous job over the last 3 years at spreading misinformation and shifting Poles against Ukraine/EU/anything west of Russia. They don't really need to encroach on our territory to build up their influence, pro-Russian parties are already polling at 20% combined.
Salami tactics, trying to see how far they can get. Were those drones attacking something or they were just flying around?
 
Salami tactics, trying to see how far they can get. Were those drones attacking something or they were just flying around?
They were just flying around. I don't see anything they could gain from attacking Poland, it's just scaremongering. Russians love to create chaos and that is exactly what they are doing, they are banking on their useful idiots here to do the rest of the job (and they won't be disappointed).
 
They were just flying around. I don't see anything they could gain from attacking Poland, it's just scaremongering. Russians love to create chaos and that is exactly what they are doing, they are banking on their useful idiots here to do the rest of the job (and they won't be disappointed).
What I meant was testing how a NATO country and the wider alliance would react to gradually increasing provocations. The actual target might be the Baltics.
 
What I meant was testing how a NATO country and the wider alliance would react to gradually increasing provocations. The actual target might be the Baltics.
Yep that is plausible. If they succeed in Ukraine, I can see them targeting Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania next. NATO’s reaction now is going to be important.
 
Nah, they won't attack us, they have no reason to and very little to gain from a military operation. They just want to destabilize us further, these are Russian tactics and they are succeeding at that as you already have people here somehow blaming Ukraine for 'pulling us into their war'. Russia have done tremendous job over the last 3 years at spreading misinformation and shifting Poles against Ukraine/EU/anything west of Russia. They don't really need to encroach on our territory to build up their influence, pro-Russian parties are already polling at 20% combined.
They sent the drones, and according to reddit the russian bots are now hard at work trying to blame Ukraine on Polish facebook.
 
They were just flying around. I don't see anything they could gain from attacking Poland, it's just scaremongering. Russians love to create chaos and that is exactly what they are doing, they are banking on their useful idiots here to do the rest of the job (and they won't be disappointed).
But isn't it kind of irrelevant whether they were technically "attacking" a target in Poland or just "flying around" (as you put it)?
 
NATO should expand a slight no fly zone buffer into Ukraine under the guise of protecting nato territory
 
They sent the drones, and according to reddit the russian bots are now hard at work trying to blame Ukraine on Polish facebook.
This is true. Not just the bots, I know actual people who are fuming at Ukraine for lying about Russian drones.
 
But isn't it kind of irrelevant whether they were technically "attacking" a target in Poland or just "flying around" (as you put it)?
A violation of airspace and an actual attack are not the same thing, or else Russian Tu-95s would have caused the invocation of article 5 about once every few days for a some decades now. Mostly it is meant to disrupt, annoy, and wear on the countries involved. What's a training flight for the Russians means an alarm scramble for the countries involved.
 
I’m getting so sick of this shit. Should have sent a message long ago when Russia invaded Georgia, by stopping them. Crimea should have never happened.

You could probably go back further.

As far as I’m concerned, Russia is winning its war with the west. Their disinformation campaigns have worked. They helped elect Trump and a number of other populist leaders in Europe.